Topic: Lightning Network - beyond just Bitcoin (Read 148 times)

i disagree. it is not about having more coins (different altcoins apart from bitcoin) to handle more transactions it is about handling what transactions? it is about adoption, the adoption by merchants for example. a merchant is never going to add 20 different payment option to his shop just because there are 20 different cryptocurrencies. it not only makes things hard and costly for the merchant but also it increases confusion for his customer. studies show that people will get confused when there are more than 4-5 options. and there are already enough fiat payment options everywhere. if a merchant wants to add crypto they will add 1 or 2.

LN does NOT need SegWit. Lightning Network works based on a couple of technologies such as Hashed Timelock Contracts, Multi Signature and 2 more which i can not recall. many altcoins have these or can add if they don't.
what SegWit does is that it makes it all much easier and safer by fixing malleability for instance.

this doesn't sound right to me but i am not sure.
i say if you have funds in your LN channel then it doesn't matter if you use bitcoin or another altcoin and atomic swap it with bitcoin! you simply use the funds (bitcoins) that you already have in your LN channel.

I view LN as a step forward for Bitcoin, and other coins that need a scaling solution. But that doesn't make them competitive with Nano. Zero fees and the absence of miners (with the problems of a self-interested faction trying to influence or control the protocol) are not minor factors. Even if we grant that the LN can effectively match Nano on speed and scaling, the simplicity and freedom of Nano is tough to beat.

I favor Bitcoin as a store of value flagship, but for payments Nano and whichever coin(s) manage to deploy the best privacy technology will be the leaders.

Your observation that payments (via LN or for that matter atomic swaps) can be distributed is OK, but complicated by the inclusion of multiple cryptocurrencies with different attributes. Since every account in Nano has its own blockchain Nano is essentially doing what you are proposing but on a much vaster scale. That's the point I was trying to make.

talking about actual usage here. not picking one rando altcoin that will never actually be adopted.

Or you could just use Nano.

So as we all know scaling is the big problem around blockchain technology. However, if you don't limit the market to just one coin, then scaling becomes much more solvable. LN is a good solution for micro-payments and everyday purchases, but even with a lot more scaling solutions in the future the bitcoin blockchain alone can't handle anything close to a global usage of LN - the limit is on the number of users based on how often they open and close channels.

But since LN can be implemented on top of any blockchain that implements segwit, I think the true power of LN is not scaling bitcoin, but creating a multi-coin payment platform for crypto in general. I know Litecoin has LN, Stellar is planning to add it, and I think maybe a few more coins as well. By having multiple coins use LN, and since LN has cross chain swaps, that would make the scaling problem of any single coin much less. Instead of filling up the Bitcoin blockchain for example, you could just say oh that blockchain is full I'll use another LN coin for the time being.

Does my logic make sense? Basically it spreads out the demand for payments using cryptos between multiple coins beyond just bitcoin, and thereby lessening the scaling demands on bitcoin itself, but all under the same unified payment platform - the LN.