It's like being dependent on others, and having someone else responsible for your life, isn't it? It's quite disheartening, because when someone loses their beauty, they'll slowly wither away without anyone willing to provide them with passive income.
This isn't true passive income, like seeking out a wealthy partner and constantly asking for money. That's incredibly cheap. The best form of passive income comes from one's own hard work, and it's important to realize that each individual is responsible for their own life, rather than relying on a wealthy person to accompany them.
I understand that women are often attracted to wealth, but it won't instantly control a rich man, even if her beauty is extraordinary. Gold diggers always use the term "realistic" as a shield to secure a partner, because they're embarrassed to be seen as materialistic or cheap
I agree, I wouldn't be able to live with someone who takes care of me, don't get me wrong I would love it if my spouse earns a lot of money, she can make as much money as she possibly could, I wish she made millions of dollars, there is nothing wrong with that, it is not about making more, it is about not being able to make anything yourself.
If you have an income even from your family, like lets say your family has a few houses you rent and make money from, that would be still fine while you are basically doing nothing, but I feel like I have put SOME money on the table. I call it "bill guy", because it means I am capable of paying the bills, the water bill, heater, mobile phones, the netflix and other stuff, I keep paying for the monthly stuff, that alone would be good enough.
If you are capable of doing that then you are going to be able to do a lot more and you could be able to tell your spouse to make as much as possible in that case. But no way in world where she makes all the money and I bring in zero.