Mining with R9 Fury NANO Experience (Since 2017-2022)

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Quote from: Mr.merson on July 22, 2022, 10:54:05 AM

If someone finds a way to decode and re-encode the memory timings for HBM1 it would be of great help nowadays, I've heard comments that you can get a lot of performance out of it as far as kawpow and etchash... The biosmods of these cards were lost in limbo

Also here I leave my grain of sand, these are timing that I found by chance in the forum and implanted it in the vbios (they are slow timing) maybe it can be useful for someone

https://www109.zippyshare.com/v/my2xJZr0/file.html <------ It has a minimum voltage of 775 mv so there is a large margin for undervolting PD, disclaimer, I am not responsible for the damage caused although the changes are very minimal compared to the original bios, it applies only to the nitro version of sapphire

PD2, in case of failure these cards have dual bios, change to the main one and repair the secondary bios with a previously made backup

What the hashrate for etchash and kawpow with your bios?

Mr.merson

full member

Activity: 200

Merit: 100

If someone finds a way to decode and re-encode the memory timings for HBM1 it would be of great help nowadays, I've heard comments that you can get a lot of performance out of it as far as kawpow and etchash... The biosmods of these cards were lost in limbo

Also here I leave my grain of sand, these are timing that I found by chance in the forum and implanted it in the vbios (they are slow timing) maybe it can be useful for someone

https://www109.zippyshare.com/v/my2xJZr0/file.html <------ It has a minimum voltage of 775 mv so there is a large margin for undervolting PD, disclaimer, I am not responsible for the damage caused although the changes are very minimal compared to the original bios, it applies only to the nitro version of sapphire

PD2, in case of failure these cards have dual bios, change to the main one and repair the secondary bios with a previously made backup

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Quote from: Mr.merson on July 22, 2022, 08:32:20 AM

I guess in terms of performance and efficiency the nano is ahead in architecture fiji PD, they released a version for ETC + KASPA for these cards with lolminer

Oh New Release 6 hours ago
Added experimental ETC+Kaspa solver for R9 285 / R9 380 (Tonga), RX Fury (Fiji) and RX 460 / 550 (Baffin) GPUs

Thank to Notify Wink

Mr.merson

full member

Activity: 200

Merit: 100

I guess in terms of performance and efficiency the nano is ahead in architecture fiji PD, they released a version for ETC + KASPA for these cards with lolminer

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Quote from: adaseb on July 21, 2022, 11:45:49 PM

Its rare to have people actually mining with the R9 Fury. I remember back in 2015 they were very expensive and had many hardware defects and people either used the slightly less efficient R9 290X or they waited until the Polaris came out in 2016 and the efficiency was pretty much on par. After summer 2016, nobody really used the Fury for mining.

They were popular with gamers and most miners sold their Furys and bought some Polaris cards. So this is why you don't really hear too much discussion about the chipset. I think it was AMDs least produced chipset.

I still mining with R9 NANO.
I give some information for someone who have R9 Fury. Not suggestion to buy it now. Wink

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3738

Merit: 1708

CoinPoker.com

Its rare to have people actually mining with the R9 Fury. I remember back in 2015 they were very expensive and had many hardware defects and people either used the slightly less efficient R9 290X or they waited until the Polaris came out in 2016 and the efficiency was pretty much on par. After summer 2016, nobody really used the Fury for mining.

They were popular with gamers and most miners sold their Furys and bought some Polaris cards. So this is why you don't really hear too much discussion about the chipset. I think it was AMDs least produced chipset.

Mr.merson

full member

Activity: 200

Merit: 100

Quote from: tale01 on July 21, 2022, 11:14:35 PM

Quote from: Mr.merson on July 21, 2022, 07:36:56 AM

PD, in any case if it has the shortened version (the fury with 56 cu sapphire) I can upload the vbios with the modified timing and you will be able to verify that amdmemtweak does not reflect the changes although in mining it behaves differently

I have version 64cu and I can applay timing with amdmemtweak it reflect to some algorithm as Argon2d-nim hash from 360 KH/s to 400 KH/s. But now not time to mine NIM

I suppose that the versions of 56 have a bottleneck due to the missing cu.

