Is this the biggest threat to BTC? | Bitcointalksearch.org

DannyHamilton

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 4801

Quote from: cafucafucafu on October 10, 2014, 12:26:57 PM

Quote from: DannyHamilton on October 10, 2014, 11:29:34 AM

Quote from: cafucafucafu on October 10, 2014, 11:05:14 AM

Quote from: DannyHamilton on October 10, 2014, 10:57:44 AM

There is no benefit to a government to publish their own blockchain completely under their control.

If they want a digital currency, they can do so in a centralized way. Doing so has no need of a blockchain at all.

The purpose of the blockchain is to provide a decentralized consensus among the users.

Limiting fraud is a benefit.

There is nothing about a blockchain that makes it easier for a government to prevent the fraud of others.

It stops counterfeit money.

You aren't paying attention.

The purpose of a blockchain is to establish a decentralized consensus.

A government operated digital currency has no use for decentralized consensus.

A centralized digital currency without a blockchain stops counterfeit money just as well as a blockchain based one.

Please take some time to learn a bit and ask some reasonable questions before making assumptions about things you don't understand.

I won't be repeating this again here.

ruletheworld

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1045

Quote from: cafucafucafu on October 10, 2014, 12:26:57 PM

Quote from: DannyHamilton on October 10, 2014, 11:29:34 AM

Quote from: cafucafucafu on October 10, 2014, 11:05:14 AM

Quote from: DannyHamilton on October 10, 2014, 10:57:44 AM

There is no benefit to a government to publish their own blockchain completely under their control.

If they want a digital currency, they can do so in a centralized way. Doing so has no need of a blockchain at all.

The purpose of the blockchain is to provide a decentralized consensus among the users.

Limiting fraud is a benefit.

There is nothing about a blockchain that makes it easier for a government to prevent the fraud of others.

It stops counterfeit money.

Any centralized digital ledger would do the same, there is absolutely no need for a blockchain. In fact, a blockchain would be a terrible misuse of computing resources for a government to implement their version of a digital currency.

cafucafucafu

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 509

Quote from: DannyHamilton on October 10, 2014, 11:29:34 AM

Quote from: cafucafucafu on October 10, 2014, 11:05:14 AM

Quote from: DannyHamilton on October 10, 2014, 10:57:44 AM

There is no benefit to a government to publish their own blockchain completely under their control.

If they want a digital currency, they can do so in a centralized way. Doing so has no need of a blockchain at all.

The purpose of the blockchain is to provide a decentralized consensus among the users.

Limiting fraud is a benefit.

There is nothing about a blockchain that makes it easier for a government to prevent the fraud of others.

It stops counterfeit money.

DannyHamilton

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 4801

Quote from: cafucafucafu on October 10, 2014, 11:05:14 AM

Quote from: DannyHamilton on October 10, 2014, 10:57:44 AM

There is no benefit to a government to publish their own blockchain completely under their control.

If they want a digital currency, they can do so in a centralized way. Doing so has no need of a blockchain at all.

The purpose of the blockchain is to provide a decentralized consensus among the users.

Limiting fraud is a benefit.

There is nothing about a blockchain that makes it easier for a government to prevent the fraud of others.

The only thing a blockchain does is take control of the currency away from the creator.

RodeoX

legendary

Activity: 3066

Merit: 1147

The revolution will be monetized!

No threat at all. A coin that is controlled by the government and can only be used in one country vs. Bitcoin? No threat at all.

DannyHamilton

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 4801

Quote from: cafucafucafu on October 10, 2014, 11:25:46 AM

Quote from: Mr Crabs on October 10, 2014, 11:07:45 AM

Are alt coins a big threat to bitcoin?

Alt coins are not government backed. A national digital coin would be a greater incentive for the masses.

But a national digital coin does not require a blockchain.

As I said, there is no benefit to a government to implement their own blockchain.

cafucafucafu

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 509

Quote from: Mr Crabs on October 10, 2014, 11:07:45 AM

Are alt coins a big threat to bitcoin?

Alt coins are not government backed. A national digital coin would be a greater incentive for the masses.

Beliathon

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 1000

https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU

Quote from: drrussellshane on October 10, 2014, 11:11:05 AM

Not for the fraudsters.

Always surprises me how many people, in 2014, STILL haven't figured out that governments and their banksters pals are fraudsters.

drrussellshane

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Quote from: cafucafucafu on October 10, 2014, 11:05:14 AM

Quote from: DannyHamilton on October 10, 2014, 10:57:44 AM

Quote from: cafucafucafu on October 10, 2014, 10:54:43 AM

Do you think this is a real threat?

No.

There is no benefit to a government to publish their own blockchain completely under their control.

If they want a digital currency, they can do so in a centralized way. Doing so has no need of a blockchain at all.

The purpose of the blockchain is to provide a decentralized consensus among the users.

Limiting fraud is a benefit.

Not for the fraudsters.

Beliathon

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 1000

https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU

Quote from: Mr Crabs on October 10, 2014, 11:07:45 AM

Maybe they would be if they can offer something much better...

Even then, altcoins still wouldn't be a threat. Bitcoin is organic, evolving software.

I'll let Garzik explain. You should also read this: http://trilema.com/2014/the-woes-of-altcoin-or-why-there-is-no-such-thing-as-cryptocurrencies/

Mr Crabs

member

Activity: 91

Merit: 10

Are alt coins a big threat to bitcoin? Not really. Maybe they would be if they can offer something much better or get more people to use them, but they don't. I think btc is safe from governments this way.

cafucafucafu

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 509

Quote from: DannyHamilton on October 10, 2014, 10:57:44 AM

Quote from: cafucafucafu on October 10, 2014, 10:54:43 AM

Do you think this is a real threat?

No.

There is no benefit to a government to publish their own blockchain completely under their control.

If they want a digital currency, they can do so in a centralized way. Doing so has no need of a blockchain at all.

The purpose of the blockchain is to provide a decentralized consensus among the users.

Limiting fraud is a benefit.

DannyHamilton

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 4801

Quote from: cafucafucafu on October 10, 2014, 10:54:43 AM

Do you think this is a real threat?

No.

There is no benefit to a government to publish their own blockchain completely under their control.

If they want a digital currency, they can do so in a centralized way. Doing so has no need of a blockchain at all.

The purpose of the blockchain is to provide a decentralized consensus among the users.

chenka563

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

no people will use that so that BTC will be safe!

cafucafucafu

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 509

Governments making their own blockchains. They are already thinking about it and will want to get all the benefits of BTC while having their own currency. SO e.g. the dollar will become digital with its own blockchain.

Do you think this is a real threat?

Topic: Is this the biggest threat to BTC? (Read 1116 times)