This is literally the fiftieth time someone has used the 'holding' funds trick. You seem like that guy that kept trying to use gambling accounts for collateral. I doubt anyone would lend to you, but sometimes on this forum common sense is lost."
Topic: looking for .5-1 BTC for SWC with 15% interest pay back July 5th (Read 777 times)
The rule here is no collateral, no loan. It's one of the first stickies here if you would bother to read. A micro loan would be fine but a loan of this size? No. Collateral is a must. Sorry but this isn't happening without it.
You do not understand. Lenders want 0% risk, that is why they ask for collateral.
You require an unsecured loan (lender risk!) to play a game a chance where you take a certain risk of yours.
Thus the lender risk is your game + your trust... it would be reasonable to give at least 60% of winnings in such a dangerous scenario.
Good luck with your request.
You require an unsecured loan (lender risk!) to play a game a chance where you take a certain risk of yours.
Thus the lender risk is your game + your trust... it would be reasonable to give at least 60% of winnings in such a dangerous scenario.
Good luck with your request.
Without collateral and playing a game of chance.... lender risk is higher than yours. 
deleted
Jump to: