Topic: Lažov Lucija (Read 672 times)

Vidiš nije loša ideja ako mi bude falilo postova za ispuniti tjednu kvotu

Ma meni je to 'sig spamer' hrpa sranja. Ja imam uvijek 10ak postova preko kvote jer mi je to neki tjedni prosjek a za Roobet je dosta al u BitVestu sam pisao svašta i odgovarao na svašta. Svi smo mi na neki način signature spammeri i svjesni smo toga. Vjerojatno su neki zato i toliko defenzivni na tu temu.

Oho! Vidim li ja to novu temu u meti: cryptofrka is signature spammer by Rikafip ?  

Kako ne. Odi fino ostavi koji komentar da odradiš tjednu sig kvotu

Kako ne. Odi fino ostavi koji komentar da odradiš tjednu sig kvotu

Onaj zadnji post u temi mi je najveći cirkus, lik shera neke postove da eto dokaze da onaj nije sig spammer.

Ne kužim kako se ljudima da svađati na internetu.

🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️


Ne znam o čemu pričaš. Nedostaje ti još 80-tak merita za Hero. Čak i ovim tempom to ćeš skupiti za par mjeseci.
 

---

Jedno retoričko pitanje. Zar ne ispunjavamo svi, koji smo u sig. kampanjama, svoje tjedne kvote? Što je tu sporno? To je činjenica.

Bože u kakvu se sapunicu pretvorio običan komentar o ispunjenu CM kvote... (sad mi ovdje dali facepalm smajli)

Ako zbog ne pisanja u engleskom dijelu foruma zauvijek ostanem Sr. Member, neka. Barem ću sačuvati i ovo malo živaca što mi je ostalo.

Lijepo savjetujem ljudima da zatvore temu a oni se nekako uvijek još dublje ukopaju.

A baš mi je zabavna Lucija.

Nisi prvi koji je predložio zatvaranje te teme, ali neće biti zaktvorena jer ima podršku elitnih članova kao što je hacker100110100

@dkbit98 - ti ga nekad uletis sirovo po meni, ali ja to shvacam kao tvoj stil haha, garant si neki nabrijani horoskopski znak

I was wondering when you would pull this case out, and it's entirely justified that this feedback should have been neutral - but I still refuse to change it even though they kicked me out of DT for it and none of the DT members will give me positive feedback because I am trust abuser. But how many such trust abuse is given by DT members in past and even today, and I do not see anyone kicked out from DT for doing that...

In fact, I'm glad I found out what some members think of me, and that you completely agree with dkbit98 that I am posting in this forum only to fill my signature quota+that I am making fake claims+that I am just a kid.

As I already wrote, I did not expect any support from the local board, and the fact that I was proposed as a moderator at one point means nothing - I left the local board because I received the same messages as in this case - posting just for fill my daily quota. Everyone just wants me to lock the thread, has freedom of expression got to the point that a few posts will destroy the forum?

Predlažem ti da zaboraviš ovu besplodnu raspravnu, život je prekratak za to 

Niti sam analizirao njegove postove, niti sam rekao da je spamer.
Još kaže da svi imamo zavist i prezir prema drugima koji su u CM kampanji veću glupost skoro nisam čuo.
Ja sam njega otpisao i stavio na ignore posle svega.
Želim mu sve najbolje.

I avoid this part of the forum as much as possible because I am not a person who enjoys endless discussions about someone’s reputation or similar things. I try to follow the rules of the forum and be as correct as possible towards other users, which I do not always succeed in, but I think that most people perceive me as a positive person on the forum (exceptions, of course, always exist).

What particularly bothers me is that someone calls me a signature spammer, because I have never been one and I have zero tolerance for such people. Although I do not pay much attention to such things, I have been in a similar situation many times as today, so I think I should react and point out the somewhat strange behavior of a user who indirectly called me a signature spammer. He of course shares the opinion of some other members of my local community who also used the same terminology when I was concerned.

I would ask members to visit this topic : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5265233.20 (https://archive.vn/lehNQ) and to tell me what they think of the member dkbit98 and his opinion that I am a signature spammer or his attitude in general when we speak of some solid facts?

Interestingly, the person in question shares an identical opinion with his colleague from the local board :



Translated : "Glad it helps you in your CM weekly quota"

I know that there is great envy and contempt for those who are members of the CM campaign, and dkbit98 is applied in same campaign few times (unsuccessful) just like his pal btcltcdigger - but that does not give them the right to call other signatures spammers.

Question I want to ask the members of this forum: In your opinion, is Lucius a person who only meets his signature quota, which would mean that he is a signature spammer, or are user comments like dkbit98 completely unfounded and inappropriate?

Local rule : dkbit98&btcltcdigger are not allowed to post here - their opinion is already quite familiar to me.