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Quote from: Mr.merson on July 21, 2022, 07:36:56 AM

PD, in any case if it has the shortened version (the fury with 56 cu sapphire) I can upload the vbios with the modified timing and you will be able to verify that amdmemtweak does not reflect the changes although in mining it behaves differently

I have version 64cu and I can applay timing with amdmemtweak it reflect to some algorithm as Argon2d-nim hash from 360 KH/s to 400 KH/s. But now not time to mine NIM

Mr.merson

full member

Activity: 200

Merit: 100

PD, in any case if it has the shortened version (the fury with 56 cu sapphire) I can upload the vbios with the modified timing and you will be able to verify that amdmemtweak does not reflect the changes although in mining it behaves differently

Mr.merson

full member

Activity: 200

Merit: 100

Quote from: tale01 on July 21, 2022, 01:34:26 AM

Quote from: Mr.merson on July 20, 2022, 03:30:37 PM

Does anyone still keep memory strap modded in hexadecimal format or at least biod mod? I have the original straps but I have no way to decode it, there is nothing related to the HBM memories (linux user, amdmemtweak doesn't work there on fiji-HBM architecture)

What the mining result with memory strap modded?

amdmemtweak work fine on HiveOS. You can run command with menu "Run Command".
example command "amdmemtweak --REF 17000 --RFC 48 --RC 20 --RCDR 6 --RCDW 6 --RCDRA 6 --RCDWA 6 --R2W 6 --W2R 6 --FAW 1"

If you have good strap mod command, let me know it, I have 10 Fury NANO Cheesy

I am precisely in hiveos and apparently it does not seem to work, as an example I have implanted straps in vbios and amdmemtweak apparently does not reflect the changes

I have confirmed that the changes can be "remarkable" I have some timing strap that I got on the internet but I don't know for sure what changes there are in those straps because I haven't found tools to decode it (there is only for GDDR5)

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Quote from: Mr.merson on July 20, 2022, 03:30:37 PM

Does anyone still keep memory strap modded in hexadecimal format or at least biod mod? I have the original straps but I have no way to decode it, there is nothing related to the HBM memories (linux user, amdmemtweak doesn't work there on fiji-HBM architecture)

What the mining result with memory strap modded?

amdmemtweak work fine on HiveOS. You can run command with menu "Run Command".
example command "amdmemtweak --REF 17000 --RFC 48 --RC 20 --RCDR 6 --RCDW 6 --RCDRA 6 --RCDWA 6 --R2W 6 --W2R 6 --FAW 1"

If you have good strap mod command, let me know it, I have 10 Fury NANO Cheesy

Mr.merson

full member

Activity: 200

Merit: 100

Does anyone still keep memory strap modded in hexadecimal format or at least biod mod? I have the original straps but I have no way to decode it, there is nothing related to the HBM memories (linux user, amdmemtweak doesn't work there on fiji-HBM architecture)

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

And the another way, suggest to see TONCOIN
it time to take profit Wink

Algo: Darkcoin
Coin: TONCOIN
Hashrate: 1020 MH/s
Power: 104w
Miner: lolminer 1.42

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

For now, Kowpow is not the Best Profit on R9 NANO

I suggest to mine NIMIQ, when difficalty is low.
For Check Diff https://metrics.nimiq.cafe/difficulty-growth

Algo: Argon2d(NIM)
Coin: NIM
Hashrate: 390 kh/s
Power: 120w
Miner: TeamRedMiner

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Yes, r9 nano easy to config OC. Wink

fmz89

legendary

Activity: 1766

Merit: 1002

Quote from: tale01 on November 24, 2019, 12:18:38 AM

Who have R9 NANO rig, What about your mining?
Still mining?

For me. I'm fine I'm OK. Still fun mining.

Share your Earning and Performance about R9 NANO Grin

I will share performance by algo, hashrate, electric, miner, os for more in next time.

-----------------------------------Performance----------------------------------
Base on Win10
Driver 19.10.1, 18.6.1
Power Consume :refer from HWinfo GPU Chip Power
MSI Afterburner config GPU as below,
Core Voltage: -81mV
Power Limit: depend on algo
Core Clock: Default
Memory Clock:Default

Algo: Chukwa v2
Coin: TRTL
Hashrate: 34kh/s
Power: 120w
Miner: Teamredminer v0.7.16b

Algo: Argon2d(NIM)
Coin: NIM
Hashrate: 390 kh/s
Power: 120w
Miner: TeamRedMiner v0.7.7

Algo: Beam Hash III(BEAM)
Coin: BEAM
Hashrate: 20 sol/s
Power: 120w
Miner: lolMiner 1.04

Algo: Kawpow
Coin: RVN
Hashrate: 16.2 Mh/s
Power: 120w
Miner: TeamRedMiner v0.7

Algo: Argon2id Chukwa
Coin: TRTL,...+
Hashrate: 95kh/s
Power: 104w
Miner: Teamredminer v6.1

This is Power from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter
HWinfo Clamp Meter
76.2w 83.6w
89.6w 104.1w
104.7w 129w
112.1w 138.6w
119w 150w
134.6w 175w
149.4w 209w
162.8w 242w

34khs in trtl v2 is good hashrate, i had one, lay down never mine with nano again

i know nano has good eficiency compared to newer card and easy to config with bios editing

old card its niice simple flashing mod bios and good to go, no need other config, this card quite hot with single fan

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Suggest profit on Chukwa v2

Algo: Chukwa v2
Coin: TRTL
Miner: Teamredminer v0.7.16b

On mid power
Hashrate: 34kh/s
Power: 120w

For High power
Hashrate: 36Mh/s
Power: 141w

For expert miner can use "AMD Memory Tweak XL" config --REF 104 --tRFC 48 --tRC 20 --tRCDR 6 --tRCDW 6 --tRCDRA 6 --tRCDWA 6 --tR2W 6 --tW2R 6 --tFAW 1
Thanks for Discord user: mrdx#0572

Result is
On mid power
Hashrate: 36kh/s
Power: 120w

For High power
Hashrate: 40Mh/s
Power: 141w

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Update hashrate Beam Hash III

Algo: Beam Hash III(BEAM)
Coin: BEAM
Hashrate: 20 sol/s
Power: 120w
Miner: lolMiner 1.04

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Update mining with algo Argon2d and Beam Hash III

Algo: Beam Hash III(BEAM)
Coin: BEAM
Hashrate: 16 sol/s
Power: 115w
Miner: lolMiner 1.02 (ver 1.03 is not better than 1.02)

--------------------------------------------
Algo: Argon2d(NIM)
Coin: NIM
Hashrate: 390 kh/s
Power: 120w
Miner: TeamRedMiner v0.7.7

On power save
Hashrate: 288 kh/s
Power: 75w

On mid power
Hashrate: 390 kh/s
Power: 120w

For Free Electric
Hashrate: 412 kh/s
Power: 145-156w

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Quote from: Xazax310 on May 22, 2020, 02:27:13 PM

Thanks I have a R9 FURY doing 160w @ 18mh/s (850 core/850mv/500mem) (220w at wall on Octominer riseless mobo).

Have you tried unlocking your Nano for extra shaders? I tried mine but it wasn't able to unlock at all.

I use last update official bios https://www.amd.com/en/support/gpu-firmware-download

Xazax310

member

Activity: 246

Merit: 24

Thanks I have a R9 FURY doing 160w @ 18mh/s (850 core/850mv/500mem) (220w at wall on Octominer riseless mobo).

Have you tried unlocking your Nano for extra shaders? I tried mine but it wasn't able to unlock at all.

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Quote from: Xazax310 on May 21, 2020, 09:19:37 PM

Can you share your overclock settings to get 16mh/s @ 120w?

Power Consume :refer from HWinfo GPU Chip Power
MSI Afterburner config GPU as below,
Core Voltage: -81mV
Power Limit: -20
Core Clock: Default
Memory Clock:Default

120w from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter get 149w per GPU(depend on Power Supply 1300w 80+GOLD 3 GPU+riser connected not include pc system)

for more information,
76.2w from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter 83.6w -> 10.5mh/s
89.6w from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter 104.1w -> 12.5mh/s
104.7w from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter 129w -> 14.5mh/s
112.1w from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter 138.6w -> 15.5mh/s
134.6w from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter 175w -> 18.3mh/s
149.4w from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter 209w -> 19.3mh/s
162.8w from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter 242w -> 20mh/s

Sometime low sometime high power on Clamp Meter, tried hard to test this algo. Roll Eyes

Xazax310

member

Activity: 246

Merit: 24

Can you share your overclock settings to get 16mh/s @ 120w?

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Update profit on Kawpow with TRM v0.7

Algo: Kawpow
Coin: RVN
Hashrate: 16.2 Mh/s
Power: 120w
Miner: TeamRedMiner v0.7

On power save
Hashrate: 10.2 Mh/s
Power: 76w

On mid power
Hashrate: 18.3 Mh/s
Power: 135w

For Free Electric Cheesy

Hashrate: 20.6 Mh/s
Power: 167w

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Glad to suggestion..

Algo: Kawpow
Coin: RVN
Hashrate: 11.8-12.2 Mh/s
Power: 120w
Miner: NBminer 30.2

Or you can mining with power save
Hashrate: 8.5 Mh/s
Power: 75w

For Free Electric Grin

Hashrate: 14.2 Mh/s
Power: 172w

nanominer 1.9 give more hashrate but some time to crash.

kuranes

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Quote from: adaseb on February 17, 2020, 11:49:43 PM

Quote from: kuranes on February 17, 2020, 09:20:40 AM

Mining eth at about 20-21 Mh/s. -50% power limit, runs at 63-65c and the card draws about 75w according to HWMonitor. This is my personal PC, so at best I'm probably break even when you factor in the wattage of the rest of the pc.

What OS is this under? Is it with Claymore? If so try a different OS or a different miner and see if you can get a faster speed. You might be able to get 30MH/s. Back in 2016 or so this was the speed that these GPUs got.

They were the most power efficient GPUs at the time, however due to their cost, many just mined with R9 290 and later switched to RX series GPUs.

Reason why is because I think this GPU like the Hawaii suffer from the DAG slowdown and my R9 290 also hashed at like 20MH/s when a few years back hashed at 30MH/s. Apparently there is some bug with Windows or Claymore, so switch a few things around and see if you can get 30MH/s. Power consumption will be a little more.

Yeah this is Claymore on Windows 10. If I run without turning down the power limit I'm able to get 30 Mh/s but it uses approximately twice the power (according to HWMonitor.) So I figured 2/3 the output for half the wattage was more efficient. I tried phoenix and seemed to get exactly the same numbers.

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3738

Merit: 1708

CoinPoker.com

Quote from: kuranes on February 17, 2020, 09:20:40 AM

Mining eth at about 20-21 Mh/s. -50% power limit, runs at 63-65c and the card draws about 75w according to HWMonitor. This is my personal PC, so at best I'm probably break even when you factor in the wattage of the rest of the pc.

What OS is this under? Is it with Claymore? If so try a different OS or a different miner and see if you can get a faster speed. You might be able to get 30MH/s. Back in 2016 or so this was the speed that these GPUs got.

They were the most power efficient GPUs at the time, however due to their cost, many just mined with R9 290 and later switched to RX series GPUs.

Reason why is because I think this GPU like the Hawaii suffer from the DAG slowdown and my R9 290 also hashed at like 20MH/s when a few years back hashed at 30MH/s. Apparently there is some bug with Windows or Claymore, so switch a few things around and see if you can get 30MH/s. Power consumption will be a little more.

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

This Time to see NIM and HNS Wink

rdluffy

legendary

Activity: 2226

Merit: 1304

Quote from: mak013 on November 26, 2019, 06:42:22 AM

You can mine RYO i think, or maybe, ETH. Your GPUs are 4GB memory onboard, am I right? Use HiveOS and mine ETH. But the best way is to knock it over the door Wink

I'm sorry to ask, but why every thread about questions of mining, people are recommending to mine RYO?
I see the calculator and the volume of trading, and it makes no sense for me

I have some friends that owned R9 Fury, and it was a beast at the time, they mined some ETH, but for today it´s hard to keep mining with this card, to much power draw, and we are at a moment that every watt counts

kuranes

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Mining eth at about 20-21 Mh/s. -50% power limit, runs at 63-65c and the card draws about 75w according to HWMonitor. This is my personal PC, so at best I'm probably break even when you factor in the wattage of the rest of the pc.

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Quote from: ronnieb on November 24, 2019, 04:10:37 PM

What's your hashrate/profit?

Mine TRTL - hash 95kh/s earn 0.5-0.6$, 104w

mak013

hero member

Activity: 2338

Merit: 750

You can mine RYO i think, or maybe, ETH. Your GPUs are 4GB memory onboard, am I right? Use HiveOS and mine ETH. But the best way is to knock it over the door Wink

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Quote from: Divinity666 on November 25, 2019, 04:23:03 PM

Quote from: tale01 on November 25, 2019, 11:01:10 AM

That Fury X. not Fury NANO. Fury X hug power consume.

What do u mean? In the article there is ASUS Fury(neither X nor Nano). Though Nano should be have same exact performance as Fury X unless u make it throttle, which is impossible with most of algos if u tune it. Since properly tuned Fury x shouldn't be exceeding 180Wt Nano shouldn't have any throttling as well.

Oh, sorry for mistake. Shocked

First picture is Fury X. https://cryptoage.com/images/Mining3/r9_fury_mining_2019.jpg

Divinity666

jr. member

Activity: 312

Merit: 2

Quote from: tale01 on November 25, 2019, 11:01:10 AM

That Fury X. not Fury NANO. Fury X hug power consume.

What do u mean? In the article there is ASUS Fury(neither X nor Nano). Though Nano should be have same exact performance as Fury X unless u make it throttle, which is impossible with most of algos if u tune it. Since properly tuned Fury x shouldn't be exceeding 180Wt Nano shouldn't have any throttling as well.

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Quote from: adaseb on November 24, 2019, 11:47:43 PM

These were good GPUs to actually mine ETH before the Polaris came out. I believe these were released late 2015 when ETH was launched and it was the most energy effecient GPU at the time especially the Nano.

I had a buddy who had tons of these. However for some reason he had very high failure rates, he said it was the highest failing GPU he has ever owned. When the Polaris came out people stopped buying Nanos due to their high price and bought the RX 470/480 instead. It had similiar hashrates and power consumption figures.

Since they were produced in small quantities, many miner developers don't spend too much effort trying to make them more efficient or faster. Hence they are usually just best in the hands of gamers.

I'm don't mine Ethash with NANO is a long time. Grin

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Quote from: Divinity666 on November 25, 2019, 10:46:07 AM

Quote from: JLC_km on November 24, 2019, 10:59:02 PM

Mining test R9 fury 2019

Just seeing first result in benchmark list makes me cry: 29.8mhs@170Watts on ETH)))) I had that hash rate @140-145Wt(975Mhz core) with my cards. Or it could be 30.8mhs @1000Mhz@155Wt. And unlike pascal it newer dropped with DAG grow) In most of Fury mining videos they even have 250+Wt... some miners. My h\rs in some other algos were: lyra2v3 58mhs@150-155Wt, cryptonightR 880hs@120Wt

That Fury X. not Fury NANO. Fury X hug power consume.

Divinity666

jr. member

Activity: 312

Merit: 2

Quote from: JLC_km on November 24, 2019, 10:59:02 PM

Mining test R9 fury 2019

Just seeing first result in benchmark list makes me cry: 29.8mhs@170Watts on ETH)))) I had that hash rate @140-145Wt(975Mhz core) with my cards. Or it could be 30.8mhs @1000Mhz@155Wt. And unlike pascal it newer dropped with DAG grow) In most of Fury mining videos they even have 250+Wt... some miners. My h\rs in some other algos were: lyra2v3 58mhs@150-155Wt, cryptonightR 880hs@120Wt

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3738

Merit: 1708

CoinPoker.com

These were good GPUs to actually mine ETH before the Polaris came out. I believe these were released late 2015 when ETH was launched and it was the most energy effecient GPU at the time especially the Nano.

I had a buddy who had tons of these. However for some reason he had very high failure rates, he said it was the highest failing GPU he has ever owned. When the Polaris came out people stopped buying Nanos due to their high price and bought the RX 470/480 instead. It had similiar hashrates and power consumption figures.

Since they were produced in small quantities, many miner developers don't spend too much effort trying to make them more efficient or faster. Hence they are usually just best in the hands of gamers.

JLC_km

newbie

Activity: 23

Merit: 0

Mining test R9 fury 2019

ronnieb

jr. member

Activity: 198

Merit: 1

What's your hashrate/profit?

Divinity666

jr. member

Activity: 312

Merit: 2

No miner developing team makes optimizations for Fiji. They used to be on pair with gtx1070 in h\r(though with 20% more power consumtions) 2 years ago, but since then they have fallen behind significantly in newer algos, some times they even can't mine some at all(and not cos of 4gb, "AMD" simply don't support them). So, I've sold my last R9 Fury this summer realizing developers won't bother to make optimizations for them ever again.

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Quote from: MATHReX on November 24, 2019, 07:48:45 AM

Glad to see that you have maintained your rig.
I do not own an R9 Fury but I do have Vega 56 and with electricity prices at $0.11 per unit. It barely makes even for the electricity cost even when mining the most profitable coin at the moment.
What is the electricity price that you're paying?
Mining turtle coin?

Glade to see you too.
electricity prices est. at $0.13 per unit

Yes, mine turtle

MATHReX

sr. member

Activity: 861

Merit: 281

Glad to see that you have maintained your rig.
I do not own an R9 Fury but I do have Vega 56 and with electricity prices at $0.11 per unit. It barely makes even for the electricity cost even when mining the most profitable coin at the moment.
What is the electricity price that you're paying?
Mining turtle coin?

tale01

newbie

Activity: 121

Merit: 0

Who have R9 NANO rig, What about your mining?
Still mining?

For me. I'm fine I'm OK. Still fun mining.

Share your Earning and Performance about R9 NANO Grin

I will share performance by algo, hashrate, electric, miner, os for more in next time.

-----------------------------------Performance----------------------------------
Base on Win10
Driver 19.10.1, 18.6.1
Power Consume :refer from HWinfo GPU Chip Power
MSI Afterburner config GPU as below,
Core Voltage: -81mV
Power Limit: depend on algo
Core Clock: Default
Memory Clock:Default

Algo: Darkcoin
Algo: Darkcoin
Coin: TONCOIN
Hashrate: 1020 MH/s
Power: 104w
Miner: lolminer 1.42

Algo: Argon2d(NIM)
Coin: NIM
Hashrate: 390 kh/s
Power: 120w
Miner: TeamRedMiner

Algo: Chukwa v2
Coin: TRTL
Hashrate: 34kh/s
Power: 120w
Miner: Teamredminer v0.7.16b

Algo: Beam Hash III(BEAM)
Coin: BEAM
Hashrate: 20 sol/s
Power: 120w
Miner: lolMiner 1.04

Algo: Kawpow
Coin: RVN
Hashrate: 16.2 Mh/s
Power: 120w
Miner: TeamRedMiner v0.7

Algo: Argon2id Chukwa
Coin: TRTL,...+
Hashrate: 95kh/s
Power: 104w
Miner: Teamredminer v6.1

https://imgur.com/a/eOJjG7L

This is Power from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter
HWinfo Clamp Meter
76.2w 83.6w
89.6w 104.1w
104.7w 129w
112.1w 138.6w
119w 150w
134.6w 175w
149.4w 209w
162.8w 242w

Topic: Mining with R9 Fury NANO Experience (Since 2017-2022) (Read 831 times)