Jim Kunstler's 2014 Forecast - A year made for Bitcoin?

oOoOo

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Here are some more quotes from his original article (though unrelated to Bitcoin):

Quote

Computer technology, produces diminishing returns and unanticipated consequences. The server farms are huge energy sinks. Online shopping corrodes the resilience of commercial networks when only a few giant companies remain standing; and so on. Problems like these recall the central collapse theory of Joseph Tainter which states that heaping additional complexity on dysfunctional hyper-complex societies tends to induce their collapse. Hence, my insistence that downscaling, simplifying, re-localizing and re-setting the systems we depend on are imperative to keep the project of civilization going. That is, if you prefer civilization to its known alternatives.

and:

Quote

Car culture and chain store tyranny have destroyed the physical fabric of our communities and wrecked social relations. These days, a successful Main Street is one that has a wig shop and a check-cashing office. It is sickening to see what we have become. Our popular entertainments are just what you would design to produce a programmed population of criminals and sex offenders.

^This is why I love JHK. Some of his writing is fantastic! With unique insights and a very well-chosen vocabulary to describe our predicament. Always fun to read! :thumb:

Dr Bloggood

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Well, if he mentions BTC, then quote it! Have no fear!

2014 might very well be the year the big one hits or starts. And when it does, I'm sure BTC will get the biggest boost it has ever gotten.

Silver, gold and bitcoin, baby! Bring it on!

granathus

full member

Activity: 294

Merit: 100

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-01-06/jim-kunstlers-2014-forecast-burning-down-house

Wow.

I just read Jim Kunstler's take on the year ahead, and it made me realize what possibilities lie ahead. Sure, he is a big bear, but I can't disagree with much of what he says.

Like:

The worldwide rise in interest rates holds every possibility for igniting a shitstorm in interest rate swaps and upsetting the whole apple-cart of shadow banking and derivatives. That would be a bullet in the head to the TBTF banks, and would therefore lead to a worldwide crisis. In that event, the eventual winners would be the largest holders of gold, who could claim to offer the world a trustworthy gold-backed currency, especially for transactions in vital resources like oil. That would, of course, be China. The process would be awfully disorderly and fraught with political animus. Given the fact that China’s own balance sheet is hopelessly non-transparent and part-and-parcel of a dishonest crony banking system, China would have to use some powerful smoke-and-mirrors to assume that kind of dominant authority. But in the end, it comes down to who has the real goods, and who screwed up (the USA, Europe, Japan) and China, for all its faults and perversities, has the gold.

And:

I think we’re near the end of these reindeer games with gold, largely because so many vaults in the West have been emptied. That places constraints on further shenanigans in the paper gold (and silver) markets. In an environment where both the destructive forces of deflation and inflation can be unleashed in sequence, uncertainty is the greatest motivator, trumping the usual greed and fear seen in markets that can be fairly measured against stable currencies. In 2014, the public has become aware of the bank “bail-in” phenomenon which, along with rehypothication schemes, just amounts to the seizure of customer and client accounts — a really new wrinkle in contemporary banking relations. Nobody knows if it’s safe to park cash money anywhere except inside the mattress. The precedent set in Cyprus, and the MF Global affair, and other confiscation events, would tend to support an interest in precious metals held outside the institutional framework. Uncertainty rules.

Some new currency will need to replace the dollar, and I doubt it will be just a change to a new fiat. Exciting times ahead for sure!

Kunstler is not a believer in Bitcoin by the way. Mentions it in the article.

Edit: Here is what he says about Bitcoin:

I get a lot of email on the subject of Bitcoin. Here’s how I feel about it.
It’s an even more abstract form of “money” than fiat currencies or securities based on fiat currencies. Do we need more abstraction in our economic lives? I don’t think so. I believe the trend will be toward what is real. For the moment, Bitcoin seems to be enjoying some success as it beats back successive crashes. I’m not very comfortable with the idea of investing in an algorithm. I don’t see how it is impervious to government hacking. In fact, I’d bet that somewhere in the DOD or the NSA or the CIA right now some nerd is working on that. Bitcoin is provoking imitators, other new computer “currencies.” Why would Bitcoin necessarily enjoy dominance? And how many competing algorithmic currencies can the world stand? Wouldn’t that defeat the whole purpose of an alternative “go to” currency? All I can say is that I’m not buying Bitcoins.

Topic: Jim Kunstler's 2014 Forecast - A year made for Bitcoin? (Read 821 times)