Topic: Looking for a good script-able wallet. (Read 1828 times)
You would have more luck on the wallets subforums, and with the bitcoinJ libraries if im not mistaken. Go and try multibit then electrum subforums
Can anyone explain to me what exactly does libbitcoin do?
I'm working more on binding this. I've learned allot, but my knowledge of C++ is limited to knowing that it's OO and that one can use the same name for multiple functions as long as each takes different arguments. I've often wondered if the same was true of variables and parameters, counter the Number::Integer and counter the Furniture::Table?
It is seriously tough to incorporate cpp libraries into perl!
http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=923321
Can someone write wrapper bindings in C?
http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=923321
Can someone write wrapper bindings in C?
Hello,
I've setup bitcoind on a server but find it problematic to implement virtual wallets(like http virtual hosts) across a single instance.
Running multiple instances gives the problem of each having a blockchain. I considered using de-duplication and hard-links, but won't this be a nightmare to maintain?
I'm looking at libbitcoin from dyne and I feel I can write bindings for the scripting language of choice.
Are there any other options currently?
Is there something about bitcoind that I've not noticed? I feel like the accounts feature is an answer, but won't any call to sendtoaddress pull coins from every account? Is there a way to ensure that this won't happen... aside from never calling this function?
I've setup bitcoind on a server but find it problematic to implement virtual wallets(like http virtual hosts) across a single instance.
Running multiple instances gives the problem of each having a blockchain. I considered using de-duplication and hard-links, but won't this be a nightmare to maintain?
I'm looking at libbitcoin from dyne and I feel I can write bindings for the scripting language of choice.
Are there any other options currently?
Is there something about bitcoind that I've not noticed? I feel like the accounts feature is an answer, but won't any call to sendtoaddress pull coins from every account? Is there a way to ensure that this won't happen... aside from never calling this function?
Jump to: