Haha. That sounds like a plan.
He is basically asking which BT client has the best number generator. E.g. Bitcoin QT uses the one from your OS (afaik!). Sooo lets say you use windows 3.11 and it can come up with a random number between 0 and 32, bitcoin qt will be very limited
In that case, Bitcoin-QT on Linux with a hardware RNG attached would probably be best. Or if you don't have a hardware RNG, just point a camera at a lava lamp and seed /dev/random from it. That should also give you sufficiently unpredictable input, and it'll look cool.
I like the idea with the lava lamp =)
That is indeed a neat idea.
But the answers so far arise the question: Is there a wallet in existence that uses a RNG other than the one provided by the system?
And also aren't web wallets all based on bitcoin-core/bitcoin-QT/bitcoind themselves? So from the entropy point of view there shouldn't be a difference between using a web wallet or a local bitcoin-core client or am I mistaken?