Actually, they are shilling for Adkins, probably bumping service. And of course, they are laying according to us. But the question is how moderators would determine if they are really laying? It'd easy to guess for us. Even moderators could guess but they can't take any action or delete posts based on a guess. They are taking advantage of the forum rule's loophole.
I understand the hands of the mods are limited and they are driven by the rules. My goal is to list those liars and tag their accounts so anyone who does not have idea of their words can at least see their trust page and see this topic.
if we accuse of them lying, that requires evidence in order to prove such accusation.
They are free to bring blockchain evidences.
I'm not depending anyone here but IMO, it's up to them to share the transaction or not, bear in mind that we want privacy here.
You are suspecting and I suspect that what you have posted here are all the evidence you got.
Looks lying and lying is different, one is suspecting while one is accusing.
Yes but in this case of adkins, it's obvious and there are zero doubt. I hope you have seen their self-moderated thread and how that thread developed.
I saw their thread and I also believe they are shilling but that's just up to me, however, lying is just another case though, that's my personal opinion too and the evidence provided if there's any doesn't suffice the accusation of lying.
Is this thread all about adkins? Then I suggest to make it more specific, like changing the thread title.
The main point here is it's not the mods job to take care of this matter.
