I'm rarely into blackjack, so when I do play I don't really care if what type of blackjack that was but knowing that I'm playing on a legit site gives me a confident that they are not manipulating their games. For the many especially to the fan of the game, maybe they will choose the live one because this makes them think that it was more legit as they can see the live action on their screens but what about the provably fair one?
Even though it is isn't live, we still can verify each of our results. This is it's known advantage. Verifying a provably fair game is only easy and doesn't require a coding or a good computer knowledge like you said there. There is also instruction if we are new to it.
Topic: Live Blackjack vs House Blackjack (Read 315 times)
So far I don’t see Blackjack as PVP mode. Maybe on tournament like the one introduced by blackjack.fun for their free roll table but in real gambling scenario I still doesn’t play a PVP mode although it’s highly possible since baccarat has PVP mode called Lucky 9 in my country but it still needs a banker which rotates every round.
It’s impossible to play this game without a banker role since the game is designed to beat the house so someone needs to be the house in able to make this game a PVP.
Well I could see that the casino Can take orders in a PVP way similar to when sports bets are made, the house will only always receive Some profits from the time you enter for each play, even if it is 0.1usd and up , but it can offer the Service , of course it is Something as I see it, I don't know if it will be profitable for them, but a casino that manages to Implement it can be lucky that they will make a lot of money and the prize pool will be Accumulated by the same Players and the same casino or that offers a prize, all that accumulates and depending on the Game you have Something interesting to win.
Blackjack is not the same with poker that player can increase the bet size according to their current cards. Typically they will just bet fixed or increased it a little bit since Blackjack is just a simple of race to 21 to win.
Casino will have less profit if they will just rely on the table fee. Blackjack is on of the of the popular game which the casino earns huge profit from player that doesn’t know how to play properly. Players typically panic when dealer already got high card.
I prefer live blackjack as it is more fun but I only play live black in real life as the experience is just a lot better than in front of a computerscreen. The problem is that a lot of casinos (especially in Vegas) have now only 6/5 blackjack which increases the house edge massively then compared to 3/2 blackjack.
I’m not aware that there’s already a payout of 6:5 instead of the traditional 3:2. Although I will not be surprised considering that physical casino only use this payout due to their operating cost is much higher than the online casino.
Anyway, the game play is just the same while Blackjack card is not that too frequent to acquire so I guess the experience will still just fine if you will play properly with strategy.
All the big casinos on the Strip (MGM, Ceasars,…) only offer 6 to 5 blackjack anymore. While the game is still the same and I try to play basic strategy your house edge of a 6 to 5 BJ compared to 3 to 2 BJ is about 400% higher.
The only winner is the casino.
copper member
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1179
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I prefer live blackjack as it is more fun but I only play live black in real life as the experience is just a lot better than in front of a computerscreen. The problem is that a lot of casinos (especially in Vegas) have now only 6/5 blackjack which increases the house edge massively then compared to 3/2 blackjack.
I’m not aware that there’s already a payout of 6:5 instead of the traditional 3:2. Although I will not be surprised considering that physical casino only use this payout due to their operating cost is much higher than the online casino.
Anyway, the game play is just the same while Blackjack card is not that too frequent to acquire so I guess the experience will still just fine if you will play properly with strategy.
So far I don’t see Blackjack as PVP mode. Maybe on tournament like the one introduced by blackjack.fun for their free roll table but in real gambling scenario I still doesn’t play a PVP mode although it’s highly possible since baccarat has PVP mode called Lucky 9 in my country but it still needs a banker which rotates every round.
It’s impossible to play this game without a banker role since the game is designed to beat the house so someone needs to be the house in able to make this game a PVP.
Well I could see that the casino Can take orders in a PVP way similar to when sports bets are made, the house will only always receive Some profits from the time you enter for each play, even if it is 0.1usd and up , but it can offer the Service , of course it is Something as I see it, I don't know if it will be profitable for them, but a casino that manages to Implement it can be lucky that they will make a lot of money and the prize pool will be Accumulated by the same Players and the same casino or that offers a prize, all that accumulates and depending on the Game you have Something interesting to win.
I would like blackjack and poker in PVP mode and I think that with that many people in the World will be happy, when you play any of the games Mentioned above it is exciting, even more when you bet, but it is much more exciting to play in PVP mode and in championships , until now I do not know what is the Reason why a casino does not dare to put this service 24 hours , I expect a lot from the best casinos in the forum , I am sure that if something like this happens, it will be for all the players.
Live Blackjack on a Table with at least 4 players betting equal amounts is something fabulous, they have done it with poker , but not with Blackjack , it would be interesting but in PVP mode, playing online against the casino the advantage is imminent on the part of the house.
Live Blackjack on a Table with at least 4 players betting equal amounts is something fabulous, they have done it with poker , but not with Blackjack , it would be interesting but in PVP mode, playing online against the casino the advantage is imminent on the part of the house.
So far I don’t see Blackjack as PVP mode. Maybe on tournament like the one introduced by blackjack.fun for their free roll table but in real gambling scenario I still doesn’t play a PVP mode although it’s highly possible since baccarat has PVP mode called Lucky 9 in my country but it still needs a banker which rotates every round.
It’s impossible to play this game without a banker role since the game is designed to beat the house so someone needs to be the house in able to make this game a PVP.
As for me - there is no difference. BlackJack is not far from the full random casino games as for me. You have a strategy for all cards combinations and it is not so many to remember it. The only difference if you don`t believe provably fair.
About my experience - i don`t like this game and very rare play it in casinos. So i can say that i mostly play offline version with friends. But i don`t see the difference between it.
For me I would compare playing blackjack either live or in-house with playing pool games, because in as much as there is same principle of play bound to it, the experience is very different. About my experience - i don`t like this game and very rare play it in casinos. So i can say that i mostly play offline version with friends. But i don`t see the difference between it.
In some instances I can even agree that the rules may be a little different between playing blackjack in-house or live, because while the dealer is human and may require much intelligence to influence the outcome of the game to their advantage, the margin of error by the computer program for live games may be more accurate and trusted as compared to a human with a chance margin of error or mistakes.
I would like blackjack and poker in PVP mode and I think that with that many people in the World will be happy, when you play any of the games Mentioned above it is exciting, even more when you bet, but it is much more exciting to play in PVP mode and in championships , until now I do not know what is the Reason why a casino does not dare to put this service 24 hours , I expect a lot from the best casinos in the forum , I am sure that if something like this happens, it will be for all the players.
Live Blackjack on a Table with at least 4 players betting equal amounts is something fabulous, they have done it with poker , but not with Blackjack , it would be interesting but in PVP mode, playing online against the casino the advantage is imminent on the part of the house.
Live Blackjack on a Table with at least 4 players betting equal amounts is something fabulous, they have done it with poker , but not with Blackjack , it would be interesting but in PVP mode, playing online against the casino the advantage is imminent on the part of the house.
There's a different kind of fun when playing with a live dealer, but I mostly play with house blackjack. I mostly play blackjack while doing something else, anyway. I very seldom play blackjack and concentrate on it alone. House blackjack is more convenient in this setup.
As to provability, you don't have to verify the result of every deal. And to anybody who wishes to verify the result's fairness, one doesn't have to understand coding. It's just a matter of copy-pasting and checking whether the numbers match or not.
As to provability, you don't have to verify the result of every deal. And to anybody who wishes to verify the result's fairness, one doesn't have to understand coding. It's just a matter of copy-pasting and checking whether the numbers match or not.
I prefer live blackjack as it is more fun but I only play live black in real life as the experience is just a lot better than in front of a computerscreen. The problem is that a lot of casinos (especially in Vegas) have now only 6/5 blackjack which increases the house edge massively then compared to 3/2 blackjack.
For me I would compare playing blackjack either live or in-house with playing pool games, because in as much as there is same principle of play bound to it, the experience is very different.
In some instances I can even agree that the rules may be a little different between playing blackjack in-house or live, because while the dealer is human and may require much intelligence to influence the outcome of the game to their advantage, the margin of error by the computer program for live games may be more accurate and trusted as compared to a human with a chance margin of error or mistakes.
In some instances I can even agree that the rules may be a little different between playing blackjack in-house or live, because while the dealer is human and may require much intelligence to influence the outcome of the game to their advantage, the margin of error by the computer program for live games may be more accurate and trusted as compared to a human with a chance margin of error or mistakes.
There’s no such thing as margin of error when it comes dealer regardless of computerized or human dealer. Human dealer usually being monitored by a manager on the screen that makes her always in check. I think the card placement during shuffling is the one that can give impact on the game however it’s a complete random arrangement so it’s still based on luck.
Game-wise, i think both house and live blackjack is same. They only differ on the experience since house blackjack is just like playing typical games while live blackjack has a touch of human interaction since the dealer is human and socializing.
I created this topic to hear what’s the opinion of most player when playing same game but in different type between live and house game.
What do you think is the most comfortable blackjack game for you? Provably fair or Live?
Provably fair system promised full transparency on the game but what if user playing it doesn’t know how to verify the code whether it’s fair or not since not all gambler can understand coding.
Live game on contrary provides physical games which we can see in our naked eye the cards that drawn in the shoe. The only fairness question is game provider might use tricky card like changing the number while on the shoe(I’m not sure if this technology is possible) to give an advantage to the dealer since they need to scan it in able to show value to the screen.
Let’s discuss about your experience. There’s no wrong opinion here.
As for me - there is no difference. BlackJack is not far from the full random casino games as for me. You have a strategy for all cards combinations and it is not so many to remember it. The only difference if you don`t believe provably fair. What do you think is the most comfortable blackjack game for you? Provably fair or Live?
Provably fair system promised full transparency on the game but what if user playing it doesn’t know how to verify the code whether it’s fair or not since not all gambler can understand coding.
Live game on contrary provides physical games which we can see in our naked eye the cards that drawn in the shoe. The only fairness question is game provider might use tricky card like changing the number while on the shoe(I’m not sure if this technology is possible) to give an advantage to the dealer since they need to scan it in able to show value to the screen.
Let’s discuss about your experience. There’s no wrong opinion here.
About my experience - i don`t like this game and very rare play it in casinos. So i can say that i mostly play offline version with friends. But i don`t see the difference between it.
In some instances I can even agree that the rules may be a little different between playing blackjack in-house or live, because while the dealer is human and may require much intelligence to influence the outcome of the game to their advantage, the margin of error by the computer program for live games may be more accurate and trusted as compared to a human with a chance margin of error or mistakes.
I created this topic to hear what’s the opinion of most player when playing same game but in different type between live and house game.
What do you think is the most comfortable blackjack game for you? Provably fair or Live?
Provably fair system promised full transparency on the game but what if user playing it doesn’t know how to verify the code whether it’s fair or not since not all gambler can understand coding.
Live game on contrary provides physical games which we can see in our naked eye the cards that drawn in the shoe. The only fairness question is game provider might use tricky card like changing the number while on the shoe(I’m not sure if this technology is possible) to give an advantage to the dealer since they need to scan it in able to show value to the screen.
Let’s discuss about your experience. There’s no wrong opinion here.
As for me - there is no difference. BlackJack is not far from the full random casino games as for me. You have a strategy for all cards combinations and it is not so many to remember it. The only difference if you don`t believe provably fair. What do you think is the most comfortable blackjack game for you? Provably fair or Live?
Provably fair system promised full transparency on the game but what if user playing it doesn’t know how to verify the code whether it’s fair or not since not all gambler can understand coding.
Live game on contrary provides physical games which we can see in our naked eye the cards that drawn in the shoe. The only fairness question is game provider might use tricky card like changing the number while on the shoe(I’m not sure if this technology is possible) to give an advantage to the dealer since they need to scan it in able to show value to the screen.
Let’s discuss about your experience. There’s no wrong opinion here.
About my experience - i don`t like this game and very rare play it in casinos. So i can say that i mostly play offline version with friends. But i don`t see the difference between it.
I don't like virtual blackjack games or "house blackjack" games as you say because it's usually very complicated to check the fairness of the round and of the whole game. In addition it's very hard to guess if the game is really random or if it tends to generate more unsual patterns than a common shuffle of the cards. In addition some virtual blackjack games uses an unlimited amount of decks, meaning you can undergo very long streaks with bad cards for the player dealt theoretically.
Well said and you really expressed what is my opinion towards house blackjack. Not that I don’t trust them but it’s hard to verify the fairness for non coder knowledge if the game is really fair.
I started this discussion since I experienced multiple bad experience playing house blackjack as if the result is manipulated which I rarely experienced playing on live blackjack. On house blackjack, I experienced multiple consecutive 21,20 and blackjack for the dealer as if a natural cards set.
There's a different kind of fun when playing with a live dealer, but I mostly play with house blackjack. I mostly play blackjack while doing something else, anyway. I very seldom play blackjack and concentrate on it alone. House blackjack is more convenient in this setup.
As to provability, you don't have to verify the result of every deal. And to anybody who wishes to verify the result's fairness, one doesn't have to understand coding. It's just a matter of copy-pasting and checking whether the numbers match or not.
As to provability, you don't have to verify the result of every deal. And to anybody who wishes to verify the result's fairness, one doesn't have to understand coding. It's just a matter of copy-pasting and checking whether the numbers match or not.
I created this topic to hear what’s the opinion of most player when playing same game but in different type between live and house game.
...
...
Personally, I am rather a fan of probably fair blackjack, specially the one being offered in Stake, I can play as fast as I like and the minimalistic art-style of the game is quite appealing to me.
I have not played live casino much, and I don't think it enhances the experience to know there is an actual person at the end of the camera to carter for our experience. Besides, it could be a problem for those who unfortunately have a slow internet connection (that in the case in many developing countries like mine). So I rather not to compromise the speed of my session and not to tempt the internet connection I have with a on-live blackjack session.
I would not see any difference in chances. Just with "house" blackjack there are some long hot streaks in some cases but no more advantages.
I like the "slow game"more. Not be in a hurry for my bets, or in case of bad connection I can resume the game.
For sure Live games will become more and more popular and in some nations there are tv channels dedicated
I like the "slow game"more. Not be in a hurry for my bets, or in case of bad connection I can resume the game.
For sure Live games will become more and more popular and in some nations there are tv channels dedicated
Quote
How do you battle the pressure when experiencing a long losing streak? It’s very hard to control bets when the game is fast phase.
Just keep the bets consistent and don't martin gale yourself because I had losing streaks of 12 games in a row but also winning streaks. It goes both ways and If u want to win you should play fast and short since on the long run the odds are against you.
But it's going to be a mental battle though, just like what he says, it's hard to control bets, and most of the time, gamblers wanted to think before putting their bets. There is also this baccarat game that I once played online wherein it's really very fast, and as you try to think the timer is up.
I think the obvious answer here is that we want to play live, no question about it. The experience is very different, because when you play against the house, you don't know if it is provably fair or maybe they are going to try to manipulate the result early and keep you winning until you fell confident and then you go on a losing streak.
I don't like virtual blackjack games or "house blackjack" games as you say because it's usually very complicated to check the fairness of the round and of the whole game. In addition it's very hard to guess if the game is really random or if it tends to generate more unsual patterns than a common shuffle of the cards. In addition some virtual blackjack games uses an unlimited amount of decks, meaning you can undergo very long streaks with bad cards for the player dealt theoretically.
I’m not pertaining to the shoe mechanism when I say that cards can be change. I’m assuming a possibility of the cards itself can be changed the display using some advanced shit technology like what I saw in the movie hahaha. I’m just overthinking this possibility for the sake of discussion for possible cheating but I’m not suggesting that this is really happening.
Btw I spend most of my wager on live blackjack so I’m pretty familiar with these games. I’m just exploring now house blackjack as this is my worst nightmare so far on my blackjack journey.
Nope, I don't think there is no such things the card are suddenly change like AI.Btw I spend most of my wager on live blackjack so I’m pretty familiar with these games. I’m just exploring now house blackjack as this is my worst nightmare so far on my blackjack journey.
But, for changing the next card dealing to the card we want from the deck could be possible by machine shoe. That's why it is better to avoid machine shuffle or machine-dealing shoe, just stick with some shoe storage in plastic not machine or dealing by hand in front of you.
Good luck for the thread.
When online: House Blackjack is much faster and there are no distractions from other players, so it seems much better.
Live online blackjack is what being referred here not the physical blackjack that you can play IRL casino. I think even on IRL casino players is not allowed to distract others or else you will get kicked out. The pressure is much higher on physical casino table games since you are dealing face to face against the dealer.
Quote
Overall, Live in a real casino is best, but the table minimums are much higher than online, so the money needed is sometimes way too high. Basically, online House is cheaper and super fast with no need to have to get to a casino. I finally played so much I will be spending time on other things. 
I agree, minimum bet on IRL casino table games is much higher but this is because they are paying many expenses compared to house blackjack that operates automatically based on the code design. Also only few play nowadays on the minimum range.
Quote
How do you battle the pressure when experiencing a long losing streak? It’s very hard to control bets when the game is fast phase.
Just keep the bets consistent and don't martin gale yourself because I had losing streaks of 12 games in a row but also winning streaks. It goes both ways and If u want to win you should play fast and short since on the long run the odds are against you.
It depends on the player and their environment some of the players want to make themselves concentrate during the game so they prefer house blackjack and also they don't get any pressure at all, unlike with live blackjack they have a very crowded place and people can watch you give more pressure but just the same outcome still it's the blackjack game if you are good with the cards of statistics and probability still you have the higher chance to win with the next card.
Both live and house blackjack they made a shuffle of the deck but just difference is its programmatically with the random and a manual with the dealer side. AFAIK before start of the game they make shuffle of cards or change the set of deck.
Live blackjack for me is much better since you have an option to have multiple seat and change table in case you are unlucky on your current table. House blackjack offers pure random card since every round dealth using full card deck meaning it’s very hard to find a streak or change the flow of the cards compared to live blackjack which you can easily cut the bad luck streak by changing the number of seat you are playing.
The only advantage of house blackjack for is the game is much quicker which is good for acquiring wagering but in terms of fun then I will definitely choose live games due to the presence of live dealers that you can interact while playing.
The only advantage of house blackjack for is the game is much quicker which is good for acquiring wagering but in terms of fun then I will definitely choose live games due to the presence of live dealers that you can interact while playing.
Both live and house blackjack they made a shuffle of the deck but just difference is its programmatically with the random and a manual with the dealer side. AFAIK before start of the game they make shuffle of cards or change the set of deck.
When online: House Blackjack is much faster and there are no distractions from other players, so it seems much better. Overall, Live in a real casino is best, but the table minimums are much higher than online, so the money needed is sometimes way too high. Basically, online House is cheaper and super fast with no need to have to get to a casino. I finally played so much I will be spending time on other things.
The house edge is exactly the same whether u play Live or House Blackjack. U will have the same RTP on both considering the rules are the same.
This correct, theoretical RTP is just the same since just the same game that why I didn’t mention this matter when it comes to comparison. The discussion is just purely revolves on the experience for using both type of Blackjack.
Quote
At house blackjack U can also redeposit for your double/split while during a live session you don't.
Great point for the advantage since you can’t do this on live blackjack as it has a time constraint for decision making.
Quote
Personally, I prefer house blackjack because u play faster and don't have to wait for other people to act. Also, there no miss deals and card shuffles happening.
How do you battle the pressure when experiencing a long losing streak? It’s very hard to control bets when the game is fast phase.
I reckon in terms of easily visible guarantee, people would prefer Live Blackjack than House. It's clearly visible as to what's happening in the cards after all plus they can technically save replays of shuffles and draws to see if anything "dubious" is actually happening. Compare that to House Blackjack where it's up in the air. Even when checked, a majority of crypto casino users don't even know if what they're doing makes the checking even valid or not really since it looks a bit technical.
Personally I don't mind either, but I do play Live more compared to House.
Personally I don't mind either, but I do play Live more compared to House.
The house edge is exactly the same whether u play Live or House Blackjack. U will have the same RTP on both considering the rules are the same.
Personally, I prefer house blackjack because u play faster and don't have to wait for other people to act. Also, there no miss deals and card shuffles happening.
At house blackjack U can also redeposit for your double/split while during a live session you don't.
Personally, I prefer house blackjack because u play faster and don't have to wait for other people to act. Also, there no miss deals and card shuffles happening.
At house blackjack U can also redeposit for your double/split while during a live session you don't.
Not quite sure if you playing the "Live-Blackjack" yets or not.
Most of the room blackjack uses shoes made with "plastic" not a machine. Yes, there is some cheating device for the "shoe machine" that can mix or make output to specific cards. But most of the shoe storage is made with plastic (Pragmatic Play/Evolution Games).
Best advice
- Play on biggest or favourite provider like PP or Evolution
- Avoid machine shoe
Most of the room blackjack uses shoes made with "plastic" not a machine. Yes, there is some cheating device for the "shoe machine" that can mix or make output to specific cards. But most of the shoe storage is made with plastic (Pragmatic Play/Evolution Games).
Best advice
- Play on biggest or favourite provider like PP or Evolution
- Avoid machine shoe
I’m not pertaining to the shoe mechanism when I say that cards can be change. I’m assuming a possibility of the cards itself can be changed the display using some advanced shit technology like what I saw in the movie hahaha. I’m just overthinking this possibility for the sake of discussion for possible cheating but I’m not suggesting that this is really happening.
Btw I spend most of my wager on live blackjack so I’m pretty familiar with these games. I’m just exploring now house blackjack as this is my worst nightmare so far on my blackjack journey.
Not quite sure if you playing the "Live-Blackjack" yets or not.
Most of the room blackjack uses shoes made with "plastic" not a machine. Yes, there is some cheating device for the "shoe machine" that can mix or make output to specific cards. But most of the shoe storage is made with plastic (Pragmatic Play/Evolution Games).
Best advice
- Play on biggest or favourite provider like PP or Evolution
- Avoid machine shoe
Most of the room blackjack uses shoes made with "plastic" not a machine. Yes, there is some cheating device for the "shoe machine" that can mix or make output to specific cards. But most of the shoe storage is made with plastic (Pragmatic Play/Evolution Games).
Best advice
- Play on biggest or favourite provider like PP or Evolution
- Avoid machine shoe
As a gambler who doesn't understand coding, I still think optimistically when playing Blackjack at an online casino, and I'm not really skeptical about cheating behind the scenes. But if you think about it, live play might be fairer because we can see some important details of what the dealer does with our own eyes.
Live dealer IMO is better than the house blackjack. While casi is say provably fair, I still feel like there are ways to cheat the players. I won't go into detail as I have no proof to offer, but I think it's possible.
With Live dealers I can see everything. They may be cheating players as well, but feels safer I guess.
Probably it's more of a human psychology, that we want to see a blackjack dealer, instead of the house blackjack and it makes us question whether it's provably fair or not. Although there are instance that a live dealer was caught cheating as well,With Live dealers I can see everything. They may be cheating players as well, but feels safer I guess.
Probably just few occasions that they have been fault.
But still though for me, I will go and play with live dealer.
In terms of comfort, i'd say they're close to one another so it all comes down to one's preference (provably fair or visual evidence) and for me, that's live blackjack as it's slightly convenient when you mostly have to rely on what you're seeing through the feed.
For house blackjack, casinos tend to have a guide and verifier to make the process easier. Even if they don't have one, there are third-party sites that should help you find the answers you're looking for and tell you what to put on their verifiers.
If you don't want to go through those steps, then live blackjack is the alternative as the live dealers follow certain procedures before they pull out cards from a freshly shuffled deck.
For house blackjack, casinos tend to have a guide and verifier to make the process easier. Even if they don't have one, there are third-party sites that should help you find the answers you're looking for and tell you what to put on their verifiers.
If you don't want to go through those steps, then live blackjack is the alternative as the live dealers follow certain procedures before they pull out cards from a freshly shuffled deck.
Live dealer IMO is better than the house blackjack. While casi is say provably fair, I still feel like there are ways to cheat the players. I won't go into detail as I have no proof to offer, but I think it's possible.
With Live dealers I can see everything. They may be cheating players as well, but feels safer I guess.
With Live dealers I can see everything. They may be cheating players as well, but feels safer I guess.
Live Blackjack vs House Blackjack first of all i love blackjack like a lot it simply because i cant play other card game and blackjack is easy and fast game and sometimes i play it for quick cash after losing in game like crash and plinko.
Back to the topic if you asked me between live blackjack and house blackjack i prefer live blackjack because it just feel alive we can say hi to the dealer and talk to them via chat when ylu play House blackjack you like play with Robot and i lost a lot haha
But im just curious what is the function of the scanner in card shuffler in live Blackjack
Back to the topic if you asked me between live blackjack and house blackjack i prefer live blackjack because it just feel alive we can say hi to the dealer and talk to them via chat when ylu play House blackjack you like play with Robot and i lost a lot haha
But im just curious what is the function of the scanner in card shuffler in live Blackjack
Live blackjack for me is much better since you have an option to have multiple seat and change table in case you are unlucky on your current table. House blackjack offers pure random card since every round dealth using full card deck meaning it’s very hard to find a streak or change the flow of the cards compared to live blackjack which you can easily cut the bad luck streak by changing the number of seat you are playing.
I believe pure random game per round means you don’t have to worry about the arrangement of the cards since you can consider it as they shuffle the whole deck per round. Although I agree that selecting multiple seat can help you change the tempo of your game since you can breakeven if one of your card is good while the other is bad.
Quote
The only advantage of house blackjack for is the game is much quicker which is good for acquiring wagering but in terms of fun then I will definitely choose live games due to the presence of live dealers that you can interact while playing.
But the disadvantage is much riskier since you can experience rush betting that will make you prone on error during decision phase. Most of my losses on blackjack is from house blackjack because of its quick game feature which is not good on game that needs to think.
Live blackjack for me is much better since you have an option to have multiple seat and change table in case you are unlucky on your current table. House blackjack offers pure random card since every round dealth using full card deck meaning it’s very hard to find a streak or change the flow of the cards compared to live blackjack which you can easily cut the bad luck streak by changing the number of seat you are playing.
The only advantage of house blackjack for is the game is much quicker which is good for acquiring wagering but in terms of fun then I will definitely choose live games due to the presence of live dealers that you can interact while playing.
The only advantage of house blackjack for is the game is much quicker which is good for acquiring wagering but in terms of fun then I will definitely choose live games due to the presence of live dealers that you can interact while playing.
I created this topic to hear what’s the opinion of most player when playing same game but in different type between live and house game.
What do you think is the most comfortable blackjack game for you? Provably fair or Live?
Provably fair system promised full transparency on the game but what if user playing it doesn’t know how to verify the code whether it’s fair or not since not all gambler can understand coding.
Live game on contrary provides physical games which we can see in our naked eye the cards that drawn in the shoe. The only fairness question is game provider might use tricky card like changing the number while on the shoe(I’m not sure if this technology is possible) to give an advantage to the dealer since they need to scan it in able to show value to the screen.
Let’s discuss about your experience. There’s no wrong opinion here.
What do you think is the most comfortable blackjack game for you? Provably fair or Live?
Provably fair system promised full transparency on the game but what if user playing it doesn’t know how to verify the code whether it’s fair or not since not all gambler can understand coding.
Live game on contrary provides physical games which we can see in our naked eye the cards that drawn in the shoe. The only fairness question is game provider might use tricky card like changing the number while on the shoe(I’m not sure if this technology is possible) to give an advantage to the dealer since they need to scan it in able to show value to the screen.
Let’s discuss about your experience. There’s no wrong opinion here.
Jump to: