i have given my account to macrotheminer for collateral in a loan
there was no suspicious activity when i got it back
and it wouldn't be a scam if he sold it since it was held for collateral on a loan
macrominer was honest when i dealt with him
thats all i got
Topic: marcotheminer selling positive trust accounts and stealing signature payments (Read 5838 times)
November 01, 2014, 05:58:58 PM
October 29, 2014, 11:30:23 AM
If the guy defaults I don't see a problem with selling the account to re cooperate the loss.
October 29, 2014, 11:05:30 AM
I PMed him earlier expressing interest in that very account. I don't see how you can call it stealing if the loan taker defaulted.
Since you clearly have been following him around for sometime, can you list the other accounts he owns?
There is one which he holds now which is claimed to have been a hacked one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9283585
I am surprised he needed to get a 2nd account to sell. He runs a loan taking collateral accounts, so it would be accepted that he will have to sell them.
How do you know that he actually made the loan? The post requesting the loan was edited. He could have changed the BTC address when he quoted the post requesting the loan and sent the btc to himself. Since you clearly have been following him around for sometime, can you list the other accounts he owns?
There is one which he holds now which is claimed to have been a hacked one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9283585
I am surprised he needed to get a 2nd account to sell. He runs a loan taking collateral accounts, so it would be accepted that he will have to sell them.
Plus he is advertising an account with positive trust so whoever buys it will be able to scam because most are willing to not use escrow with positive trust accounts.
I don't see how any of his actions can be considered scamming.
He had two paid signatures on his account, both of which he was getting paid for, both signature campaigns have rules that say their signature is the only paid signature allowed. 
October 29, 2014, 07:32:48 AM
I don't see how any of his actions can be considered scamming.
October 29, 2014, 06:25:51 AM
I PMed him earlier expressing interest in that very account. I don't see how you can call it stealing if the loan taker defaulted.
Since you clearly have been following him around for sometime, can you list the other accounts he owns?
There is one which he holds now which is claimed to have been a hacked one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9283585
I am surprised he needed to get a 2nd account to sell. He runs a loan taking collateral accounts, so it would be accepted that he will have to sell them.
Since you clearly have been following him around for sometime, can you list the other accounts he owns?
There is one which he holds now which is claimed to have been a hacked one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9283585
I am surprised he needed to get a 2nd account to sell. He runs a loan taking collateral accounts, so it would be accepted that he will have to sell them.
October 29, 2014, 03:42:28 AM
It looks like marcotheminer is engaging in the practice of selling accounts with positive trust.
On Oct 1, MikeCorleone posted on his thread (the post is now edited to say "all good" - hiding the evidence of requesting the loan). However marcotheminer quoted what he posted confirming the loan. See below:
Sending 0.40BTC, repayment 0.46BTC by October 19 to 12hYBWiPqfwdveGzpbRdGxeqnoMcNvGNSq
Sent! https://blockchain.info/tx/1c6706d3e288ed5762bc8af0add5da770b189f6a5d219eee1bac3a744fb4d0ca
I believe that ValueAccounts is an alt of marcotheminer as it is selling several accounts that have defaulted on loans.
One of the accounts that is being sold by this account:
If he is not engaging in the sale of trusted accounts then he is engaged in stealing accounts as a loan request was clearly made.
He also seems to be engaged in the practice of stealing signature campaign payments. A review of his trust shows that in September he had two paid signatures on his signature
This is despite the fact that dicebitco.in had rules against having any other signature then their own.
On Oct 1, MikeCorleone posted on his thread (the post is now edited to say "all good" - hiding the evidence of requesting the loan). However marcotheminer quoted what he posted confirming the loan. See below:
All good.
Loan amount: 0.4 to 0.5
Collateral: My Account - Same as last
Term length: 2 Weeks
Refund: 0.46 or 0.56
Let me know if you still are capable of this. I'm online now to make the account details trade off.
Thanks again,
Mike
Collateral: My Account - Same as last
Term length: 2 Weeks
Refund: 0.46 or 0.56
Let me know if you still are capable of this. I'm online now to make the account details trade off.
Thanks again,
Mike
Sending 0.40BTC, repayment 0.46BTC by October 19 to 12hYBWiPqfwdveGzpbRdGxeqnoMcNvGNSq
Sent! https://blockchain.info/tx/1c6706d3e288ed5762bc8af0add5da770b189f6a5d219eee1bac3a744fb4d0ca
One of the accounts that is being sold by this account:
Senior Member #1 Green Trust
Created in 2013
300 - 364 activity
Account does not have an avatar.
Green Trust
This matches MikeCorleone as all he would need to do is make one post to get the activity to be over 300. Created in 2013
300 - 364 activity
Account does not have an avatar.
Green Trust
If he is not engaging in the sale of trusted accounts then he is engaged in stealing accounts as a loan request was clearly made.
He also seems to be engaged in the practice of stealing signature campaign payments. A review of his trust shows that in September he had two paid signatures on his signature
This is despite the fact that dicebitco.in had rules against having any other signature then their own. Jump to: