There simply isn't enough to invest in for another round of funds based on illiquid securities, especially if all you invest in is Litecoin-Global.
Have we not learned anything from folks getting their asses kicked when everything on GLBSE takes a shit, and takes all the funds and funds of funds along for the ride? The route litecoinglobal has taken isn't all that much different from GLBSE as far as approving securities, so I fail to see how the outcome should be expected to be different.
When there are more players, and market makers on the exchange, then funds might be appropriate, but it is very unlikely that a fund manager can do any better than a private investor in this market.
Investing in fixed hash rate mining bonds is a sure fire way to lose money. There should never be another one of those. Those should pay a fixed or floating rate of interest based on something other than difficulty. The return should reflect the risk, and the true cost of borrowing capital, not the potential reward for having spent capital. Those bonds offload the operator's risk onto the unwise investor, leaving him holding the whole bag (and leaving the operator in a position close out the debt at a significant discount, securing a tidy profit)
No argument on most points. LTC-Global does not yet have a very diverse set of assets to invest in. Our current verification system is non-existent. I leave it up to the investors to do their homework and I would HIGHLY ENCOURAGE them to NOT INVEST in an asset issuer that does not provide enough detail to establish a level of trust.
I will however argue that I am not Nefario. I've been doing business successfully in a very customer-oriented industry (website hosting) for over 15 years. You can expect that as long as I am operating LTC-GLOBAL, things will be as open and fair as possible.
Cheers.