Topic: Is trading just a form of gambling? (Read 1424 times)
Every business that has a risk involved is a form of gambling but trading is not the same. While trading, we can monitor our losses and profit which is not possible in gambling whether we play dice games or sports betting. We have no option to withdraw our money which we have invested unlike trading as it's totally our choice.
Do traders know what the fuck they are doing and tend to profit, or are they in reality just gambling? Sorry for my ignorance.
Only if you do not know what you are doing and just follow your gut-feel to decide whether to buy or to sell, to short or to long. That is the risky and can be considered as a gamble. But if you know what you are doing, can read graphs and trends technically and follows bitcoin news regularly, then you are in for profit.
I think it can be considered as gambling but its not really gambling on the other hand, I think its for a part is but for the other part not at all because it has a lot of other functions.
many people are doing it like gambling but it is the wrong way of trading. and them using it the wrong way doesn't mean trading is gambling! it means you should not invest without knowing about the future of your investment, if you are buying something (bitcoin or altcoin) and just hoping it goes up that would be gambling but if you buy them at a price that is good and when you think they can go up based on your analysis it means you are trading.
I think it can be considered as gambling but its not really gambling on the other hand, I think its for a part is but for the other part not at all because it has a lot of other functions.
trading is like poker, in the short term it's pure gambling, in the long term if you know what you're doing, there is a +ev to be made
yeah, i agree.
if you know what you're doing, it's a bigger % of success so you should get profitable, even if your profit varies from day to day and might some days be negative.
with gambling you'll usually be in the negatives, unless you get a lucky day, but it has nothing to do with skill, unlike poker and trading.
Its still a guessing in my view, but hey whatever you see fit. lol.
I mean the only times I would agree for trading to have a bigger chance of in someones direction is if there is something technical like the halving situation.
Trading are needed a knowledge and analysis skills and sometimes needed a guessing too.
If we do guessing continuously I think you can call it as a gambling but if guessing occasionally, I don't think so.
Wait so you know people made money off a TA and speculating on the # of buy orders coming in?
Last time I checked despite whatever trade setup you have, take a few enough hits from a bad trade and you wont trade again lol.
You can consider it as gambling and I must say that I think its a sort of gambling because you need luck for it.
And the fact is also that you are taking a risk.
And the fact is also that you are taking a risk.
when you say "gambling" it means something that you don't know the outcome of, something that you have no control and can't predict it.
but when you say "trading" it means you can predict/speculate the outcome so you somehow know what is going to happen. also there is all these technical analysis and all that stuff for a reason. you use all of these to have an idea about what is about to happen
but when you say "trading" it means you can predict/speculate the outcome so you somehow know what is going to happen. also there is all these technical analysis and all that stuff for a reason. you use all of these to have an idea about what is about to happen
Just to put this here: http://goo.gl/OKQGNb
Eventually, it's about how much exchanges get the profit from traders, house always wins.
Eventually, it's about how much exchanges get the profit from traders, house always wins.
I had this talk just a few days ago in a private chat.
Many people think trading == gambling. I like to think it's a little more calculated than that.
Experience plays a big role here. In 2011 I was "trading" but completely on gut instincts. I did pretty well considering, but that streak would likely have ended badly, eventually. That can be construed as gambling. I will not argue that.
What we do now is more like science in that we form a hypothesis (through our brand of TA/EW) and the trade is the experiment to test the hypothesis. Not by any means would I call TA an exact science, but more a practice like doctors do. We can figure out what should be happening based on some symptoms (indicators/price action), but sometimes things are out of place (like precise location of innards in people). So it's never exactly the same twice.
I also do not think it's gambling because we have a different type of risk. In Vegas, you slap a $100 bill on red, and black has it, that is completely gone. You buy .2 BTC and price drops, we have the ability to exit and preserve capital. Gambling is all or nothing with every play. Trading can be limited if done right.
It is true that most traders are not profitable. This comes back to the experience mentioned in the first paragraph. If you read investopedia about RSI once, this does not constitute you being a trader because you will not sufficiently learn how it acts or why it moves like it does compared to price action. The consensus for most things in life is that 10,000 hours of practice, learning, hands-on training is required to get proficient at something.
Many people think trading == gambling. I like to think it's a little more calculated than that.
Experience plays a big role here. In 2011 I was "trading" but completely on gut instincts. I did pretty well considering, but that streak would likely have ended badly, eventually. That can be construed as gambling. I will not argue that.
What we do now is more like science in that we form a hypothesis (through our brand of TA/EW) and the trade is the experiment to test the hypothesis. Not by any means would I call TA an exact science, but more a practice like doctors do. We can figure out what should be happening based on some symptoms (indicators/price action), but sometimes things are out of place (like precise location of innards in people). So it's never exactly the same twice.
I also do not think it's gambling because we have a different type of risk. In Vegas, you slap a $100 bill on red, and black has it, that is completely gone. You buy .2 BTC and price drops, we have the ability to exit and preserve capital. Gambling is all or nothing with every play. Trading can be limited if done right.
It is true that most traders are not profitable. This comes back to the experience mentioned in the first paragraph. If you read investopedia about RSI once, this does not constitute you being a trader because you will not sufficiently learn how it acts or why it moves like it does compared to price action. The consensus for most things in life is that 10,000 hours of practice, learning, hands-on training is required to get proficient at something.
Methinks OP has two very separate questions.
I think a lot of folks who trade on the cryptocurrency exchanges have no clue what they're doing. How could they? You can't analyze these coins like they're stocks--businesses with earnings and so forth. You have very incomplete knowledge. So no, I don't think they know exactly what they're doing.
Is it gambling? Absolutely. Some people believe in these coins, but I think most are like me and are not attached to any of them and are just looking to make money. It's totally gambling. But I find it more satisfying than going to a casino and handjobbing a slot machine.
I think a lot of folks who trade on the cryptocurrency exchanges have no clue what they're doing. How could they? You can't analyze these coins like they're stocks--businesses with earnings and so forth. You have very incomplete knowledge. So no, I don't think they know exactly what they're doing.
Is it gambling? Absolutely. Some people believe in these coins, but I think most are like me and are not attached to any of them and are just looking to make money. It's totally gambling. But I find it more satisfying than going to a casino and handjobbing a slot machine.
trading is like poker, in the short term it's pure gambling, in the long term if you know what you're doing, there is a +ev to be made
yeah, i agree.
if you know what you're doing, it's a bigger % of success so you should get profitable, even if your profit varies from day to day and might some days be negative.
with gambling you'll usually be in the negatives, unless you get a lucky day, but it has nothing to do with skill, unlike poker and trading.
Its still a guessing in my view, but hey whatever you see fit. lol.
I mean the only times I would agree for trading to have a bigger chance of in someones direction is if there is something technical like the halving situation.
Trading are needed a knowledge and analysis skills and sometimes needed a guessing too.
If we do guessing continuously I think you can call it as a gambling but if guessing occasionally, I don't think so.
Or maybe its like entropy and you can't beat it except in statistically unlikely fortuitous events
At this time I see it like this. Yes it is a form of gambling. BUT with discipline you can have better odds than the house. But what normally happens is emotions take control and you lose
trading is like poker, in the short term it's pure gambling, in the long term if you know what you're doing, there is a +ev to be made
yeah, i agree.
if you know what you're doing, it's a bigger % of success so you should get profitable, even if your profit varies from day to day and might some days be negative.
with gambling you'll usually be in the negatives, unless you get a lucky day, but it has nothing to do with skill, unlike poker and trading.
Its still a guessing in my view, but hey whatever you see fit. lol.
I mean the only times I would agree for trading to have a bigger chance of in someones direction is if there is something technical like the halving situation.
A small group, maybe 10% make genuine profits with genuine skill. The other 90% lose, and they lose money to the 10%. Trading is a zero sum game, it's not possible for everyone to be a winner.
From where did you get these figures? I don't see 90% losing while trading as mostly all traders sell their coins above the market rate and hence even if the price goes above 15%, they get back what they invested. Gambling also requires skill but the risk is more where people lose almost their entire bank roll and it's mainly a luck based game.
trading is like poker, in the short term it's pure gambling, in the long term if you know what you're doing, there is a +ev to be made
yeah, i agree.
if you know what you're doing, it's a bigger % of success so you should get profitable, even if your profit varies from day to day and might some days be negative.
with gambling you'll usually be in the negatives, unless you get a lucky day, but it has nothing to do with skill, unlike poker and trading.
Technically EVERYTHING is gambling.
Do traders know what the fuck they are doing and tend to profit, or are they in reality just gambling? Sorry for my ignorance.
well we can say that it is kinda gambling as you aren't sure that you will get money, and you even have chance to lose money that you have so we can say it is gambling
but even if it gambling, it needs a lot of skills and knowledge, you have to know a lot how price changes, so even if it gambling it is gambling like poker, not only luck based game
Compared to other forms of gambling games thats played, I say it has better odds then some dice site.
Now keep in mind when you say trading, youre basically applying any form of trading.. which is generic term.
If you have your own ways to go about getting price reduced bitcoin then selling on the exchange - then that too is trading.. lol. But assuming we are talking about daytrading so in the price guessing route it is a gamble.
Its basically a guessing game, of when a huge buy order of that comes in.
Now keep in mind when you say trading, youre basically applying any form of trading.. which is generic term.
If you have your own ways to go about getting price reduced bitcoin then selling on the exchange - then that too is trading.. lol. But assuming we are talking about daytrading so in the price guessing route it is a gamble.
Its basically a guessing game, of when a huge buy order of that comes in.
It depends on what kind of trader you are. Experienced traders who understand how the Bitcoin market works are no gamblers. They trade with a good amount of experience. And then we have the YOLO "investors" who buy themselves some coins at whatever price hoping to get a lot profit. They can be seen as gamblers. There is no logic behind their investments.
Trading is a game of buying low and selling high and selling high and buying low. All with risk involved.
The risk compared to gambling is comparatively less. We can earn profit or a loss but the entire amount we have invested is not lost unlike gambling where we lose the complete amount we have used to bet.Risk involved is more in gambling rather than trading.
Do traders know what the fuck they are doing and tend to profit, or are they in reality just gambling? Sorry for my ignorance.
well you can say that trading is a some form of gambling, but it cant be applied to
everyone specially to those who knows what theyre doing when theyre trading.
PS: i dont think this topic belongs in speculation, let know know if im wrong.
A small group, maybe 10% make genuine profits with genuine skill. The other 90% lose, and they lose money to the 10%. Trading is a zero sum game, it's not possible for everyone to be a winner.
Yes, trade against market and with high leverage with the hope to obtain high profit is the same as gamble!
*Want high profit? PM me!
*Want high profit? PM me!
No it is not just a form of gambling, in gambling your profit or loss depend upon your luck and the the script used by that gambling site but in trading your skill and sometime the intention of the big whales determine you will go loss or in profit.
If you dont know what is happening in the market and cant predict you are gambling else you are trading. Gambling has no stop loss but trading has.
I think trading is not a gambling because gambling can give entertainment to people and trading can give only profit and altcoins..
So they are different forms.
So they are different forms.
Tricky one to answer really. I'm sure most traders don't think they're gambling. They busily apply all their witchcraft. In a similar way there are gamblers who believe their systems absolve them from the gambling tag too.
Trading is a game of buying low and selling high and selling high and buying low. All with risk involved.
Gambling is a form of trading if you know what you're doing 
True enough. If you're the
Gambling is a form of trading if you know what you're doing
This is why we hodl:
Silly c0ckroach, hodling is not trading
OP, trading the way it's done on this board is gambling, usually ruinously unprofitable. There are those who make money trading, but they are usually pretty hooked up.
Do traders know what the fuck they are doing and tend to profit, or are they in reality just gambling? Sorry for my ignorance.
I do not see trading as a form of gambling because with trading you now that you are getting something back. With gambling you are not sure that you will get something in return.
I've never lost a dime trading Bitcoin in terms of my initial planned entry/exit points yadda yadda, but I don't consider Bitcoin's purpose as trading or gambling. I currently use Bitcoin as a store of value and keep 0 in the bank because keeping money in a bank account is even more risky to me due to cascading deflationary collapse of fractional reserve fiat when all the debts/loans go bad. It's a true domino effect that you will have the pleasure of witnessing one day (probably sometime soon) and you're either going to receive a big haircut, withdrawal limits, or forever bank holiday.
This is why we hodl:
This is why we hodl:
The currency system that exists is not run as a function to empower the state. It was the opposite, the banks took over the state. ... you choose to be a banker's indentured servant on purpose. Unless you wilfully choose to boycott their system as much as humanly possible, this will always be the case.
Mat's idea of a bright future was the fractional reserve, debt as money systems collapsing, and then him lining up at the table for a second helping of the exact same scam when they clear the board to start anew to steal his money again. Most people who can understand these issues would likely call him a very dumb person, but he seems to think it's just being practical. It's only being practical if there are no alternatives. You are literally choosing to be scammed on purpose when you don't have to be. Pretty much any option is better than signing up to be Ben Shalom Bernanke's slave on purpose.
trading is like poker, in the short term it's pure gambling, in the long term if you know what you're doing, there is a +ev to be made
Do traders know what the fuck they are doing and tend to profit, or are they in reality just gambling? Sorry for my ignorance.
Jump to: