Topic: Is my profile eligible for signature campaigns ? (Read 644 times)

How is that possible, the unnecessary piece of information you wrote about the feedbacks can be found by everyone in the OP's trust page, what is the purpose of writing it out in your post in this thread.
Only the user who left you the feedback can remove it. But i don't think any signature campaign manager would deny you a spot in a campaign because of that feedback, it is not a valid feedback IMO, so maybe you should ignore it and lock this thread.

I guess it vary from user to user. I do not see that negative feedback because I do not have custom trust list. DefaultTrust does not shows the negative feedback.

You don't have to do anything. His feedback does not show by default because he is not a DT member. Feedback system supposed to be used to handle trading related risk. But it is often used to prevent unethical actions. His feedback is clear misuse of feedback system. Let him write more feedback like this and other DT members will judge his feedback and he may get DT exclusion due to his misuse.

I am curious, as he claims, have you ever said you are from Indian subcontinent?

The trust system is unmoderated. You can try appealing to the user who left the feedback, but they cannot be compelled to remove the trust feedback if they don't want to.

The way the system works is someone who regularly sends wrong feedback should not be included in trust lists and their feedback will not matter.

Can I appeal this negative trust somewhere because it is obvious that he gave because of his ego issues and my reply to his illogical comment on this thread ?

Your trust shows: +0 / =2 / -1



Judging by some of your posting patterns (along with the feedback), it would probably be difficult for you to be accepted in any campaign. The general quality of your posts are extremely low and that is usually synonymous with people operating more than one account (though I am not advocating it is or is not the case here) therefore if the purpose for using the account was to post and be paid, it seems you are probably wasting your time.

It's negative trust feedback but it comes from a non DT member so you have to click on Show Ratings with this link to see that feedback.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1341921

If in future that member elected in DT gang, that negative trust feedback will appear on your profile by default.

How much you will bet for the proof ? I will also give same amount if I loose this bet.


Which negative trust ? I do not see it on my profile ?

It will depend on the campaign manager whether he will make you eligible or not. Even if you have a red tag, you can do the signature campaign if the camp manager accepts you. However, if for some reason your account is banned from the forum, you will not be able to add any signature to the profile, due to which you will not be able to do signature campaigns.
However, they accept accounts that have good quality posts in campaigns that are active and that are brought in by reputable managers. And if his profile doesn't have good amount of merit earning in 120 days then they don't ineligible in their campaigns.

I agree completely that the negative trust is unfounded, the reference doesn't relate to anything that was said, so no proof was provided and if there was proof, there was no sufficient accusation for a negative trust.

I don't have that user on my trust list, but I see the negative trust on post of the user.

I don't think (and I believe that the majority will agree) that this negative tag makes sense and I hope that the person who left it will consider changing it to a neutral one. However, it is not from a DT member, so (at least for me) that negative tag is not visible in the posts.

 You got your first neutral tag by Don Pedro Dinero reason being stated by him as follows that "He misuses the merit system by proposing to give merit to whoever guesses the price of bitcoin on a date instead of giving merit for quality"
Second tag was by LoyceV reason being stated by him as follows that "This user plagiarized my post, while trying to rent out his avatar. I wouldn't hire him".
"(this feedback replaces LoyceMobile's feedback)"

I personal dropped this notice to you if in case you don't know how come about your 2 tags on your profile.
I also hope you adjust so that you don't get more or worse than the neutral tags.
However, it depends on quality posts and repetitions of a profile that campaign managers considers when hiring participants on their Campaigns. Perhaps you can be hired by some managers with your current tag so also, so managers would not hire you.

Giving feedback or tags based on interests would be abusing the trust system. There is absolutely no need for a balance in this. The trust system is created to make the forum a safer place for everyone and make shady people exposed to the general public. So the tags given should solely be for the welfare of the community instead of being for personal interests, conflicts, or to create a balance in the system.

I have noticed Op to be some kind of controversial user. Especially when he created thread in the service board to be hired for signature campaign simply because he saw some reputable members do that, LOL. I think it was at the course of doing that he plagiarised LoyceV.
According to Lovesmayfamilis, his attitude towards the fun he created could warrant Don's neutral feedback. Maybe Don didn't use the best lines of expression in the feedback.
For not leaving red tags or neutral is normal. The community should have people interested in giving red tags and people interested in only positive, that way there will be a balance in the ecosystem.

All accounts on the forum are eligible for a signature campaign provided you're not ban but accepting you in the campaign is the choice of the manager and not that of any other person on the forum.

Don't want to repeat what others have said but next time when you make a mistake, instead of acting ignorant, take corrections immediately and you might get forgiven. Your tags could've been forgotten if you followed up the matter and apologize and also made yourself useful to the forum. Two neutral aren't that bad, if you could build up your positive feedback in a legitimate way, as it could help you when your profile is being looked through by managers. Also be more active on the forums and contributing to quality discussions and it might help your case when next you apply for a campaign.

Seriously? I wouldn't believe that until I see some proof. Why would someone hire a user who doesn't even post much or has enough good-quality posts? As an advertiser, it wouldn't make sense for anyone to hire someone who posts generic posts around the forum that most people would probably ignore because that wouldn't bring enough visibility to what they're trying to promote through that user's signature. Why do you think signature campaigns only accept users with good post quality? It is because they tend to get more attention, their posts are read by more users around the forum, and that brings more visibility to the brand being advertised.

If someone can hire you, I'm pretty sure every single average poster in this forum can get offers for their signature and avatar spaces if they create their threads in the Services section but I'm pretty sure that wouldn't work because you at least need some reputation to attract advertisers, even if you don't have a very good reputation yet, you should at least be a good poster.

---

I know this is off-topic, but I'm curious to know why you abandoned this thread of yours and never made an announcement about the winner of the contest? You created the thread, made people participate in it, and then abandoned it. Why?
You also received one of the neutral tags you have because of that contest.

What a pity, you're now having an additional negative trust to the neutral tag left on your profile, maybe you need to take time in reviewing yourself and know the wrongs in which you have been doing and still continue doing, all the three tags on you are not speaking well at all, those two neutral tags were as equal as a negative one because you have been misbehaving right from time in things you do and maybe you never thought of how obvious those things have been to others, no campaign manager will see those reviews and want to hire you.

if you meet their initial requirement(like rank, merit, etc...) then it entirely depends on the signature campaign manager whether they'll accept you into their signature campaign or not. There are members who have negative feedback and are currently in the signature campaign.

Not only Yahoo. but all campaign managers wants their signature participants to be responsible on how they post, You are promoting a brand so its important to be active most of of the days in a week, and all your posts have interval to get the brand you're promoting maximum visibility.
I'm sure once you improved you can get hired on any signature campaign, the key is consistency and being a responsible poster, and keep your reputation clean by not involving into shady deals or promoting scam platforms.

Dont take it personally. The people from India who are active in the Indian local board have been trying for the last few years to encourage our people to visit and post in the local board. We have a hope to get that section up and running for any upcoming bull run in which India might (with a lot of hope) becomes the next big leader in crypto.

Speaking of campaigns, plagiarism is a big no no from my side, that is if I was managing a campaign, which will never happen. Even without a campaign you still have the ability to post and eventually earn merits over the upcoming years. So why not look forward to that?

Registered 7 years ago, still doesn't know forum rules and opens a topic like this in Meta - definitely not someone I would personally accept in a sig campaign. However, considering the fact that there are fewer and fewer quality members, in recent years even the biggest spammers are getting a chance.

This was escalating quickly.


You came here to ask for advice, and as far as I can see you got enough concrete answers. Why don't you just accept it and move on, instead you are entering into a further discussion in this way.
That certainly does not help you qualify for the signature campaign.

 Some campaign managers could overlook the neutral tag pasted on your account and try to give you a shot but if you don't improve, may not last long in the campaign. My advice? Focus on your weak points and better them first before seeking to apply in a campaign. At least you know where you are falling short so this gives you enough advantage over someone who doesn't.

I support you. Your tag can also very well characterize the OP. Those who did not follow the link you left may not know all the reasons.
But I participated in this topic and saw the OP's attitude toward the "fun" he created. Apart from the pursuit of merit and his failure to fulfill his obligations, this topic held no significance. It is strange that Jolly did not leave him his tag. I can say that the OP likes to create the simplest questions in his started topics and almost never returns to them.
In addition, he has been on the forum long enough not to know what worries him here today. Based on this, could such a person be interested in promoting signature companies?

You are a Full Member and that's enough to put some colorful ads with links in the signature area. Your trust score doesn't make you ineligible, accounts that have neutral and negative trust can also get ads in their signature. It depends on the campaign manager, they all have different criteria. The more quality posts you make, the better your chances of being selected.

Before you start giving lessons the first thing you could do is to lead by example, you've been on the forum for 3 and a half years and you haven't written any neutral feedback or any negative feedback either. So you don't seem to be the best example to establish what can and can't be written in neutral feedback.

Rewarding people with your bitcoin for whatever you want is not the same as rewarding them with merit for something that has no merit at all.

Thanks yahoo62278 for coming in here. Op, a manager who recently hired has given you a desirable answer. You can now work on your posting habit.

I also think that Don's feedback doesn't actually hold water and shouldn't be in the first place. I have seen people reward users with BTC just for guessing BTC price. So, I don't find it out of place to reward anyone who guesses correctly BTC price with merits. We could call it guessing, who knows if the person actually used some TA skills to arrive at the price. That's obviously not an abuse of merit.

By having 100 merits and enough activities as a Full Member, you are qualified for the Full Member campaign cadre but equally note that the 2 tags you have are a concern. But the good thing is that they are both neutral tags, nonetheless the first is more concerning as it's related to plagiarism, however, the second one is "nothing to write home about," it's not a direct offence, so the campaign manager may not take it as a serious offence. Above all, I advise you to work on the quality of your posting going forward, that is what matters to show a change in attitude and attract the attention of CMs. Good luck!

I'm going to be brutally honest with you. Even though your trust score, having neutral tags, might not make you ineligible for participating in some signature campaigns where the managers don't reject users for having neutral tags for certain reasons, your post quality isn't impressive enough to convince a campaign manager to accept you in their campaigns and pay you for the posts you are making. Most of your posts are general responses to topics, and you can probably find a bunch of similar replies if you look through all the pages.

What I said above is also the reason why you have been around for so many years, have made more than 1900 posts, but still couldn't manage to get a considerable amount of merits even though you have been active since 2021 based on your merit history. And, let me tell you that most campaign managers also require participants to have earned at least a minimum of 5 merits in the last 120 days to qualify, so you fail in that area as well.

So overall, despite the trust score on your profile, you have a lot of work to do on building your presence in the forum. Signature campaigns are for people who are actively contributing in the forum in one way or another, with that kind of stats, you don't really deserve a spot in one. So you better make yourself worthy of getting a spot first.

No offense.

You seem more interested in my nationality on a thread I created related to doubt regarding trust system on bitcointalk. Speaks clearly who is the real clown here.

False. Here is an example:

Neutral tags do not matter for campaigns.

The question you should ask yourself is: if you were a campaign manager, would you hire yourself to participate? Do you think your posts are of sufficient quality to carry a company brand and get paid for it? I think that gives you an idea of ​​whether or not you deserve to be in a campaign.

If you are so smart then why are you getting confused? You have created a self moderated or shall I say an announcement thread to get sponsorship  from a client: Krishnaverma's Signature, Avatar and Personal Text for rent

I personally don't think you are from the Indian subcontinent as you  are trying to make a joke about yourself. If you were from the Indian subcontinent then you would have been active on multiple board related to the subcontinent.

Edit: why I am certain this guy is trying to act like a clown as he is using a username which is known in the Indian subcontinent.

What i mean by negative neutral tag is that, the comments left on your neutral speak negative of you. It could be that you are spammer, ai poster, or have an alternative accounts, some of them are people who take loans. All am saying is that any feedback left on your reference that does not speak good of you is negative feedback but was tagged neutral which means you are on watch list. Jsyk, neutral tag can have either negative or positive feedback.

Can you tell me about negative neutral tag ? How can I know if the neutral tag is negative or positive ?

You are eligible to apply for a signature campaign since you don't have a negative feedback. Although that not a criteria that you will get selected in any of the campaign because what would make you outstanding is your quality of post and merits earned. I have noticed that having a negative neutral tag reveiw will reduce your chances since campaign managers sees it as a red flag.

Your post imply I was doing mistake all over these 7 years. Reality is that I was hired in multiple campaigns during this period. I was also approached privately by advertiser and paid for renting my signature.



Yes, You are right. One line taken from your thread with modification is what every campaign manager looks for before finalizing any candidate.


I can go on with other comments you made in last post  but I do not care much especially seeing the tone of your last post.

OP has been here for 7 years. If he wanted to improve his posts, he would have done it by now.

You were plagiarizing for money.

Proper referencing would mean including quote tags.

No need to speculate, there's a Reference link with the neutral tag.

Your Merit count doesn't speak in your favor.

Most people who say that are quickly proven wrong here.

Maybe I'm too negative when it comes to plagiarism, but in my experience change is rare. Signature campaign managers can hire anyone they want. Just know you won't rank high against the competition.

I was not plagiarizing the content for likes or merits. I was making a thread of "Renting my signature" and I was using his thread as a reference. My mistake was that I liked one line there and posted it as it is or with some modification. I do not remember exactly but this might be the reason why he gave neutral tag. I have thousands of posts here till now and I have not copied post from other user or from anywhere else on internet.

I am not saying I am perfect or I did not commit any mistake. Also, if I am not accepted in any campaign, that also does not mean the end of the world. I was just clarifying if I am still eligible based on my trust .

It's neutral trust feedback so it is less harmful for your account than negative trust feedback (Red one).

You got some helpful replies above including ones from a campaign manager, yahoo62278. I'd like to share one thread for you, that can help you too.
Signature Campaign Guidelines (read this before starting or joining a campaign).

Neutral trust feedbacks won't harm your account too much, so if you can improve your post quality, you will be in campaigns soon.

The rules for signature campaigns are pretty simple. Since you don't have a negative tag, you're eligible to apply. But just review the rules so you can figure out if you're eligible or not. However, being eligible doesn't mean you'll get hired. With only a few campaigns and a lot of users wanting to join, the manager will definitely look for the best posters who fit well with the project or company they're running in the signature campaign.

I'm not sure why you're asking this, but I'm guessing it's because you haven't been hired when you applied, maybe a few times now. Just a small tip: try to be more active first, be helpful in the community, and earn some merits, as that's also something managers look at when choosing participants. Also, I noticed you have a neutral feedback. That could be something they consider too, there are a lot of factors, but it really depends on the campaign managers.

You are eligible to get into a signature campaign but the chance is very low to the extent that you can not get into any. First is your merit in 120 days, at least 5 merits are requested by campaign managers while people that have 100 merits or more are taken. Although there are few exceptional cases but yours is not like it. Also try to begin to post good and convince LoyceV to remove that neutral tag. I am sure he will remove it if he see a very clear changes in you and notice that you are here to contribute and not to plagiarize.

A neutral tag can be a negative tag. That tag that he got from LoyceV is like a negative tag although it is a neutral tag and not related to trading trust. A campaign manager will always dislike accounts that are plagiarizing.

The feedback although neutral by Don I wouldn't pay attention to. Merit is able to be used pretty much in any way a user sees fit, minus selling it. The feedback by LoyceV you might be hindered by and are lucky it's not a red tag and you banned. I suppose you were just copying 1 of his terms for making a deal on your sig space, but you should probably come up wit your own terms or ask permission to use someone else's. I would have to look deeper into it if I ever did consider you for a campaign, but usually neutrals are not an issue.

With your forum rank? Yes you're eligible even people below your ranks can still participate but perhaps your eligible depends on the managers terms and conditions towards the campaign.

If you're found worthy of being accepted in any of the campaigns surely you will be accepted but if for some reason just as yahoo62278 mentioned above you're probably never or rarely going to be accepted.

I am happy that at least you remember me applying there. So my profile was rejected by you not for these trust ratings ? But because of inactivity and burp posting ?

I will try to improve as per your suggestions.

If you don't have any banned on your signature then yes you are eligible for the signature campaign.
But here are some things and that is that many users apply for signature campaigns and here those whose activity and reputation are better than all, they got accepted by the managers.
And also each manager accepts users from different perspectives here to see what will be best for the project for which they are going to promoting.
And the tags you currently have are already reducing the possibility of your signature campaign being accepted. But if you can do good activities in the future and if you can convince them that you have improved yourself, they might reconsider your feedback.

I remember you applied to EVO campaign that I am managing and I passed on you for a couple reasons. You have made less than 20 posts in the last 2 months being 1 of the top reasons. Looking at your profile again, I see that you are also burstposting which IMO is a big no no unless the quality is exceptional.

Are you eligible? Yes, but likely need many improvements to be given a chance.

You are eligible (albeit one of those neutral tags sounds pretty negative) but you will have to seriously improve your posting quality if you want to get into one.

The =2 you are seeing are for the 2 neutral tags you got.
 
Some campaign managers still accept members with neutral tags, but it depends on what the tags are for. If they are for spam, it's hard for you to get into a campaign unless there is some noticeable change, which managers will see and consider as a reason to hire you.

My trust shows
Trust:   +0 / =2 / -0

I am not very much sure how the trust is calculated. The reason is mentioned though on trust page. Am I eligible for signature campaigns now or I cannot participate ?