What it implies is that you better have your head on straight when you decide to launch fiduciary tools like the DAO for example.
Something that can not be counterfeited is priceless, compared to a $60 million loss.
Indeed. But, in as much as that sounds evident, it might very well be that there are a lot of people who don't mind using something that can be counterfeited. After all, the market cap of all crypto is still orders of magnitude below all fiat stuff. So it seems that a lot of people don't mind centralized, counterfeitable, reversible and other tricky financial assets, as long as they believe that *they* will not suffer too much from that (and might even profit from the counterfeiting, rewinding, etc...)
Very true and hence why two chains are existing. It is an incredible experiment to watch unfold in real-time.