Pages:
Author

Topic: Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passi - page 4. (Read 885 times)

legendary
Activity: 4326
Merit: 8950
'The right to privacy matters'
But in reality today most girls rely on this criterion to choose a husband. Whether you say that this is a business transaction or that it is not real love, it has become a trend these days. Many women will not choose a poor man but are willing to choose a rich man as their husband even if they do not have feelings for that person. Simply because they know life is difficult and their children will have a miserable life if they are poor. That can be considered a sacrifice or a business exchange depending on each person's thinking.

As a man, I want to say that money cannot buy happiness but it will maintain and nurture your happiness. Without money, marriage is very difficult to sustain.

If you have a good job/business and earn good amount of money then you can easily find someone who will marry you. That's not the case if you don't have good money in hand, no matter how much talented or hardworking you are. Life is getting tough and you are in saying that money cant buy happiness but nor do poverty can give you comfort. I would say Love and affection will follow if you have money.

I said "money can't buy happiness but it can maintain happiness", that's just an understatement. And if we speak frankly, what you say is not wrong, but many people still do not believe that happiness today is determined by money, the more money you have, the more opportunities you have to choose a partner.

Marriage was once considered sacred, but today it has also been corrupted by the development of society when money plays an important role in almost every corner of society, love cannot be excluded. Nowadays without money, there will definitely be no love.

No money no love 💕 sad thing to think. But likely true.

At the very least some money is needed.

Food shelter and being in a kind of safe crime zone all help.

I look at the world and see so violence in so many places it is very sad. I also think it hinders love 💗.

So some money for love is kind of true.
full member
Activity: 1540
Merit: 219
Marrying for financial gain ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment. Comparing marriage to home ownership simplifies their distinct values. For a more happy existence, it is critical to value real connections above money exploitation and to combine financial objectives with personal contentment.
Well, that's not really the point of the post although I do agree, I think what OP means is that there's a perks to having a relationship with someone and tying the knot to that bond. Of course what you're saying is important but we have to be a realist here, I am sure that people don't want to marry just with love and other romantic stuff, they want security too.
hero member
Activity: 2044
Merit: 784
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today?
Not today, but it has always been like this. Marriages are partnerships heavily related to financial gains, status maintenance or acquision, power disputes and in least place, "love". Marriages are games of personal and clans' interests. Since the stone age it's happening: women would focus marrying the best hunter, strongest or richest man inside the primitive society.

Then later kings and nobles only married their daughters to another noble ones to add wealth to their kingdoms.

Nowadays hypocrisy plays a big role as it didn't exist anymore, so some foolish people marry thinking they are doing this for love, rather they are just going to be used and abused by the other side.
sr. member
Activity: 812
Merit: 252
Free Crypto Faucet in Trustdice
Marrying for financial gain ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment. Comparing marriage to home ownership simplifies their distinct values. For a more happy existence, it is critical to value real connections above money exploitation and to combine financial objectives with personal contentment.
In building a relationship, of course both of them have the same goals to achieve and if they have different opinions on achieving their goals, of course both of them will separate and look for their own happiness. If both of them can respect each other in their relationship, of course they will be able to achieve their happiness very easily, but if they marry only to take one-sided benefits, of course this will not last long.
sr. member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 323

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

If you going to marriage for sure you gonna need more funds since you starting a family and that just means soon your gonna have a child and having a child needs a big amount of funds so that you can provide for your child's needs, not to mention since your gonna need to do it on your own and your spouse because you're gonna be apart from your parents so you're not gonna get any support from them anymore.  We are all going to realize how hard life is when we are the ones who need to pay bills, like water, electricity, internet, etc. Even though you feel like you have a good enough job already it's not going to be enough for the most part.

Rental property for sure if one of the most difficult things to achieve since it is just so expensive and could eat up a big percentage of your salary but for sure its going to be necessary since your not living with your parents anymore, there was no cheat that you can do, probably your gonna need to buy your own property first just to avoid renting, so probably what you can do is save a lot of money, invest while you still can and make a lot of sources of your income while your still not marriage.

Sure if we are just talking about finances, maybe the more sugar daddy the more passive income as well, and the more you going to earn, I mean it's gonna work as long as you earn.


In short, do not take another responsibility if you are not done with another responsibility or if you are not ready yet. And what I mean when I said ready, is not just being financially prepared but as well as being mentally, physically, and emotionally stable. Also, everyone of us has a different view about marriage some see it as a sacred thing and others do not find marriage as something that is serious. And marrying someone for solely about financial gains and not really about love is kind of heartbreaking.
But as from what I have seen here, this is a win-win situation from both parties. The sugar daddy will have someone to take care for him, and his spouse got what she wanted. As simple as that. But isn't that a dream for all? having financial freedom without having to work at all.
sr. member
Activity: 1820
Merit: 436
Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"


Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

If you going to marriage for sure you gonna need more funds since you starting a family and that just means soon your gonna have a child and having a child needs a big amount of funds so that you can provide for your child's needs, not to mention since your gonna need to do it on your own and your spouse because you're gonna be apart from your parents so you're not gonna get any support from them anymore.  We are all going to realize how hard life is when we are the ones who need to pay bills, like water, electricity, internet, etc. Even though you feel like you have a good enough job already it's not going to be enough for the most part.

Rental property for sure if one of the most difficult things to achieve since it is just so expensive and could eat up a big percentage of your salary but for sure its going to be necessary since your not living with your parents anymore, there was no cheat that you can do, probably your gonna need to buy your own property first just to avoid renting, so probably what you can do is save a lot of money, invest while you still can and make a lot of sources of your income while your still not marriage.

Sure if we are just talking about finances, maybe the more sugar daddy the more passive income as well, and the more you going to earn, I mean it's gonna work as long as you earn.
hero member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 579
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
But in reality today most girls rely on this criterion to choose a husband. Whether you say that this is a business transaction or that it is not real love, it has become a trend these days. Many women will not choose a poor man but are willing to choose a rich man as their husband even if they do not have feelings for that person. Simply because they know life is difficult and their children will have a miserable life if they are poor. That can be considered a sacrifice or a business exchange depending on each person's thinking.

As a man, I want to say that money cannot buy happiness but it will maintain and nurture your happiness. Without money, marriage is very difficult to sustain.

If you have a good job/business and earn good amount of money then you can easily find someone who will marry you. That's not the case if you don't have good money in hand, no matter how much talented or hardworking you are. Life is getting tough and you are in saying that money cant buy happiness but nor do poverty can give you comfort. I would say Love and affection will follow if you have money.

I said "money can't buy happiness but it can maintain happiness", that's just an understatement. And if we speak frankly, what you say is not wrong, but many people still do not believe that happiness today is determined by money, the more money you have, the more opportunities you have to choose a partner.

Marriage was once considered sacred, but today it has also been corrupted by the development of society when money plays an important role in almost every corner of society, love cannot be excluded. Nowadays without money, there will definitely be no love.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1100
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!
This is not good, 100 sugar daddies will mean 100 plus sexual partners. That is unhygienic.

Cheesy you both go find a hotel.

Left aside the sexual thing, the point here is that these kind of sources of income are not scalable. Time is limited, and you need a certain amount of time for each "client". You may be earning money while you sleep, but when not sleeping you have some work to do, even if it's just answer to a phone call or simply a conversation on WhatsApp. To me, that's not passive income, so it's not the best example.

And to rental property you have to buy it first, so you need the money. Even if you buy it, renting it is not a sure thing, and there are also other potential risks. And rest assured that you won't be able to get a private jet by just renting three typical properties.
Scalability, scalability, scalability - it's a crucial aspect when considering sources of income, isn’t it? Indeed, every job that exchanges time for money is unscalable. Even little jobs like answering calls or texts demand your time and attention, right?

The initial capital needed to own rental homes is a major obstacle. It's expensive, right? Risk comes next. Find reputable tenants? Will home values rise? The venture is not passive due to many issues and risks. Getting rich enough to buy a private jet? A bit far-fetched.

Your insights emphasize the necessity of scalability and real passivity when researching income streams. Is it not a complicated choice?
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1192
Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"


Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

As others have said, you shouldn't simply see marriage as a business contract because that can lead to disaster. It's an additional perk that comes out of a loving relationship and should only be considered that way. It is also not some magic bullet to double your own income, but sharing costs, if both people in the marriage work can bring down your expenses considerably. Also, if one partner decides to stay home and actively maintains a household or looks after children, it can make life much easier for both.
hero member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 630
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
Marrying for financial gain ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment. Comparing marriage to home ownership simplifies their distinct values. For a more happy existence, it is critical to value real connections above money exploitation and to combine financial objectives with personal contentment.

But the realities of things happening to our faces is that growing up incidences have all changed now. There are contract marriages and they are all accepted as marriage. Marriage that was for death do part now has expiring dates set by both parties by consent, such marriage are either to achieve some financial goals and that goes to show how values have been eroded because of the chase of money. Some people don't value the happiness of being together but only what money can provide whether happiness or not. Money is good in marriage but it has to be balanced.
sr. member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 252
Marrying for financial gain ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment. Comparing marriage to home ownership simplifies their distinct values. For a more happy existence, it is critical to value real connections above money exploitation and to combine financial objectives with personal contentment.
sr. member
Activity: 2506
Merit: 366
Catalog Websites
Before marriage, always make sure that you are stable to establish a family. Have a good income or business that can support your family for a lifetime as marriage is not a joke. Sooner or later, you will have some kids that's why before marriage, both partners should be ready.

reflecting on my experience with my partner, we initially didn't have jobs that could give us a stable income, but we still believed that when we were together, all problems would be resolved slowly and now we can still live safely with our two children even though we haven't arrived yet. have a stable income, we are independent and do not depend on our parents, we are sure that if we thought about being stable before getting married then we would not have married until now because we are not yet financially stable.

If possible too before marriage, try not to lived in a rent house and try to found a way to  have your own house.

Marriage should be planned properly and not just you loved each other.

It's difficult to be able to buy your own house when you come from a simple family and don't have a lot of inheritance, especially in a city with quite a lot of people, so renting a house is the only option you have to take, until now my little family and I are still renting in a simple house, slowly but surely we are collecting money to pay off the subsidized housing issued by our country's government in installments.
hero member
Activity: 2002
Merit: 534

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

Marrying rich seems like the best way to set yourself up for life without having to worry about money again. As long as you get some children together you don't need to worry about a prenup. This is mainly in place to prevent you from getting a divorce after a few years and taking 50% of his money. The thing is that it's a decision on how you are going to spend the rest of your life, some people might choose love and happiness over money. Having a few sugar daddys doesn't classify as passive income in my opinion, you still have to work for it and make the men happy. Also this only works when you are young, nobody is going to pay for your companionship when you are 40. Eventually you are going to have to live of your own money.
hero member
Activity: 3178
Merit: 937
Quote
But marriage can only happens once in a life,

You haven't heard about divorce? Some people had married several times in their lives.

Quote
one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!

100 sugar daddies=prostitution if you ask me. Grin Can you tell me what kind of woman could handle 100 sugar daddies at once? I want to meet her.

Quote
Boomers got their land for free. You have to pay for land

For free? Land was cheaper decades ago, but it definitely wasn't available for free. In which country do you live?

I have the feeling that OP is trolling us with this post. Grin

In summary. Passive income isn't passive. You have to work hard for "passive income". Even the gold diggers and prostitutes have to work hard for their so called "passive income".


legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2354
The Alliance Of Bitcointalk Translators - ENG>SPA
Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!
This is not good, 100 sugar daddies will mean 100 plus sexual partners. That is unhygienic.

Cheesy you both go find a hotel.

Left aside the sexual thing, the point here is that these kind of sources of income are not scalable. Time is limited, and you need a certain amount of time for each "client". You may be earning money while you sleep, but when not sleeping you have some work to do, even if it's just answer to a phone call or simply a conversation on WhatsApp. To me, that's not passive income, so it's not the best example.

And to rental property you have to buy it first, so you need the money. Even if you buy it, renting it is not a sure thing, and there are also other potential risks. And rest assured that you won't be able to get a private jet by just renting three typical properties.
sr. member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 413

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.
This looks like taking a swipe on the women folks but not sure if you are talking about the single ladies, the married or about to. But definitely the sugar daddy is for the women. Are you saying they are busy chasing after sugars and leaving crypto investment for the guys?  Grin
You'll be surprised about the number of simps out there that are paying allowances or sponsoring trips and rents. These ladies don't have to chase since there are already a lot of platforms where they can just "sit" pretty and men will come to them. They'll just post hot and sexy pictures on their instagram and get multiple offers on their DMs. Social media has created a bubble economy for a lot of these women - it's easy money.
full member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 116
0xe25ce19226C3CE65204570dB8D6c6DB1E9Df74AC
...for plummeting birth rates in the west...
More people to fund the booming rent market!

...myth for lazy people because ...they are avoiding it...to become leeches ...become wealthy without doing anything...
Think you can stop me from creating snake oil(fake stock/fake commodity/fake bill) out of thin air and dump it on gullible guy all over the place?

...married friends and I have single friends with girlfriends, the difference is huge...just break off the relationship...
I come for the laugh!

It's like being dependent ... It's quite disheartening, ...loses their beauty, they'll slowly wither away ...passive income.
You can't stop me from begging! No enough of shaming would work. Smiley

...marriage for convenience,...
Why you do shame.

...a lot of money is spent...
Great! You are ensuring rich get richer, by doing exactly as planned.

...in a year... she could give each guy 31 seconds Grin
Not doing it one by one, it is too slow. Ten guys at once!

... Are you saying they are busy chasing after sugars and leaving crypto investment for the guys?  Grin...
Lmao you would trade crypto during lunch break!

... you said it was only a myth...
Surprise!

...Owning 10 rental properties is possible, ....
And yeah, it's not as passive as many would think,...
Need 30 years work experience btw.!
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1352
Cashback 15%
I already saw this post earlier and failed to see the logic of the post so I decided to look at it again later, and now that I am back I still fail to see the main point of this. What's the message? What's the correlation between having sugar daddies to being married? Are you saying that the key to having financial stability is to get married? If so, millions of us could have been millionaires and billionaires by now.
sr. member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 268
Fully Regulated Crypto Casino
People who think that renting properties/real estate all easy is the one who never actually doing it. It's the same as doing other businesses, you need manage the money, you need manage your employee, you also need to think about the maintenance, and it could get worse if you have a problematic tenant. If a person has try to do renting real estate, they might even disagree to call it passive income
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1139
Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"


Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.
If you’re from my part of the world, then you would realize that even your kids are a resource you can build on to have them give you returns when you don’t have enough energy ti keep up.

I buy the idea in quote but, majority of the people in our world never gets it that rossy. Not because they aren’t putting in their best or the resources ain’t available for them but, when shits ain’t working, it just isn’t.

Now, would you rather advise they never get married and keep pushing for success that never comes or to continue their life in another dimension?

There are those that dreamed of driving fast cars and never got the money to buy it themselves but rather invested in Human Resources as there kids and have those kids buy it for them.
There are more than one sides to it but the reality is, you never can tell which way would work best for every individual and we are out here testing life on different plains.
Pages:
Jump to: