Topic: List coins at exchanges just after ICO - is it good sign? (Read 560 times)

the ico schemes works as the good means as developer to gains with the returns of examination as collecting supports and shifts as the different spheres with the customs on moderation as exchanging the disposition as the offers on request to deliver as best of the goods and service with the predefined of scales as the contrast of indication as the notice as beginning the attains as entering field of the business with the cryptocurrency fields and the finance.

It is really interesting.
Could you give me please a couple of advice about your project?

That's really great that you are investors because investors are looking for trust place and you got the trusted place here so i would suggest you that you are here for right then and it will help the project too by your investment.

Another reason to not list soon after ICO.

Sad but true. ((

He-he. It's not real investors. They are someone who wants easy money just like ICO initiators. ))
But OK. They are new generation of investors. More risky but acting faster and easier and get income faster.
So what is the proportion between classic investors and new-generation? Is there real ones who ready to wait for real project grow?
Or there are just new investors who want to fund-and-exit ASAP...



That is exactly I'm talking about!
But it could not last forever I hope.


So the question is: what should do the project which is really going to do something real?  List coins? Do not list?

I'm not going to go into details but ICO's do have connections with the exchanges before releasing the tokens during their ICO/Pre-ICO.Like I have known  ICO's which update stuff like 'In Talks with Poloniex to have your coin on an exchange'.Secondly bounty whores dump the coin as soon as the ICO ends ,doesn't matter much but kinda is reflected on the price.

Because for some ICO, they don't really care about its future increase, what they really care about is making money now.

It's convenient for the investor that list coin in the exchanges and sell their coins to get BTC.

For the most of ICO project, they just want to make some money and don't really need to develop its project.

mozillaspez, what a nice way to spam a post! Don't pretend you haven't heard of the coin called  Lisk before now. Well, if you hadn't, there was nowhere in your quoted post that the poster indicated Lisk was having an ICO.

To your question OP, I strongly believe that coins should be listed in exchanges as soon as the ICOs are over. This should be expedient. That way, investors can trade or sell them off to recoup their money if they aren't interested in hodling them for the future.

I would like to know if it is available then give it to me the detail about your ico and exchange prices per token because i'ma investor i would like to invest in your ico as well.

Yes sure, it allows to get profit back very fast but:
1. It's just a speculative profit and not the profit the company intended to (in case of real project, not fake).
2. This is too risky.
3. If company got enough funds to raise the project it needs no more investors. In case of good growing project investors who fund this project already are not interested in new participants because they do not want to split further profits with others.

Again: if company works good token price raise accordingly. If company did not work yet and just finished ICO no one knows real price so it's accidental at the beginning.

Lisk has really proved itself legit and freindly for every user.
Yes it is a good sign for users and also for the dev and investors to get their profit back and it will attract others devs to come in market.

Banana coins are good to sign up and if you want to sign up, just click this link https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bountyico-banana-coin-coins-linked-to-bananas-ended-2164386

Lisk was listed not after ico but now price is higher then ico.

Hello!

We know that a lot of tokens drop price when listed in exchanges just after ICO. I do not understand why companies list tokens immediately.

Suppose some company goes to ICO and DO NOT have plans to list the token at any exchange immediately after ICO.
What are conclusions from this?
1. The company have good project and really looks for investment to develop the project. It needs money to grow and make good business.
2. If cap have not been reached then Company could store tokens to sell later because it have good intentions (see p.1). Definitely some investors will want to buy after see the company is on good way.
3. The company goes to take all the money and disappear so it does not care about promises. But having this intention does not prevent company from making promises to list token.
3. What else?


Suppose some company goes to ICO and DO have plans to list the token at any exchange immediately after ICO.
What are conclusions from this?
1. The company have good intentions, but want to drop the price to buy its tokens back for much smaller amount? If it has money after ICO to grow the project then why it should go to exchange?
2. The company have good intentions, but want to raise price to sell some tokens for extra amount.
3. The company have bad  intentions, want to drop the price to buy its tokens back for much smaller amount, ideally buy all the tokens back and remain "clear" - no tokens, no liability - profit.
4. The company have good intentions but poor management? If company have good project isn't it better to start it and show some growth and list token later when it will have good support according to project results and not because of ICOs promises.
5. Something else?

What do you think?