I am sure everyone who watched today's hearing about Virtual Currencies noticed Tunstalls negative attitude towards Bitcoin (not virtual currencies in general).
If not watch the video and make up your own mind:
http://c-spanvideo.org/program/VirtualCuTo get to the point:
So Tunstall just said "we" several times speaking about Ripple.
https://twitter.com/jerrybrito/status/402918026968039425Here are some quotes from here testemony.
I work directly with multiple clients that offer their own forms of virtual currency.
Who might that be? Blizzard?
but Bitcoin has also demonstrated a number of weaknesses that the next
generation of virtual currency should be careful to address.
I am sure she is not talking about Litecoin.
Bitcoin has built its reputation and structured its virtual currency around being both antigovernment
and anti-establishment.
Ripple has indeed a way better image than Bitcoin.
The
next generation of virtual currency should figure out a way to better align with existing payment
methods, or virtual currency will never be able to move from a “niche” into the mainstream.
Like Ripple gateways?
The final quotethere's also a virtual currency called ripple that has started very differently from bit coin and started with the premise we are operating in in existing financial ecosystem and we need to be able to comply with the criminal laws and anti money laundering laws that are in place
Here testimony:
http://www.banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Testimony&Hearing_ID=955322cc-d648-4a00-a41f-c23be8ff4cad&Witness_ID=dbe29432-77ba-4884-aead-37d7a6fe60e8Who is behind this? Banks, an unknown competitor or Ripple? Sure it that is wasn't just here own opinion.