in short regulations only ask for MSB to report people who make transactions over 10k in a lump/small time frame of smaller amounts that can be seen as moving a large amount often.
they need to gather identification info to ensure people dont just make multiple accounts..
but essentially its not a regulatory requirement to ask for income statements. infact 90% of KYC is about regulators telling companies to make their own policy handbooks on how the company will identify suspicious transactions. rather than a regulator demanding an entire life history
thus regulators dont need to know all that crap, but its the company that would ask all that crap because the company fears that not having peoples entire private/personal life story will get them in trouble.
in my eyes i have seen many exchanges overstep their boundaries. infact companies are not suppose to even freeze/seize assets, not even allowed to inform customers that a sars file has been sent to authorities or that the customer is under investigation/review.
the company is suppose to not act as a authority, but simply a witness.. allowing the transaction to go through as normal and just report the suspicious activity confidentially. its for the real authorities to get a court order and apply a asset seizure. not the company independently/by choice just seize funds
so when i see exchanges do crap like this, my mind says that the company has no clue and does not even know its job/purpose
Yes, I'm thinking quite the same thing.
Nobody has asked Bitstamp to collect that much data.
I had sent them proof of ID, proof of address, and details of the bank account I've used with their services, and all that is fine with me, but they have no need to know more. I mean that, nothing more would be needed to buy a car, and get it registered.
It's especially shocking that I've only done a very few trades with Bitstamp. I did way more trades with bitcoin.de or Kraken, and they ahev'nt asked anything. I'm still checking a few things, but I think I will close my account.