Why not just use a service meant for mixing? Seems like it's a lot more complicated than using a reliable bitcoin mixer.
it is simple: because of the fees!
if you have ever used a mixing service or if you check their website like bitmixer.io you can see that when you mix your coins you have to pay the network fee and also
a percentage fee which is a percentage of the amount you want to mix so you can end up paying 0.01
BTC for example.
I'm not really sure if you bothered to do the research before you said that, but if you did, you'd realize that BitMixer.io charges a minimum of 0.5% transaction fee + 0.0005
BTC. The second bit is so tiny that it should be ignored; as of right now, only about 30 cents. Even if you didn't go full cheapskate on the transaction fee and did the minimum 0.5% fee and used, instead, a 1% fee, you would have to be mixing 1
BTC in.
first of all you are repeating the same exact thing that i said but instead of saying it the simple way you are playing around with numbers.
second of all that 0.5% is only the minimum amount and the recommendation is to use a random percentage that is why when you ope the page the slider goes on a random number instead of a fixed one. give it a try an you will see
third the 0.5% on 1
BTC (if that is what you want to mix) is 0.005
BTC so you will pay 0.0055
BTC if there is only 1 forward address.
now compare this to deposit in an exchange site and withdrawing. on poloniex withdrawal fee is 0.0001
BTC and if you deposit with current fee you will be paying less than 0.0003
BTC which is
18 times lowerif you want to mix 5
BTC you pay 0.0255
BTC which is 85 times higher this time. and so on
i should add that i am not suggesting this is a good way or fees are high, i am simply pointing out possible facts why some people are looking for alternative ways.
And if you're holding 1
BTC, I hardly think that you'd be fretting about a $6 fee for anonymity.
Seriously, if you're worrying about the fees on BitMixer.io, you should stop hodling so much.
now if you kept on reading the rest of my comment instead of reading the first sentence and cutting the rest you could have seen that i have pointed out that this method is not the best for mixing and also has risks but it surely is the cheapest.
and the anonymity that you are talking about does not concern regular users who are not doing anything illegal and only want to protect their "privacy" from other regular users not the government.