Politics and Alcohol rarely go well together 
This!
relationship between both is not new its nearly many centuries old
Topic: Just come back from the pub (Read 799 times)
This!
relationship between both is not new its nearly many centuries old
Politics and Alcohol rarely go well together
This!
relationship between both is not new its nearly many centuries old
Politics and Alcohol rarely go well together
This!
Politics and Alcohol rarely go well together
Politics and society: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=34.0
i think there is a button to move thread when you press Edit.
i think there is a button to move thread when you press Edit.
Its never good to bomb anyone. prejudices aside, why would you want to do that.
Possible answers:
Because they bombed you first.
Because they will bomb you if you don't bomb them first.
i can always see two sides of a coin but the guy i mentioned proper freaked out becuase he took a view that you should always help out and bomb the "bad people" based on "intelligence information"........ bbc propaganda brainwash bullshit inmho. Its never good to bomb anyone. prejudices aside, why would you want to do that.
the difference being that chem weapons take out wide swaths of civilian population whereas conventional weapons have a narrower target of others who picked up weapons themselves' unless the innocent target is specifically acquired leaving it easy to see where abuses of warfare are happening... after seeing conventional tanks blasting standard housing projects, the abuses have been around since the start... that's where the ground troops should be used but then the human shield tactics get used...warfare all around sucks shit on either side whether conventional or not..i still think other countries should stay out
..and wouldn't acquiring and destroying specific targeted depots just release as much deadly gas as lobbing from a rocket launcher?...maybe the instant burn takes up the majority...IDK
whos to say which side was the true distributor of the chem attack?..was you..no it was you
..and wouldn't acquiring and destroying specific targeted depots just release as much deadly gas as lobbing from a rocket launcher?...maybe the instant burn takes up the majority...IDK
whos to say which side was the true distributor of the chem attack?..was you..no it was you
cheers Rez, going to try and find the politics thread now ;-=)
This probably belongs in "Politics and Society" but I feel ya.
Hello folks, check this out.
I just got back from the pub, great night out in my local. However i have something that i just have to mention because its winding me up.
Let me knwo what you tink please.
I was drilling a bloke from london about the syria thing and this chap was the only guy that i felt on the level with all night, whatevr we was on about, he understood me and my bullshit blah blah blah. However when we started taling about syria and i said that it was wrong to drop bombs on people no matter what.... he piped up and said fuck off we should support the kids that have been chemicalised etc etc. i said what about the 80k peeple that have already died with mortas and bullets etc no one gived a fuck then.
Anyhows he done one (fucked off) on the belief that it is always good to "save" people that are getting abused, no matter what, my view is that to throw a few tomahawks to "help out" is not really the best of ideas.
I dont believe in left OR right wing and this sort of atitude just seems to sum that up, so anyhows what does anyone here think?
ta, from a drunken bitcoin enthuist in the midlands, england.
I just got back from the pub, great night out in my local. However i have something that i just have to mention because its winding me up.
Let me knwo what you tink please.
I was drilling a bloke from london about the syria thing and this chap was the only guy that i felt on the level with all night, whatevr we was on about, he understood me and my bullshit blah blah blah. However when we started taling about syria and i said that it was wrong to drop bombs on people no matter what.... he piped up and said fuck off we should support the kids that have been chemicalised etc etc. i said what about the 80k peeple that have already died with mortas and bullets etc no one gived a fuck then.
Anyhows he done one (fucked off) on the belief that it is always good to "save" people that are getting abused, no matter what, my view is that to throw a few tomahawks to "help out" is not really the best of ideas.
I dont believe in left OR right wing and this sort of atitude just seems to sum that up, so anyhows what does anyone here think?
ta, from a drunken bitcoin enthuist in the midlands, england.
Jump to: