Author

Topic: I've found an alternative plagiarism checker. (Read 276 times)

legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
October 14, 2018, 08:50:14 AM
#3
I've tried http://plagiarisma.net/ and i can agree with it have better method, but sometimes the result is too sensitive, especially if it contains common words.

Additionally, it has limited check amount for free user and doesn't use HTTPS which is concern for Tor user like me.
member
Activity: 265
Merit: 14
Nina
Thanks for sharing the information.
I used to use https://searchenginereports.net/plagiarism-checker/ : it's very useful and help me many times find plagiarazed contents. When i tried to check the post you mentioned i got 7% to be plagiarazed. With http://plagiarisma.net/ it gave me 23% but it took too much time loading. I don't know how those services work or what techniques they use to exactly differentiate which is the best and which is the good but what i want to say here is that the proof of plagiarism could be proven in both of the two tested checkers; may be i should use the fastest one for a daily use.

Sorry for broken english
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 2444
https://JetCash.com
I checked this opening post in my usual checker, and it only detected a small percentage.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-is-a-currency-5049904

I then used a site that I haven't tried before - http://plagiarisma.net/
and I switched to checking with Google ( it provides a Bing alternative ), I removed the tick in the exact match box as well. It gave hits on almost 100% of the content, and it highlighted the extracted phrases.
Jump to: