Author

Topic: Libertarians built a Bitcoin economy in a small town, feds shut it down (Read 294 times)

legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
One more interesting article related with Ian Freeman and continuation of his story and releasing from jail after he paid $200,000 bond, and waiting for minimum ten years or life time in prison!
This is probably one of the best crypto related articles I ever saw, released for New York Magazine on August 16 after Freeman was interviewed by journalist Simon Wood.
Ian talks about his early life and how he became libertarian after first time smoking a pot at age 16, and after that he was bitten by a Bitcoin bug like many other libertarians.
Freeman could have been a bitcoin billionaire now but he regrets nothing according to his own words:
Quote
Is there something I regret? I mean, of course not.
This is my mission. I’ve been given this mission from God to get this alternative form of value into people’s hands.

I don't think Freeman should go to prison for life, but in this twisted system anything is possible, while real criminal politicians are safe at their homes living as fat parasites.
You can listen to Freeman on his radio website:
https://www.freetalklive.com/


Source: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/08/bitcoin-ian-freeman-fbi-doj.html
archive: https://archive.ph/61xUa

legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
....

I'm surprised this hasn't received more publicity.

There is an odd angle here where they praise bitcoin cash and criticize bitcoin for not adopting larger block sizes
...


I do not see this as a big event to be honest. There are many "libertarian" groups in the US and many of them are simply a poor excuse for a hillbilly group of half drug traffickers and half drunkards waving the confederate flag.

Those that are not, are actually trying to live a delusion, trying to live their lives as if there were on a free country - meaning they can ignore the laws - and declare some short of sovereignty and be left alone. The world does not work like that. If you want a libertarian state, you will need to either conquer one by war or by convincing a massive number of people. And that is only to create it, then you will need to defend it. Anything else is delusional.

On the bitcoin cash topic, I see that these people wanted to use bitcoin as currency, as it was intended in the beginning, and that spirit is better achieved with BCH

I never understood the adherence to smaller block sizes either.  It's like hardcoding a limit into the ability to enable mass adoption.  A currency that can't be used without lengthy transaction delays or significant fees is not a useful currency.  But the ship has long sailed on bitcoin as a functional currency.  Now it's all about price appreciation and FOMO.  No one uses it as a currency.
sr. member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 275
Natural herbs have healing properties that shouldn't be wasted, but it doesn't mean they should be used in innapropriate ways. Anyway, the main issue presented here isn't the drugs usage itself, but the coop relationship that was established between the called libertarians and the potential drugs dealer who approached the community.
If that was really the case, the police was just doing their legit job and the community members victimizing themselves. I believe there are no excuses to maintain a relationship with a drugs dealer since this kind of people is involved in the most atrocious acts against civilized society.

More precisely, it will have an impact on the next generation, if it is allowed to circulate on a large scale and there are no actions that incriminate the dealers. We clearly condemn, according to the rules of all countries that drugs are still a threat and are mutually agreed upon in every country (except for other rules that I don't know about in which countries drugs are free to roam). However, so far, which country has tried to loosen the rules on drug dealers and let people go free. What will happen in the future if it is left like that?
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
If there is actually a connection with drug dealing (either intentionally or not), then it will be impossible to side with these people.
For me, siding with them would depend on what kind of drugs were being dealt and exactly what they're connection was to it.  I generally don't like drug dealers, but I've met a lot of them through my work and not all of them are equal.  Some do it out of desperation, some to feed their own addictions, and then there are others who are absolute scumbags who don't care about the people they're hurting in the least.  

And what if the drug was marijuana?  In that case, I wouldn't care whatsoever.  But in any case, yeah....it sure would be nice if the public were given enough detail such that they could make an informed opinion on the matter.

I don't believe everything the feds are claiming (we saw that in the case of Ross Ulbricht), but it looks like some amount of shady activity was going on there.  
Man, if you dig into anyone's doings far enough, you'll find something shady.  But I don't trust law enforcement reports to be accurate, nor those made by the media.  This group doesn't sound like it was some backwater, anti-government militia that operates out of a fortified compound, though.  It'd be nice to hear an opposing viewpoint or at least a news report with verified facts.

What kind drug? Paracetamol, ibuprofen, cocaine, etc? I actually think the government can decide to allow/ban certain man-drugs... but natural herbal drug shouldn't be... It's doesn't make sense to ban them.  They can however have laws against their abuse.
You can't tell a Christian not to eat/use a particular herb whereas they are permitted to eat it by their laws.     
Ah, I didn't read your post before making mine (I'll never get over that bad habit).  Drug laws, IMO, are counterproductive.  People are going to use drugs regardless of their legality--they always have, they always will.  Prohibition in the 1920s failed spectacularly, as did Reagan's war on drugs.  Putting people in prison for substances they choose to ingest is just another infringement on individual freedom. 

Yes, the problem of addiction is a very real, very serious one--but do laws help the problem at all?  Nope.  They just make the US's incarceration rate even higher, and drug users need help and not punishment.
hero member
Activity: 2044
Merit: 784
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
One of the strongest points presented by the police was that libertarians were exchanging with a drugs dealer aware about who the man was, since he was an undercover agent and exposed it later.



What kind drug? Paracetamol, ibuprofen, cocaine, etc? I actually think the government can decide to allow/ban certain man-drugs... but natural herbal drug shouldn't be... It's doesn't make sense to ban them.  They can however have laws against their abuse.
You can't tell a Christian not to eat/use a particular herb whereas they are permitted to eat it by their laws.     
Natural herbs have healing properties that shouldn't be wasted, but it doesn't mean they should be used in innapropriate ways. Anyway, the main issue presented here isn't the drugs usage itself, but the coop relationship that was established between the called libertarians and the potential drugs dealer who approached the community.
If that was really the case, the police was just doing their legit job and the community members victimizing themselves. I believe there are no excuses to maintain a relationship with a drugs dealer since this kind of people is involved in the most atrocious acts against civilized society.
sr. member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 275
I wonder why a country that has gained her independence way back 1847 is still blind and dumb about the renaissance of the world's economy,which has simply grown above trade by batter into currency exchange. Bitcoin, to them is maybe seen as a medium some group of gangsters or Internet guru practically gets money in the name of foreign currency trading and profit making over time ...
The may believe its fake so the begin to work against it..
But who gave these police men or the government Authority over someone's private affair???
To the extent of demolishing buildings and machine with funds that worth that amount??
The should better be illuminated so they could even depend and invest thier country's economy..Thanks

Because that's how the real owners of this country want things to be, they want chaos and divide among the people so their power won't be threatened because they know that a united people is going to be a problem for them, they are only 1% so they have to do all means possible to keep the chaos. Also, this is a big threat to us as a community because it can happen to any of us.

Don't get me wrong, the opposition and the regime always try to create a conflict that is designed to make people feel confused about which policy to side with. In this situation the US always tries to be a hero even by placing it as a supporter of weapons even though it is still with world security and so on. Who dares then he will be silenced. Which country stands and will be confused with its own brother.
The term liberal appears as a form that is not much different, the term only evolved based on the era that led it.
Sometimes in the economy, Bitcoin becomes a target to beat the wealth of the bankers, dealing with the problems behind the politicians behind the round table.
Ucy
sr. member
Activity: 2674
Merit: 403
Compare rates on different exchanges & swap.
One of the strongest points presented by the police was that libertarians were exchanging with a drugs dealer aware about who the man was, since he was an undercover agent and exposed it later.



What kind drug? Paracetamol, ibuprofen, cocaine, etc? I actually think the government can decide to allow/ban certain man-drugs... but natural herbal drug shouldn't be... It's doesn't make sense to ban them.  They can however have laws against their abuse.
You can't tell a Christian not to eat/use a particular herb whereas they are permitted to eat it by their laws.     
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
How's the weather in el salvador. If raids are on the table, I wonder if bitcoin safe havens will see a good influx of crypto migrants. Crypto refugees?
I'd prefer a raid by the FEDs over a raid by a gang:
Quote from: GOV.UK
El Salvador has one of the highest crime rates in Latin America. Violence between gangs is common and targets are usually rival gang members or the military and police. While most gang violence occurs away from tourists and visitors, no location is completely safe. Most visits to El Salvador are trouble-free but there have been isolated attacks on tourists including robberies, car-jackings and violent assaults.

avoid displaying items of value
there remains a small risk of kidnapping
if you’re attacked, don’t resist
hero member
Activity: 3038
Merit: 617
Absolutely ridiculous, but is this even surprising?

The governments around the world have one thing in common, and that is a collective disdain against decentralised cryptocurrencies.

It is definitely encouraging to see people in a community setting actually adopting bitcoin though. The Feds could shut down the initiative or the town, but they can never shut down the bitcoin protocol itself, and that is all that matters.

Hard to battle against them when we know they can do force like what they did to Freeman. We always thought they couldn't seize our Bitcoin but if they do have the forces and point guns to your head like the kidnappers asking for ransom, you'd be forced to give them up, and surprisingly they are authorities we call when there are crimes happening.

If the towns become bigger though, like the country El Salvador, they may not be able to completely pinned them all down but will call the government a REGIME. And a Regime is always subjected to interference.
hero member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 753
Absolutely ridiculous, but is this even surprising?

The governments around the world have one thing in common, and that is a collective disdain against decentralised cryptocurrencies.

It is definitely encouraging to see people in a community setting actually adopting bitcoin though. The Feds could shut down the initiative or the town, but they can never shut down the bitcoin protocol itself, and that is all that matters.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
It's hard to take a side on this situation, because we don't really know if it's pure power abusing from authorities or if the source of the money used by the members of this community was really result of shady activities. One of the strongest points presented by the police was that libertarians were exchanging with a drugs dealer aware about who the man was, since he was an undercover agent and exposed it later.
Sadly these news seem very hidden from the traditional media vehicles. I would like to see it more in evidence by popular sources of information, in a way more people could see and understand this situation better.

If there is actually a connection with drug dealing (either intentionally or not), then it will be impossible to side with these people. I don't believe everything the feds are claiming (we saw that in the case of Ross Ulbricht), but it looks like some amount of shady activity was going on there. Feds and left-wing nuts have intruded in to the libertarian movement in the United States and these guys are yet to realize it. And all it takes is just one connection with an illegal business, to tarnish the reputation of the entire community. 
legendary
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1624
Do not die for Putin
....

I'm surprised this hasn't received more publicity.

There is an odd angle here where they praise bitcoin cash and criticize bitcoin for not adopting larger block sizes
...


I do not see this as a big event to be honest. There are many "libertarian" groups in the US and many of them are simply a poor excuse for a hillbilly group of half drug traffickers and half drunkards waving the confederate flag.

Those that are not, are actually trying to live a delusion, trying to live their lives as if there were on a free country - meaning they can ignore the laws - and declare some short of sovereignty and be left alone. The world does not work like that. If you want a libertarian state, you will need to either conquer one by war or by convincing a massive number of people. And that is only to create it, then you will need to defend it. Anything else is delusional.

On the bitcoin cash topic, I see that these people wanted to use bitcoin as currency, as it was intended in the beginning, and that spirit is better achieved with BCH
hero member
Activity: 2044
Merit: 784
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
It's hard to take a side on this situation, because we don't really know if it's pure power abusing from authorities or if the source of the money used by the members of this community was really result of shady activities. One of the strongest points presented by the police was that libertarians were exchanging with a drugs dealer aware about who the man was, since he was an undercover agent and exposed it later.
Sadly these news seem very hidden from the traditional media vehicles. I would like to see it more in evidence by popular sources of information, in a way more people could see and understand this situation better.
member
Activity: 189
Merit: 16
Well, things like that can be done in a way that does not provoke the host Country.
By the way, I wish people focus more on nomadic kind of Bitcoin settlement rather than fixed one.  And you can always back the Bitcoin with physical products like foods, engage in trade by barter... or use use stone, plastic etc as currency just incase they prevent your community from surviving with Bitcoin .

It will always provoke the host country when there is the suspicion of tax-relevant activities that go untaxed.

There might be authorities that could agree to some lump sum taxation model if looks like it won't result in lower taxation, and comes with less effort than trying to determine every transaction.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1338
Does this surprise anyone? These guys are at the fault here and not the feds. Bitcoin is not a legal tender in the United States and each and every cryptocurrency transaction needs to be reported in the income tax return and should comply with the federal and state (New Hampshire in this case) regulations. Just because libertarians are a majority in a small village, they can't make rules on their own. If that is the case, then tomorrow some drug traffickers will move to ghost towns and then declare that cocaine, heroin and fentanyl are legal there. These things don't work. If they want to use Bitcoin, then it needs to be done in sync with the prevailing laws and regulations. Bitcoin is not banned in the US. The only thing is that you need to take the proper channels while dealing in it.
This is correct, I understand that there are people out there that have very strong convictions about bitcoin and there is nothing wrong with that but there is no point in challenging the government, because if you do it is obvious who is going to lose, however people have options, now anyone that is interested in using bitcoin directly as money and without having to report their activities to anyone should just move to El Salvador and be done with it.
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
How's the weather in el salvador.
Cloudy, with a chance of massive bitcoin seizure if the influx becomes too great.  Oh, and then there's all the crime.

If raids are on the table, I wonder if bitcoin safe havens will see a good influx of crypto migrants. Crypto refugees?
If the article you posted is anything to go by, I don't think there's ever going to be a bitcoin safe haven anywhere in the world.  The protesters were right, law enforcement acted as a gang of thugs--and if the amounts of money involved weren't so great, none of this would probably have happened.  I could almost guarantee you that wherever someone tried to set up a bitcoin utopia, as long as there's money to be seized "legally", the government in that jurisdiction will do it--and if there aren't laws already on the books, they'll create them.

This is why I mentioned the need for crypto lobbyists in one of my recent posts, bitcoiners with deep pockets and political connections they can leverage to ease this sort of shit.  Big pharma, oil companies, you name it, they have lobbyists paying off politicians left and right--and none of that is ever going to change as long as politics exists.  So why not have some bitcoin whales beating these anti-bitcoin lobbyists (banks, primarily) at their own game?  I'm not saying it'd happen overnight, but steps have to be taken, lest crypto gets regulated to the point of uselessness.

I wonder how some politicians can steal all the money they want, lie, abuse everyone all the time, make people suicide themselves, and yet they never end up in jail.
There's no need to wonder about that, because the answer is simple:  they have all the connections and the power.  If you make the laws, that's all you need.
sr. member
Activity: 1848
Merit: 341
Duelbits.com
If we read and finish all these texts, we will be very surprised. Because based on what I understand and also took the time for almost 15 minutes to read it. I conclude, full control over something that is considered to threaten the economy of a place and then the formation of groups of groups calling themselves libertarians and so on.

It shows that a decentralized one should be able to switch to a centralized system without having to tell everyone that. The world is too wide to control, but in fact, all have signals in various directions and then mix up scenarios and seem to give stories of patriotism.

In fact, this is not what crypto residents expect, there are quite a few people who want to step in and damage the image of authenticity. And precisely the economic sector became the object of the most extraordinary.
Ucy
sr. member
Activity: 2674
Merit: 403
Compare rates on different exchanges & swap.
I mean, it's not about building a Bitcoin economy, it's about operating an unlicensed money transmitting business. Regardless of where you stand on the political spectrum, trying this is the US is risky at best, and outright stupid at worst. I also found this about their indictment, which just paints a worse picture for them:
I do agree that doing this is US was very risky but complying with every government decision, rule and law got us in this crazy situation we have in the world now.
More people comply with new government decisions, like wearing mandatory horns on our head or not talking with anyone on the street, more problems we are going to have, so I see non-compliance as a tool people have to resist.
I wonder how some politicians can steal all the money they want, lie, abuse everyone all the time, make people suicide themselves, and yet they never end up in jail.

All that being said, the use of force certainly seemed excessive; I hope that no one was hurt. It seems he has since been placed under house arrest though, so that's a bit better for him at least.
It seems to be true and here is additional video interview made with Ian Freeman, who was a prisoner at his own home with police leg bracelet:
https://youtu.be/eoYopgjUUfQ


Would have been better if it's about not complying with evil laws. You can easily resist evil law and the ULTIMATE KING will be on your side for resisting evil. People still don't understand that the one who impose can't go against the Will of the CREATOR of this World and their Countries.     So, you look for the evil laws and stand firmly against them in faith and righteousness then watch and see that they really fear a BEING who no one can see. If they do not fear then they suffer the consequences of breaking the laws of their LANDLORD
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
I mean, it's not about building a Bitcoin economy, it's about operating an unlicensed money transmitting business. Regardless of where you stand on the political spectrum, trying this is the US is risky at best, and outright stupid at worst. I also found this about their indictment, which just paints a worse picture for them:
I do agree that doing this is US was very risky but complying with every government decision, rule and law got us in this crazy situation we have in the world now.
More people comply with new government decisions, like wearing mandatory horns on our head or not talking with anyone on the street, more problems we are going to have, so I see non-compliance as a tool people have to resist.
I wonder how some politicians can steal all the money they want, lie, abuse everyone all the time, make people suicide themselves, and yet they never end up in jail.

All that being said, the use of force certainly seemed excessive; I hope that no one was hurt. It seems he has since been placed under house arrest though, so that's a bit better for him at least.
It seems to be true and here is additional video interview made with Ian Freeman, who was a prisoner at his own home with police leg bracelet:
https://youtu.be/eoYopgjUUfQ
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
Does this surprise anyone? These guys are at the fault here and not the feds. Bitcoin is not a legal tender in the United States and each and every cryptocurrency transaction needs to be reported in the income tax return and should comply with the federal and state (New Hampshire in this case) regulations. Just because libertarians are a majority in a small village, they can't make rules on their own. If that is the case, then tomorrow some drug traffickers will move to ghost towns and then declare that cocaine, heroin and fentanyl are legal there. These things don't work. If they want to use Bitcoin, then it needs to be done in sync with the prevailing laws and regulations. Bitcoin is not banned in the US. The only thing is that you need to take the proper channels while dealing in it.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3684
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
I'll read this properly later, but just a glance tells me the Feds didn't shut down Bitcoin Mecca because there was a Bitcoin economy there, but because of the economy that they thought was being built there.

Arnhem, the original "Bitcoin City" has managed to do one up I think, simply by modernising the existing economy and commerce there by getting them to adopt and accept Bitcoin. It's not just survived for years, but thrived, and even is one of the quiet little bubbles building up Lightning adoption. Took a massive hit because of Covid, but yeah, Bitcoin doesn't necessarily need angry high libertarians to build Meccas. Often, practical, simple steps work better.
hero member
Activity: 1834
Merit: 759
I mean, it's not about building a Bitcoin economy, it's about operating an unlicensed money transmitting business. Regardless of where you stand on the political spectrum, trying this is the US is risky at best, and outright stupid at worst. I also found this about their indictment, which just paints a worse picture for them:

According to the indictment, some defendants then engaged in substantial efforts to evade detection of their unlawful virtual currency exchange scheme by avoiding answering financial institutions’ questions about the nature of the business and misleading financial institutions into believing their unlawful virtual currency exchange business was instead a religious organization receiving charitable contributions.

All that being said, the use of force certainly seemed excessive; I hope that no one was hurt. It seems he has since been placed under house arrest though, so that's a bit better for him at least.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1965
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Libertarians are building pipe dreams of having their own small sovereign land and their own reserve currency.... but we saw what happened to previous attempts to do this, the governments step in with violence and they stomp it out. Example :

https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-libertarian-nirvana-at-sea-runs-into-a-stubborn-opponent-the-thai-navy-11556466473

Imagine if they get this right.... who will pay the taxes for their salaries? ...Who will pay for the weapons and the people that are used to keep them in power?

It is all about power and money.... and libertarian sovereignty is a threat to that, so I cannot see how they will be able to pull that off.. on land or on sea...  Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 293
I wonder why a country that has gained her independence way back 1847 is still blind and dumb about the renaissance of the world's economy,which has simply grown above trade by batter into currency exchange. Bitcoin, to them is maybe seen as a medium some group of gangsters or Internet guru practically gets money in the name of foreign currency trading and profit making over time ...
The may believe its fake so the begin to work against it..
But who gave these police men or the government Authority over someone's private affair???
To the extent of demolishing buildings and machine with funds that worth that amount??
The should better be illuminated so they could even depend and invest thier country's economy..Thanks

Because that's how the real owners of this country want things to be, they want chaos and divide among the people so their power won't be threatened because they know that a united people is going to be a problem for them, they are only 1% so they have to do all means possible to keep the chaos. Also, this is a big threat to us as a community because it can happen to any of us.
Ucy
sr. member
Activity: 2674
Merit: 403
Compare rates on different exchanges & swap.
Well, things like that can be done in a way that does not provoke the host Country.
By the way, I wish people focus more on nomadic kind of Bitcoin settlement rather than fixed one.  And you can always back the Bitcoin with physical products like foods, engage in trade by barter... or use use stone, plastic etc as currency just incase they prevent your community from surviving with Bitcoin .
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1402
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Damn US with their militarized cops. If these people are libertarians, they wouldn't have violently resisted their arrest, so why deploy the forces this way, strengthening the whole point of libertarians by demonstrating excessive use of power?
I understand that tax evasion is a crime, and the state has the right to prosecute Freeman on these and perhaps other grounds.
It's good that the trial is in more than a year; I hope the defense team will use this time wisely to prepare compelling arguments. After all, they had a legal opinion on the matter, and the banking department knew about his business and didn't say anything.
member
Activity: 294
Merit: 28
I wonder why a country that has gained her independence way back 1847 is still blind and dumb about the renaissance of the world's economy,which has simply grown above trade by batter into currency exchange. Bitcoin, to them is maybe seen as a medium some group of gangsters or Internet guru practically gets money in the name of foreign currency trading and profit making over time ...
The may believe its fake so the begin to work against it..
But who gave these police men or the government Authority over someone's private affair???
To the extent of demolishing buildings and machine with funds that worth that amount??
The should better be illuminated so they could even depend and invest thier country's economy..Thanks
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1441
Quote
THE SACKING OF A CRYPTO MECCA

TheThe sky was still dark when the agents arrived at Leverett St. in Keene, New Hampshire, a leafy block of kit houses at the quiet edges of the small college town. They settled on a house at the corner, surrounding it with two armored BearCat G3s and a fleet of unmarked SUVs. Both BearCats had gunners stationed in a hatch on the roof, clad in camo fatigues. The only light came from the blue-and-red sirens, strobing off houses in every direction.

Inside, Ian Freeman was asleep with his girlfriend and their small dog Coconut. He woke to the sound of exploding glass. A ramming pole, tethered to the front of one of the BearCats, had plowed through a first floor window, tearing off the frame as it backed up. Freeman threw on a bathrobe and stumbled downstairs, still shaking off sleep. There was shattered glass everywhere. His first thought was that some stranger had thrown a brick. But then he heard a whirring sound, a small hovering drone that police had deployed to explore the house. He looked outside and saw blinding lights. Coming into focus beside the lights, men pointed rifles at him.

One mile east, Freeman’s talk radio co-host Aria DiMezzo stumbled downstairs in her underwear only to be met by a tactical assault team, who told her they would shoot her if she moved. At the town’s Bitcoin Embassy, a group of agents tore a Bitcoin dispenser from the concrete floor, leaving four symmetrical holes where it had been bolted down. They took another machine from the Campus Convenience in central Keene, another from a bar called Murphy’s Taproom, and a fourth from the Red Arrow Diner in Nashua. Together, they held more than $50,000 in cash.

There was even more money in Freeman’s home, seized by federal agents and later reported to the courts in a forfeiture filing: $180,000 in cash, a 100oz Swiss silver bar (worth roughly $3,000), and a platinum coin stamped with a portrait of Ron Paul. There were boxes full of gold-laced bills called goldbacks that were too obscure to even put a value on — some taken from Freeman’s home, others seized in transit by the postal service. The biggest prize was two Casascius physical Bitcoins, worth 100 and 1 btc respectively, first available in 2011 and now worth more than $4 million.


For police, the money was nearly as important as Freeman himself. For years, they had been tracking his Bitcoin business for evidence of money laundering or other crimes. As far as they were concerned, it was all part of an unlicensed money transmittal scheme processing millions of dollars a year. The purpose of the raid was to break that system, tearing out Freeman’s Bitcoin machines one by one and seizing any illegal proceeds along with them.

News of the raid spread fast. A local Linux developer and crypto activist named Christopher Waid rushed to Freeman’s house to film the last gasps of the raid, catching footage of the BearCats, the drone, and the bizarre militarism of it all. When he was done there, he headed to the Bitcoin Embassy, where a crowd had gathered to watch police carry out duffel bags and plastic tubs full of loose paper. Despite the name, the embassy was little more than a side room to a convenience store. The most radical part of it was the bookshelf, offering DevOps manuals alongside copies of Ludwig von Mises’ Socialism and Robert A. Heinlein’s The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.

For years, Freeman had been warning about federal encroachment, broadcasting every night on the radio about the tightening fist of the state. His Bitcoin venture was part of a broader Free State movement in New Hampshire, turning a quiet corner of New England into a libertarian paradise. Now the counterforce was here, like a prophecy fulfilled, and the Free Staters understood their role perfectly. They were ready with cameras, asking for warrants and litigating precisely where they were allowed to stand while the raid dragged on. When police herded the crowd across the street, it just meant they had to yell that much louder.

“You guys are the fucking enemy!” one of the protestors told the agents, as they carried out another tub of papers. “You’re not protecting anybody’s fucking freedom. You’re all a bunch of gangsters.”

By the end of the day on March 16th, six people were in custody: including Freeman, his girlfriend, and a married couple who lived nearby. Two co-hosts on the radio show were also named: DiMezzo and a man born as Richard Paul, who had legally changed his name to Nobody in protest of the bureaucratic state. According to the indictment, all six had been involved in Freeman’s Bitcoin dispenser business. An indictment filed under seal the day before the raid counted out thirteen instances when someone from the group had contacted a bank on behalf of the business since April 2017, listing each call or email as a count of wire fraud.

The defense lawyers describe the project in more idealistic terms. “The defendants were a loosely affiliated group of people with libertarian political leanings that included a strong belief that Bitcoin was a great development for those who champion human freedom,” one filing reads.


There are lots of people like that in Keene, although you might not guess it from driving through. A quiet college town of less than 25,000 people, the libertarian migration to New Hampshire (also known as the Free State Project) has turned it into a magnet for cryptocurrency buffs, some of whom have unexpectedly become millionaires after the Bitcoin boom of the past few years. In 2019, Forbes called the town a “crypto mecca,” citing more than 20 businesses accepting some form of cryptocurrency payment. Many of those businesses were solicited directly by Freeman and his cohort, who saw cryptocurrency as a kind of moral crusade against the belligerence of the US government.

Freeman is best known as the host of Free Talk Live, a libertarian talk radio show syndicated to 185 radio stations across the country. Many of the activists outside the embassy had appeared on the show at some point, including Waid. When the BearCat rammed through the window, it was ramming into Freeman’s studio, a maze of cables and audio racks where the show is recorded, mixed, and distributed.

Free Talk Live gave Freeman the power to draw together a community of crypto-minded libertarians in Keene, but it also amplified his ugliest mistakes. Most recently, it gave center stage to his still-active lawsuit against New Hampshire’s mask mandate. (“I was never really convinced that COVID was a particularly dangerous thing,” Freeman tells me when I ask about the case.) The show also gave an early home to the infamous “crying nazi” Christopher Cantwell, who appeared on Free Talk Live when he was still trying to brand himself as a libertarian anti-police activist. (“When he became a racist, I fired him from Free Talk Live,” Freeman says. “He just kept getting deeper into that world.”)

The chaotic world of libertarian talk radio made Freeman’s show a natural gathering point for the early Bitcoin community. Free Talk’s first call about Bitcoin came in December 2010, the same month Satoshi Nakamoto disappeared from active development of the Bitcoin spec.

Hyped on the Free Talk Live site as the first consumer media mention of Bitcoin, the episode now comes off as a bizarre time capsule. The first 20 minutes are taken up with a discussion of voluntarist alternatives to the fire department and municipal road maintenance, after which the conversation turns to crystal meth and Venezuela. Around 40 minutes in, a caller named Jeremy from Australia chimes in to talk about a new digital currency called Bitcoin.

“It was about six cents for a Bitcoin in August and now it’s 26 cents, so it’s already increased quite a bit,” Jeremy says.

“My initial concern was that it’s essentially a fiat currency, because it’s not backed by anything,” Freeman responds. “It’s a neat idea. I don’t know if it’s yet a fantastic alternative.”

Freeman came around to Bitcoin in the months that followed, eventually fitting it into broader complaints about the way the US government controls the value of the dollar. The price kept rising: within three years it had cleared $1,000, then $10,000 four years after that. According to the forfeiture documents, Freeman’s cryptocurrency holdings are now worth well over $5 million.

As more money flooded into cryptocurrency, something else came with it. The version of Bitcoin that’s become popular in recent years is less political and more straightforwardly interested in making money. Venture capital has embraced the blockchain as an opportunity on the same scale as targeted advertising or independent-contractor labor schemes. It’s rare to hear concerns about the Federal Reserve at a Bitcoin conference these days, and few are interested in standoffs with regulators — there’s just no money in it.

But if you’re ready to work with regulators, the money is almost endless. Coinbase, an early adherent to federal Know Your Customer rules, is now processing more than $100 billion of transactions every month, while the company itself is valued at $50 billion. New wallet regulations are creeping forward from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, and while some activists cry foul, most entrepreneurs have welcomed them with open arms. At the Bitcoin 2021 conference in Miami, the Winklevoss twins promised a crowd of real estate moguls and retail investors that anyone who owns a Bitcoin will one day be a millionaire.


For true believers like Freeman, that shift has been bittersweet. “There’s nothing wrong with somebody seeing it from that perspective and just wanting to invest in a thing and be successful,” Freeman tells me. “But in the libertarian Bitcoin community up here, they see it differently. They see it as a dramatic transfer of power.”

But if Mt. Gox and the Silk Road represented a transfer of power, the power is now shifting back the other way. In 2017, international raids took down BTC-e (then the largest unregulated exchange), with a money laundering sting revealed the following year. An Ohio man was arrested last year for running a Bitcoin tumbler called Helix, which mixed blockchain records with obscure transactions; a month after the New Hampshire raid, a Russian-Swedish national was arrested for running a similar service called Bitcoin Fog.

In public statements, prosecutors refer to these as “darknet” cases, treating the unregulated Bitcoin system as a loosely organized criminal conspiracy. There is a lot of tainted money on the blockchain: money from drug sales, online scams, or stolen from individual users as part of a breach. Tumblers and anonymous exchanges let criminals escape with that money, so law enforcement agencies are trying to shut them down one by one, like plugging holes in a dam. With so much dirty money trying to get clean, the prosecutions take on a kind of fatalist logic. Any unregulated exchange will eventually be used for money-laundering; any unmonitored flow of coins will eventually be an accomplice to a crime.

For the Keene project, keeping those coins unmonitored was the whole point. Their goal was to maintain the privacy and freedom of Bitcoin’s original design while staying just inside the bounds of the law. But to the federal government, it just looked like one more hole to be plugged.

By the end of May, both Freeman and DiMezzo were out on bail, with the trial scheduled for October 2022. Waid announced Freeman’s release with a wry blog post on Free Keene: “After Significant Delays Hostage Takers Release Ian From From Merrimack County Spiritual Retreat.”

The conditions of the bail are stringent, befitting the aftermath of the raid: they can’t leave their homes, trade Bitcoin, or communicate with other co-defendants. That last provision created significant problems for Free Talk Live, since it meant the main two co-hosts could no longer speak to each other without risking more jail time. Within a few weeks, the court granted a relief order letting them talk for the purposes of coordinating the show, and the show returned to its usual troublemaking. By the end of July, they were drumming up support for a ballot measure that would allow New Hampshire to secede from the United States.

Nobody took a more adversarial stance toward the legal system and stayed in jail for months longer. According to court records, his calls with the public defender broke down into screaming matches. After two weeks in jail, he made a phone call so alarming that it halted his efforts for pretrial release. The recording itself is sealed, but a filing gives alarming titles for the exhibits, including “audio clip — needs to die,” “audio clip — start shooting pigs,” and “audio clip — kill himself if sentenced.”

Prosecutors say he made threats against his public defender’s life, and the public defender withdrew from the case the next day, putting the bail hearing on hold. As late as August, he was still in jail. Supporters rallied outside the corrections building, waving signs that said “Free Nobody.”


Freeman’s cohort had always lived at the margins of the broader Free State Project — but after the arrest, a new wave of libertarian activism sprung up around him. The Free Keene website became a flurry of daily news about bail hearings and protests. Waid started a website to support “the Crypto6,” as he called them. Soon, T-shirts bearing the name were a regular sight around town. A longtime Free State activist named Dave Ridley started organizing jail rallies, lending more local credibility to the cause.

As the jail rallies tapered off, Ridley turned to a more ostentatious kind of activism: branding himself as “Bitcoin Gandhi” and launching a 24-day march from Keene to Concord dressed in robes in a historically accurate Gandhi costume. A string of YouTube videos show him walking down the narrow shoulders of two-lane highways, picking up trash and occasionally being questioned by confused but genial highway patrollers. In an open letter to the head of New England’s General Services Agency, Ridley called for the federal government to distance itself from the case, saying, “escalations of this type indicate a Venezuelan-style slide into currency-fascism.” The month after, Ridley’s Gandhi alter ego took part in another protest outside the Concord federal building with Mr. Bitcoin, a Mr. Met-style foam suit embodiment of a physical Bitcoin.

Freeman was familiar with this kind of civil disobedience, acting out to showcase the brutality of the carceral status quo. Years earlier, Freeman had smoked marijuana on the main street of Keene, daring local cops to arrest him for a crime that usually goes unpunished. (A friend filmed the encounter from across the street.) A longer running gag is Freeman’s refusal to pay municipal fines, litigating every parking ticket or summons until the bureaucracy finds it easier to simply give up.

Looking at his Bitcoin business, it can be hard to tell where that activism ends and the straightforward business begins. Freeman’s machines were real, and he was making money by building out cryptocurrency infrastructure like any entrepreneur. But he arranged the business in a self-consciously risky way, avoiding financial licensing and other measures that insulate many Bitcoin businesses from prosecution. Even more than his Wall Street competitors, Freeman was deeply familiar with cryptocurrency prosecutions. He knew that his Bitcoin dispenser left him exposed, but it never slowed him down.

Freeman believes he was under investigation as early as 2018, when he says a federal agent approached Renee Spinella with questions about Freeman’s Bitcoin dealings. Spinella refused to inform on Freeman; she and her husband were among the six arrested during the raids. But it was an ominous sign, the first indication of a federal case against Freeman’s Bitcoin business.

Still, it wasn’t enough to make Freeman drop the project. As he tells it, his Bitcoin work was too important to give up, a kind of moral crusade against the American state and its ability to wage war.

“I was on a mission to spread Bitcoin,” Freeman says. “To give people an opportunity to get out of this government money system that funds evil and funds violence and funds war. Dollar by dollar, people need to get out of that system.”

Freeman also didn’t think the FBI could make a case. “We believed that this was legal,” he says. “There was a legal opinion written by our church attorney that looked at both federal and state regulations and he said, this is just a sale of a product; this isn’t money transmission.”

That opinion, prepared by the Shire Free Church, rests on a unique technical point that makes Freeman’s Bitcoin dispensers more like vending machines than an ATM. The machines look like a Cupertino-fried version of your standard cash machine, but each one holds its own wallet, akin to a stash of Bitcoins held physically inside the machine. So instead of transmitting your money from somewhere else, Freeman argues it’s merely dispensing a locally controlled inventory. It’s a clever distinction, although one can see how the FBI might not be convinced.


Freeman was operating the business openly and the New Hampshire Banking Department never told him to shut it down, but he kept receiving ominous signs from law enforcement. Earlier this year, he was cultivated by a stranger who claimed to be a drug dealer — and who Freeman believes was actually an undercover FBI agent.

“This guy had been a Bitcoin buyer, seemed like a decent guy. He’d shown up at one of our crypto meetups,” Freeman says. “He wasn’t even talking to me personally, but I was within earshot and I heard him say he was a heroin and ecstasy dealer and it was like, ‘Red alert! We have a possible fed here! You’re either a federal agent or you’re a fucking moron.’” Freeman says he recognized the legal danger and refused to sell to the man, thinking he’d avoided a money laundering charge
.

But if Freeman was ready to butt heads with the federal government, he wasn’t ready for the dramatic violence of the raid. “They could have just come and knocked,” Freeman says. “No one had to get their windows busted in.”

He also wasn’t ready for the full scope of the charges. Reviewing the case now, he’s particularly alarmed by the charge of operating a “continuing financial crimes enterprise,” which was levied against him specifically. It seems to have been triggered by the Shire Free Church allegedly bringing in more than $5 million in gross receipts over two years, which puts it in a different class of criminal organization. When we spoke, Freeman was still expecting more charges to emerge from ongoing grand jury proceedings.

“It was worse than I expected it to be,” he tells me. “And they’re not done yet.”

Once DiMezzo was released, one of her biggest surprises was the bail restriction on Bitcoin. It’s a reasonable request from prosecutors — you can’t let an accused diamond smuggler sell diamonds — but it’s meant a huge change in her lifestyle because, unlike most cryptocurrency enthusiasts, DiMezzo actually uses Bitcoin as money. She tells me she made about 80 percent of her purchases directly off the blockchain before the arrest, usually businesses in the Keene area that have set up Bitcoin payments through a local point-of-sale system called AnyPay. DiMezzo says she could eat at a different restaurant every night and always pay in crypto. This isn’t how Bitcoin works for most people and it can feel like Keene’s crypto mecca is a kind of island, blissfully cut off from the broader motion of cryptocurrency.

After the raid, the island is shrinking. In a phone call from the Merrimack jail, Freeman’s co-host Nobody spoke to me bitterly about Bitcoin developers’ refusal to increase the block size, a disagreement that ultimately led to the 2017 Bitcoin Cash split. His side lost that fight — the block size didn’t change, pushing the price of Bitcoin up while on-blockchain transactions got slower and slower. The Keene contingent still uses Bitcoin Cash where possible or fully anonymous alternatives like Monero, but it’s a much harder sell than Bitcoin.

The financial side of Bitcoin (the side you would find partying in Miami) isn’t interested in Bitcoin Cash. They don’t care about on-chain transactions or anonymity or anything else that would add friction to the vast sums of money pouring into cryptocurrency. For most of the new arrivals, Bitcoin is about profit, not politics.

“There’s that division,” Freeman says, “between the people who want to be regulated and controlled and people who see [cryptocurrency] as a new freedom that we have.”

That division is particularly stark after the raids, now that supporters are trying to raise money and awareness. It would be a good time to have rich and powerful friends, but Freeman doesn’t have any expectation that the institutional Bitcoin world will step in. “They probably won’t speak up in any of our cases,” Freeman tells me. “We’re irrelevant to them.”

Bitcoin was born as a way to escape from all this, to build a monetary system outside the reach of the dollar, the Fed, or the government. That was the dream that first drew Freeman into Bitcoin, before it was any more plausible of an investment than gold-laced currency or silver coins. In the decade since, Silicon Valley and Wall Street have gotten friendlier with Bitcoin, and prosecutors have learned how to tame it — but Freeman sees the same dream of escape still living beneath it all.

“They’re gonna regulate the exchanges,” he says. “We know that. They’re going to regulate the banks, wherever else they can apply pressure… But regardless of how much effort they put into trying to control cryptocurrency, it will fail because of the decentralized nature of it.”

It is a point of almost religious faith for him. No matter how hard the clampdown, it will be incomplete. The wilder forces will survive just out of reach.

“They can’t control Bitcoin,” he tells me. “That’s why they hate it.”

https://www.theverge.com/22599932/bitcoin-raid-keene-new-hampshire-ian-freeman-libertarian-prosecution

....



I'm surprised this hasn't received more publicity.

There is an odd angle here where they praise bitcoin cash and criticize bitcoin for not adopting larger block sizes.

There have been many regional cryptocurrency projects like auroracoin in iceland. Many articles and stories published about small villages and towns rolling out their own cryptocurrency for local use. Unfortunately I have not seen anything in the way of updates or news on these ventures.

How's the weather in el salvador. If raids are on the table, I wonder if bitcoin safe havens will see a good influx of crypto migrants. Crypto refugees?

Jump to: