Topic: Ivermectin Emerges as a Significant Aid in Cancer Treatment (Read 93 times)

Don't know how this got into this topic, but by law, if there isn't any affidavit regarding the so-called swearing in, then the swearing in doesn't count. Anybody can stand in a room with other people and a flag, and take an oath. But the Oath of Office to uphold the Constitution must have the affidavit on file, executed within 30 days of the actual taking of the Oath. If it isn't done that way, the Oath and the swearing in are not valid.

Ivermectin is a horse dewormer. But I'm sure that it is used with other animals, as well. AND, people can buy it with a perscription if they don't want to use the horse kind.

Now Fenbendazole, another pet deworner, is being proven as a cancer cure. Check it out. Note that you can even get Fenbendazole in the pet department at Walmart... under a different name.


Fenbendazole acts as a moderate microtubule destabilizing agent and causes cancer cell death

---

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-30158-6
Drugs that are already clinically approved or experimentally tested for conditions other than cancer, but are found to possess previously unrecognized cytotoxicity towards malignant cells, may serve as fitting anti-cancer candidates. Methyl N-(6-phenylsulfanyl-1H benzimidazol-2-yl) carbamate [Fenbendazole, FZ], a benzimidazole compound, is a safe and inexpensive anthelmintic drug possessing an efficient anti-proliferative activity. In our earlier work, we reported a potent growth-inhibitory activity of FZ caused partially by impairment of proteasomal function. Here, we show that FZ demonstrates moderate affinity for mammalian tubulin and exerts cytotoxicity to human cancer cells at micromolar concentrations. Simultaneously, it caused mitochondrial translocation of p53 and effectively inhibited glucose uptake, expression of GLUT transporters as well as hexokinase (HK II) - a key glycolytic enzyme that most cancer cells thrive on. It blocked the growth of human xenografts in nu/nu mice model when mice were fed with the drug orally. The results, in conjunction with our earlier data, suggest that FZ is a new microtubule interfering agent that displays anti-neoplastic activity and may be evaluated as a potential therapeutic agent because of its effect on multiple cellular pathways leading to effective elimination of cancer cells.
...

---

Another cancer cure, but not a dewormer. Cancer would have been cured in everybody long ago if they had used some of these treatments simultaneously. Look at the threat expressed in the article, below.


Cancer Cured for All 12 patients who experienced complete rectal cancer remission after receiving dostarlimab, a monoclonal antibody.

---

https://choiceclips.whatfinger.com/2024/04/09/cancer-cured-for-all-12-patients-who-experienced-complete-rectal-cancer-remission-after-receiving-dostarlimab-a-monoclonal-antibody/
Since Doctors make a fortune treating cancer, a great question then is this: Salty Goat asks: So how long until they restrict it's use or make it illegal for doctors to use it?

----------

SaltyGoat
@SaltyGoat17
·
Follow
“It’s absolutely incredible ... We’ve certainly never seen this before.”

All 12 patients experienced complete rectal cancer remission after receiving dostarlimab, a monoclonal antibody.

So how long until they restrict it's use or make it illegal for doctors to use it? Show more
...

---

Seems that you are missing the point as usual. The Oath videos are not evidence of anybody taking the Oath... if they are not followed up by an affidavit of the taking of the Oath, within 30 days of taking the Oath.

When one does a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request, it is government people who respond to the FOIA, right? Perhaps the government people responding to the FOIA should be checked to see if they have a proper Oath affidavit on file.

So, produce a properly authorized affidavit for these people before you say that they took the Oath properly. If you can find these affidavits, let us know where and how you found them. Why? So we can go and check the affidavits to see if they were done the prescribed way. If they weren't, not only are the Oaths false, but the affidavits are false, as well... at least regarding the official, governmental, positions that these people are holding.

If you want to get lots of people to take Ivermectin, inject it in the @$$. This way people will get the humiliation they desire. And you can give a bull@#$^ excuse like saying that the shot will make a bruise, so you might as well inject it somewhere that is not so visible.

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

if the truth were on your side, why are so many of your arguments based on lies?


Yes she does.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jw1_00uI02U

Yes he did.



Yes he did.




https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-merrick-garland-takes-oath-as-u-s-attorney-general


How about you go fact check the rest of your list and report back with what you find...

But how can they get away with it? Law requires that if people hold government office, they need to take the Oath of Office to support the Constitution. Since a bunch of them haven't taken the Oath, how can they even be in government?

Possibly the most important question is, have the Supreme Court justices taken the Oath? If they have, what will they do regarding the others in government? If they haven't, who is there that has enough authority and strength to take them all down? Trump?

And if they get away with this, it's easy to see how the FDA gets away with lies and misleading information to the public.


No Oaths of Office in the Federal Government

---

https://banned.video/watch?id=66152d8b34a98569f6ba4367
On January 10th of 1963, forty-five current communist goals were submitted to the Congressional record. Number thirteen was, "Do away with loyalty oaths."

Sixty years later on the very same day, Biden, Obrador, and Trudeau met in Mexico City for the Declaration of North America which states a plan to unify North America under the ideas of diversity, climate change, migration, health, and regional security. The beginnings of a North American Union, which is a step towards a one world government.

According to law, elected officials must swear an oath that they will support, defend, and bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. And through the Freedom of Information Act, US attorney Todd Callender, along with his team at Project Proper Oath, found that not a single member of the existing cabinet has a valid oath of office.

US Secretary of the Treasury, Janet Yellen, has no oath of office.

US Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin, has no oath of office, and has also failed to register as a foreign agent, which is required due to serving on the boards and conducting international business with Raytheon, Nucor, and Tenet Healthcare.

US Attorney General, Merrick Garland, has no oath of office.

US Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, has no oath of office.

US Secretary of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, has no oath of office.

US Secretary of Transportation, Pete Buttigieg, has no oath of office.
...

---

It took them long enough. Will there be any punishment for them for tricking the public, and killing possibly tens of thousands thereby? Doubt it.


FDA Finally Takes Down Ivermectin Posts After Settlement

---

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fda-finally-takes-down-ivermectin-posts-after-settlement
The FDA removed posts from X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn that stated: "You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously y'all. Stop it."

The posts had remained up even after the regulatory agency agreed to take them down as part of a settlement in a legal case brought by doctors who said the posts wrongly interfered with their practice of medicine.

The March 21 settlement said the FDA would take down specific posts within 21 days. The posts were made in August 2021.

The FDA has also deleted the following posts:

An Aug. 21, 2021, Instagram post that said: "You are not a horse. Stop it with the #ivermectin. It's not authorized for treating #COVID."

An April 26, 2022, Twitter post that said: "Hold your horses ya'll. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn't authorized or approved to treat COVID-19."

The posts directed people to an FDA webpage titled, "Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19." The page itself acknowledged that the FDA has approved ivermectin for some uses but said "taking a drug for an unapproved use can be very dangerous" and "currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19."

The agency pointed to a database of clinical trials testing ivermectin against COVID-19; some of the trials showed the drug works against the illness.

Doctors commonly prescribe FDA-approved drugs for a range of purposes, including some outside the scope of approval. The practice is known as off-label prescription.
...

---

What is Ivermectin?
But search and find your own answers - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Ivermectin&ia=web.

The important thing is that Ivermectin is a dewormer and antiparasitic - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivermectin. There are others - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=various+animal+dewormers&ia=web - like Fenbendazole - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=fenbendazole&ia=web -  that some people say helps cure cancer - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=fenbendazole+and+cancer&ia=web. But nothing will cure cancer if people don't know about it, or if they don't use it.

Seems like the medical is covering up a lot of simple treatments and cures. Why? Could it be that they are trying to make more money?


Ivermectin Emerges as a Significant Aid in Cancer Treatment

---

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2024/04/09/ivermectin-emerges-as-a-significant-aid-in-cancer-treatment/
Roman Balmakov of EpochTV is the best news presenter in the business. In this 13 minute video Balmakov reports successes from the use of Ivermectin in cancer treatment.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/ivermectin-as-a-powerful-drug-for-fighting-cancer-a-look-at-the-evidence-facts-matter-5622050?utm_source=Enews&utm_campaign=etv1-2024-04-05&utm_medium=email&utm_content=upvideo&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAceE5JjMFys3H%2BbdAvWpUcQzPZ0WlGLZbDFlFfmdQNQ%3D%3D

As I reported during the 3 years of orchestrated Covid hysteria, both HCQ and Ivermectin are preventers and cures of Covid. The medical authorities knew this, but they suppressed it,
because if they acknowledged that a cure existed, the Covid "vaccine" could not be released under emergency authorization.

As the "vaccine" had not gone through the required testing, it could not be released for use under normal conditions. Therefore, it was a known risk, and the emergency use authorization protected the pharmaceutical companies from liability.

As the "medical authorities" –FDA, CDC, NIH, WHO–are all shills for the profits of Big Pharma and exist in a revolving door relationship with Big Pharma–Fauci himself shared patent ownership with Big Pharma–an untested vaccine was falsely and illegally released under false pretenses. Big Pharma made billions of dollars, and millions of "vaccinated" victims died or had health injuries. This is an established fact, not a "conspiracy theory" as Big Pharma's "fact checkers" proclaim. It is an established scientific fact totally ignored by the whore media, medical boards, and the Big Pharma operatives that constitute the "medical regulatory authorities."

As a consequence of legislation lobbied to passage by Big Pharma and insurance companies, fewer and fewer doctors are in private practice. Instead they are employees, which means they are accountable to their employer, some HMO, and not to their patients. Medical insurance has not adjusted to this fact.
...

---