While installing, spare the waiting time signing the same TX with Brainwallet.github.io and check whether the results are same.
~~MZ~~
Topic: Is this transaction bad? (Read 1220 times)
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
Okay!
While installing, spare the waiting time signing the same TX with Brainwallet.github.io and check whether the results are same.
~~MZ~~
While installing, spare the waiting time signing the same TX with Brainwallet.github.io and check whether the results are same.
~~MZ~~
I used the coinb.in UI to sign the transaction with the private key from dumpprivkey 18UfvFPqRp5LXwhQTZnkUy5bZxyqrbujTm.
I manually constructed the nonsense output and lock time, so maybe that messed things up? Or coinb.in doesn't know how to sign it?
I didn't try using qt because I haven't been synchronized since the April bubble. I'm probably no further than block 230000
I manually constructed the nonsense output and lock time, so maybe that messed things up? Or coinb.in doesn't know how to sign it?
I didn't try using qt because I haven't been synchronized since the April bubble. I'm probably no further than block 230000
Coinb.in does know how to sign the TX. Did you try again?
If you can't use Bitcoin core, why don't you try lightwallets like Electrum and Multibit?
~~MZ~~
I did try again. No avail :/
I will look into those in the mean time.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
I used the coinb.in UI to sign the transaction with the private key from dumpprivkey 18UfvFPqRp5LXwhQTZnkUy5bZxyqrbujTm.
I manually constructed the nonsense output and lock time, so maybe that messed things up? Or coinb.in doesn't know how to sign it?
I didn't try using qt because I haven't been synchronized since the April bubble. I'm probably no further than block 230000
I manually constructed the nonsense output and lock time, so maybe that messed things up? Or coinb.in doesn't know how to sign it?
I didn't try using qt because I haven't been synchronized since the April bubble. I'm probably no further than block 230000
Coinb.in does know how to sign the TX. Did you try again?
If you can't use Bitcoin core, why don't you try lightwallets like Electrum and Multibit?
~~MZ~~
I used the coinb.in UI to sign the transaction with the private key from dumpprivkey 18UfvFPqRp5LXwhQTZnkUy5bZxyqrbujTm.
I manually constructed the nonsense output and lock time, so maybe that messed things up? Or coinb.in doesn't know how to sign it?
I didn't try using qt because I haven't been synchronized since the April bubble. I'm probably no further than block 230000
I manually constructed the nonsense output and lock time, so maybe that messed things up? Or coinb.in doesn't know how to sign it?
I didn't try using qt because I haven't been synchronized since the April bubble. I'm probably no further than block 230000
Quote
Or maybe it's messed up some other way. Does anyone know where I went wrong? 
DNA?Your transaction has invalid signature. May be you signed it and later appended one more output to it.
Of course, it is wrong way.
You should tell us what were your steps. And only with this knowledge we can help you to find an error.
The signature doesn't check out. How did you make it?
txHash should be "73b3b2795aa0826233122d6c0992e5a051562d10bc9e84700daf4a1329c47981"
txHash should be "73b3b2795aa0826233122d6c0992e5a051562d10bc9e84700daf4a1329c47981"
I can't figure out how to sign this properly. Or maybe I did, and nothing recognizes it as correct. Or maybe it's messed up some other way. Does anyone know where I went wrong?
01000000011f38c765e6b4548cdb112ea84d581a7636a402cc4a939bd4bbf838a380e3528500000 0006a47304402203974d95c154cc54f53c87545427dcc5762eb104bfcc063f83195ab147b407ee0 02202ad13dbfb70983f93ee9312623b5bc1f3f4f237391e59984841473291568f727012103d7ea9 69c44cfb62ecafa8b203dbae3acd7f82c6a42dc66aeeb0d6ef0257003a60000000002905f010000 0000001976a9146fb7d03e48040fa239e2dc730620270806dc98ca88ac0000000000000000197e7 e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e044d454f57856715160500
Yes I'm aware the last output is stupid. I just wanted to see if it would work
01000000011f38c765e6b4548cdb112ea84d581a7636a402cc4a939bd4bbf838a380e3528500000 0006a47304402203974d95c154cc54f53c87545427dcc5762eb104bfcc063f83195ab147b407ee0 02202ad13dbfb70983f93ee9312623b5bc1f3f4f237391e59984841473291568f727012103d7ea9 69c44cfb62ecafa8b203dbae3acd7f82c6a42dc66aeeb0d6ef0257003a60000000002905f010000 0000001976a9146fb7d03e48040fa239e2dc730620270806dc98ca88ac0000000000000000197e7 e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e7e044d454f57856715160500
Yes I'm aware the last output is stupid. I just wanted to see if it would work
Jump to: