Author

Topic: Mining on another planet. Possible? (Read 6548 times)

sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
November 04, 2013, 11:08:56 PM
#68
Lets discuss how we can make Bitcoin work for 7 billion people here on EARTH before discussing how to export it to other planets and galaxies Smiley
Im afraid the architecture of bitcoin has its limitations if we reach millions of daily users.

Thats the problem, there is too many people on earth to mine Tongue.. Mars only have whoever that manage to land...
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
In Hashrate We Trust!
November 04, 2013, 06:17:13 PM
#67
Lets discuss how we can make Bitcoin work for 7 billion people here on EARTH before discussing how to export it to other planets and galaxies Smiley
Im afraid the architecture of bitcoin has its limitations if we reach millions of daily users.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 501
November 04, 2013, 05:49:04 PM
#66
wtf is this thread?
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
November 04, 2013, 05:23:06 PM
#65
Fast & Furious 6....


Fast five is better than 6 for me. I hate that airport scene at 6, That airport i 150 Kilometers long

The series went downhill after the first one imo.


where downhill?
full member
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
November 04, 2013, 05:19:57 PM
#64
I dont see a reason it shouldnt work on marse as long as theres internet connection there!
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
November 04, 2013, 04:35:54 PM
#63
Lets start real digging on mars, we might find something even more valuable then diamond or gold.... like the gem underneath avatar tree..

if we find somethnig everyone shall quit form BTC Sad
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Bitgoblin
November 04, 2013, 09:19:49 AM
#62
Lets start real digging on mars, we might find something even more valuable then diamond or gold.... like the gem underneath avatar tree..
Actually if something like a gem was found in abundance, it wouldn't have much value anymore.
The real scalable materials are those with an actual use, and even those only up to their saturation limit.
legendary
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
November 04, 2013, 08:36:22 AM
#61
Lets start real digging on mars, we might find something even more valuable then diamond or gold.... like the gem underneath avatar tree..
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
November 04, 2013, 02:58:18 AM
#60
I think in the first few years energy on mars could be dirt cheap, in the time mars is collonised fusion energy will be available, and on mars there are no enviromental activists and the like, so produce energy, and dump the radioactive waste in the next hole. And deuterium looks like to be more common on mars.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
In Hashrate We Trust!
November 03, 2013, 08:36:42 PM
#59
Why do it so complicated? People could use physical silvercoins on Mars if they ever move there.
hero member
Activity: 647
Merit: 501
GainerCoin.com 🔥 Masternode coin 🔥
November 03, 2013, 08:24:28 PM
#58
Possible but why would people wanna do that? Real mining on another planet would be a better deal cause their stone is so rare....
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Manateeeeeeees
November 03, 2013, 12:34:59 PM
#57
Mining Bitcoin on Mars is totally infeasible, as almost all blocks mined on Mars will be orphaned by the time they reach Earth. I have talked about a solution before:

Each planet will have its own locally-mined cryptocurrency (Marscoin, etc), which each have a floating exchange rate to the original Earth-based Bitcoin. Marscoins and bitcoins can be directly traded for each other in order to settle interplanetary trade balances, the only issue is the speed-of-light delay for confirmations (which is unavoidable no matter what). Naturally Bitcoin can't be mined on Mars and Marscoin can't be mined on Earth, but that's not important.

An interplanetary coin with a block target of several Earth days (to allow interplanetary mining) is also a possibility for interplanetary trade or as a solar-system-wide reserve currency, but probably not necessary as long as the planetary coins can be freely traded, in which case it's likely that Bitcoin will become the solar-system-wide reserve currency (making all previous price predictions seem hopelessly pessimistic).

Yeah that's what I was thinking - thanks!
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 101
November 03, 2013, 10:43:39 AM
#56
If we can get a fast enough connection between another planet and Earth, it could be possible.
Of course we can. Lasers!

That's funny though. Assuming BTC will be around when we colonize the cosmos. Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 286
Neptune, Scalable Privacy
November 03, 2013, 07:04:56 AM
#55
quantum entanglement should allow for instantaneous communication over any distance.
It shouldn't and it doesn't.

Why shouldn't it? I guess you know everything their is to know about quantum mechanics,.... better let the rest of the world know so they can give up their research.
Foxpup is correct. I am a physicist.
member
Activity: 168
Merit: 10
November 03, 2013, 07:01:48 AM
#54
mars colony can use their local coin. But exchange could be possible always. Very easy to solve.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
November 02, 2013, 06:20:41 PM
#53
stupid topic, it should be in off topic. Dont spam for no reason
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
November 02, 2013, 05:48:56 PM
#52
I wonder what electricity cost on mars
That's pretty much the problem with it. The electric generally comes from solar panels. There is hardly enough electric to keep all the life support going much less have a mining farm. Maybe if they had a nuclear reactor... Grin
member
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
Vast
November 02, 2013, 12:56:33 PM
#51
I wonder what electricity cost on mars
legendary
Activity: 1807
Merit: 1020
November 02, 2013, 12:54:27 PM
#50
nope, in black holes time goes slower, so on earth 10min have passed, but your shiny asic din't finish the first hash.

There is no known place in the universe with significant faster time than on earth.
If you found a spot with negative mass density in the surounding, but it is generally believed that negative mass doesn't exist.

i forgot to write (it could be the other way around) Cheesy

but.. in that case, we live in the blackhole and we mine on the outside

p.s. wasn't being too serious <3
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
November 02, 2013, 12:41:56 PM
#49
nope, in black holes time goes slower, so on earth 10min have passed, but your shiny asic din't finish the first hash.

There is no known place in the universe with significant faster time than on earth.
If you found a spot with negative mass density in the surounding, but it is generally believed that negative mass doesn't exist.
legendary
Activity: 1807
Merit: 1020
November 02, 2013, 11:01:22 AM
#48
If you could use quantum entanglement for instantaneous communication,

then we could send our mining computer into a black hole or somewhere else with massive distorted space time...
 for the miner, time may pass at a different rate.. maybe much faster than on earth.. yet you are still getting instantaneous communication..
so.. on earth 10minutes have passed, but the miner has had 5 years to mine blocks in that short period...

WIN
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 500
November 02, 2013, 09:53:13 AM
#47
Mars is freaking cold, so maybee heat production?

Oxygen would be the main problem... until then, lets stop thinking of mining there .....
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
November 02, 2013, 04:42:38 AM
#46
Mars is freaking cold, so maybee heat production?
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
November 01, 2013, 08:54:30 PM
#45
Cant even roi mining on earth, why ppl want to do it on mars instead :p
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
In Hashrate We Trust!
November 01, 2013, 02:59:40 PM
#44
Forget about Mars coin, there wont be humans on Mars for decades. But we can have bitcoin in space around the world to make the vision of a free and untouchable internet become reality.

My vision is that we build 1000s of tiny satellites with the following functionality:
-mesh networking
-communication with earth and neighbour satellites
-bitcoin mining hardware onboard
-hosting of websites

These devices can enable a free and uncensored internet in countries like China, it will be slow but it will be work and will be hard to stop unless they shoot down 100s of satellites over Asia.


newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
October 31, 2013, 10:03:05 AM
#43
I doubt there will ever be some big population on mars this century. Enought time to see if Bitcoin will be still alive

Bitcoin will live forever..... Well just the mining stop but its still there...

Incidentally, if mining stops, Bitcoin dies, given it's the only method of propagating transactions. I still don't think it'll be around when Mars is colonized - only because of how long it will take.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
October 31, 2013, 09:26:54 AM
#42
I doubt there will ever be some big population on mars this century. Enought time to see if Bitcoin will be still alive

Bitcoin will live forever..... Well just the mining stop but its still there...
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe
October 30, 2013, 01:30:31 PM
#41
I doubt there will ever be some big population on mars this century. Enought time to see if Bitcoin will be still alive
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
October 30, 2013, 01:11:22 PM
#40
Maybe the best solution would be to have another coin just for Mars, then there could be a rather slow trade market.
member
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
October 30, 2013, 10:18:14 AM
#39
Bitcoin might be the currency of the universe. Even alien use them Smiley

This could help Bitcoin if aliens wanted to trade, but only in exchane for Bitcoin  Smiley


But back to topic, Bitcoin does not need high speed Internet at all to work. With Electrum client you dont need to download the blockchain
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
October 30, 2013, 10:04:33 AM
#38
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
October 30, 2013, 09:56:44 AM
#37
Its not like we ganna ran out of space. But anyway, its possible to mine on another planet since they send their robot there and is able to control from earth. So the connection is fast enough Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
October 30, 2013, 01:21:17 AM
#36
so i have another question. if its imposable for entangled particles to transfer information, how could you ever design a test that would show whether two particles were entangled or not. wouldn't that test require that they transfer some sort of information between each other?
You can't tell whether two particles were entangled without knowing the state of both of them. And you can't know the state of a distant particle without measuring it and transmitting the results of that measurement across that distance, which can't be done faster than the speed of light.

k that also makes sense
legendary
Activity: 4542
Merit: 3393
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
October 30, 2013, 01:15:40 AM
#35
so i have another question. if its imposable for entangled particles to transfer information, how could you ever design a test that would show whether two particles were entangled or not. wouldn't that test require that they transfer some sort of information between each other?
You can't tell whether two particles were entangled without knowing the state of both of them. And you can't know the state of a distant particle without measuring it and transmitting the results of that measurement across that distance, which can't be done faster than the speed of light.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
October 29, 2013, 10:37:39 PM
#34
you would just measure it and when it is in a state than it is a 0 and when it is in superposition than it is a 1.
I am not even able to comprehend the degree of confusion that could provoke such a statement. To measure something means to determine its state. A particle or system of particles is always in some state or another after you measure it, by definition. Superposition can only exist as long as no measurement is performed.

that makes sense. i was just basing my conclusions on what you said, not on my intricate understanding of quantum physics.

so i have another question. if its imposable for entangled particles to transfer information, how could you ever design a test that would show whether two particles were entangled or not. wouldn't that test require that they transfer some sort of information between each other?
legendary
Activity: 4542
Merit: 3393
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
October 29, 2013, 10:36:41 PM
#33
you would just measure it and when it is in a state than it is a 0 and when it is in superposition than it is a 1.
I am not even able to comprehend the degree of confusion that could provoke such a statement. To measure something means to determine its state. A particle or system of particles is always in some state or another after you measure it, by definition. Superposition can only exist as long as no measurement is performed.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
October 29, 2013, 10:03:33 PM
#32
Speed of light is the "fastest internet connection" you are going to get.

This always bothered me; assume a string of (non elastic) rope from earth to Mars. If someone pulls it on earth, wouldnt it be noted instantly on Mars?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do1lm9IevYE&t=5m27s
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
October 29, 2013, 09:55:30 PM
#31
quantum entanglement should allow for instantaneous communication over any distance.
It shouldn't and it doesn't.

Why shouldn't it? I guess you know everything their is to know about quantum mechanics,.... better let the rest of the world know so they can give up their research.

It shouldn't and it doesn't.
I cearainly don't know everything that is to know about quantum mechanics, but I've studied quantum mechanics and quantum field theory for more than 1.5 years now.

The problem is: you can enforce a particle that is in a superposition of 2 states to bee in one of the 2 states over great distances, but you don't get to choose which of the states it gets into.

When your communication partner measures the particles, he can't distinguish between particles that were forced into one state by his measurement, and particles that were in a pure state before. So no communication with quantum entanglement

Ok so maybe you didnt quite explain it properly, but according to the way you explained it you should still be able to communicate information. you would just measure it and when it is in a state than it is a 0 and when it is in superposition than it is a 1.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
October 29, 2013, 09:06:43 PM
#30
I don't see humans populating mars at all...or by the time they do, bitcoin will be obsolete completely. 

I believe Mars will be settled in just under a decade.  So do hundreds of thousands of other people.  Bitcoin will still be relevant.
http://www.mars-one.com/en/



Bitcoin might be the currency of the universe. Even alien use them Smiley
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
October 29, 2013, 06:51:03 PM
#29
I don't see humans populating mars at all...or by the time they do, bitcoin will be obsolete completely. 

I believe Mars will be settled in just under a decade.  So do hundreds of thousands of other people.  Bitcoin will still be relevant.
http://www.mars-one.com/en/

legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1077
October 29, 2013, 06:48:59 PM
#28
Speed of light is the "fastest internet connection" you are going to get.

This always bothered me; assume a string of (non elastic) rope from earth to Mars. If someone pulls it on earth, wouldnt it be noted instantly on Mars?

Nope. Not even gravity will be noted instantly. If I disappeared Earth right this instant, Martians will only notice the change in gravity after the gravitational waves arrive, coincidentally at the speed of light.
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
October 29, 2013, 06:41:30 PM
#27
Speed of light is the "fastest internet connection" you are going to get.

This always bothered me; assume a string of (non elastic) rope from earth to Mars. If someone pulls it on earth, wouldnt it be noted instantly on Mars?

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/FTL.html#4
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
October 29, 2013, 06:31:47 PM
#26
Speed of light is the "fastest internet connection" you are going to get.

This always bothered me; assume a string of (non elastic) rope from earth to Mars. If someone pulls it on earth, wouldnt it be noted instantly on Mars?
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1077
October 29, 2013, 06:18:11 PM
#25
By the time humans settle Mars, the block reward would have decreased significantly and will no longer be an important factor of mining. The solution, consequently, is simple: add a "second genesis block" to Bitcoin. These blocks are identical to regular blocks, except they employ a different hashing algorithm (to prevent Earth-miners from overtaking the Mars chain), and primarily deal with transactions broadcast to Mars. Interplanetary transactions will certainly take a while, as the Mars blocks will need to be broadcast to Earth, but are seamlessly integrated into the system. Transactions limited to a single planet work as expected.

Every time a new planet is settled, new genesis blocks can be created, one for each planet.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
October 29, 2013, 06:11:46 PM
#24
Mining Bitcoin on Mars is totally infeasible, as almost all blocks mined on Mars will be orphaned by the time they reach Earth. I have talked about a solution before:

Each planet will have its own locally-mined cryptocurrency (Marscoin, etc), which each have a floating exchange rate to the original Earth-based Bitcoin. Marscoins and bitcoins can be directly traded for each other in order to settle interplanetary trade balances, the only issue is the speed-of-light delay for confirmations (which is unavoidable no matter what). Naturally Bitcoin can't be mined on Mars and Marscoin can't be mined on Earth, but that's not important.


Depends on Bitcoin hashing speed on Mars, if you have more Bitcoin hashing speed on Mars, Earth Bitcoin miners will not mine much  Sad

True, whichever planet has the largest hashing power will eventually dominate. Regardless of who "wins", it's not good for Bitcoin as interplanetary currency. Only if the communication delay is negligible compared to the average block-time, will it interplanetary mining be feasible. A coin with a 24hr block-time can be mined on Earth and Mars just fine (assuming a network connection can be established of course).

Using bitcoins as interplanetary currency has been discussed here before, several times.

The only method that makes sense to me is for each planet to have their own version. Travelling from earth to Mars? Sign in to your local exchange before you go and trade some bitcoins for Marscoins. Mining bitcoins would only work for earthlings and mining Marscoins would only work for Martians.

This could get interesting when miners start hopping planets to take advantage of hashrate and price discrepencies.
full member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 110
October 29, 2013, 02:24:11 PM
#23
when we are living on mars, what use will we have for bitcoins? though i like the idea of 'marscoin' /\
sr. member
Activity: 265
Merit: 250
October 29, 2013, 02:18:21 PM
#22
You only encouraging someone to launch another alt coin, Marscoin Cheesy

maz
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
October 29, 2013, 02:12:11 PM
#21
I love how folk are already fleshing out the technicalities of it. Gotta love the Bitcoin community...
edd
donator
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1002
October 29, 2013, 02:09:16 PM
#20
Mining Bitcoin on Mars is totally infeasible, as almost all blocks mined on Mars will be orphaned by the time they reach Earth. I have talked about a solution before:

Each planet will have its own locally-mined cryptocurrency (Marscoin, etc), which each have a floating exchange rate to the original Earth-based Bitcoin. Marscoins and bitcoins can be directly traded for each other in order to settle interplanetary trade balances, the only issue is the speed-of-light delay for confirmations (which is unavoidable no matter what). Naturally Bitcoin can't be mined on Mars and Marscoin can't be mined on Earth, but that's not important.


Depends on Bitcoin hashing speed on Mars, if you have more Bitcoin hashing speed on Mars, Earth Bitcoin miners will not mine much  Sad

True, whichever planet has the largest hashing power will eventually dominate. Regardless of who "wins", it's not good for Bitcoin as interplanetary currency. Only if the communication delay is negligible compared to the average block-time, will it interplanetary mining be feasible. A coin with a 24hr block-time can be mined on Earth and Mars just fine (assuming a network connection can be established of course).

Using bitcoins as interplanetary currency has been discussed here before, several times.

The only method that makes sense to me is for each planet to have their own version. Travelling from earth to Mars? Sign in to your local exchange before you go and trade some bitcoins for Marscoins. Mining bitcoins would only work for earthlings and mining Marscoins would only work for Martians.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
October 29, 2013, 12:41:37 PM
#19
quantum entanglement should allow for instantaneous communication over any distance.
No. Please stop spreading false informations.
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
October 29, 2013, 11:21:34 AM
#18
quantum entanglement should allow for instantaneous communication over any distance.
It shouldn't and it doesn't.

Why shouldn't it? I guess you know everything their is to know about quantum mechanics,.... better let the rest of the world know so they can give up their research.

It shouldn't and it doesn't.
I cearainly don't know everything that is to know about quantum mechanics, but I've studied quantum mechanics and quantum field theory for more than 1.5 years now.

The problem is: you can enforce a particle that is in a superposition of 2 states to bee in one of the 2 states over great distances, but you don't get to choose which of the states it gets into.

When your communication partner measures the particles, he can't distinguish between particles that were forced into one state by his measurement, and particles that were in a pure state before. So no communication with quantum entanglement
full member
Activity: 239
Merit: 250
October 29, 2013, 10:43:44 AM
#17
quantum entanglement should allow for instantaneous communication over any distance.
It shouldn't and it doesn't.

Why shouldn't it? I guess you know everything their is to know about quantum mechanics,.... better let the rest of the world know so they can give up their research.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
October 29, 2013, 10:13:07 AM
#16
Mining Bitcoin on Mars is totally infeasible, as almost all blocks mined on Mars will be orphaned by the time they reach Earth. I have talked about a solution before:

Each planet will have its own locally-mined cryptocurrency (Marscoin, etc), which each have a floating exchange rate to the original Earth-based Bitcoin. Marscoins and bitcoins can be directly traded for each other in order to settle interplanetary trade balances, the only issue is the speed-of-light delay for confirmations (which is unavoidable no matter what). Naturally Bitcoin can't be mined on Mars and Marscoin can't be mined on Earth, but that's not important.


Depends on Bitcoin hashing speed on Mars, if you have more Bitcoin hashing speed on Mars, Earth Bitcoin miners will not mine much  Sad

True, whichever planet has the largest hashing power will eventually dominate. Regardless of who "wins", it's not good for Bitcoin as interplanetary currency. Only if the communication delay is negligible compared to the average block-time, will it interplanetary mining be feasible. A coin with a 24hr block-time can be mined on Earth and Mars just fine (assuming a network connection can be established of course).
full member
Activity: 306
Merit: 100
October 29, 2013, 04:48:51 AM
#15
Mining Bitcoin on Mars is totally infeasible, as almost all blocks mined on Mars will be orphaned by the time they reach Earth. I have talked about a solution before:

Each planet will have its own locally-mined cryptocurrency (Marscoin, etc), which each have a floating exchange rate to the original Earth-based Bitcoin. Marscoins and bitcoins can be directly traded for each other in order to settle interplanetary trade balances, the only issue is the speed-of-light delay for confirmations (which is unavoidable no matter what). Naturally Bitcoin can't be mined on Mars and Marscoin can't be mined on Earth, but that's not important.


Depends on Bitcoin hashing speed on Mars, if you have more Bitcoin hashing speed on Mars, Earth Bitcoin miners will not mine much  Sad
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
www.DonateMedia.org
October 29, 2013, 04:41:45 AM
#14
Mining profitability is bad enough before factoring in billion dollar space missions  Grin
legendary
Activity: 4542
Merit: 3393
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
October 29, 2013, 01:07:16 AM
#13
quantum entanglement should allow for instantaneous communication over any distance.
It shouldn't and it doesn't.
full member
Activity: 202
Merit: 100
October 29, 2013, 12:41:30 AM
#12
Quick! somebody needs to work on this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansible

I don't think this would work, just too good to be true...
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
October 29, 2013, 12:16:32 AM
#11
quantum entanglement should allow for instantaneous communication over any distance.
sr. member
Activity: 419
Merit: 286
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
October 29, 2013, 12:12:01 AM
#10
Quick! somebody needs to work on this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansible
full member
Activity: 202
Merit: 100
October 28, 2013, 11:29:43 PM
#9
You will be more profitable to do real mining on mars.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1018
HoneybadgerOfMoney.com Weed4bitcoin.com
October 28, 2013, 10:35:51 PM
#8
As far as I understand you could spend a Bitcoin on Mars. The light travel time means it could take up to 30 minutes to get the first confirmation, so that's not a massive problem.

But what about having miners on Mars, perhaps to speed up confirmation times for colonists.

How would the protocol fair when say a block is found on Mars and it could take nearly half an hour for it to arrive on earth?



Last I check there is no internet connection in Mars Smiley

Check again:

"NASA Shoots Lasers at the Moon to Create Insanely Fast Internet"

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/10/nasa-internet-laser/

 laser beam?Huh you mean line of sight.....yea right thats totally economical to limit internet to a 20 minute window each day.
back to reality - don't you think btc will be antiquated?  I don't see humans populating mars at all...or by the time they do, bitcoin will be obsolete completely.  Just cause its a thought doesn't mean it makes any sort of good sense. Mars makes sense like living on the moon does....it doesn't.
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
October 28, 2013, 10:34:00 PM
#7
As far as I understand you could spend a Bitcoin on Mars. The light travel time means it could take up to 30 minutes to get the first confirmation, so that's not a massive problem.

But what about having miners on Mars, perhaps to speed up confirmation times for colonists.

How would the protocol fair when say a block is found on Mars and it could take nearly half an hour for it to arrive on earth?



Last I check there is no internet connection in Mars Smiley

Check again:

"NASA Shoots Lasers at the Moon to Create Insanely Fast Internet"

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/10/nasa-internet-laser/
legendary
Activity: 4542
Merit: 3393
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
October 28, 2013, 10:14:07 PM
#6
Mining Bitcoin on Mars is totally infeasible, as almost all blocks mined on Mars will be orphaned by the time they reach Earth. I have talked about a solution before:

Each planet will have its own locally-mined cryptocurrency (Marscoin, etc), which each have a floating exchange rate to the original Earth-based Bitcoin. Marscoins and bitcoins can be directly traded for each other in order to settle interplanetary trade balances, the only issue is the speed-of-light delay for confirmations (which is unavoidable no matter what). Naturally Bitcoin can't be mined on Mars and Marscoin can't be mined on Earth, but that's not important.

An interplanetary coin with a block target of several Earth days (to allow interplanetary mining) is also a possibility for interplanetary trade or as a solar-system-wide reserve currency, but probably not necessary as long as the planetary coins can be freely traded, in which case it's likely that Bitcoin will become the solar-system-wide reserve currency (making all previous price predictions seem hopelessly pessimistic).
full member
Activity: 239
Merit: 250
October 28, 2013, 10:21:53 AM
#5
If we can get a fast enough connection between another planet and Earth, it could be possible.

Speed of light is the "fastest internet connection" you are going to get. Which leaves you with a transmit time of between 3 and 22 minutes, depending on the orbit.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
October 28, 2013, 08:33:31 AM
#4
As far as I understand you could spend a Bitcoin on Mars. The light travel time means it could take up to 30 minutes to get the first confirmation, so that's not a massive problem.

But what about having miners on Mars, perhaps to speed up confirmation times for colonists.

How would the protocol fair when say a block is found on Mars and it could take nearly half an hour for it to arrive on earth?



Last I check there is no internet connection in Mars Smiley
b!z
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1010
October 28, 2013, 08:15:29 AM
#3
If we can get a fast enough connection between another planet and Earth, it could be possible.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
In Hashrate We Trust!
October 27, 2013, 05:44:10 PM
#2
How would the protocol fair when say a block is found on Mars and it could take nearly half an hour for it to arrive on earth?
The protocol must be adjusted for the lag in time between nodes at planet A and B so they can have a chance to sync with each other.
each block will need to be at least lag_time * 2 = 1 hour for all nodes to accept the blockchain
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
October 27, 2013, 05:15:06 PM
#1
As far as I understand you could spend a Bitcoin on Mars. The light travel time means it could take up to 30 minutes to get the first confirmation, so that's not a massive problem.

But what about having miners on Mars, perhaps to speed up confirmation times for colonists.

How would the protocol fair when say a block is found on Mars and it could take nearly half an hour for it to arrive on earth?

Jump to: