Topic: IS THIS HIM or HER: Satoshi Nakamoto??? (Read 267 times)
it's impossible to know really.
I read it ... and
It does not read like the whitepaper nor like any of 'his' communication in any forum ... and
It reads like it has been authored by more that than 1 person ... and
And I don't think Satoshi would end any communication with the following sentence, sentiment and grammar:
"And with that, is where this magical story into the history of what once was, concludes.."
It does not read like the whitepaper nor like any of 'his' communication in any forum ... and
It reads like it has been authored by more that than 1 person ... and
And I don't think Satoshi would end any communication with the following sentence, sentiment and grammar:
"And with that, is where this magical story into the history of what once was, concludes.."
I've read, that satoshi also makes a paper that ever posted on the internet in November 2008.
the essence of the paper is to explain the bitcoin system "BITCOIN A Peer to Peer electronic cash system".
the paper has only 9 pages, and comes with an explanation of how peer to peer bitcoin works system.
in my opinion many writings made by satoshi but we only know little about it.
the essence of the paper is to explain the bitcoin system "BITCOIN A Peer to Peer electronic cash system".
the paper has only 9 pages, and comes with an explanation of how peer to peer bitcoin works system.
in my opinion many writings made by satoshi but we only know little about it.
He knows too much about bitcoin, it does not mean he is definitely satoshi. Satoshi tried to hide his true identity, there was no reason for him to return. I believe that a certain phisher is trying to fake it.
Or better yet, it it him, her, they, or it? This an answer I'm doing to know and it's something I've never liked about the basis of crypto. There's something just really shady about the satoshi aspect
Maybe, I am a strange person but as for me it doesn't matter whether it is he or she because the only thing that matters is his/her innovative technology. I like btc and think that it is the best one! I hope that it will become the main currency
Anyone read this? I did. He seems to know so much history of bitcoin.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-30/is-bitcoin-creator-writing-a-book-cryptic-note-indicates-yes
http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/
Satoshi Nakamoto hid because he had purpose. Media is a privacy destroyer and somehow, a story creator. They don't care about who are the people involved in their story and they don't care about the safetiness of individual who they used in order to have an article. I did not look for the website because it is just useless, no one knows about who is really the founder of Bitcoin unless he will proclaim and show a lot of evidence and study related in the creation of this innovative technology. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-30/is-bitcoin-creator-writing-a-book-cryptic-note-indicates-yes
http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/
Could it be -
A - the rigourously anonymous creator of Bitcoin who hasn't made a squeak in many years.
B - some twat.
There are several billion more examples of B.
I'll have to go away and think about.
A - the rigourously anonymous creator of Bitcoin who hasn't made a squeak in many years.
B - some twat.
There are several billion more examples of B.
I'll have to go away and think about.
I won't just believe it unless he will prove that he is really Satoshi Nakamoto, unless he will go into a public or in press conference and will say that he is Satoshi, but if he is not appearing in the public I won't just believe in it that easily, a lot of people nowadays saying that they are Satoshi.
Just another clickbait article. News sites love to make these kind of headlines because it gets tons of hit and thus gets ad revenue.
The only way to prove that someone is satoshi nakamoto is to move keys from the genesis block. And even then, it would only mean that someone controls satoshi's coins. For all we know, satoshi could have been captured by someone and tortured until he gave them his keys.
Basically, at this point it's impossible to demonstrate that you are satoshi nakamoto, no matter what you do.
I don't like how you are saying but its kinda annoying in my mind and I can't hold it in any way. Your negativity are way too much.The only way to prove that someone is satoshi nakamoto is to move keys from the genesis block. And even then, it would only mean that someone controls satoshi's coins. For all we know, satoshi could have been captured by someone and tortured until he gave them his keys.
Basically, at this point it's impossible to demonstrate that you are satoshi nakamoto, no matter what you do.
The only way to prove that someone is satoshi nakamoto is to move keys from the genesis block.
He could have showed his PGP keys just to prove that he is real Satoshi.And even then, it would only mean that someone controls satoshi's coins.
Look, he is bitcoin creator, he wouldn't get fucked up like that.For all we know, satoshi could have been captured by someone and tortured until he gave them his keys.
It is impossible to capture satoshi as there are so many impersonators about him. 
Anyone read this? I did. He seems to know so much history of bitcoin.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-30/is-bitcoin-creator-writing-a-book-cryptic-note-indicates-yes
http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-30/is-bitcoin-creator-writing-a-book-cryptic-note-indicates-yes
http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/
No one will be able confirm this is Satoshi. Even anyone comes with the proposal of saying this is Satoshi with the valid proof also no one wants to believe that and praise him.
I want the investors keep support to bitcoin with their potential. It will bring all demand and finally it gives you more profit.
It would be really interesting if this person signed the genesis block, or one of the first blocks in general.
I don't really expect Satoshi to appear, and people claiming to be him without cryptographic evidence are boring. But the idea that Satoshi might actually communicate again is pretty exciting to think about, even if it's very unlikely.
I don't really expect Satoshi to appear, and people claiming to be him without cryptographic evidence are boring. But the idea that Satoshi might actually communicate again is pretty exciting to think about, even if it's very unlikely.
Who knows, it could be him? Personally, I thought the name was a pseudonym rather than an actual government recorded identity. Most people who take part within the underground grassroots internet scene, almost never use a real identity, just a pen name.
Names are usually reflections of our inner most thoughts at the time the name is conceived, encapsulating either a single idea, or a collage of ideas.
Names are usually reflections of our inner most thoughts at the time the name is conceived, encapsulating either a single idea, or a collage of ideas.
I think that Satoshi Nakamoto is not one person, but a group of people who created Bitcoin and introduced crypto-currencies into the world. They do not want to declassify their personal data, because it is easier for them to work anonymously. However, personality was necessary to them in order to enter into the confidence of people.
Just another clickbait article. News sites love to make these kind of headlines because it gets tons of hit and thus gets ad revenue.
The only way to prove that someone is satoshi nakamoto is to move keys from the genesis block. And even then, it would only mean that someone controls satoshi's coins. For all we know, satoshi could have been captured by someone and tortured until he gave them his keys.
Basically, at this point it's impossible to demonstrate that you are satoshi nakamoto, no matter what you do.
The only way to prove that someone is satoshi nakamoto is to move keys from the genesis block. And even then, it would only mean that someone controls satoshi's coins. For all we know, satoshi could have been captured by someone and tortured until he gave them his keys.
Basically, at this point it's impossible to demonstrate that you are satoshi nakamoto, no matter what you do.
Everything he says in the pdf everyone knows that. It's all over the web for years. To me, it seems someone is again trying to be Satoshi, a Craig v2.0. I am not going to believe it is Satoshi, he should give more persuasive proofs. And I am interested to know what the imposter wants to do. Satoshi has no reason to come back
Anyone read this? I did. He seems to know so much history of bitcoin.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-30/is-bitcoin-creator-writing-a-book-cryptic-note-indicates-yes
http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-30/is-bitcoin-creator-writing-a-book-cryptic-note-indicates-yes
http://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org/
Jump to: