By the way, I'd kindly request that you remove this post as your basis for the title is on old information.
Topic: Lock! (Read 1019 times)
No Bruce, I didn't see your post linking to your records before I made the comment.
Meanwhile, I did find out when you took a liking to achieving prowess of the King's English: http://projects.chass.utoronto.ca/emls/iemls/shaksper/biogs/f.txt
Quote
I am fairly new to the world of Shakespeare, it is only in the last year that I
have begun to study the works during my space time. As owner of a small
investment firm I do a good deal of writing and public speaking. I believe my
quest to become a better writer and speaker is one of the roots of my intrigue
with Shakespeare. It is my belief that mastery over one's vocabulary is one of
the greatest skills one can have. By developing a tiny fraction of the command
of language that Shakespeare had we can explain ideas, convince, make people
laugh, make political changes, sell ourselves and our ideas and share our
enthusiasm effectively.
have begun to study the works during my space time. As owner of a small
investment firm I do a good deal of writing and public speaking. I believe my
quest to become a better writer and speaker is one of the roots of my intrigue
with Shakespeare. It is my belief that mastery over one's vocabulary is one of
the greatest skills one can have. By developing a tiny fraction of the command
of language that Shakespeare had we can explain ideas, convince, make people
laugh, make political changes, sell ourselves and our ideas and share our
enthusiasm effectively.
http://projects.chass.utoronto.ca/emls/iemls/shaksper/logs/98log.txt
Quote
I am visiting my daughter in Ormond Beach and printed out your
information before I left Canada.
information before I left Canada.
I don't see no mention of Canada here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brucefenton
Gleb, this is really terribly sad.
You've now gone back to a 1998 ListServe mailing list about the writing of Shakespeare in an attempt to tarnish my name?
Yes, the first post is me. Please read carefully and see that the second post not me but was a reply by another person. Correct, I do not have ties to Canada and did not even have any kids until a decade after this post. Think also: you know my age from your research. I was 26 years old in 1998. Do you think I'd have a daughter living on her own that I'd go visit?
Once again you have accused me of dishonesty and once again your claim has been proven false.
Please, I don't know what kind of person you are, but I have some hope that you are honorable. Give it a a rest, appologize if you see fit. Call me and we can speak by phone or perhaps together we can work to catch an actual bad apple. You do nothing for yourself, this board or Bitcoin by continuing to increasingly grasp at demons that are not there.
I'm going to do my best to walk away from this now.
I guess I'm asserting that there's some pretty obvious puffery in his style of presenting his work history. I''ve asserted in another thread that there's no reason for TBF to continue to exist and that it's current board isn't one we should want representing us in the media. But that's off-topic here.
What "obvious puffery"?
Have you read my reply explaining all of the many items in the post?
In reality the only one even resembling something with merit is the point that I reffered to my job 21 years ago as "Morgan Stanley" when at the time it was Dean Witter, which aquired Morgan Stanley, changed the name to Morgan Stanley Dean Witter then later dropped the Dean Witter. The OPs suggestion is to add a parenthetical explaining the acquisition)
That seems to be it.
Is that about right?
(By the way, my resume, records and online materials were reviewed many times by compliance officers and during annual audits for the purpose of ensuring accuracy and none of them every had an issue with the use of the newer Morgan Stanley name)
Glen's post calls me a "liar". Do you agree with him? Are you calling me a liar or do you have any other basis for any accusation of any wrongdoing whatsoever?
I never called you a liar. I might go as far as calling you the opposite of modest, if you asked.
Ok... I looked ...and? I see nothing damning.
Every accusation was answered reasonably
as far as I can see.
No, I'm sure you're right. Everything totally above board here. Two paragons of integrity and truthiness. My mistake. (Sorry.)
Judge how you like. I'll say this: I find the same pattern with you as Gleb displayed above.
(Fall back on humor/sarcasm when you can't back up your assertions with facts.)
What assertions?
Your implied assertion that Bruce Fenton did something wrong.
Are you asserting that or not?
I guess I'm asserting that there's some pretty obvious puffery in his style of presenting his work history. I've asserted in another thread that there's no reason for TBF to continue to exist and that its current board isn't one we should want representing us in the media. But that's off-topic here.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
Ok... I looked ...and? I see nothing damning.
Every accusation was answered reasonably
as far as I can see.
No, I'm sure you're right. Everything totally above board here. Two paragons of integrity and truthiness. My mistake. (Sorry.)
Judge how you like. I'll say this: I find the same pattern with you as Gleb displayed above.
(Fall back on humor/sarcasm when you can't back up your assertions with facts.)
What assertions?
Your implied assertion that Bruce Fenton did something wrong.
Are you asserting that or not?
Ok... I looked ...and? I see nothing damning.
Every accusation was answered reasonably
as far as I can see.
No, I'm sure you're right. Everything totally above board here. Two paragons of integrity and truthiness. My mistake. (Sorry.)
Judge how you like. I'll say this: I find the same pattern with you as Gleb displayed above.
(Fall back on humor/sarcasm when you can't back up your assertions with facts.)
What assertions?
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
Ok... I looked ...and? I see nothing damning.
Every accusation was answered reasonably
as far as I can see.
No, I'm sure you're right. Everything totally above board here. Two paragons of integrity and truthiness. My mistake. (Sorry.)
Judge how you like. I'll say this: I find the same pattern with you as Gleb displayed above.
(Fall back on humor/sarcasm when you can't back up your assertions with facts.)
Ok... I looked ...and? I see nothing damning.
Every accusation was answered reasonably
as far as I can see.
No, I'm sure you're right. Everything totally above board here. Two paragons of integrity and truthiness. My mistake. (Sorry.)
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
Ok... I looked ...and? I see nothing damning.
Every accusation was answered reasonably
as far as I can see.
And I'm not "skewering" anyone.
I'm suggesting that if you made an accusation
and you were rebuffed, then the honorable thing
to do is say "well then I apologize".
Is that so freakin hard? Jeezez christ.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
If you were wrong just apologize. That's the manly thing to do.
Wait till you read my first reply to Bruce's replies. It's a killer reply, perhaps even worth another reply from Bruce. Will be posting in a sec after I make sure there's no grammatical errors and such within.
I've always respected you Gleb but it appears you've
been refuted and frankly you're belittling yourself
by refusing to apologize to Bruce.
Please tell me you're NOT one of those guys who
always has to be right and can't admit a mistake.
(Those kind of people are childish and pathetic.)
And if it turns out I'M wrong, I'll gladly apologize
to you.
Quote
In 1997, Naval Base Coronado was created, incorporating seven separate Naval installations under one Commanding Officer.
Question 2: Did you help build it or was merely instrumental in garnering the billions needed for others to build Naval Base Coronado via some financial thingy you governed or were employed by while on tour at the yet unconceived said Naval base during November 1990 – August 1992?
Here is my discharge form from the US Navy indicating dates if service and clearly noting the location as NavSpecWar Center, Coronado, CA
You have again made a false accusation which has been proven such.
https://i.imgur.com/35AhBtn
Quote
>>>>> Everything on this LinkedIn is accurate, there is absolutely nothing inconsistent or inaccurate
https://www.linkedin.com/in/brucefenton
Quote
US Navy
United States Navy
November 1990 – August 1992 (1 year 10 months)
Coronado California
United States Navy
November 1990 – August 1992 (1 year 10 months)
Coronado California
Question 1 (semi-personal): Will you be getting a full or partial Naval pension for your years of service?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Base_Coronado
Quote
In 1997, Naval Base Coronado was created, incorporating seven separate Naval installations under one Commanding Officer.
Question 2: Did you help build it or was merely instrumental in garnering the billions needed for others to build Naval Base Coronado via some financial thingy you governed or were employed by while on tour at the yet unconceived said Naval base during November 1990 – August 1992?
You are really unbelievable.
Nav Spec War Center, and Naval Ambibious Base Coronado have been around for a very long time, certainly in the case of NAB for decades prior to me being stationed there in the early 90s.
The new base AS IT STATES ABOVE was created by combining several EXISTING Naval bases (including where I served) under one Commanding officer. This is trivially easy to verify. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Amphibious_Base_Coronado
You have now once AGAIN called me a liar and AGAIN been proven wrong.
When will you be apologizing?
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
May be true, but Bruce could've accomplished the same with only 10% of his professed accolades if said 10% is 100% true.
Now that bArAPIc74b has detailed Bruce's timeline in a coherent fashion, others can now more easily weigh in after hopefully conducting their own investigations.
Gleb, you have made a false accusation against me. I have stated exactly why it is false in great detail.
Do you have anything to say about the substance of your accusation or the reply?
Amazing. You could not have waited for my reply?
I replied in great detail to the long list.
Every item mentioned is easily explained and perfectly consistent.
Sad that there is such a low bar in making accusations against someone (for example, asking them to explain it before publishing or reading thier public reply)
I replied in great detail to the long list.
Every item mentioned is easily explained and perfectly consistent.
Sad that there is such a low bar in making accusations against someone (for example, asking them to explain it before publishing or reading thier public reply)
I've indiscriminately deleted all my posts in thread and am locking it. Please PM me if you, too, desire to have your posts deleted so not to have a reference to BF's name.
I will be penning a formal apology and hopefully speaking with the BF tomorrow, assuming he's abed now.
Jump to: