Topic: Ivermectin and Fenbendazole found HIGHLY EFFECTIVE at preventing cancer. (Read 128 times)

Another hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) study. And one where the odds of being wrong are minuscule.


Hydroxychloroquine Does Save Lives After All, New Study Finds

---

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/10/no_author/hydroxychloroquine-does-save-lives-after-all-new-study-finds/
This study was carefully done, peer-reviewed, and published in a prestigious journal.

It looked at very sick, hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and tried to see if hydroxychloroquine, given with or without the antibiotic azithromycin, would help save lives.

The authors selected matching controls to account for any possible confounding effects.

We conducted a retrospective analysis to compare the 28-day mortality rate in 352 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin (HCQ-group) in our hospital with a contemporary control group of 3533 patients receiving standard of care from the Belgian Collaborative Group on COVID-19 Hospital Surveillance.

Scientists found that hydroxychloroquine did save lives, indeed:

A statistically significant reduction in crude mortality rate at 28 days was observed in the HCQ-group compared to standard of care (16.8% vs 25.9%,p ?= ?0.001).

For those not statistically inclined, p=0.001 means there is less than one-in-a-thousand possibility of this outcome being a random bit of luck. In other words, this is a finding of a very high degree of statistical certainty.
...

---

Well, we all knew that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) saved lives. That's why it was the medicine of request for people going into malaria zones for, like, the last 70 years or so. And it was also one of the safest medicines in all that time... so safe that it could be given to infants without any adverse effects.

But it was demonized by our demonic medical system, and has fallen out of popularity because of this.

We need to start taking a few of these simpler medicines, and stop getting vaccines. If we do, we will find that we are cured of a whole lot of maladies, and that other maladies will never develop.


Hydroxychloroquine Does Save Lives After All, New Study Finds

---

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/10/no_author/hydroxychloroquine-does-save-lives-after-all-new-study-finds/
This study was carefully done, peer-reviewed, and published in a prestigious journal.

It looked at very sick, hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and tried to see if hydroxychloroquine, given with or without the antibiotic azithromycin, would help save lives.

The authors selected matching controls to account for any possible confounding effects.

We conducted a retrospective analysis to compare the 28-day mortality rate in 352 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin (HCQ-group) in our hospital with a contemporary control group of 3533 patients receiving standard of care from the Belgian Collaborative Group on COVID-19 Hospital Surveillance.

Scientists found that hydroxychloroquine did save lives, indeed:

A statistically significant reduction in crude mortality rate at 28 days was observed in the HCQ-group compared to standard of care (16.8% vs 25.9%,p ?= ?0.001).

For those not statistically inclined, p=0.001 means there is less than one-in-a-thousand possibility of this outcome being a random bit of luck. In other words, this is a finding of a very high degree of statistical certainty.

Scientists did their utmost to eliminate any possible confounding factors, such as the effect of age and so on.

After adjustment for these variables the OR for mortality was 0.635 (95%CI 0.464–0.875). Patients who did not receive HCQ had a 57% higher risk of mortality.

Read this again: those who did not receive HCQ had a 57% greater chance of dying, all other things being equal!
...

---

Here we see it again. Possibly the whole major medical industry is wrong about our major diseases. These diseases might simply be parasite dominated. Maybe the medical industry is wrong intentionally, just to make more money.


Synergistic pairing of ivermectin and fenbendazole found HIGHLY EFFECTIVE at preventing and treating cancer

---

https://www.newstarget.com/2023-06-30-synergistic-pairing-ivermectin-fenbendazole-prevent-treat-cancer.html
During the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) "pandemic," the powers that be made it a top priority to discourage and even prevent the general public from using ivermectin as a prophylactic, instead pushing masks and "vaccines." Well now there is another use for ivermectin that is sure to put it right back in Big Pharma's crosshairs, and it involves the treatment of cancer.

One of the "side effects" of taking ivermectin for COVID, it turns out, is that it also helps prevent cancer cells and tumors from forming. This could be very helpful for those dealing with the sudden onset of "turbo cancer," a phenomenon that appeared not long after the launch of Operation Warp Speed.

If "fully vaccinated" people who got jabbed for COVID had easy access to ivermectin, many of them could potentially find relief and healing from it. And even better is the fact that fenbendazole, another anti-parasite drug, also works to fight against cancer.

"What would happen if one did a combination therapy for both the prevention and treatment of cancer using BOTH ivermectin and fenbendazole?" asks "2nd Smartest Guy in the World" on his Substack. "The synergistic pairing would be far more effective than just using one of these miraculous drugs."

Ivermectin and quercetin together fight prion diseases

When taken together, ivermectin and fenbendazole deliver a one-two punch to cancer. When combined with other anti-cancer nutrients such as quercetin, vitamins C and D, and curcumin, the effects are even more pronounced.

Preclinical studies show that both ivermectin and fenbendazole exhibit cytotoxic effects against cancer cells. The two drugs also inhibit the growth and spread of cancerous tumors.
...

---

An electron microscope only views things that are dead, and it only views them in grayscale. This means that there isn't much of a way to properly interpret what is being seen.

The Microsphere Nanoscope view things that are alive, and in color - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Microsphere+Nanoscope&t=ffab&ia=web. You can even find pictures of what it views on Youtube. Search it.

The principle was used as early as 2011, and the first actual Microsphere Nanoscope was put together as early as 2017. But even if it isn't quite as powerful as an electron microscope, looking at 'life' in color has benefits way beyond what the electron microscope can give us. So, why isn't it the rage? What is being hidden from us? If the bugs were true, no medical, AMA, CDC, Big Pharma would want to admit it. Why? It might prove that there aren't any viruses at all.


Again, peruse https://openvaers.com/. If you peruse the whole site, and put all their info together, it will show you that there are a minimum of 3,600,000 covid vaccine deaths, and many millions of covid vaccine adverse reactions in non-death areas. This is info that the CDC tricked itself into having to give us. They started withholding some of the data in 2022, because it was too damning.

Yet, the medical, the CDC, and governments are still advertising to get your Covid shot, that it is safe and healthy and beneficial and effective.

You still believe the medical? Where's your logic? When are you going to wake up and see that things in this world are far from the way you envision them? You're only looking at the tip of the iceberg.

The university I attend happens to have an electronic beam  microscope, which theorically any student can use with previous permission, so there are even more universities in the USA which likely count with such tools and regular people can use.

We are talking about a microscope, not some shady supper technology which is being kept out the eyes of the public, it would be fairly easy for a medicine student to observe a sample of a tumor under the microscope and find those bugs you are talking about.

I bet you could even rent one of those microscopes if you had the money.
Such affirmation about the bugs would be easily proven if it was true.

There are inventions galore that are not brought out into the open. And unless you have free reign to use an electron microscope as much as you want, why would you believe what the medical tells you?... considering the millions that have died worldwide from the covid vaxx -
Less than 1% of the covid adverse events have been reported
Basically less than 1% of covid vaxx adverse events - https://openvaers.com/covid-data.

The point being, why would anybody believe anything the medical says? If they happen to cure something, they could have done it far easier and cheaper some other way.

And regarding microscopes, the Microsphere Nanoscope has been around for years, and it sees everything the electron microscope does, but living and in color. Why doesn't the medical talk about it? Sounds to me like the medical is the thing that is keeping us sick, and that cures are a whole lot easier than the medical makes them out to be.

My man, that does not make any sense at all.
Parasites are supposed to be living organisms made of one of multiple cells. Nowadays we have the technology of electronic beam microscopes which are able to make us see things as small as a single unit of a virus, which are smaller than a cell.

There are even machines which have allowed scientists to observe collection of molecules and atoms.

Also, I just made a quick research and I found out Hulda Clark actually died from cancer, Do you think would be appropriate to take such sensitive advise from someone who made such claims and yet was not even able to cure herself?

Honestly, I wished such serious disease was so easy to prevent and cure, though some pills of ivermectin, but it is not the case.

While people are continually dying from the covid shots in the US and Europe, here's a country that used Ivermectin instead... and it's a third world country. Maybe the US and third world countries are starting to change places.


Most Intensive Ivermectin Use Had 74% Reduction In Excess Deaths In Peru: New Study

---

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/most-intensive-ivermectin-use-had-74-percent-reduction-excess-deaths-peru-new-study
The paper's results, published August 8 in Cureus, found a 74 percent reduction in excess deaths in 10 states with the most intensive ivermectin use over a 30-day period following peak deaths during the pandemic. When analyzing data across 25 states in Peru, researchers found these reductions in excess deaths correlated closely to ivermectin use during four months in 2020.

When ivermectin was available without restriction, there was a fourteenfold reduction in nationwide excess deaths. Once access to ivermectin was restricted by the government, a thirteenfold increase in excess deaths was observed in the two months following the limitation of its use. The findings align with summary data from the World Health Organization for the same time period in Peru.

Ivermectin is a widely-known and inexpensive treatment against parasitic diseases. Scientists believe the drug can also bind to the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, limiting its morbidity and infectivity.
...

---

There are a couple of interesting things about this. One is that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was a favorite medicine for curing/controlling malaria, until it was found that cures/controls Covid. Before Covid, HCQ was declared one of the safest medications around by the WHO... safe even for children, and in high doses. Now, all of a sudden, HCQ is somewhat dangerous if not carefully taken under medically controlled conditions.

Then, as we see in the OP post, animal parasite controller medicines cure/control cancer in people. But the WHO doesn't say anything about it.

The point is, why should we believe the WHO when they say that artemisinin controls/cures malaria? Who is putting pressure on the WHO so that they keep on saying that HCQ is 'bad' so that they need to find a new malaria treatment for people? And why would you even believe them when they did such a deceptive about face with HCQ?

Since many drugs are developed from plants (as you will see in the below article for artemisinin), drugs can be sort of safe when used as directed, and only for a short while. All the double-talk and incomplete info put out by the medical and the WHO is only designed so that the medical companies can make more money, without becoming liable enough to destroy them or wreck their "good" name.


WHO: Artemisinin is a powerful remedy against malaria

---

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-06-30-who-artemisinin-powerful-remedy-against-malaria.html
Last November, the World Health Organization (WHO) published a Question & Answer page about artemisinin providing partial protection against malaria infections.

Artemisinin, a natural constituent derived from the Artemisia annua plant, also known as sweet wormwood, as well as its derivatives, are described by the WHO as "powerful medicines known for their ability to swiftly reduce the number of Plasmodium parasites in the blood of patients with malaria."

In order to effectively control malaria once it starts spreading, powerful anti-malarial medicines are necessary, of which artemisinin and its various derivatives are included. Known as artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs), the WHO recommends these as first- and second-line treatment for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria and chloroquine-resistant P. vivax malaria.

Right now, the latter version is said to have infected four people in Sarasota, Fla. Transmission there was local, meaning the infected caught it locally rather than overseas – which has not happened there since the 1950s, according to health officials.

While there is not yet a conceivable "outbreak," so to speak, since transmission is low, it is still a good idea to keep in mind which remedies work best for treating malaria. And one of the most powerful is artemisinin and its derivatives, which include artesunate, artemether, and dihydroartemisinin.

The WHO recommends pairing these derivatives with a partner drug to help reduce the number of malaria parasites, known as parasite biomass, during the first three days of treatment. The partner drug, meanwhile, eliminates the rest of the remaining parasites, rendering it the "cure."

Currently, the WHO recommends six different ACTs. Two of them are injectable – one with artesunate and the other with artemether – and these are recommended for cases of severe malaria. After getting these injections, patients are advised to follow up with an oral ACT regimen, just so long as they are able to tolerate it.
...

---

Hulda Clark showed us years and years ago that cancer is caused by tiny bugs. Bugs, not viruses. And that the bugs are much smaller than the standard microscopes can see. These bugs are essentially parasites. So, it's not surprising that ivermectin and fenbendazole (anti-parasitic drugs) can cure cancer.

Back in early 2011, a microscope was invented that can view living things in living color that could only be seen dead, with an electron microscope, previously. It's call the Microsphere Nanoscope, and it can see things much smaller than Hulda Clark's microscope. Where is this microscope today? Why haven't we heard anything about it? Could it be that the leaders in the medical are trying to hide the truth about cancer from us... for money making purposes?


Synergistic pairing of ivermectin and fenbendazole found HIGHLY EFFECTIVE at preventing and treating cancer

---

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-06-30-synergistic-pairing-ivermectin-fenbendazole-prevent-treat-cancer.html
During the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) "pandemic," the powers that be made it a top priority to discourage and even prevent the general public from using ivermectin as a prophylactic, instead pushing masks and "vaccines." Well now there is another use for ivermectin that is sure to put it right back in Big Pharma's crosshairs, and it involves the treatment of cancer.

One of the "side effects" of taking ivermectin for COVID, it turns out, is that it also helps prevent cancer cells and tumors from forming. This could be very helpful for those dealing with the sudden onset of "turbo cancer," a phenomenon that appeared not long after the launch of Operation Warp Speed.

If "fully vaccinated" people who got jabbed for COVID had easy access to ivermectin, many of them could potentially find relief and healing from it. And even better is the fact that fenbendazole, another anti-parasite drug, also works to fight against cancer.

"What would happen if one did a combination therapy for both the prevention and treatment of cancer using BOTH ivermectin and fenbendazole?" asks "2nd Smartest Guy in the World" on his Substack. "The synergistic pairing would be far more effective than just using one of these miraculous drugs."

(Related: Gold standard medical science proves that ivermectin is a powerful remedy against COVID.)

Ivermectin and quercetin together fight prion diseases

When taken together, ivermectin and fenbendazole deliver a one-two punch to cancer. When combined with other anti-cancer nutrients such as quercetin, vitamins C and D, and curcumin, the effects are even more pronounced.

Preclinical studies show that both ivermectin and fenbendazole exhibit cytotoxic effects against cancer cells. The two drugs also inhibit the growth and spread of cancerous tumors.
...

---