Topic: Mandatory Deflation Model For Ico's! (Read 220 times)
As i said before i think you are right but i don't think it will happen in near future. At least, i saw some projects trying to implement this so i would choose them when investing and maybe someday without deflation method nothing get investment so everyone feels to implement this.
If deflation is implemented the price will start to grow. I agree with you in this decision.
Mandatory deflation model should be applied to ICOs and should be regulated properly as they burn their deflation automatically. If it is applied the price can get the chance to grow and can dimilish the lesser supply of the coins for the investors and the owners.
Yes, I agree with you. It is a must to have deflation, burn and exchange program for a utility tokens in order to survive.
Deflation of tokens is a mendatory concept. To retain a much higher value in exchange scenario, the tokens must be deflated to a certain level.
Your idea is good and to the point. It will surely help tokens and they will not die easily in this way. The deflation system will also help the rice to rise.
It is true that ICO's business model needs a few tweaks here and there, especially in the case of putting a mandatory deflamation/burning/payback program as that would help the growth of value and give it a chance to succeed. With time if people suggest enough maybe they'll implement this sort of program, who knows.
It is true that ICO's business model needs a few tweaks here and there, especially in the case of putting a mandatory deflamation/burning/payback program as that would help the growth of value and give it a chance to succeed. With time if people suggest enough maybe they'll implement this sort of program, who knows.
Your idea is good and to the point. It will surely help tokens and they will not die easily in this way. The deflation system will also help the rice to rise.
Well, this is not farfetched, it should be fine if the deflation model is made. Besides, truth this model, the exchange rate will increase and it will be a lot easier to transact the currency.
Yes you are right. For utility tokens,it should be mandatory to put a deflation/burning/payback program. And it shouldn't stop at any point.
Yeah, you are more than right.
For utility tokens, it should be mandatory to put a deflation/burning/payback program and it shouldn't stop at any point.
For utility tokens, it should be mandatory to put a deflation/burning/payback program and it shouldn't stop at any point.
After seeing too many utility tokens dying, i think this kind of thing should implemented.
An utility token has 3 part. Buyer, exchange and seller.
Buyer buys 10 token from exchange, seller sell it on the exchange and buyer takes it back. So if not extreme interest there is no reason for price to grow. And if people won't hold it now like us, it won't have any value at all.
But like some icos, if they put a for example %1 deflation automatic burn.
Buyer buys 10 token from exchange seller recieve 9 and sell 9 token on exchange. And with drop of the circulation, price can have reason to grow. Constantly lesser supply.
An utility token has 3 part. Buyer, exchange and seller.
Buyer buys 10 token from exchange, seller sell it on the exchange and buyer takes it back. So if not extreme interest there is no reason for price to grow. And if people won't hold it now like us, it won't have any value at all.
But like some icos, if they put a for example %1 deflation automatic burn.
Buyer buys 10 token from exchange seller recieve 9 and sell 9 token on exchange. And with drop of the circulation, price can have reason to grow. Constantly lesser supply.
Jump to: