Topic: Lauda please find a reason to review your decision on me (Read 313 times)

Case resolved, and thread locked up.

Thanks for your kind suggestion.

I don't know how justine11 defines it, but I define it like this:
And that's just one of many you've made.  So what is it you're doing here other than posting low-quality garbage in mega spam threads?  And what is it the forum will gain if Lauda removes your negative trust?  Answer:  Nothing.

I can't speak for Lauda either, but users like you are part of the reason why SMAS was put into effect in the first place.  You're only on bitcointalk to pollute it for your own financial gain, and you don't have it in you to be a good poster.  There's absolutely no reason why you should be taken off SMAS or have that negative removed.

Difficult .... to have an unsorted SMAS list (although its a great list, but yahoo's is better) and then tag members for cheating. I think, it is a red tag without proper evidence.

First and foremost I guess this thread should be moved to Reputation and not in here. Second, like what had been said by the person above, admins and mods can't do anything about this since trust is not moderated. Third, try to read here if you still don't https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/forum-campaign-why-have-i-been-banned-posting-guidelines-1741988.
Fourth, try to change the title's thread, like something plead to lauda for review of your posts so you will be untagged and remove from the SMAS "if ever".

Friend, how do you define shit post?
Or, does the post look low quality?

Pray you don't get unlucky with lauda ok...

Theymos and mods won't help you and your trust will unlikely to be removed since you violated a SMAS rule which is joining a SMAS campaign (which handled by lauda itself) while you are blacklisted on lauda's list. What you should done first is improve your post quality then wait for sixty days (do not join in any campaigns within the time period) and PM lauda for a review. Since you already broke the rule the negative trust will stay forever.

I don't have a choice than to come on here. I have been on red from Lauda since last November 8th, on the allegation that I applied on Lauda's campaign while being on SMS list. At that time, I just finished from these 2 SMAS campaigns
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/latoken-signature-campaignclosed-2130967
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xaurum-gamma-signature-campaignbest-rates-short-campaign-2189942.

I sent a first PM to Lauda after being on red for 3months, pleading to let me go off the red but didn't get a response.

On this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.30325625 , from page 10 to 13 , I raised the issue of my plea but Lauda responded that I should PM once Shorena removes his own negative. I quote from the thread.... "PM me once Shorena removes my own negative". I don't know who is Shorena and why he gave red neg to Lauda... should I be punished for another person's issue? Is that the way this forum should be ran?

The next PM was about a week/ or two after I didn't get a response from the first. The reply I got was that, it was early, I should stop PMing frequently. This was close to 4months and just 2 PMs.

Now, Lauda has blocked me from appealing through PM.

I have been on red since 5 months because I "ignorantly" applied in a campaign. How fair can this forum be?

I plead that Lauda be reached. I appeal openly , I don't intend users to use this medium to abuse any party. I just want the red neg off.

How long more will I wait for Shorena to take of Lauda's red neg. Or,  is Lauda using me to get to Shorena...This is just unfair to me.

I'm appealing because I honestly didn't know I was on any list and this is 5 months.