I wouldn't call this an extra layer of security, I'd call it an extra risk factor: you don't have a backup of all required private keys, so the classic "not your keys not your coins" rule applies.
If you are a risk-taker, probably. I was thinking about it the wrong way, for sure. Then it's meh for me.Using a multi-signature wallet will increase your risk more than enhance security.
You need to sign the second signed message before making/broadcasting any transaction, and therefore you need them to send coins.
It is true that you can obtain signed transactions before, but why all this this complication?
I don't think it's necessary to use that kind of service anymore. It's just going to be more complicated than it already is, so why bother?? Maybe when there is lightning support? You need to sign the second signed message before making/broadcasting any transaction, and therefore you need them to send coins.
It is true that you can obtain signed transactions before, but why all this this complication?
