The accusations are false and baseless.
Accusations are not false or baseless, actually. I provided solid proofs of your plagiarism.
Accusations around plagirism might be true not the inference that it makes us a scam project. The inference is completely baseless and false.
In a 21 pages whitepaper, we could have chosen not to mention the ~3-5 pages highlighted around plagiarism. The intention of mentioning it was to reaffirm the researched & published data that goes along with the central premise of the whitepaper & roadmap. The whitepaper is designed in a way such that it is easily interpreted by the masses. In the previous edition, the sources were erraneously missed out. We are thankful to the resources we used & have given them the credit to them to the best of our knowledge.
This content around the whitepaper in no way influences the capabilities or the vision of the MakeMyCoin platform. We are accomplishing our roadmap milestones including platform, it's end use, POS/MN MMCO blockchain, exchange listings, everything as planned.
Content that is highlighted as plagiarised is generic in nature and has to do with what is blockchain, how blockchain is changing business operations in these times and steps that an organisation must take at blockchain ideation stage leading to development and final deployment.
Why do you think that you can just copy-paste such content word-to-word?
We have professional people in our team that work very closely with and some in such Advisory and IT companies. We understand that once published due credit must be given to entities who are publishing the same.
We are thankful to the resources we used & have given them the credit to them to the best of our knowledge.
Thanks you for highlighting the concern around plagiarism. We have made changes in our whitepaper to explicitly credit all sources possible
So you just used those sources that I found and pasted into white paper? Such a good idea! Don't forget to thank me for that too.
The entire whitepaper has been collaborated with the efforts of various individuals. We are appreciative of all the constructive feedback including yours. It makes us better. You appreciate & support the Bitcointalk vision of supporting open source platforms and discussions, we have devised a freelancing platform and have tried to articulate things in our whitepaper so they are easily interpretable by all.
You may want to review the latest uploaded version of the whitepaper. Wherever credible, well researched and public information is retrieved from, sources are mentioned. We have re explained even these generic concepts in our understanding to lest this petty accusations effect the intrinsic work of the platform or the coin.
You didn’t worry about it and hoped that you could raise money with these “small” details like plagiarism and lack of
references to sources. But unfortunately for you, were caught.
There is nothing about being caught here. You highlighted an erroneous mistake and we are appreciative of it. We wonder if you have even read the whitepaper and understand the central premise ; the reasons for highlighting the well published information and then building up on those thoughts to create an actual platform thus solving globally known issues. We believe in not only writing content but working to make our platform a success. I will strongly advise you to keep monitoring our project & platform ; the work that is actually happening here to create dynamics in this blockchain ecosystem.
