Topic: Ivanka received from the Arabs $ 100 million. (Read 475 times)

100 million isn't a big jump for either Trump's wealth or arabs wealth, definitely is a political move though, most likely they will get a benefit substantially higher than 100 million.

Since the last comment we see Jared Kushner seeming to be associated with the coup in Saudi.

Also, we finally see one actual real instance of the Trump team colluding with Russia...on behalf of the right-wingers in Israel.  The Trump admin tried to trade U.S. sanctions against Russia for support of what most of the world views as Israeli ethic cleansing in construction of settlements in West Bank occupied territory.  It seems to be what Flynn lied to the FBI about and what they busted him on, but unsurprisingly there is not a peep about it in the Mainstream Media.  And precious little in the 'alt' media either.

And just lately the suggestion that since the Palestinians are to weak, Saudi should negotiate with Israel on their behalf.

$100 mil is chump-change to the Saidi guy who just appropriated many times that from his extended family.  I would not be surprised at all if such a sum and more went to the Kushners.

From a limited hang-out, I noticed this interesting observation related to Ivanka:

---

12/28/2017 at 4:21 am

Watch for Ivanka to be POTUS eventually. I can ‘feel’ that she’s being groomed for it. Having ovaries is good enough for the Left and having Trump branding is good enough for the right. I predict that she wins easily when the time is right.

This is important because Ivanka seems likely to be in the Chabad-Lubavitch cult/white collar crime syndicate along with Jared. I say this because they seem to have gone to the grave of the sect’s Rebbe Schneerson to pray for Donald to win.

Chabad-Lubavitch is interesting. Orthodox Jewery tended historically to rejects Zionism on the basis that the Messiah needs to come before Israel; not after. Lubavitchers gets around this by classifying Schneerson as a Messiah. At least some of them do.

Chabad-Lubavitch is remarkably successful with numerous ‘Chabad Houses’ around the world. In Russia, one Lubavitcher Rabbi Lazar is known as ‘Putin’s Rabbi’ even though there is and ongoing power struggle Rabbinical preeminence in that country.

One of the fixations of the Lubavitchers seems to be the ‘7 Noahide Laws.’ A ‘Noahide’ is roughly synonymous with a goyim, and the laws seem in the same vein as the biblical 10 commandments although they originate from within Talmudic teachings. Many Jews subscribe to the notion that as God’s chosen, their Job is to ‘help’ the poor Noahides to understand and adhere to the 7 Noahide laws, but the Lubavitchers seem particularly fixated on this ‘duty.’ What is a bummer for the Jews is that they have over 600 laws to deal with because their own covenent with God recognizes that they are more sophisticated. The rest of us lesser quasi-humanity gets the simplified version, but it is universally stressed that we goyim need to adhere to these laws not out of being a decent person but rather because God commanded it. I see this over and over in my research. Also, again, that it’s the calling of the Jewish race to foster this amongst the goyim in order to have world peace. And to foster it from a court in Jerusalem.

It looks to me as though the ‘money shot’ of these 7 laws is the one related to having a ‘just’ legal system, since it kind of goes without saying only Jews have the wherewithal to sustain one. In Talmudic tradition, a law such as ‘don’t eat the limbs from a live animal’ can spawn a library full of interpretation which achieves nearly any goal the interpreter wishes.

One of the main Rabbi’s promoting the ‘Universal Noahide’ within the United Nations is Rabbi Yaakov Cohen. I’ve sat through a number of his presentations (on Youtube.) One particularly funny moment was when some Norwegian guy said, ‘um…we finally got rid of the Church/State tie-in…how are we going to bring it back?” Cohen said matter-of-factly that they way they got around the problem in the U.S. is by calling it ‘education’. Sure enough, there is an ‘education day’ accepted by the U.S. Congress way back in Carter’s time, and it specifically honors the life of Lubavitcher Rebbe Scheerson. Wow.

This money can not be good, because they bribe Trump and I doubt that they will go to charity. Many now just hide behind charitable funds to look kinder.

You justify a bribe if she would go to charity? It's very bad. It's called one hand treat another cripple. Even if the money will go to charity for it Trump promised to the Arab States. Are you sure that it's good for America? I'm not. Therefore, I am against that kind of money, even if they go to a good cause. The devil always lies in the details.

This is how the same Arabs who funded Hillary are now trying to gain Trump's favor. 100 million is pocket money for these guys and they'd rather dish out this small amount of cash then have the US interfere with their business with ISIS and other terrorists. It's like they're begging him to forget they were supporting his opponent during the elections.

Perhaps this is a false rumor, but if this is true information, then I would like that this money really went to charity.

Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have pledged a combined $100 million to the World Bank's Women Entrepreneurs Fund, a campaign that is the brainchild of Ivanka Trump.

I think it is to her charity,but we know from Clintons..what the donation actually meant

There are many accusations and false articles with no basis at all against President Trump. And so we must make sure that before we believe on it we must do some thorough research so that we can gather enough facts to back up our claims. Otherwise we are manufacturing and spreading false stories that will help destroy the president. But it is not also bad to hear bad news but without doing some research it would be harmful.

Once again, the mainstream media is twisting the facts and trying to tarnish Trump and his family members. Ivanka is not connected to this particular fund. It happens that it is just one of the funds which she supports.

There is such a thing as a conflict of interest. There are a lot of charities, but how often do you hear that their account has anyone filled up at $ 100 million. This is clearly a bribe. She will spend it is quite another question. In any case, helping the Fund to others, she will advertise the Trump and this is greed.

The money was donated to her charity foundation the same way clinton also received money in their foundation and we dont know till now what they did with that money. People have double standards when it comes to Trump, you cant just condemn one person and let the other go scot free, thats not fair at all.

Ok I see your point, but please consider this situation:
You are running a charity, someone is in love with you, has a lot of money and wants to be noticed by you. Instead of sending you flowers they make a huge donation to your charity, so that you might want to meet and thank them and stuff.
Would you be grateful? Would that person catch your eye? I'm quite sure they would. 
So by law it's not a bribe, but we can assume this wasn't pure generosity, but they had their reasons, that were discussed behind closed doors.

100m$??? Who cares??

You talk like you don't know who is Ivanka's father... Even if the Arabs gave that money as a bribe, nobody still won't care because 100m$ won't make a slight difference to Trump's wealth at all.

Ivanka will have 0 control or influence on how this money is spent. I'm a Trump hater but suggesting this is corruption is wrong and deflects from the real problems in the Trump administration.

You don't provide many details so I Googled: "Ivanka Trump + $100 Million" and the following results appeared: https://www.google.com/search?q=Ivank+Trump+%2B+%24100+million&rlz=1C1NHXL_enUS712US712&oq=Ivank+Trump+%2B+%24100+million&aqs=chrome..69i57.6383j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

It's a donation to a charity.

Could it be seen as a "bribe"? Sure. The Clinton's are being accused of turning many of the charitable contributions to their Clinton Global Initiative into opportunities of political access for the Governments, politicians, or businesses that made donations.

The corruption test is whether preferential treatment or access was provided to the person/entity making the donation after the donation was made. Proving this can be difficult.

So on the face it's not an impeachable offense. But if it turned into a blatant source of bribes there would be reason for investigation...probable cause.

Ask yourself if you think Hillary Clinton is guilty of corruption for allowing foreign governments, politicians, and businesses for donating to her charitable organization.

What's different in Ivanka's scenario is that this donation was given to a World Bank fund that Ivanka supports. She doesn't own it, she doesn't operate it. So based on these few details the act itself is less corrupt (if at all) than what the Clinton's have been allowed to do for 15 years.

Is it serious??
If it had happened then it must be a shame for American people, directly it is shameful for the Republican party, Trump should be ashamed of this happening. He always raise his finger to Muslim countries.
So, if this news is authentic then Trump must be ashamed..

I ask immediately apologize for this news if it's fake, but I have heard this. Has anyone heard about this? If so then is it not corruption? Is it a gift for a special Prosecutor. Trump has lost all fear of impeachment.