Author

Topic: Merit source application of Coolcryptovator. [Updated] (Read 1092 times)

legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2226
Signature space for rent
Thanks to theymos and everyone who have supported me on my merit source application. Eventually admin has been considered me as a merit source. Hope now I will  be able to help more forum contributors. Thanks once again to admin for give me that opportunity Smiley

Locking thread to avoid spam.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
I also support Coolcryptovator and hope he will become merit source soon. He deserve it.
Don't give up, have patience, be persistent, and I believe the admins will accept your request.
I also had to wait long time, several months, but I was eventually accepted as merit source.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 6194
Meh.
I approve this merit source application!
I would consider your removal from merit source more appropriate.

I'm not a merit source Smiley (again).


I support CoolCryptovator in their quest to become a source, more of them is needed and I think you'd do great things if you were given the chance!
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 56
I approve this merit source application!

In light of your recent use of merits to support doxing of a very snr member and that endangered him and the boards funds then I think it best the reader strike this endorsement or treat it as a negative sign.

I would consider your removal from merit source more appropriate.

Too many endorsements from too many of those that have politics that we find detrimental to the boards optimal functioning.

Better for theymos to locate other members that can balance the rather unfair and biased politics that are being pushed hard on meta in recent times. Not add more that are closely aligned with them.

Now merit is TRUST, then we need to be very careful to keep a sensible balance of persons that are on either side.  Not have all merit sources that seem to align with the same group.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 6194
Meh.
I approve this merit source application!
full member
Activity: 924
Merit: 221
Bump for visibility
All things will be done in due or in the right time. I believe that you can be a merit source one day. So let me help you with it by bumping also this thread of yours. A little way to help for a good users that has extra ordinary posting skills like other legendary users here in the forum.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
I'm sorry to see that you are still waiting.
I see that you are good member on the forum, with good quality posts, helping and supporting others, well respected so I hope you will become merit source soon.
You have my full support.
Don't give up, sometimes we just have to wait longer than expected.
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 56
I would suggest that Coolcryptovator find 5 more posts that are deserving merit to replace the last half of his application.
Updated OP with new reply,
Really I didn't look for high quality post, if always we look for high quality post then good poster/normal poster couldn't upgrade their rank. However, I have updated OP since few users already criticizing. Lets wait for admin respond.  


The support from Tman pushed me over the edge into opposing openly the application.
it can't be a behavior of quality poster and trusted users. You proof yourself untrustworthy with this statement. This really political opinion. Don't forget, being merit source will not bear any benefits for me, I just want to help others especially newbies.



I don't understand your criticism? You believe strong endorsement (huge merit award and comments) by a person who abuses the trust system by his own admission, and supports an observable liar and scammer, and someone that is implicated in a serious extortion scheme is not a negative thing?  How so?
This makes me untrustworthy because I do not wish for those that are possibly strongly affiliated with such persons given more access to influence the systems of merit and trust?

Also, I don't feel your grasp of English is adequate for you to get certain nuanced or subtle points that the poster may be making. You may therefore not be suitable to be accurately applying merit where it is due.

Sorry, but that, with the dreadful posts you selected (regardless of the subsequent excuses) exposes you as an inappropriate merit source. We have enough of those. Let's have some people that can differentiate between net negative nonsense and real value.

Too many dreadful bumps also. Very desperate and pushy looking.
Just my honest opinion. We can discuss it if you wish.

legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2226
Signature space for rent
I would suggest that Coolcryptovator find 5 more posts that are deserving merit to replace the last half of his application.
Updated OP with new reply,
Really I didn't look for high quality post, if always we look for high quality post then good poster/normal poster couldn't upgrade their rank. However, I have updated OP since few users already criticizing. Lets wait for admin respond.  


The support from Tman pushed me over the edge into opposing openly the application.
it can't be a behavior of quality poster and trusted users. You proof yourself untrustworthy with this statement. This really political opinion. Don't forget, being merit source will not bear any benefits for me, I just want to help others especially newbies.

member
Activity: 518
Merit: 21

1. Many of the presented exemplary posts apparently deserving merit are verging on shit posts. The latter ones are garbage and have minimal if not zero value.

I would have to agree regarding the last few posts cited in the OP.

I would suggest that Coolcryptovator find 5 more posts that are deserving merit to replace the last half of his application.

If a merit source gave merit to any of the last 5 or so posts, people would probably be (rightfully) criticizing him.
Yeah in case that OP wishes to be a merit source then a good way is to prove its credibility as a merit source. Since  OP was challenge then it is up.to OP now.

We, OP is also a good poster. I have been here in the forum for a couple of months and always having fun or getting lessons from OP's post.

Wish OP's luck in the merit source application
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374

1. Many of the presented exemplary posts apparently deserving merit are verging on shit posts. The latter ones are garbage and have minimal if not zero value.

I would have to agree regarding the last few posts cited in the OP.

I would suggest that Coolcryptovator find 5 more posts that are deserving merit to replace the last half of his application.

If a merit source gave merit to any of the last 5 or so posts, people would probably be (rightfully) criticizing him.
copper member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1814
฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.
-snip-
someone is clearly bitter here.
You are the people making this forum far too radicalized with your propaganda and pure hate.
The system is not perfect but making this place should not be a war zone where you just accuse anybody who doesn't agree with you as an asslicker does no good.
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 56
You deserve a crack at it dude, you are plenty active enough

I was on the fence over this one.
 
I would like to voice my legitimate feedback or opposition on the basis of 4 key points. I may retract them if things change in the future.

1. Many of the presented exemplary posts apparently deserving merit are verging on shit posts. The latter ones are garbage and have minimal if not zero value. If those are the best you could select from the entire board then you are not fit as merit source.
2. You are far too desperate, pushy and self congratulatory. I have noticed this thread and his last one bumped and spammed far too often. Believes that legends are his inferiors?
3. Observably an ass kisser and beneficiary of merits that come from the meta cycling club.
4. I could not trust any person that supports Lauda or tmans use of red trust to silence: whistle blowing and presenting observable events demonstrating their previous untrustworthy actions on this board.

The support from Tman pushed me over the edge into opposing openly the application. It suggests to me that the merit will just find themselves circle jerking around to entrench the untrustworthy and devious members that in in DT even more deeply.

Additional merit sources are needed. They should be selected from a group that is in no way so closely affiliated with the current meta board/ DT merit cycling club.
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
You deserve a crack at it dude, you are plenty active enough
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
One more good candidate for merit source, and he is waiting to long to receive answer.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 611
[....
My trust score is 17: -0 / +7.
....

After changes made in the trust system the level of your trust is no so obvious... For example I see this values more like        9: -0 / +3  

What doesn't change the fact that i wish you good luck with your applicatoin...


member
Activity: 518
Merit: 21
The good thing is that user like OP has already proven its worth in the forum. Created a lot of helpful posts and even made some good replies in that are often helpful. The only problem for now is that there are some users also that are applying to be a merit source that are deserving also and has higher rank compared to OP. Anyway, it is theymos discretion on who among the applicants will be granted to become a merit source.

I think over a period of time OP will become a merit source. I have my prediction and it is 80% chance that OP will become one. Good Luck!
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
I really think that you are very good candidate for merit source.
I shared this opinion in your previous thread and I will repeat it again here.
Don't give up!
I hope admins will finally give you answer.
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 3150
₿uy / $ell ..oeleo ;(
I don't think it's because of the posts/threads you choose. It's mostly likely the lack of time and lower place in the TO-DO list of Theymos.
On random basis he choose a few people so it will come your time in the next wave.

LoyceV has waited quite some time (a few months) before he got elected, and we are talking about an outstanding poster and trusted person so... just wait...

Maybe I shall also throw my hat into the ring one day. Started to see "You have 0 sendable merit" way too often Cheesy... jk omn...
sr. member
Activity: 742
Merit: 395
I am alive but in hibernation.
Few of the users become merit source without even putting the application. I just find your re applying weird.
Anyway , I can wish you the good luck.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2226
Signature space for rent
Reason of reapply:
Today is my one year achievement on Bitcointalk. I have applied for merit source around SIX months ago, unfortunately I had not got any answer from admin till now. I was submitted TEN post on my previous application, but all of these TEN post was main topic (not reply). However, I realized that collect TEN quality main topic (main thread) is very easy task. But I believe collect TEN good reply more difficult than collect TEN quality main topic. That's why I am rewriting my merit source application with TEN good reply. All of my collected reply (users) not above member rank. I have not collect any post from above member rank. Because I believe above self made full member rank almost quality poster. So choosing them also easy task. Occasionally I have report few reply to merit source for review on Report unmerited good posts to Merit Source  and my selected reply has been merited by multiple merit source. So I can say my selection was not bad. By the way, I have locked my previous application in order to make clean application again, hope admin will consider this application.




Merit source application:

I am Coolcryptovator member since March 28, 2018. Today is that day I was joined this forum. And yes that is another reason of my reapplication. I spend a year on this forum. My total time logged in:73 days, 5 hours and 45 minutes on this forum.
My trust score is 22: -0 / +8. I am a "Sr. Member" and I have earned 579 merit till now which is more then Hero potential. I am fully out of smerit now and I am unable to help others especially lower rank users.


If you want to be a merit source:

 1. Be a somewhat established member.

I can say that I am a established member of this forum and as well as I become DT1 member by new DT selection/voting system. Since I have joined forum, I have been fighting against scam, spam and corruption. Mostly free time I try to report spam post and investigate scam ICO's. I have been trying to contribute my best knowledge and experience to improve this forum. I have reported 5733 posts with 99% accuracy (5632 good, 72 bad, 29 unhandled) and I have exposed 41 scam ICO's till now. And I have been trying to motivate people's to avoid and expose spam, scam and corruption. I never hold my smerit and I have been distributing my smerit since beginning, and I proudly can say I haven't handover my smerit on wrong hand. Currently I am out of smerits. I want to keep my role to build a decent forum, and I want to help best contributors especially low rank users. My merit history will say how am I helping lower rank users.


2. Collect TEN posts written in the last couple of months by other people that have not received nearly enough merit for how good they are, and post quotes for them all in a new Meta thread. The point of this is to demonstrate your ability to give out merit usefully.

I have collected TEN reply, I believe that reply have not received nearly enough merits. I know these post are really not high quality but these are good post in my opinions according to their rank. Because all of post collected from members or below rank. I don't like to see someones are disappointing from merit system. We can see most of quality or good topic has been merited by multiple merit sources. But we can't see much merit on good reply. So I will try my best to help them if I become merit source. To be honest merit source will not bear any benefit for me/myself. I have earned lot of merit and I will earn more then potential Legendary before achieve my activity for Legendary. But I really want help and motivate lower rank users. Below is my selected post.



Quote#1

I still standby that charts can only help you if you are experienced with how the markets work.  I am convinced that people don't in a general sense even understand the relation of USD/BTC/Altcoins and how the markets fundamentally operate and move. Technical analysis in my opinion basically is just zones or areas to look at it and apply it to the fundamentals, experience, market conditions, etc and making a sound decision off of all of these.   If nothing else, technical analysis is great discipline because the biggest mistake I see new traders making is they buy at the wrong times (which is awful because in trading this is seriously the only thing you have pure control over is when you buy a coin and at what price and what position it is in), and sell way too late or way too early, and they have no idea or inkling of what this looks like.  Traders, in general, cannot detach from their love of their coins, and don't have the discipline to sell even if it might continue going up, or sell at a loss to avoid disaster because they're just too busy being human and in euphoria.   So  EVEN IF NOTHING ELSE, trading on fibonacci zones or following just the "ABC" Elliott Wave correction theory where you don't buy into a correction until an established bulltrap.. or if there's a TK death cross or we're wicking hard on these moving averages with nowhere to fall to...then even if its not working correctly will most likely stop and give people some rules and things to look for so they don't base their decision purely on greed and emotion, and I almost guarantee that 9 out of 10 people would do better (even if the success of the technical analysis is purely coincidental on making them avoid emotional trading).  Technical Analysis isn't the key to trading... discipline and knowing how the markets work is... but the catch is technical analysis is needed to help form disciplinary habits.

Quote#2

Full nodes do not always relay, or always receive transactions if they have this setting turned off. The operator of a node can use the "blocks only" setting to only receive new blocks, and is a way to reduce bandwidth. There can also be instances when a miner will receive transactions to consider including in their blocks from not-full nodes, such as their websites, or from SPV clients (light nodes) if the miner's node is an electrum server for example.

A full node is one that validates each block in full, including that transactions included in said block contain valid signatures and have not previously been spent (are not double spends).

The decision between running a full node and a SPV client (a "light node") depends on the end user's value of security and privacy. A full node will use more resources, such as bandwidth, computing power, memory and hard drive space, and a SPV client will have incrementally lower security and privacy, but I am not aware of any thefts of coin that were stolen/lost because the end-user was using a SPV client.  

Quote#3



There is no accurate measure of how profitable the project will be. Demand vs supply dictates everything. But if the project is really good and people start to recognize it, then there is a high chance that it can be profitable if you are an early adopter.
Take an example of Bitcoin; it took some years for it to gain value, the main player was the rise in its demand over the years.

So here are the key aspects;
  • What problem does the project tackle using the blockchain?
  • What blockchain based solution does it have in place?
  • How unique is the solution offered from other solutions provided by other projects before
  • Is the solution offered feasible?
  • How experienced are the team members when it comes to the blockchain technology
  • Is the project adoptable?
  • Is the project in line with the regulations?
    e.t.c
Note: Am emphasizing blockchain technology in my points because it's the newest kid on the block and would love to see it prosper

That said, There are so many articles online which could help you to identify if a project is just scam or legit. I will share a few links here, you can do more research online.
- 10 Ways How to Spot a Scam ICO
- How to Identify Cryptocurrency and ICO Scams
- 10 keys for evaluating Initial Coin Offering (ICO) investments

You can also visit the scam accusations board and you get to see and learn how some members identify scam projects

Quote#4

Basically you won't get paid anything until you manage to convince a number of people (victims) to invest in the scheme. After all, its from them the actual money is coming from... That's how you recognize them. Most won't let you quit right away (after you invested) and give you a refund. I knew one that allowed refunds but only for 24 hours.., i guess to comply with local laws (somewhere, often NOT your country, but some fiscal paradise).

The very early ones to enter and leave might be the only ones able to cash something, but it depends on the life of the MLM. I read some estimations say about 8% can profit, so 8 in 100 people will gain at the expense of the other 92 who will lose all.

How long they last? Until someone or group finds out and convinces enough people its a scam; then it bankrupts. Similar to a bank run (and fractional reserve banking is similar to a Ponzi scheme). Basically it lives and dies by word of mouth.

IF its a business that uses some MLM style marketing, but the main income comes from selling actual products or services, then you should research further. If you are selling soaps and get a commission for each one sold but you also manage to recruit people to sell them and earn like 1% of their cut for each sale they do, its still the soap that is making most of the profit, not the people joining to work under you and expand your network.

Sometimes they are very clever and blurry the lines, its not always easy to recognize. You might think they are earning their main profits with another (actual) business when in reality they are doing pure MLM. Sometimes they happened to have another business but secretly isn't doing well, or they buy an actual business (possibly failing) and try to combine it with MLM to give it a decent facade.


Quote#5


It depends on the demand of the coin if many investor wants to buy the coin the higher thr price it will get, so to make sure that there will be a new investor or buyer the developers and team should achieve all the accomplishment and continue to expand and upgrade the project.

It's also important that the project has a unique concept and unique solution to an existing problem using a blockchain technology (or the likes)

An exposure to the community might affect the price as well so a bounty would help since there's a lot of niches here in the forum but it it's still depends on te project whether there will be an investors or none.

To conclude this, a unique and promisable project would increase it's investors and the value of coin as well.



Quote#6


I feel like a lot of people fell victim to this over exuberant buying that started in December and fell into this trap.thanks for being honest and I'm glad you see where your mistakes came from...you were emotional trading and thats okay .. its better to learn now than when your stack is much larger come 2-3 years from now.

First and foremost, December/January were not normal.. alts aren't typically allowed that sort of long leash while BTC goes sideways for so long..  John Mccaffee and tons of youtubers promoting "hot coins" that constantly pump abused the noobs even more (along with attracted people they could make tens of thousands over night, which to be fair I'm sure did happen if people didn't get greedy and took profit).... a lot of people didn't understand the correlation of alts vs btc and just viewed BTC as something that has small gains or goes down while all alt coins go up constantly for 100% + gains per day.. us long term traders are also responsible as much as the fomo'ing noobs.. we abused new traders and stuck them with big bags, then double and triple dipped on the gains through the BTC fud as they sold it all back to us.. we all deserve this correction cycle for different reasons, and hopefully everything is coming back to normal.  The moral of the story can be learned all around.. old players/whales and noobs both need each other.. we both have our role to play in a responsible healthy market where we are all successful and hopefully across the board we all learned from our December/January craze mistakes.  

Couple of notes based off of your points...

1) I think past charting would show that January definitely slumps, but past doesn't always predict the future.. instead of waiting to buy til January.. maybe look to dump alt positions to safe havens in late December...

2) To expand on not selling at a loss, just always be greedy with BTC.. hodling btc will lead to you double dipping on success if btc price fuds out.. you can flee to USDT to buy lower then at the lowest price buy alts that have also bled out..  

Extra input:  Picture trading as more of a positional rotation.. where you have 3 faces.. one has BTC mooning.. one has BTC going down.. and one where BTC is going sideways.... BTC mooning is best to be in BTC.. BTC going down is best to be in BTC so you can move to USDT easily as a shelter.. and BTCs going sideways as alts moon...  The point is alts in two of the three positions are potentially two trades out of position.. where as the worst position you can be in with BTC is your value goes sideways.. this is very important because alts will have 70-80% where BTC will do better but during that 20-30% of times alts do better you can easily double up.. investments have to be a rotational thing if youre buying in at higher prices. its not safe in any of the three positions except hodling btc.. and even that AT TIMES (although limited) is too conservative.   You want to be able to multiply position and make money even in down markets, and the only way to do so is to play the position game.. and even if primarily hodling you're going to need atleast 30-50% of your portfolio in BTC to cost average alt coins slippage or mistakes. I know some people put very little value on BTC or ETH and just want to support alt coins but the market will catch up with you and you will be left losing satoshi value when your alts go into the wrong position and even if you make USD overtime you will lose value as compared to just hodling BTC.

I can't stress enough to learn the BTC relationship to alts.. its not only something you have to understand.. but you have to have BTC's chart open all the time just to monitor.. its THAT important.
 


Quote#7

The person who holds this private key holds ownership. In cases where we use various wallets and exchanges to store our crypto tokens, this private key is with them. We just have access to those tokens via a username/email id and password to that wallet or exchange. This is risky since the ownership is not with us. Most of the times the exchange wallets are on the internet and such wallets are called Hot wallets. Hot wallets pose a maximum security risk since they are connected to the public internet while those stored no a “cold wallet” are not.

best ways to keep cryptocurrencies safe

1. Safety from Phishing Scams
The most common kind of scam is a phishing scam where a hacker sends emails or directs the user somehow to a fake site where the user enters their password. This password is received by the hacker. Be careful of the sites you open, check their security certificate and do not open emails from unknown sources.

2. Keep your device safe
Another common method of hacking is to install some kind of malware on your phone or computer and then steal sensitive data as it is being entered by the user. The device that you use for trading cryptocurrencies should be kept free of any kind of unknown programs and with an anti-virus at all times.

3. Keep private keys with you / Do not store on exchanges
Do not store your crypto tokens on exchanges. They get hacked all the time. Centralized exchanges do not provide you with your private keys. This means the crypto is stored in their wallets – hot or cold. And if they were to get hacked, you lose your tokens.

4. Enable two-factor authentication
5. Avoid public Wi-Fi

Read the complete article here: https://coinswitch.co/news/10-best-ways-to-keep-your-cryptocurrencies-safe-in-2019

Quote#8

Falling for scams such as this happens when people let their greed get the better of them,and they become enthusiastic over earning through what they never signed up for,once you receive a random email without actually signing up for anything it's most probably fraudulent and you should be wondering how your email was gotten and not how to maximize the supposed opportunity.
We've had head ups such as this and numerous warnings over time but the gullible will hardly read and put all this safety measures into practice.
Once one is simply focused on Just earning without safety,then that is being greedy and it has repercussions

Quote#9

Okay.  Let me explain something here.
When you borrow 200,000$ from the bank to buy a home, they don't actually give you a briefcase with 200,000$ cash in it. In fact, they don't even have to have any money in their vaults to loan it to you. What they do is they write down that you owe them 200,000$. It's just an entry on their ledger.

And the guy you buy the house from, he doesn't get 200,000$ in a briefcase either. The bank just adds that amount on their ledger.

I'm not even joking here. This is actually written into law and it's called fractional reserve banking. A.k.a. the ability for the bank to loan out 200$ when they only have 10$ in their vault.

This is why your bank will give you a really hard time if you try to cash out a large enough sum of money. They'll say you could be a suspected terrorist or drug dealer. And they will try really hard to make you change your mind. In fact, here in Canada, it's actually illegal to walk around with that much cash in your wallet or in your car.

The bank won't have a problem with you if you try to deposit a million$ in cash. But if you try to withdraw just 10,000$ out of that million, you might be a terrorist.

Banks are actually terrified of the idea that everybody suddenly decide to withdraw their money in cash. Simply because they don't have it. And so they would have to tell you you can't withdraw your money. This is called a run on banks. When the banks are not capable of giving you the money you deposited in your account.

Now take this idea over to your investment broker. When you call him up and you tell him you want to invest some of your money in gold, he never actually sends you a gold bar for you to keep under your pillow. What he will do is give you paper gold. That is, he will give you a gold certificate with a serial number on it. And he will tell you that this is the serial number of your gold bar.

And he will tell you that your gold is stored safely in a vault somewhere. And every month he will charge you a small fee for your gold storage. Now the average Joe might think he owns a gold bar but he doesn't. Possession is nine tenth of the law. In other words, ,if you don't hold it in your hand, you don't own it. So the only thing that the average Joe owns is a piece of paper, an IOU for a gold bar, nothing else.

But what your broker doesn't tell you is that he is selling the same paper gold to 10 or 20 other people. So an other 20 other people are walking around thinking they own the same gold bar as you do. And most interestingly, they all pay monthly storage fees for that same gold bar.

Now, naturally the average Joe thinks that the more people invest in gold, the more the price will go up. But in fact, with paper golf, the more people invest in gold, the more worthless it becomes.

After all, gold is valuable because it's rare. Not everyone  is able to walk around with a gold bar in their coat. So that's why it's so expensive to own gold.

But if everyone is walking around with a gold certificate in their coat, than suddenly gold doesn't look like it's so rare and valuable anymore.

The more you buy gold certificates, the lower the price of gold will get.

Some people call this a form of fractional reserve banking. Others call it rehypotecation. And yes, it's legal too.

Do you see now why I don't think Wall Street and banks getting involved in Bitcoin is a good idea?

Your bank and your broker will never give you actual keys for your coin. They'll just give you a Bitcoin certificate.

Bitcoin is the revolution against greedy crooked bankers and brokers. It's not supposed to be one of their tools for profit and control.



Quote#10


You don't have to know much to start using LN already. The easiest way (not the safest) is to use a custodial wallet.

For example: bluewallet.io (iOS and Android apps)

You top it up with a small amount of Bitcoin and can immediately send and receive lightning payments.
By default it uses a third party LND installation, meaning it's already capable of sending/receiving payments because it's well connected.

You can set it up to use your own LND hub instead.

There's also Bitcoin Lightning Wallet for Android which is quite good.

Give these apps a go (using small amounts of Bitcoin). That's how you get the ball rolling. It won't get rolling if everyone just sits there hoping for the thing to resolve itself on its own.

HTH

Note: I have include also few recent reply, because I think it's appropriate since no one noticed yet or someone not considered as good post. I have exclude Meta & Reputation board during post selection since most of merit source around these board and most of quality poster here.
Jump to: