i think this not a good idea. you must give them only a feedback on their trust and not expose them publicly. because all members have a freedom on what they do. they didn't scam people and you never know that what if the accused didn't know that he/she already spamming? we have different interpretation on spamming. but this is not a big deal unless they spam censored words or flammy. but if it not the case. i think you don't have the right to post it here publicly. this is the job of moderator. Even the moderator didn't expose the user who committed spam so why do you? i appreciate your act. but this is too harsh. Just saying, because we are all human, and we can't avoid to do mistake. Personally when im newbie, i committed also spam and the mods delete my post. as simply as that. That's why we have mods here.
Wow. Quoting the giant block of text.
Anyway, what's wrong with talking about spammers? They are posting publicly, with non-constructive and insubstantial replies which are a detriment to the forum. This list has references to their posts. There are clear rules. The first rule is literally, "1. No zero or low value, pointless or uninteresting posts or threads."
All of the users here that I have put on the list, in my opinion, have pointless posts and most post on pointless threads. If they have a problem, they can inform me and show me why they're not spamming. Why they're contributing to the discussion.
He is trying to contribute to the community/forum by identifying who are those who are just taking advantage of the signature campaign . Instead of us saying he is just looking for attention lets do our part as well to clean up the forum.
OP there's a thread like this but it's posted in Meta and it gets the attention of hilariousandco and when he did, he usually take action, I think it's much better if it's moved to that section.
Thanks for the support, but I think Reputation is a better section. Meta is for forum discussion, but Reputation made more sense in my mind. If it has to be moved to Meta, then sure. But I think here is fine.
Be specific on your accusation there so you would not create any commotion among those listed above,
And the big question is why are you doing this? You want to be on dt2 list? Or you just make it just to earn positive trust score to the dt2 members? Or you just want to earn sympathy and make your name create some noise here?
what i am seeing here is you only want some attention
How come you instantly are thinking that I have some sort of ulterior motive? It's a list to help better the forum. Do you know how much better it would be if all those megathreads were closed, or at the very least devoid of spammers? If you go into Bitcoin Discussion, Economics, Speculation, Gambling (especially Gambling) onto any thread with a high number of pages, you'll see every single post is just garbage and spam.
Understand that I wish for that to end. Even Meta sometimes gets signature spammers around.
I'd like to nominate wine132, who is currently applying for the secondstrade campaign, and even though he might not get accepted, he will no doubt try others and contin. to befoul this fine forum. I have reported some of his posts already.
Specifically, this user's posts have no capitalization, no punctuation, are in poor English, and repeat the same thing over and over while daying absolutely nothing. The posts are rushed and obviously done only to get paid.
Soon to come. Also, clean up your own posts a bit.
