Topic: Lauda must be getting paid from group of lenders for not negging them (Read 532 times)

I see that you've been tagging some people with open Scam accusations, but not all of them. Therefore, you are making the trust system very shady. - OP logic.

OP, IMHO you deserve to be lit up like a Christmas Tree. Spamming us with 5,6,7,8,9 new threads only hurt you, not help. What's next, the "highly accurate" poll thread? 
For help, you should try some soothing salve.

community
noun

 a body of persons of common and especially professional interests scattered through a larger society

---

Huh, I guess you're right. Lauda is a cat, after all.

I side with Lauda and I think you are a cunt

You are NOT in the side of deciding whether it is a bullshit or delusional. Lets wait for this community to decide.

Which is absolute bullshit and has nothing to do with the reality that we live in. Maybe you're having delusions such as Quickseller tends to.

I've read all existing posts / don't care when you aren't literate enough to properly create a thread.

Two sentences that defeat the very thread that you've built. I can't tag: 1) Everyone. 2) Things that I don't see. 3) Everyone for the same reason as situations tend to be quite complex (e.g. contributing members, randoms, repeated offenders, bias, et. al.). 4) Things that I don't want to. I could tag a single user out of a big group for reason X, even though every participant of the group was implicated in X.

You are not having same stand on account selling to all the people here. I guess this will be more than enough reason for anyone to assume about shady behaviors for your own benefits. Shady behavior = potential scam.

It is already notified by @sbogovac. Better read previous posts before you make one. It will help avoiding repeated things

I never asked to tag every single user. Where did I ask that ?

1) This isn't a scam of any kind.
2) This is wrongly formatted as is.
3) Do I look like a robot? An ET? An alien? I can't manage to tag every single user for every single reason that I am tagging for. Unlike people like you, I am actually busy building stuff / helping others. Not that this is something you're familiar with.

I SMELL PUSSY!

This accusation has nothing to do with my account nor its trust scores. Please take time to read OP

I will try to follow the format. Thank you for suggesting.

What to do. Until it becomes personal, I am too not finding time to fight for this community !

Don't forget to include the part where you asked me to remove your negative and I said no.

OK, first of all thank you for trying to report a scam(-mer) and trying to help this community get a bit safer. But...:

1. please use the proper scam report format, as now your report is at least incomplete (and quite confusing, I may add);

2. by using the porper format you would also point us readers to the proper point and evidence (as now you're just linking to another topic, one that has't even got any posts by Lauda a.t.m.); and,

3. if I look at the previously mentioned topic you are referring to it was started just earlier today (you might want to allow for a bit more time for someone to react).

This way your report seems a bit unstructured (and therefore unclear to us readers), somewhat impatient (same day delivery isn't a given) and reading your own trust feedback looks like another "butthurt" retaliatory remark...  

I accuse Lauda for potential scam for NOT negging group of this forum's lenders for their action of dealing with account selling.


What happened::
I did see and experience Lauda is giving negative trust for involving account buying and selling. But when I asked lenders also into account sales, he refused to explain his stand on them. From this I assume, he is getting some personal benefits from lenders and that is the reason, he is ONLY-negging rest of account dealers.

Scammers Profile Link:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lauda-101872

Reference Link:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-not-neg-all-the-lenders-who-accept-bitcointalk-accounts-as-valid-collateral-2118288

Amount Scammed:
-NA-
Payment Method:
-NA-
Proof of Payment:
-NA-
PM/Chat Logs:
Will provide if required.
Additional Notes:
My point is all account dealers must be treated same. Most of this forum's lenders accept BCT account as collateral. So, obviously we can mean that they will sell accounts if needed.
I want solution like this :
Lauda and all other who are negging for account buy/sell must neg lenders too. Otherwise no account sellers should not be negged for reason of involving into account sales.

I open this scam accusation when Lauda is ignoring to unveil their stand on https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-not-neg-all-the-lenders-who-accept-bitcointalk-accounts-as-valid-collateral-2118288

When Lauda is ignoring to answer there, I assume the following:
Those account sellers who are/were not ready to benefit Lauda, gets negative trust from him and those who are ready to benefit Lauda are set free to deal account buying/selling.

He is not having same stand on all the persons who are dealing with account buying and selling which is leading to shady behavior with trust system. I guess this will be enough reason to neg Luada by referring this topic.

I invite DT members to neg lauda until he clears his stand on this.