Topic: MetaMask Crypto Casinos (Read 785 times)

Well, some of this centralized casinos actually have implemented a simple way of sign up and login, which is simply by connecting your metamask to the casino, by doing this, you no longer have to go through the stress of copying and pasting addresses for deposits, every money related transactions can be done I internally.
And next time you want to go online on that casino, you also don't have to start trying to remember your login details like password and username, all you have to do is connect your metamask to the site and that's an automatic login for you.

But then, as easy and fast as this is, I still believe it's one of the very bad ideas I will not advice anyone to do, it's a bad idea in the sense that,  a casino that has been well trusted can turn rogue overnight and hack users wallet, that is those who connected their wallet to the site.

I mean hacking risk exists everywhere regardless of what kind of service you use. I do agree that verifying smart contracts can be an arduous task, but if you can do it then you can verify before you connect your wallet to some random websites. It is not like you are forced to connect your main wallet anyway, which is never recommended whether you plan to gamble or not. Relying on a centralized service is usually not what you want to do with your crypto, especially when most licenses can't guarantee the business you're dealing with don't use some trick on the backend. At the end of the day, always verify and research the platform you want to use, and be aware of the risk associated with it.

Actually, it does not depend on Metemask (which is just a wallet or an interface to interact with different blockchains or projects) it would rather depend on the Blockchain and protocol one is trying to use to bet. If the network is Ethereum, then indeed there will be many transactions on the bets being placed and it would be very unprofitable to anyone who is a small gambler, though that is not the only option people have.

You should consider that there is a real market for people who would like to gamble or bet without having to send their KYC personal information to the casino and also those who are simply enthusiastic on the advantage of the decentralization in several branches: exchange services, decentralized finances, gambling, insurances, among others. Such market is not big enough as the centralized casinos, but one cannot ignore their existence.
Perhaps someday, it would be a part of this ecosystem which we will see to grow, in spite of the efforts of regulators to shut them down.

Lol.... how your casino list is Metamusk casino? how to you manage them? all casino site from your list is centralized  gambling site and all site asking  for creating a account and login. from here i already have gambling experience with some site. how that site can be considered as web3 (metamusk)casino?
Metamusk or Web3 Casinos are not yet available in the gambling market. and these casinos also have risk because wallet can be hacked through wallet connect. So centralized casino is enough to use only for fun purpose

I think the concept will still require a deposit to the casino. so when you bet you don't need to confirm every bet via Blockchain.
Use the Metamask extension in the browser only to connect the wallet to the casino. and there is no need to register to become a player at the casino.
As far as I know, the process is like that, but I don't know what the OP meant.

I don't understand why you need to use Metamask for casino betting. If you play in a casino and place bets, then you will spend a commission for each bet because that's how the blockchain works. It's completely unprofitable! I don't think Metamask is needed to play casino games. It's much easier to deposit once into your account and play.

Those casinos are just online casinos, they have nothing to do with metamask, even if it's a decentralized casino you will have to connect any supported crypto wallet, from metamask to trust wallet and others.

Metamask is not running any casino so the way you constructed this topic is way off key, and also it's risky connecting your crypto wallet to any platform especially the likes of casinos, you are far safer from threats if you deposit digital currencies to the address in your online casinos account.

The fastest way that crypto wallets get compromised is by connecting the wallet to a platform, how many people are even aware of the signing they approve on their wallet? It's also why I advice people to not use the same wallet they store lots of assets on for airdrops.

Most of the time on some of the gambling websites that I've played all you need is email in order to register and start playing, But recently I came across somewhere you can use your MetaMask wallet in order to log in to their website, For sure I don't really going to recommend that especially because it is just way too risky to put your personal wallet to some suspicious website, especially on a gambling website where there is a lot of phishing that is happened most of the time.

If I have a huge amount in my Metamask money I would really connect it to a lot of websites that is not really secure or trusted, I would just use it for safe transactions where I wouldn't risk my account getting drained, It was just very scarry since there are a lot of cases of it where metamask wallet get drain pretty easily probably phising or some other method, there are lot of method that they might use in order to hack our wallet to its already better to avoid it and be safe from it than having regret in the end when you get hack, Also it wouldn't really hurt if your going to just make a other metamask account that doesn't have big funds, or just an account that you use for playing, or else just use other ways like email.

I prefer centralized casinos over decentralized ones, mainly because you can't trust new platforms, especially if they require you to give them access to your wallet containing your assets because you never know, the industry is full of scams and scammers and you can't believe every single platform.

A lot of people are against KYC and KYC-enabled casinos because they believe it's against their privacy to provide their personal information to any platform and they don't want to do that. However, I believe KYC-enabled casinos and platforms are more secure because they are operating under a licensed authority and even if the licensing firm doesn't care much, they will still have to comply with a lot of rules and regulations imposed on them.

I have tried some of these casinos before and noticed the option to register an account using your web3 wallet through WalletConnect or Metamask. I prefer this option because it requires the least amount of personal data. You can just leave the wallet empty if you are concerned about privacy and don’t want your entire transaction history visible to the casino. You will still be able to deposit to your account normally, by copy and pasting your deposit address into any other wallet.

For decentralized casinos it is a bit different and requires more trust because you might be required to approve a smart contract request if you want to participate in something like Metawin’s on-chain lotteries. In those situations it is best to set a budget and send those funds to a separate wallet, so your main wallet can’t get compromised, and only connect to casinos with good reputations.

The thing i dont really like when dealing up with Metamask kind of log in is tha you do really have that kind of risks on losing your assets inside that wallet specially if it allows that permissions and if you do able
to make yourself deal up with those unknown or non popular sites on which we know that this is something too risky. This is why i do much still prefer on registering on sites on using up some gambling
email based that i have created so that i wont really be putting up the risks of those assets inside the wallet. Yes, those sites above does have that kind of metamask option for you to make
some log in and able to play directly which it isnt really that a bad option either. There are really just those people who cant really just that bare up with the risks involved
when doing or making use of this kind of log in option.

This your thread is a little bit confusing to me as reading it I talk it was only Metamask casino which are available but going through the link you provided I happen to see other casino which are popular among others in this forum here even B.C. game is included which I don't even know there was such an option in it as I have used it many times.
 
Metamask is popular among crypto users, especially those who hold a lot of altcoins, but I don't think it's only advisable for a crypto casino that allows wallet connections to only integrate Metamask and doesn't allow the use and connection of other wallets in.

It might also make no difference as most of the listed casinos allow account creation, and they are not just a web3 casino, so one can make use of any available deposit options they want to make use of and fund their betting account.

You are not the only one who is lazy to read these messages, especially those messages that keep repeating with every activity, even by changing the browser page. Except when I am forced to do this, i.e. using the MetaMask wallet with an application, I often avoid connections with any application that requests this, including gambling platforms, and perhaps I prefer a site on which I complete the KYC verification procedures in order to lose part of the privacy of my data rather than risk exposing my money to the possibility of danger. In the best case, I will create a special wallet for that transaction or casino application and deposit small amounts into it on separate occasions.

I support you in the opinion that it is a good and important idea to read the wallet and browser warning messages because they are stingy for those who want to continue the experience with one of these casinos or any other application.

I am too lazy to read them carefully LOL.
I have not connected metamask recently with any project but I remember they ask for many call to actions. At-least more than twice. I only clicks and move forward knowing that it's a temporary wallet, if I lose anything then it's not going to be much for me to regret. But this is a good suggestion.

I have a lot of mistrust with the metamask, and when one day I Entered the casino it doesn't give me much confidence, I don't really know what the security issues are like, I actually have two metamask sessions and they are on the ETH network where I have some money, like 10usd, but Things are different, so when I try to play in that it doesn't give me much confidence, so I didn't play, that's something that yes, it's like it says, they have to give Permissions and they can do Things, but the truth is, I don't know, I don't remember where I read that in an exchange or in a casino like that, a person's funds were stolen through the browser caches , so I might think that things don't work for me. the trust I want.

I am a person who will always do things very Carefully , I will always Take great care of my money, that is something that I do not do just like that, I prefer a thousand times to be in a normal casino, those are the Disadvantages of decentralized casinos.

Although this is going to cost you more since you need to pay the fees each time you need to add funds to your wallet, it's still the best thing to do. This way, even if something wrong happens, you will lose only the coins that are on that wallet. Your main wallet will remain safe.
To avoid getting scammed or hacked, always make sure to read the approval request message before granting permission. You need to know and understand what action you are authorizing.

Connecting metamask with other sources will be very risky of losing the balance in the wallet, so make sure we have checked the source to be linked but so far there is no popular DEX gambling except regular gambling which does not require connecting to any wallet. However, any site that needs to connect metamask should use a new wallet and make sure you do not keep a high balance. Make sure you access the main wallet on metamask using a personal profile on the browser (google chrome) for all personal access to avoid errors when connecting metamask with other sources.

I think you have practiced correctly about avoiding connectivity risks from metamask, but I suggest it is better not to use Kason DEX but focus on regular casinos that are reputable and trusted.

But for a DEX casino, don't you need to approve and link your wallet with their system. I am not sure how metamask really works but for safety I create a new wallet and connect it with DEX casino or any DEX application. If I feel I am using it for real reason then I send coins to that new wallet. I don't hold coin on that new wallet.

I am not sure if I am practicing it correctly but at least I am stress free that my main wallet is safe.

This is definitely one of the ways that people get their crypto wallet compromised, they can connect their wallet to anything available online, one day you just decide to operate your crypto wallet and all your assets are gone, still you will keep asking how the hell this happened.

Don't you know that you give access to any platform when you choose to trade using your metamask wallet or other? Newbies don't even check the request they are been asked before accepting them, they only want to see their metamask work on the platform, it's obvious that people will keep losing their assets this way and I am not surprised.

If you want to stay safe online it's better to send the amount to the platform using your metamask, don't link them to anything, if you have done so already, use revoke to check your wallet address, it's probably full of weak traces that will eventually get your wallet busted by hackers and scammers.

I would never prefer a thing like this, it is risky in my opinion, and not for investment, gambling or trading will I want to connect my MetaMask wallet. I can't just think it twice. Many ways are possible that people are ignorantly causing issues for themselves and I often advise people to avoid things like this, especially for the investments forcing them to do it that are so rampant these days.

Thankfully, it won't be so long before I advise them that the scheme/supposed investment will pack off. If they could scam people like that and are more tech pros in hacking, can't they move further? However, my subsequent advice for such people is to avoid using that wallet again, they can open another one and continue their crypto dealings.

The best is to move my money to anywhere I want to move it independently. This is even more reason why I avoid some swapping arrangements.

What do you mean by strange system? Are you referring to the casino the OP had mentioned? If it is, well, that wasn't strange. You are not new in here in cryptos, so you should be familiar with those already. Even if you are not a gambler, for sure you already tried using a decentralized exchange. Their mechanics are almost the same. I mean in a way that we will need to connect our web3 capable wallet first before we can start using the platform or the services that they are offering.

You might be referring to the standard centralized casinos. Yes, most of them has a KYC but the decentralized casinos or the ones OP had, don't have a KYC. Except maybe to some Web3-based casinos, as I think I already saw a few who still have a KYC on them.

OP does not know what he is talking about. The sites he rated on his site are not web3 at all, you can not connect your wallet, not to talk of using it to deposit on the site. The sites mentioned as we have talked about it before in this same thread are centralized casinos and bookies. You can only send your coins to those casinos and bookies.

Have you ever looked at any of the casinos listed and how the Metamask integration works there? I don't think so, because it has nothing to do with the "decentralization" you write about. At some of the casinos listed there, you can simply connect your Metamask to the casino to deposit coins relatively easily. But you can't just play there with your wallet, you need the transfer to the casino account.

It seems decentralization. It is very easy to use such sites and the funds are under your own control, due to which the funding risk is very low. But there is another problem here. If you have money in your account, you can lose it through gambling because it is very difficult to control yourself and adhere to a limit in gambling. And since we gamble for fun, centralized platforms are not a problem for us. We can gamble by depositing there. But centralized platforms require kyc which is a problem in this case the metamusk quality casinos you mentioned would be better. So according to everyone's requirement whoever has the choice can use that type of site. But all centralized casinos are enough for me so far

They're dealing with labels like they're a web3 casino or sort of layer such applications that seems to be hype recently. But just like you, I also find it complicated and I usually avoid those casinos that are wanting me to connect with a metamask wallet or any other extension wallets that they're supporting. I know that we've got differences and preferences when its come to this but I just don't find it ease for me. I dunno but just as you've said, many will be fine with the kyc on a casino that we trust than going with a metamask connect wallet login.

There are few of them on this section and they're like the web 3 casinos that seems to have a lot of customers before. But, right now, I don't know if they still have a lot of customers because no matter what happens with them. In the end, the customers will go back to the usual casino and gambling experience that they've found with the typical casinos that requires registration and logging in with information that we used to sign up.

OP, you can't be so concerned about the metamask acceptance on online casinos without the safety part, what are you doing? There are scam casinos on your list and it doesn't matter if they accept metamask only, you have some cleanup to do on that website.

As a matter of fact, there is no casino that's branded as a metamask casino, if any platform or casino is accepting metamask connection it will work with other web 3 wallets too, either by WalletConnect or Direct.

If a online casino is not available on this forum you need to be careful, you have a load of traffic on that website, and with scams available in those casinos it's not safe, you will eventually lose credibility when one or more people fall victim to scam through your website, they ain't coming back and they might drop some bad reviews too.

       -   I think that such metamask apps to be used in a casino seem complicated in my opinion. It seems to be different that you just sign up, deposit, and we can immediately play gambling, even if we say that there is KYC most of the time in the casinos I'm talking about.

Although I haven't tried it yet, I rarely see a casino where, by connecting the wallet, you can play gambling. Apart from metamask, are there any other options to connect to crypto gambling here?

The casino listed on your site are not the decentralized ones and most of them are centralized and require a KYC in order to play or withdraw. I do not understand how you classify them as "Meta Mask" Casino.

By the way, I just checked the traffic on your site and you get over a 100,000 views in a month, which is something interesting. Wouldn't it be good if you could write about the detailed reviews and playing experience at each of the casinos? Though it will take some work to do so, but can further boost your site and stand it ahead of other crypto casino's review sites.

It wont be effective cause the system needs an update.
And then connecting your wallets to metamask will be trouble shooting,cause we all know  your KYC information is needed to aid effective withdrawal and deposits but when its not.thats a big issue.

In fact, the problem is with the user himself not with the technology. The web3 technology is supposed to be safe as long as you know what you are doing.
For example when you connect your wallet to a web3 website and it asks you to grant them permission to perform an action, how many of us read the message before signing it (giving them your authorization)?
However and despite all the advantages of this technology, am not a real fan of it.

The headline is totally misleading...there are no MetaMask casinos, there are casinos that allow us to play if we connect MetaMask wallet, or some other wallet, at the moment there are many of them! But Ethereum fees can be so high, so I am more for BNB chain wallet or Tron (but I don't use Tron as I used to).

Logging in with wallets can make things a lot easier, deposits & withdrawals are instant. I played in several casinos with a browser wallet and had no problems, no one ever asked me for KYC. I started with TronLink, MetaMask was interesting before ETH fees started to rage and I moved to Binance wallet... Now many casinos offer different options for logging in and maybe most importantly we can choose different chains for depositing & withdrawing, which can save us some money!

I have way more trust trust issues connecting to web3 casinos with my metamask to various sites then sending small amounts to web2 casinos i don't yet trust.
Also i see issues like typosquatting if people aren't careful where they connect to. For example finding the site via fake google ads or something like that, leading to duplicate fake site. This wouldn't even be that bad with centralized casinos as they might notice new ips trying to use your passwords and fagging them. With web3 hacking they would immediately get full access to your personal wallet.

As far as I know, in most cases, it only needs 1 confirmation to access and connect to the site and every action from there like placing a bet doesn't require any further or new confirmations. If let's say that is not the case, we all know already that Metamask supports several token networks based on ETH and it should be obvious that we won't use a coin that has insane fees that are not worth gambling with.

Not a technical person here but someone can correct me if my statement is wrong. \

That is one of the biggest downsides of decentralized gambling, indeed, there is little or no support of the most important asset of this industry: Bitcoin. Even though some people may argue WrappedBitcoin is good enough, it is a token which is rather stigmatized in the Bitcoin community of being pretty much decentralized (controlled by an issuer), realistically storing value using auch token is not safe in the long term, for obvious reasons, one of them being the possibly of the eventual shutdown of the issuer.
I personally believe than using Ethereum and other alternative currencies to gamble in a decentralized way should be good enough for the time being, even if the network becomes too congested there will be alternative main nets/ and block chains which supply the demand for decentralization. As it stands for now, it would not seem to be much demand, though, in comparison the old and reliable system of centralized casinos which allow to deposit Bitcoin.

It is quite ironic some casinos nowadays need to decide either go with the wave of decentralized gambling or accepting Bitcoin, due to those two concept remain to be incompatible.

In my case, I prefer to use the way most casinos have done it, which consists of creating an account using email, password, username and after creating an account at the casino, make a deposit using the deposit option and the address will come out to which I should send the coins, then I copy the address and go to my wallet and paste the address and send the coins to that address. I think this method is safer and less of a headache than using a very risky method like this MetaMask. This MetaMask method exposes people to the risk of losing funds in my opinion. I don't know how many people are using this MetaMask method and how long they have been using it without having any problems. It would be very interesting if in this thread we had testimonials from many people who are using this method

and these many people would tell us what their experience has been like using this MetaMask in the casino and how long they have been using the MetaMask in the casinos. With this we would have an idea of how this could be advantageous or not. Searching on Google I found few articles that talked about the advantages and disadvantages of MetaMask in crypto casinos. according to this article:


source: https://timestabloid.com/metamask-casinos-pros-cons-review-rating/

Just reading this article gives me an idea that many casinos will not use this MetaMask

Well, I do not think you completely understand the op and what he is talking about, it's not about casinos allowing the use of metamask as their only means of login and access to the casinos, op is talking about centralized casinos like the ones you possibly know, that allow users to connect their metamask to their platform as an easier and faster means of gambling, deposit and withdrawal, over the normal traditional way which is to enter your email and password, possibly get a 2fa mail or code, then enter the code before you are logged in, and in times of withdrawal, you have to enter the wallet address you want to withdraw to, pass several means of verification like email and 2fa verification, before you can withdraw, using metamask cuts out all this processes use you can easily deposit and withdraw out from or into the same wallet that is connected to the casino easily without having to fill in email and 2fa codes.

But then, even though this seems like we likable feature, it's very risky, not just to a gamblers privacy, but also risky to gambler money, since the casino may have access to even funds in the wallet, and if such casino turns scam or is hacked, they hackers or the casinos may steal funds from connected wallet.

Metamask supports a wide range of blockchains, not only those you mentioned, in fact any EVM-compatible chain can be integrated into Metamask.

The biggest disadvantage for me, however, would be that there is no direct support for non-EVM-compatible blockchains such as Bitcoin (apart from all the wrapped bitcoins, of course). Bitcoin is still very popular in the online cryptocasino sector and is still my first choice for depositing coins on a platform. 

What makes me wonder ehy a casino would only target user base of Metamask wallet. It can be a good idea if the gambling circle only use tokens or blockchain that support the wallet. Which according to my understanding is either Ethereum or Binance smart chain. While majority of gambling enthusiasts prefer Bitcon, Dogecoin, Tron and Ethereum using Metamask only would elude them from being interested in a particular casino that encourages the use of a particular wallet. I feel if you want to create a non KYC casino you should focus on wallets like Trust wallet apart from Metamask.

As far as I know, there are no true web3 casinos because there is always a centralized point of control somewhere. So I do not gamble on "decentralized" casinos. Therefore I do not connect my wallet to anything like that. The reason why is because it is very dangerous to trust many of these gambling services that pop up. Most of the time, they use the term decentralized for marketing reasons. You know, to make themselves look better than they really are. Don't get me wrong, I am a huge fan of decentralization, when its real and not just a advertising slogan.

I don't need a casino with a strange system and other.

I already like with current system, the most important thing on casinos is (easy to withdraw and deposit). That's all another a good point, people love to play with a casino who have less strict on (KYC) topic.

Are you sure the reason is because of the lack of interest, not that your website is hard to find or not SEO-friendly? Your URL name is like a scam gambling website to be honest, I won't be surprised if people think you are one of those website aggregators that provide little to no value to anyone who is researching the web. Have you considered changing your website name to something catchier/easier to mention? Just take a look at other services on this forum, most of them are short and easy to remember.

I usually try to avoid a casino where I have to connect a wallet. I feel like I might be putting coins at risk by connecting a wallet. So many scams in the crypto space these days, it's hard to take the risk.

Technically speaking you are pertaining to a casino that offers web3 connection. Metamask is just one of the many web3 wallet which you use to login on a web3 casino. Web3 feature is not that popular for me due to retrieving purposes once your wallet seed phrase is already compromised. There’s no way to recover your account since the wallet itself is your account which there’s no way to change a seed phrase.

The traditional way of creating account on a casino is still popular due to security purposes. I personally use web3 wallet on a casino when I’m just doing a quick bet while my portfolio is on altcoin currency and stored in a web3 wallet but most of the time I use hardware wallet.

Where did you get the fake information that Metamask requires KYC? Metamask is still a noncustodial wallet that does not require KYC. Probably you used a third party site on Metamask that requires KYC and you thought it was Metamask. I used Metamask recently to claim a coin I was unable to claim on Trustwallet and it requires no KYC. Only what you have to do is to use your seed phrase. Even if any wallet that uses seed phrase is requiring for KYC, you can stop using the wallet and import the seed phrase on another wallet. But Metamask requires no kYC.

Also web3 sites will prefer to add other web3 wallets, not only Metamask. OP is not just knowing what he is talking about. His post and the site he referred us to are full of wrong information.

I read it. I don`t believe that there are some decentralizes high quality casinos. But it is only my opinion. The main idea is that gambling in such casinos is dangerous enough. You can get fake casino, cheat casino or some other way to lose all your money. But there is difference between standard fake casino and metamask fake casino: in MetaMask casino you can lose all your money, not only deposit.
That`s why i`m talking about additional MetaMask, or just ignoring such casinos.

       -   If only metamask can be connected and there are no other wallets, it seems that the risk is high when we gamble in a casino like that, although, as far as I know, metamask now requires KYC, which is no different from regulated crypto casinos.

So if you gamble in a casino that uses a metamask, my suggestion is not to use your old wallets in a metamask; it is better and better to use a new address wallet in a metamask.

It's not an important factor to me as a very private person and a gambler at that. As seamless as the method could be with the gambler not having to all of the time going through the process of depositing and withdrawing from his gambling account with the casino I still don't buy the idea as it can make a gambler easily prone to excessive gambling without a bankroll control especially when they  are so naive enough to connect with a wallet they do use for other transactions, and just as @fivestar4everMVP  did said, we shouldn't compromise our privacy for a comfort that have the tendency to jeopardize our security in the future as most of these casino's if not all of them are centralized casinos.

For me I'll continue to stick with the casinos I use for my gambling and I can't for any reason see depositing and withdrawing in/from my gambling account as a stress filled process. Let's always be up-to-date with any features we decide to make use of as it concerns it's pros and cons if you're cool with it before embarking on making use.

Initially, I've always thought that it is only decentralized casinos that offer gambler such ability to connect and play on the casino not just through metamask, but through other non-custodial wallet as well, like trust wallet and so on.

Learning now that it is actually possible for gamblers to connect some casinos that offer the possibility, to metamask and play, I must say that this is a great feature, or seems to me, but I doubt a lot of gamblers will be interested in using such feature, since by connect your wallet directly to a centralized casino, there is the possiblity that they could have access to every bit of coins or tokens you hold, and they can also have access to all your transactions history's on that wallet.

So, for me, I don't think I would definitely want to ever connect my wallet to a centralized casino, I would always prefer to login the traditional way since to me, it possibly takes same amount of time and efforts, but even if connecting a wallet seems or is faster and time saving, I can't sacrifice my crypto investment privacy for time saver, it's just not worth it, I will definitely connect my wallet to a decentralized casino and play, but I don't consider it safe to do same on or with well known centralized casinos.

Every time users connects his wallet to any webpage is a risky action. That is why I prefer limiting number of pages I connect my wallet to. Of course it is convenient to have wallet connected, as you instantly see all available balance. But on the other hand, when most have metamask widget, it isnt complicated nor takes a lot of time and action to make a transaction. Users should also take into consideration, that it might happen that with connected wallet, user could be asked to confirm every bet (transaction) he makes, and that is extra money expenses.

No, there's no complicated at all to connect your wallet with Web3.0 or dApps, you're just need to have the wallet, open the site, and connect it, that's all. While lightning network, you need to convert your on chain coins to LN, download the wallet that support LN, pay the fees using your on chain Bitcoin, and other further steps.

The problem is usually related to security, most people feel it's not safe to directly connect your wallet.

I think the problem with these Web3 casinos and wallets are similar to the problems that the Lightning Network are experiencing.

The solutions are over developed and too complicated for the majority of the normal users to adopt. Yes, the concept are great and it actually solve problems, but the applications are too complicated and not really idiot proof.

Developers should alpha and beta test these solutions with the general public, before they launch it... not with their peers or fellow developers that are technically skilled.

So let's pass on that case about the actual content of the URL you've dropped. Honestly, if I'll be asked to what I prefer, I just like the old ones where many have been just random casinos but trusted where you don't have to register and you'll be given a deposit address and that's how you'll be betting.

No need to register, no need to connect wallets.

Just deposit your bet and put your receiving address if ever you win that bet, either with any games, lotto, sportsbetting, etc.

The one in my signature is a decentralized casino where betting can also be done directly through connecting various crypto wallets (e.g. Metamask).

Website: https://just.bet
ANN Thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62287190

As for my view regarding gambling sites with a wallet connect feature, it's not something a big deal to me. What is more important to me is trustworthiness, good customer service, better overall service, no scam-related issues, and anything positive things that most gambler wants.

Let's not just talk about MetaMask. There are many other wallets that can be used with the same formula and which are supported by many casinos.

This is supposed to be a good feature that facilitates the use of the application and greatly supports privacy, since the user will not be required to provide special data to register or log in. Unfortunately, this feature is very dangerous, as it is not possible to easily trust any application that is used, or its security cannot be sensed unless the casinos are trusted in advance.

I cannot recommend avoiding trust in all applications that support it, or the whole idea is useless, but caution must be extreme because the possibilities of manipulation are very real.

You're joking, right?












If you are serious and genuinely unaware of these matters, visiting TOP69 Crypto Casinos will offer you many useful insights. For example, you could find out that there are crypto casinos with bitcoin lightning, lists with no kyc crypto casinos (the real deal, no bulls..t), crypto casinos with no deposit free spins, crypto casinos with lucky wheel and many other interesting stuff.
Good luck!

No, I don't prefer those casinos and I haven't used those casinos. I don't know that the casinos that I use have that feature or not but I don't really care much about that feature. I don't really deposit money in my MetaMask wallet and that's another reason for me to not like or use such casinos. However, if they allow normal crypto deposits then I surely love to use them.

I know that some people prefer MetaMask due to its ease of use but I'm not among those people. I try my best to avoid using it as much as possible. I won't say that MetaMask isn't a useful wallet or anything else but I personally don't give much preference to it. I rarely use MetaMask or Trust wallet, and that's why even if a casino has that feature I would avoid it instead of availing it.

I think for those who have been in the space or experience how hackers or criminals can take over and take advantage of web3 and grant them permission to access our wallet? It's not safe to do so.

They can call us old school or something, but it is what it is. We shouldn't trust them, specially if we have a lot of our MetaMask as it our crypto can quickly gone in seconds without us realizing what really happen. So safety first guys, or just go with the old system of having a deposit address and others that we are used to in friendly casinos. At least we don't give those hackers a chance to steal from us.

I agree but for those who are really into anonymous gambling, it would be a matter to adapt and follow some security steps before logging in and withdrawing. Though, nobody is 100% resistant to social engineering and scammers. Regardless whether the casino is decentralized or not, there will be always some bad people trying to exploit both the system of the casino and deceive both clients and operators/staffers.
While for now staying in centralized casinos is the right thing to do for newbies and those who do not care about KYC, we should not completely close our minds to the future of decebtralized gambling. Who knows, we may someday find some web3 casino which is actually appealing and we decide to give it a shot.
Though, I would only do so if can use a hardware wallet to check whatever transaction I am signing or what smarth contract I am actually interacting with.

I am going to leave this appointment here, since this idea of OP to put a thread with the traffic priority, rather than to have a real doubt, leaves many without verifying the link that has left us op, hence there are users to fish: mode, reply.
Then, It is a thread that should die on page 1, but goes to page 2.

My apologies for "abusing" the quote:
OP: No, I don't use them.

.

I don’t think I’d trust a web3 casino, not necessarily because the casino did anything wrong but because it is so easy to make a mistake in web3 and grant a permission that could result in losing everything in your wallet. If you know what you’re doing it’s fine, but for casuals I think web3 is a recipe for absolute disaster of your wallet funds.

The casino that operate in this way are called Web3 casono and they mostly provide privacy service to their users but it also have some disadvantage despite the ease that with it which I believe some gamblers never like since they are not regulated/governed by the rules and regulations of master licences provider and they mostly limited games due to there of operation which is against the rules of most game provider.
Having said that, I personally don't like there service and I haven't play on them before.

Well, when it comes on being decentralized on which you could really be able to bet directly on using your Metamask wallet then to those who are really that a fan for privacy and full control then this one would really be
appealing but we know that it is really that something that quite not that preferred if you are really that planning on having those fast pacing kind of gambling which we know that common platforms that we do have
now is really just that much better when it comes to overall execution on which this is why platforms that we do have in the market today is really that having that kind of significance when it comes
to user experience and this is why numbers are really that more on which it is somewhat expected.

Its not really that shocking that there would really be less interest into it, we do know that decentralized is good but when it comes to user experience
then it would be normal that people would be sticking into something which gives out that best experience.

this comes to the fact that it depends on the gambler's needs at the time of his games. because some may opt to use metamask because he has tokens stored, whereas, others will stick to btc or other top alts, because that's what they have in their wallet.
so this route totally depends on the gambler himself because not all players are also familiar or using the metamask. but for those who are using, the OP's list may come in handy. especially those players who have long list of tokens they want to dispose of.


this is the dilemma when you connect your wallet to a site that is not yet proven in the industry. you don't know the loopholes or other possible threats involved. they may have hidden malwares that can attack your wallet. so even if it is dex, better be cautious using such site. check for reviews or feedbacks. it may save your day digging for the background of the site first.

I have a feeling when OP says "Metamask casinos" he meant that you can connect your metamask wallet to your casino account(of course after you log in to the casino) to be able to deposit and withdraw on the website using metamask, and after checking sportsbet.io it seems like that is the case(at least for sportsbet.io).

https://sportsbet.io/help-centre/help-payments/help-payments-using-crypto/how-to-deposit-crypto-from-metamask-to-sportsbet-io-account

I don't think it should be called Metamask casino when in fact you can connect lot of dApps on it. I think "dApps/decentralized casino" is the appropriate name of it. Yeah been there post 2021 but I think decentralized casino was far from being adopted considering the liquidity in the first place plus the lot of rugs and hacks happen on it.

Online casinos that offer the MetaMask feature, this is a useful feature, of course, for those who store several types of crypto that they own, because casinos and gamblers have crypto ties in a way to transfer easily and quickly, but for me the MetaMask feature doesn't like it, after all I only store Bitcoin don't have Altcoins.

Regarding casinos and MetaMask two different things, both support each other in crypto methods, the point is very useful for those who are interested in Altcoins and casinos, maybe not for those who use Bitcoin.

Read what AB de Royse777 posted about it, the casinos OP mentioed are centralized and not web3. So advising OP or people may make some people to get confused not to use the gambling site rated by OP. Another thing is that you should use the amount of money that you can afford to lose to gamble, so little amount of money that someone can afford to lose should be on the noncustodial wallet like Matamask. As for me I can not use such casinos because some people can mistakenly connect their wallet with huge amount of money to a fake website as some people are scammed these days.

Since when did bcgame, sportbets.io and livecasino start using MetaMask to connect to their site [ie connecting with just your MetaMask without any login details]? If you want to run a blog site please do so with the right information and if you don’t know what to write then rest don’t write anything rather than publish misleading content online.

I connected one of me wallet to this type of casino long time ago but I never made any deposit in it since I wasn’t sure if it’s safe to let my funds stay in a wallet after giving a site that I don’t know how it was built some permission to perform certain actions on it.

I thought as much because I have actually not come across any topic here with a clickable link to redirect you out of the platform. What I am very sure of is post content which can be embedded but not topic. But however since it is not an offence against the platform, then it seems OP can try it out but I hope the link would not be something not in line with the principles of the platform otherwise it would likely be deleted as you have said.

I think it's a great thing that you could connect your meta mask directly. It's an advantage I think because of the sureness of holding your money on something that you can control.

To be honest, I haven't tried this type of thing in casinos, I don't really know a casino that lets you. Mostly it's an account then you will deposit.

This will be a breach in security of your wallet, and it is not advisable for anyone to risk his funds just because he wants to gamble and experience Web3casino games.

The risk is higher than the fun and nobody will choose to go this direction. It is better to gamble in Web2casino with cheap fee and for safety. Even though a special wallet should be created for gambling, you wouldn't know when you are in a scam site.

Tbh I always prefer to use Web 2.0 Like most of the casinos are running today. Web 3.0 is an updated version but I think it's yet not much popular.

It's okay that in Web 3.0 casinos need very little time to connect/sign in, Deposit is also much faster but it does not mean instant withdrawal. If a casino has a manual withdraw process feature users need to wait for their confirmation.

So, personally, I don't know why but I am not user-friendly in the Web3.0 project tbh.

Op the truth most be told automatically connecting one's wallet to a casino to deposit and withdraw is not advisable and many will not use that feature because everyone is very care with the security of their wallets. If anyone used that feature it will not more than 0.01% and the large number nod people would prefer to use manual deposit and withdrawal. Therefore I will advise you to allow the users to deposit and withdraw their funds manually.

It's why when someone need to gamble by directly connecting their wallet, they need to treat their wallet as the account, which mean only use that wallet to gamble. Don't forget to use revoke.cash to make sure the wallet isn't connected with the casino anymore.

It's fine, there's no ban too, the chance is only your post could be deleted by moderator, that's all.

I really have not seen such here. I believe you too have observed it yourself. Possibly it is not allowed here as you can see for yourself that majority of the topics here have no such features and as such are not clickable to redirect you to another page outside that of the platforms. You could try it yourself if you can but doing such, you should know that you are liable for your own actions.

Is there a forum ban on inserting links in created topics?

Yoi have a good initiative OP but I saw some casinos there which have pending scam accused cases here and some are yet to be resolved. Do you not think that members would look your website as promoting scam casinos and some are no more here to start with. Possibly you did not do a proper verification before including them in on your website but you can still do that as it is not too late. I must commend your efforts on this task OP. You have a  clean idea but it would be nice you do take out time to attend to the observations made on your website.

It is the thread about metamask casinos, but i only see how the OP try to promote his website.
About such casinos - if you ready to risk all your money without betting - you can use such casinos. In all other ways i can recommend not to use it, or, at least, use special metamask, without big sums. It is good idea but as usual - first of all we have to take care of our security.

In the past I have used web3 casinos but in my opinion the risk is very big because there is a possibility that we will enter a phishing website or be infiltrated by dangerous malware. I don't have coding skills but I think connecting wallet directly to casino or website has high risk, once I realized there is big risk in it then I prefer to use casino account as usual, even though they have web3 features like bc.game but I don't interested in using this feature

It's a huge security risk, especially when no-name casinos do it.

Because of the way that Metamask and related wallets work, you need to sign a message to allow access. But how are you supposed to know whether a site is legit or scam, if you don't even recognize it?

If you sign a message and the casino turns out to just be one giant phishing operation, then you're going to lose your money.

Besides, you only need to connect your wallet when you do deposits, not as a login.

Isn't that the risk of hacking our personal wallets, and of course as gamblers we will avoid problems like this unless we use another wallet or spare wallet that is only used for gambling.
I personally still prefer casinos with deposit and withdrawal features because it makes it easier to organize or manage finances, besides that using deposit and withdrawal methods has become habit.
Maybe some gamblers will be happy with feature that connects their personal wallet directly to the gambling site, but I sure they will only use another wallet, not their main wallet, serious problems will be felt if problems occur when using the main wallet.
No matter how good the casino use, if it has direct feature for connecting personal wallet, still have to be careful.

Even though I am aware it could happen sometime in the future at this time and era of the gambling industry I believe centralized and licensed casinos to be more reliable than wallet/decentralized/smart contract casinos, to be honest. It is not only the fact decentralized casinos have not been proven through long period of time like centralized ones have (it have been literal years since Stake , FreeBitcoin and others have been around doing business), but also, it is easier for scammers to steal funds from unsuspecting victims who get used to connecting their wallets to play, deposit and withdraw.
Also, ideally those decentralized casinos are supposed to be connected to using hardware wallets, but not all gamblers are willing to do such investment for the sake of their money, at the very least the biggest centralized casinos have advanced security and hardware wallets to safe guard the wealth of their users while they gamble. Granted, it is not the ideal case to trust our money to a centralized service in the long term, but we are not talking about a Bank anyways.

For now I prefer to good old big and centralized crypto casinos, let us see if through years we can get some equivalent within the world of decentralized ones, however, keeping in mind the regulation and the path which governments are going, as soon as a big and reliable decentralized crypto casino appeared, it would be target of scrutiny and likely be shut down by Authorities eventually, unless the operator started to comply with KYC and AML measures.

No thank you very much. I am find with a direct deposit and withdrawal from my own wallet and not MetaMask wallet.In other words, I am not read for web3 casinos yet. I am scared of external wallets and having too many makes it complicated for my liking most especially the high fees I hear that may be associate with them.

You should do your homework well and keep your list updated. Remove casinos that have been accused of scams and have had a poor public reputation. It may rub off on this work you have put in place. Keep it fresh.

I do not think OP knows the meaning of web3 casinos or the casinos that you can connect noncustodial wallet with. He may probably think that it means to send coins from a wallet to a casino. The reason I said it is because I can see some casinos that I know of on this forum on his website. Casinos like BC.game, Sportsbet, Livecasino and Bitcasino which are web2 and not web3.

The casinos you have listed on that page are not metamask casinos LOL. Some of the sportsbook have even scam accusations and they are not operating anymore. You need to keep the page updated and have the content that you are claiming.

By the way, it's a nice strategy to drop your URL to this high authority website :-D

I think what you mean is a casino with a web3 system, where not only metamask can be used to log in, you can also use trust wallet and so on. Honestly, I have never used it because ERC20 transaction fees are more expensive. I prefer regular crypto casinos, I use Doge or Trx because the deposit/withdrawal process is fast and the transaction fees are cheap. I'm comfortable enough with the regular casino model that I've never tried a web3 casino

There should be other wallets that you can connect to, not only Metamask is the only web3 wallet that is existing.

I have not used web3 casinos before. I hope people can not be encouraged with ERC20 this way because of high fee. But if connecting using networks like Tron, BRC20 and other ones like that are available, the fee will be low.

I prefer the normal casinos like Livecasino.io. If such casinos are reputed, I prefer them than playing with coins in a way that transaction fee will be deducted from every game that I stake.

Hi,

Do you prefer casinos where you can connect your MetaMask wallet for quick sign-in and deposit/withdrawal, or is that not very important to you?

I've created a section listing crypto casinos that offer this feature, but it hasn't attracted much interest, so I'm curious to know what you think about this feature.
You can find the list here -> MetaMask Casinos