Topic: List of wallets, exchanges, pools and services NOT supporting hardfork ? (Read 357 times)

reserved for future use

THE LIST: (note: currently mostly unfilled)

Mining pools: (first guess from the ones not-mentioned on Bitcoin Classic site)

• F2Pool - ???
• BTCC - ???
• Slush - ???
• Kano - ???
• Bitclub - ???
• Ghash.IO - ???
• Eligius - ? - (Possibly, as Luke-jr supports Core?), probably due to this.
• BitFury - ?? - mentioned on BitcoinClassic as suporter, but this indicates more balanced view.
• P2P mining - ???

Online wallets:

SPV wallets:

• Mycelium - ???
• Multibit - ???
• Electrum - ???
• Armory - not a SPV wallet, probably depending on "Core"/"Classic" implementation
• breadwallet - , mentioned on Classic
• Greenaddres

Other:

• Trezor - ???
• Ledger - ???
• Keepkey - ???

Exchanges:

• BTC-e - ???
• localbitcoins - individual, obviously. Depends on the participants.
• MPEx - Mircea Popescu expresed some very strong views in this case. (Repeatedly, consistently and coherently). (1, 2, 3)

Merchants:

• Robocoin - ???, possibly ceasing operations 1, behavior of their ATM machines will depend on operator?

Payment processors:

Hello.
I would like to ask for and rally information about Bitcoin interfaces, merchants and services who do not and will not (in near future) support hardfork of Bitcoin protocol.
Simply put: I mean online wallets, mining pools, SPV-Clients, exchanges, payment processors, etc. who currently support Roadmap as planed by Bitcon Core and do not support proposals by Bitcoin Classic (nor BitcoinXT, Bitcoin Unimited) to increase max block size by hardfork, (exclude RBF, change PoW mechanism...).
Meaning they will consider >1MB blocks invalid and transactions within such blocks as inconsequential. Meaning they will not produce such transactions and blocks.
I would like to divert my mining power and transfer my bitcoins to such services before Bitcoin Wars roundly erupt.

Please do not post just your speculation and/or wishful thinking about who supports what. Please refrain from judging and arguing which path for Bitcoin is "right" or "wrong" or what is "needed and necessary".
If you post information, include source and date of that information if possible. Keep in mind, that not opposing Bitcoin Core does not automatically mean (commitment to) rejecting 2MB hardforked blocks and resisting majority of miners. On the other hand, supporting Bitcoin Classic does not automatically mean enforcing it against dissenters and deliberate generation/preference of such blocks. So, for example, if exchange or online wallet favors 2MB blocks, but respects and guarantees that it will send you withdrawal in <1MB block (in a chain of transactions with no ancestor in 2MB block) if you wish so in the future, include it with this information.
Likewise, If mining pool transparently allows using different ports to commit mining power to strictly 1 MB branch then include this info.