How do we know that the owners of eth addresses are not connected with each other? I mean, who knows, only one person owns all of that addresses. Tracing addys via etherscan is not effective anymore as you can create eth addys as many as you can without being connected with each other? And as you said, only time will tell to trust this project.
Well you can't know for sure I guess, but I believe the first bid was from this reddit
user and I don't know him from anything at all.
Do you really believe that there would be someone who would believe to these words? lol
Trust And Time
"As the author, I commit not to withdraw money from the contract, and to sell the Lambowei only to museums / art galleries to preserve it."
And I haven't broken my word. This is a blockchain art experiment, the idea that the Lambowei (the physical piece of art) is at least as valuable as the contract is realized through the fact the owner has access to the contract's value.
This is a Ponzi and no one believes such shit. You are the one probably depositing in the contract address to make it look fair and legit.
It's your opinion, but I disagree. In the end there's a physical good, the Lambowei, that the owner can sell and reimburse the last bidder and still the owner wouldn't have had to withdraw anything from the contract.
Good guess, but that only would mean I've outbid some lucky bidders.
I am suspicious that other depositors are also you.
That's a fair suspicion, however it's just not true.
Anyway it's a dumb game and wouldn't find any interest. Keep playing it yourself.
Good luck.
No doubts its ponzi scheme since OP already mentioned that previous bidder will get 2x from new bidder. What will happen if there is no new bidder after 1 bid?
I could sell the Lambowei (the physical piece of art with the digital display) and reimburse the last bidder. But yes, it's a high risk (but high reward) gamble.
Your unique idea isn't going to work for you. This is the worst idea ever I have seen to raised money. Those arts have been added, I don't think any reputed museum will buy it. On that case I am fully agree with @Avirunes, you are just biding yourself in order to attract peoples. But investors become more quite conscious now, and likely they will avoid such as shady game.
Obviously I disagree. Right now it only represents the high risk/reward factor, but over time as the contract stays and the owner refuses to withdraw anything, this could become a symbol of trust in the blockchain world. I've been scammed by mt.gox, so I know how it feels and I won't do that to other people.
There is no guarantee for new investors that how they would get return money, but when someone going to bid means he is going to pay previous bidder. So how a investors would sent money such as unconfirmed ponzi scheme?
It could take time to get a new bid. In the end the owner could just sell the Lambowei and reimburse the last bidder. If it gets to that I, as the owner, will do that.
I think there are some point in this project that you will be thinking if it is not legit project because on it s offer and because on how they describe about their project. But for me it bring too much fun and excitement even if this project is too close of being scam because this is the real gambling,have too much of risk.
Thanks, I'm glad you enjoy it.