Thank you, (and I just figured out you get to that link by clicking the magnifying glass next to the search bar on the top
theymos doesn't make that many posts so if it was fairly recent you could easily just go through his post history and cntrl + f to use the keyword you want (I've done it before when trying to find something).
Hes got 7000 posts but looking at the dates you are right around page 55 goes all the way back to 2014
This post?
The more traditional setup (which I read in a statistics textbook) is something like:
You can use statistics to get meaningful info out of this even though the randomness is slanted toward Yes, but I don't remember off the top of my head what you're supposed to do exactly to remove the random effect. (Maybe you can just subtract half of your total respondents from Yes? And it probably changes statistical confidence, etc.) In my previous post I changed it so that the randomness is evenly distributed, which makes it easier. Though on the other hand, you really shouldn't rely on random.org if the question is truly sensitive.
The more traditional setup (which I read in a statistics textbook) is something like:
Quote
Flip a coin. If heads, answer yes to the following question regardless of the truth. If tails, answer honestly.
Question: Have you ever done drugs?
Yes
No
Question: Have you ever done drugs?
Yes
No
You can use statistics to get meaningful info out of this even though the randomness is slanted toward Yes, but I don't remember off the top of my head what you're supposed to do exactly to remove the random effect. (Maybe you can just subtract half of your total respondents from Yes? And it probably changes statistical confidence, etc.) In my previous post I changed it so that the randomness is evenly distributed, which makes it easier. Though on the other hand, you really shouldn't rely on random.org if the question is truly sensitive.
Yes that is the one thank you
