Topic: Is politics supposed to be for the old ones? (Read 465 times)

You're not fair enough tbh and this sounds more of old age blackmail than objective argument. Politics is not a game of emotions and pity but based on number and depends on how you know how to play your cards well. Selfishness is not peculiar to old age alone. I don't know where you are from; but here in my country, young politicians are even more corrupt than some old politicians.

The youths are not playing their cards well and besides they tend to participate less in politics but prefer to be thugs to these old men rather than standing for themselves. We the youths should endeavor to participate more in politics and stop blaming the old men when we are not taking any action. Starting from you, contest for councilorship in your ward in the coming election. The youths can not just sit back and expect to be given position without contesting for it. The game is our hands now.

This is a problem all over the world, it's just that some countries have a larger percentage of elderly people participating in politics than other countries. The youth consider politics boring and that's why they don't partake. They'll prefer to go to protest that's will be dangerous because it can be fun and filled with chaos.

Whenever a politician can convince the youths and make them pick interest in voting he always win and we saw that when Barrack Obama used the youths to win his first election. The youth are mostly interested in what's trending but the old ones care about the future of their children and they want politicians that can give those they'll be leaving behind a better life. Also the old ones don't have anything taking their time so they have free time and can seat at those campaign rally and listen to what the politicians have to say. Politics is supposed to be for everyone and the sooner the younger generation begin to realized that, the better for them unless they aren't ready to vote in the people that can lead their country forward. For the youths to pick interest in politics, I feel we need younger politicians as they will be able to relate with them more than the old folks. At the moment we have more old folks as frontrunners and this is discouraging the youths from participating in politics.

Everybody wants to live a bit longer in superb health. Those who don't want this don't really know what they are thinking.

It seems that God might have placed a dead end into the science of anti-aging. It seems that there is something that is entirely missing that could curb old age. As long as politicians can't find the missing piece(s), they will get old in their politician job.

I have noticed a trend in recent politics... it seems that in every nations, there are powers that want weaker politicians/leaders; the reason for this is what is not too clear but it will not be far from control. Most African countries including Nigeria and most recent, USA are good examples of this global trend.

Of a truth, I don't see this trend reversing easily given that democracy itself have a lot of loopholes that make external influence and meddling feasible. Best approach is for the youths of every nation to push for constitutional reforms that limits the age of public servants and politicians.

The issue of older politicians dominating political affairs can be worrisome, as it limits opportunities for younger generations to participate and bring fresh perspectives to governance. A diverse range of age groups and experiences can contribute to more inclusive and dynamic decision making processes. But then, it is more important to have politicians who are corrupt free, honest and capable of effectively governing a country, regardless of their age.
It is important to also know that having the younger generation in power doesn’t automatically take the corruption away cuz there is corruption living within the youths as well whether you like it or not.

From my advice from my elder brother he told me that politics is not supposed to be for old people that it is not too good and he has his reasons when we are discussing of politics so I understand that politics is meant for young men that can be able to walk around and investigate project and Survive them old men cannot work very well cannot be asking to investigate or supervise project so they will be there in one place a lot of investment will take place in your region or in their government

I don't think a political elected position have Category of age, if politics should have such I believe that its something that being reflected in their constitution, many countries their president use to be about 70 years and its from their I noticed that age is not a barrier in a political position, anyone can contest no matter the age

Politics is not supposed to be for old people so quality is meant for the youth so that they can be able to control the affairs of the government and the mandate of people so what people that is old supposed to go home and the rest and manage their family or community because there are incapable of controlling or making a decision for what that appropriate the used at the mass

A lot of things are happening so we need not to bother ourselves when we see old men ruling us because we are about to enter another new era where people would be able to make there choice and call for the remover of old people in government do that the youth can take control of the seat. This is necessary for the world to have a new look.

I have responded in this particular trend and I believe that how many people have also presented their own opinion concerning this so politics is directly meant for everybody it does not have a particular age that people get before the contest in any political position or any particular age that a person will get all this before it will not be allowed to contest in political group again so I left that the government of any country we put some certain things into constitution and amend

The old ones cannot conduct politice alone but there can be a balance between young and old depending on the areas involved in politics, they both have their unique role they play, some aspects of politics need the intervention of an elderly people to look into the situation and circumstances and apply his experience in giving solution to it while in some areas as well, we will need the young adults or youths to showcase their strength or vigour in taking a lead towards change.

 There's the saying that what an elderly person sees sitting down, a young man, no matter what tree he climbs, can't see it. Which invariably means that the older ones are experienced and filled with a lot of wisdom. But I think these days, the older ones are taking advantage of this maxim to suppress the youths from getting a chance at rulership.
In my country, the older ones keep vying for postions, not mindful of their age or health status all so they can loot money and further bleed the country of it's resources.
 I don't think politics should be left the in the hands of the older ones as the youths are also capable of changing the status quo, but then will corruption and godfatherism permit such?

Although we cannot rule out entirely the importance of the old ones when it comes to leadership mostly when it borders on a country, the youths are the future of a country.
One of the reasons why politics has been flooded by the old is due to one fact that many joined at a young age. They didn't get old and joined politics, they joined politics and got old in it.
The youths these days may have the strength and vision, but the wisdom of the old is priceless.
Politics is not restricted to the old in this case, the young can rule too.

The adage that says the youth are the leaders of tomorrow is considered hypocrisy by the older generation, from all indications that motive is not realistic. For example, in a country like mine, our immediate past president was also a military head of state in 1983. They have just recycled themselves for the past 50 years.

there is no age limit in politics, regardless of the age of the leader, all the society glamour for is better leadership. We have seen a country run down by a young person, and we have also seen country prosper by an old leader. It's all depends on the the character of the leader and not age per say.

No one should be limited from politics, not even age. But know when to retire and rest, because politics required 24hours services.

Hence, politics is for all, both the young and old

In some countries I believe that the set of people who runs political affairs are the old ones and is really worrisome, talking about age range 70yrs and above. Like in my country where I'm from these set of people (politicians) just feel they are the only ones fit to run the country and you find it hard to see someone between the age of 40yrs and above to rule as president or any higher position, is really outrageous and irritating. Why is greed speaking more in politics? Must every politician(s) think only about themselves other than the citizens?

I really don't blame most countries that engages in protest year in year out, nobody would be happy to have guys who ship in money into the development of their own businesses other than developing the country.Discrimination based on age should not be tolerated in politics. I believe that the democratic system of government does not require a specific sort of person or age group to apply for a post. Age discrimination is solely used to characterize a government that is just interested in its own self-interest, giving the impression to the public that ruling is based on age and how much experience you have in that profession.

This is all a falsehood, and the sooner we speak out against this injustice, the better. Bravo to the countries who do not accept any sort of discrimination against their people; such citizens take action until the government complies to their requirements

politics is supposed to be a game reversed for the youths, because at this stage, this sets of persons are agile, and can go about the day to day running that comes with some high positions, plus they are mentally fit too to carry out decisions without seeking for opinions from aids...

But things aren't so, the older men use their accumulated wealth to buy themselves into the position the know the do not befit.

Actually politics is not supposed to before the Old adult or old people but in my country where I came from politics is being hijacked by old people who called herself a cabal so I believe that for a leadership of a country to be in equilibrium it's supposed to be handed over or being in custody of adults use who knows the new technologies and who knows the problem of the society but recently I can say that act of seven continent we have in the world four of the Continent old people has taken over the leadership of Nations

Discrimination based on age should not be tolerated in politics. I believe that the democratic system of government does not require a specific sort of person or age group to apply for a post. Age discrimination is solely used to characterize a government that is just interested in its own self-interest, giving the impression to the public that ruling is based on age and how much experience you have in that profession.

This is all a falsehood, and the sooner we speak out against this injustice, the better. Bravo to the countries who do not accept any sort of discrimination against their people; such citizens take action until the government complies to their requirements.

I think politics is not meant to be for only the older ones with reasons, that in a democratic society, Politics is meant to be inclusive and represent by the entire adult population to contribute to the decision making process and shape their communities and nations, well it is true that older individuals have experiences because of the knowledge they've gained from years of involvement in politics or other areas of life but younger generation also have valuable perspectives and idea to contribute, infact the inclusion of younger voices in politics is crucial for addressing issues that affect them directly, such as education, employment, climatic change and social justice.
Politics shouldn't be limited for the old people, the younger adults should also take part in it as well, it's not really inherently supposed to be reserved for older adults.

Politics is for everyone, it has no age limitation. Everyone should get involved in politics regardless of your age. Politics is for all human beings no discrimination. The aged politicians should carry the young ones along for future purposes.

I can't get it with how you drop your lines, all I'm saying is that people who are in the system just look for what they can benefit from other than doing more on what's best for the citizens.
To be honest with you, I can't see my self voting for something that doesn't work out in my favor, politicians are just selfish. As for Democracy, it hardly works or should I say it doesn't work from where I'm coming from.

The main issue with politics is godfatherism; many of these senior politicians have been working for the former leaders of the party for a very long time, and when they finish, they give them positions so they can continue what they have started and follow their orders. As a result, it is difficult for some nations with senior leaders to advance quickly.

Your reasoning doesn't quite make sense. It's like saying that people shouldn't get a fireman jobs because there will be always people who set fires, or policemen because there will be always crimes.
And in comparison, people who are capable and interested on changing things but yet choose not to get involved pretty much guarantees that nothing changes.

Just because person you voted for doesn't win doesn't mean democracy doesn't work. It just means that you are not part of majority who won. If your candidate would win even if only few people had voted, that woudn't be democracy.
(depending what sort of voting system are we talking about)

Politics is supposed to be the mixture of both the old and the young in order to make a fair and reasonable policy for the economy.
The younger ones are supposed to be at the helms of the affairs. While the older ones are supposed to be the advisers who will always call the younger ones to order whenever they derail.
This will create a balance because the older ones are experienced and they will make laws that will guide and protect the right of the old people. While the younger ones who are more civilized and digitalized, will make laws that will enhance the progress of the economy in the present technological era.

But when the older ones are at the helms of affairs, then the younger ones become adviserd, you know that something is seriously wrong.

What if some of these old experienced politicians are not really interested in getting new ideas but are interested in how to get rich day in day out? Hmmm, to be frank with you that's their aim, if you look at it from how some of them behave when they start up a campaign, Is like a script that they [politicians] read while doing their rally, and they make promises that they know they can't keep like "we'll build new schools, there will be free medical health care bla bla bla... Is a political thing but why is it always so?

I believe that politics doesn't have a specific age, but you see when old people start thinking about a particular plan that would favor them is annoying but I'd like to see a change if we have 15% of old people and 85% of young people running politics, I'd like to see that some day, that's if they'd [old ones] agree to retire and pass the barton to more younger ones.

Politics is for every bother so we need to understand what we are doing so that we cam make a better decision. The old and young ones can join politics depending on there aim of joining whether to help the poor and make life better or to come and steal money. Politics is mostly seen as a evil positions that is why we do see the week ones getting to the seat.

Politics does not have an age blanket so I believe that you are missed understanding things concerning politics so policy is based on interest and someone that I have the people interest are the people that people normally vote in election in terms of wallet is not all politicians are beneficiary in government so that is why I want you to understand and it does not classify air quality due to age

The average age of presidents around the world is 65, 35 as youngest and 85 as oldest. factors that had cause the rise in age of presidents are
1. Experience
2. Ageism
3 Recognition
4. Financial stability/manipulation
A diverse range of ages and perspectives in politics can lead to more balanced decision-making and policies that benefit more people. While younger individuals can bring new ideas and energy to the political process, older individuals can share their experience and wisdom.
Therefore, anyone who has a passion for making a difference and is interested in politics should feel empowered to participate

From what you said, the major reason why age comes into play in the political setting in your country is because of the selfish game played by the politician where they could eliminate any opponent that appears to be a threat to their political seat.
I think the problem is not about letting the old one govern the country if you as a youth can get your hands dirty you can join the political race.

Youth are now participating in the political sector in my country, the governor of my State is in his forties and one other governor in the country, it may take a while for the federal level but youth are politically active now.

The old one who have stopped aging are the ones who are in the cemeteries or urns. They can't do anything, especially politics. However, if those still alive promote the manifestos of the aged dead, it's the same as if the old ones were still alive.

Old ones cannot actively participate in politics like the young ones, we need the agile and vibrant minds to go after the community ambition and society building, there are some political positions that requires a particular age range for young adults to partake from while the common one to the old people isn't in politics but the traditional positions and titles, and in every settings both political or traditional, we need people who are ready to serve and rule the people.

African politics is not practised in it right senses most especially those countries that claim to be practising democracy because in a true democracy, the power belongs to the people and the citizen elect their leaders but in Africa most states' electoral systems are corrupt and at that process of election only favour the old one who has worked in government and have stolen billions of naira from government funds to sponsor their election.

 And the young one who is constantly told that they're the leaders of tomorrow are always pushed back by the big money bag holders and they will do everything possible to win the election,  knowing fully well that all the money their spend is gotten through corrupt means.

I'm some African countries such as mine. Politics and positions is for the old and it is like a family business where inheritance is vital. These old leaders do whatever is possible to remain in power, including reducing their aged and by swearing false affidavit to justify it.
They manipulate the electoral system to always favour them even when the masses vote against them.
They launder and lavish public funds for personal purposes and yet they are being praised by the poor and gullible who they enslaved with slavery .
They remember the poor masses once every 4 years which is during the time of the election.
They keep changing youths as the leaders of tomorrow while we are already in the morrow.

If we can only get most of the people to think that politics is only for certain people, then we don't have as much political opposition to our agenda.

And I do see it as a problem because in a democracy we're not talking about the individual, but the majority.

How would you describe the average 70 year old politician? He has many years of experience, that's for sure, usually a lot of money, has been in a current monetary system all his life, has used banks all his life, but hasn't used a lot of technology. He's not a fan of computers, new technologies, he falls behind with the innovations. He has wealth to protect, his children and grandchildren, he wants them to be raised in the same values that he was. He doesn't want to change much, feels too old to go through a revolution. He doesn't drive, he's being driven around, he also doesn't shop anymore, he has people who do that for him.

I know I have not much to talk about with these people and I can't expect them to understand me. We definitely need more young politicians in every single country.
In my country the government consists of old farts who due to not driving cars impose new speed limits all the time and make up new fines so they can make more money from those rich drivers, because according to them if you drive you're rich and can pay a fine. Poor people take the bus. Now they even want to force us into driving electric cars that nobody can afford, because they want to be good for the environment Chinese.

I feel like in the last 5 years they increased the fine amounts 4 or 5 times, but it's all good - the more ridiculous the laws are the more money ends up in the treasury.

Here in my country, the current president took power a long time ago and he is now about 50 years old. Many believe that he is ruling the country well, but of course there are many opponents who believe that he is not fit to run the country because of his young age.

Age does not matter if the person is mature enough to be a successful politician, but in general those who are of great age have great political experience and expertise, so they always think that they are the best.

But in my opinion, this is not necessary, especially with regard to technology, where we find that it is difficult for the elderly to accept this modern technology, and therefore they may sometimes cause the country to lag behind.

Once it comes to politics I don't think it is a matter of age, politics is for the old and young as long you have what it takes to serve the people, the main reason people go into politics today is just because of there own selfish reasons, either to enrich their self and family not to serve the people, which the number one suppose should be about the people, how to make life easy, to clean the tears of the people, a young man can take that position and do very well, and in the other hand make things worst than the old person that was there before, so it all depends on what they can offer. Any body that want to serve the people will come and do well, it doesn't mean if the person is older or younger.

Politics is a task that both the young and old can work on together. However, when you refuse to perform what is right and expected, it is a problem for society. Everyone is welcome to join in politics, regardless of age. However, the system is dominated by old men in my nation, and they were unable to support the youth on their own. Because of this, there are more old men than young guys in the system. Do what you were elected to do, though, whether you are young or elderly.

Being young or getting involved in politics won't change the fact that we still have dirty corrupt politicians who still find it hard to quit the game even when they know that they're not competent enough to secure a position. Young people do cast their vote but haven't you asked why is it that the result doesn't always comes out in favor of what the people voted? Is something you have to be worried about, is as if the vote of the people do not count, the old ones just want to be there (in power) not for the people but for the money.

The duty of leading a country can be very tough for someone who is too old or too young and inexperienced. It is not a retirement home for the very old people who should be resting instead of handling the affairs of a country that requires someone who is agile, fit, healthy, sane and experienced in leadership.

That someone is old does not make him a better leader, leadership is not by age, but by experience in leadership.

Politics does not have any specification so for you to become a politician you might be bored and they might be young it depends on your interest and the group you are into so I believe that only thing is for every person and no conclusion of any nation that's a start if you have not gotten to this particular age you cannot become a leader in a political group

Politics does not have age restrictions or retirement, so anyone who can manage to win an election is conditionally fit to run the state we should not lay much emphasis on age because age is just a number, so long as the leader is healthy and fit no matter what the age is it doesn't matter and according to some countries constitution.

-There is an entry age for each political position, but there is no exit age limit so at that anyone is at liberty to rule.

I am assuming you are younger. So why why not get involved in politics? You really can't complain of wrong people doing wrong politics if you are not doing anything. You can obviously vote for younger candinates, but you also can be a candinate. Politics only change by people changing it. If young people won't vote, there will be most likely old people in charge. As old people might not trust young and inexperienced politicians.

I think if we view politics as a game alone, then it would give a justifiable reason to the way politicians act in Nigeria, especially the older ones. Before a country can develop and move forward, the intending and aspiring leaders would have to put aside greed and the need to swell their personal coffers first.
 Just like you pointed out, politics is for the mature, but what then happens if the "matured" no longer think maturedly? Also, when room is not given to the younger ones to try, how would one be able to rate their maturity?

Politics is meant for everyone as long as they are fit in for that particular position in a political career, for instance, children and overaged citizensay have low or zero tolerance to participate in any political ambition because their age factor is a detriment in this, what every political career is aimed at is to render a service to ye humanity and the general public as well and those believed to be able to deliver upto task were the average youths and not senior citizens or children.

politics is a game of interest for everyone, it's only game that has no limitations, it's endless. But it's service oriented game. If you don't have the capacity to lead be you Young or old step aside and allow those with the energy and capacity to lead. Politics for the mature mind, those willing to accept and celebrate defeat regardless of age.  Age doesn't matter in politics, just that in Africa the old refused to prepare the young ones for leadership

It's just in few countries that you will see old ones in politics, mostly in Nigeria and other African countries, old people don't really rule in some developed countries, anyone whose much old won't be allowed to run for any electoral positions,
Though age doesn't really determine good leadership or governance, but atleast we need leaders that can walk by themselves and not leaders that would be supported by others before they can walk, we need someone that would stay with us in the country and not an old person that would be travelling every week for medical check-ups in other countries..
So to me I think this old men should rest and give the young people atleast a little chance to take over the mantle of leadership...

Age in politics does not determine a good quality leader.
I think the young vibrant youths should be given the opportunity to rule to see the change of government and for them to have access to the future that is promised to them by the old leaders.
Old politicians should give space for the youths for more employment opportunities. The old politicians can always guide them with their ideas and support them too. It must not be from one old leader to another old leader.

Politics is a game of numbers and intelligence; if you have the necessary number of votes, you are given power. Politics has no age restrictions. When guys who are unable to care for themselves engage in politics instead of looking after their health, it is unacceptable. The political structure in Africa has completely collapsed due to greed and selfishness. Old men who can do little to advance Africa's growth run the political system.

It depends on society and the country itself. In my view, it is about how a career is built.
When someone finishes college and seeks for a job,one is seen as a junior and taken as someone who needs to learn and accumulate much experience, as time passes the person gets older and also accumulates both experience, connections and influence sometimes, it is that way, not only in politics but also in other professions.

The youngest politicians start their careers with low local positions, eventually moving onto congress, perhaps then after some years they can run for governor or senate, by the time they are running for presidency they are already in their late 40s or 50s, minimum.

That's because it's based on their experience but citizens shouldn't limit their preference just to the old ones with experience but also be open to the young ones that have a love for the country and likes to serve people. If the system is just the same and people keep on electing the same old experienced people but barely see the changes in it, it's time to replace that and have some bet with the next generation of politicians through the aspiring young ones. But regardless of age preference, if the candidate or the politician is corrupt, that will never change.

Speaking about Biden, he's 80yrs and hasn't it strike your mind that no matter how competent they are these positions have never been occupied by someone who's 40 to 50 years old?
All I'm saying is that letting the younger one come into power is like they'll lose everything they have labored for, all in the name of greed and selfish interest, is just madness.

I don't see old age as a problem to bad leadership but I see corruption and the key factor to bad leadership. An old leader will have more experience in handling issues than a young leader due to their experience in life and in politics.

Good leaders are good fathers to the nation. The problem with Nigeria political system is that they are the same old politicians since in the 70s that are coming back to rule. Meaning that they were young leaders then,so all I see is the same bad eggs that are re-enforcing back to steal the country's funds because their friends are the ones in government.

This is not about whether politics is meant to be for the old ones just like we have in America where Biden is the US president and that might extend after 2024 when the us will conduct another election for who next is going to become the president. This is politics and most time the opposition parties normal look for who has experience and can be able to win the ruling party that is on the seat. Most time they do look for a person most old people who can be able to take the seat from the current or leaving president.

Age isn't a barrier but with the way they make it look like if is not the older ones nobody can handle a certain position better than they're doing. Talking about greed, is like politicians have it in their DNA always them first which is not fair IMO, so they should sometimes let the youth be part of them allowing them to share ideas (like you said) with them (the older ones) and it will go alone way. They're all willing to serve if not they won't be there but willing to serve and take more is something I dislike. And the citizens especially the youths will even avoid some crazy things like crime and all that because they'll know how to talk sense into them.


Well that's the truth no doubt but I think is the elderly ones who influence the younger ones to do what they're doing, is like if we don't give them it will look like we're cheating them, in my country they'll say "scratch my back and I'll scratch yours too".
You have to do something to get paid that's it.

Apart from health problems and other issue that are associated with old age, I don't see any reason for age discrimination in the political sector of any nation. The most important virtues in leadership are integrity and willingness to serve. A leader that is selfless and compassionate will always perform better than selfless and greedy politicians. I don't see age as a barrier because even some of these youthful leaders end up becoming tyrants and dubious. Nelson Mandela was 75years when he became the president of South Africa and till date he is one of the best leaders in Africa. Abiy Ahmed the Prime minister of Ethiopia was 41 when he assumed office, look at what a Nobel prize winner has turned Ethiopia into.

The reason why most people agitate for younger leaders is because they are stronger, open to new ideas and innovative. There is not correlation between younger politicians and good governance. Most youths in my country will steal more than the old politicians if they assume political offices.

Well, I believe the political ladder has a lot to with loyalty and longevity, you have a bunch of guys who have been loyal to a political cause for years, trust me, they and their cronies will always run the political system, it's more like a cult group, you can barely see an ordinary person having a breakthrough into the scene.

The political class, can hardly entrust powders to a younger person not within their circles, So they easily pass the political positions to their loyalist even though the person is 80+ years.

In some countries I believe that the set of people who runs political affairs are the old ones and is really worrisome, talking about age range 70yrs and above. Like in my country where I'm from these set of people (politicians) just feel they are the only ones fit to run the country and you find it hard to see someone between the age of 40yrs and above to rule as president or any higher position, is really outrageous and irritating. Why is greed speaking more in politics? Must every politician(s) think only about themselves other than the citizens?

I really don't blame most countries that engages in protest year in year out, nobody would be happy to have guys who ship in money into the development of their own businesses other than developing the country.