If that is the case, iungo really didn't keep to their other side of the bargain.
It is unethical for someone to carry out a successful campaign for a company and such thing happens. I think their should be some kind of rule that should protect the bounty hunters and the company running the ICO.
This would make the two parties keep to their bargains.
Topic: Iungo really screwed bounty participants (Read 133 times)
Iungo said they would give out 1.5% of tokens for bounty. Now they say on the bounty thread that they reduced the amount to about one tenth of a percent. They reduced it by at least 10 times! Claiming this was due to low number of participants. Payout should remain the same regardless of number of participants. Now bounty people are getting practically nothing.
that's not fair as it's obvious breach of rules if they didn't state there is some min limit of participants for the original % otherwise the % allocation is decreased. But if they're right, you should get good money anyway
doing bounty is something that can't be relied on, it's a risky "job"
Well, it's pretty sad that you are screwed. One thing you can do about it, social media is powerful. And you deserve better.
They set the bounty pool, and you do the job. It's pretty asshole if they will reduced the Bounty Pool provided their ICO was 100% raised.
They set the bounty pool, and you do the job. It's pretty asshole if they will reduced the Bounty Pool provided their ICO was 100% raised.
Iungo said they would give out 1.5% of tokens for bounty. Now they say on the bounty thread that they reduced the amount to about one tenth of a percent. They reduced it by at least 10 times! Claiming this was due to low number of participants. Payout should remain the same regardless of number of participants. Now bounty people are getting practically nothing.
Jump to: