Here's a pretty good diagram with counter-arguments you can use whenever someone throws a criticism of Bitcoin at you. It's a fairly old tweet, but still pretty useful.
I have realised from the unset that Michael Saylors's approach to bitcoin has been somehow biased and his arguments have always lacked the statistical evidence to take him seriously.He has been a manipulator, who constantly takes advantage of Bitcoin's potential in private and publicly discredits Bitcoin at every chance, so best to just ignore this dude, and focus on personal knowledge building that will help each and everyone to make better decisions as regards to bitcoin.
True. I always kinda disliked him, he looks insane and always talks about Bitcoin like he talks about God.
he hoards bitcoin. but he wants everyone to stop using bitcoin and instead deposit their bitcoin into his custodianed "factories" of another network to get "inbound balance" of a different unit of measure to be locked into playing with on this other network.. (i would mention the other network by name*(triggering their bots) but the usual 'other network' lemmings usually crawl into the discussion and spout their broken promises of why people should ignore me and instead use their network.
if saylor cared about bitcoin he would be sponsoring devs to fix bitcoin exploits. not sponsor the creation of exploits just to annoy bitcoiners in the hopes they shift over to his prefered other network he pretends is bitcoin
*it begin with L and is the flashy zap of electric in the sky that causes thunder sounds
