I think John Connor should offer the exploits for a reward/bounty, if they do really exist.
I thought he was about the improvement of crypto, I mean there are plenty of really good aspects of Vcash that are making crypto payments easier, shouldn't he 'help out' Monero by telling them what their expoits are?
If it is personal, he is ignoring the mass of users, who could lose coins or have their value greatly reduced by these exploits being exploited. That seems irresponsible to me.
He did state that there would be some sort of event to Monero in March, so his track record is as shady as his self-congratulatory claims in all areas of cryptocurrency. I just think it's amusing that he and his shills/sock-puppets actively start arguments with BTC and Monero developers and then play the victim card as soon as they hit back--it's like that bratty cousin who hit you and ran away when you were kids. Add an over playing of persecution complex and you have the complete vcash playbook.
And yes, some time stamps would help you look less like a liar Mr. Connor. I can't find anything on twitter that leads me to believe you knew anything before the actual attack took place--it's akin of some army representative saying that he predicted that 24/7 radar use would help stop an attack the day after the Pearl harbor attack, but can't provide any evidence other than his word--well, duh, thanks for nothing. Unless you can find a publicly verifiable source, your word is as good as your reputation, and in this case, that ain't so hot.
