I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
I think it is hard to implement because you need evidence to prove that they are scammers. Moderators are also not an employee, they are just volunteer and their numbers are not enough to solve this issue. It is also the responsibility of investors and bounty hunters to be diligent when joining the campaign or investment. 
Topic: Moderating Bounty Posts (Read 429 times)
It's a awesome idea, but very hard to do. There are many and many ICOs every day, if there any bounty section, how can moderators know which ICO is legit or not?
It is impossible, so you can only choose the right bounty campaign yourself. Good luck
Thanks for the opinion but There's something we can do to lessen the scam ICO at least. It is impossible, so you can only choose the right bounty campaign yourself. Good luck
It's a awesome idea, but very hard to do. There are many and many ICOs every day, if there any bounty section, how can moderators know which ICO is legit or not?
It is impossible, so you can only choose the right bounty campaign yourself. Good luck
It is impossible, so you can only choose the right bounty campaign yourself. Good luck
Yes. I agree, a lot of bounty scam. it's hard to know which one is really legitimate. Despite studying their whitepaper, and researching the board. but it's still hard to know which one will work out its ICO.
I wonder how you are going to figure out which ico is a scam and which is not? if there were any obvious features of scam, then people would have stayed away from them and never lose their money:)
I think that a lot depends on the moderator himself, because not everything is responsible for his work. I know a couple of simply unbearable moderators, but there are really very responsible.
I think that in the first place you need to try and find the best ICO and select it yourself, because in the crypt you can not be completely sure of anything.
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
I am fully agree about that but I think it takes a big team and will be more effective if there is representative for each country.I think it will take a lot of effort to verify every ICO project.
Moderators usually have so much work to do and to monitor each participant's posts is simply not realistic, especially if a big campaign.
I think that in the first time it will be very difficult to distinguish a well-scaled scam project from the real one. I think that this is one of the most important problems of the crypt.
It was a good idea, not just bounty maybe bitcointalk or community should also regulating or moderating the ICO it self, so many of investor and bounty hunter can focus growing cryptocurrency community from legit ICO.
Sir its our responsibilities (bounty hunters/investor) to choose the right project. Its very difficult task for moderators to do this thing with a lot of new ICO everyday. Thats why we need our own research before joining in the ICO or bounty. The moderators didnt also know if the project will turn to scam in the last phase. So the blame is in ourself if we choose the wrong one.
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
The thing is you can only do some research especially about the team, that is the only way you may be able to identify scam project. However, you can not tell the project that will scam people. Although some project did not intend to scam people, what happen is they could not succeed in their plans or maybe their plans where not good enough to attract investors.
It will be tedious work and I don't think is quite important. ICO listing sites and other monitors are already doing that. The best thing any serious bounty participants can do is to visit these listing sites and do a thoroughly review and research on them before joining them.
that's the thing they should always consider as a member of this organization to thoroughly review everything before posting because with that they would able to know the exact detail of the project.
This would be a good step in the right direction but it would be really hard for moderators to be able to differentiate between good icos and bad icos as well. Many icos started well and ended badly. Many other started badly and ended well. So, its up to the bounty hunter to do his or her own due diligence
Of course this is so good, everyone hope for this, but that just a joke.
So much have to select everyday, try to imagine, is it easy for the moderator? Of course not.
So let's help the moderator to tell if there's any ico that smelling like scam.
But if it easy for you, please try to explain how it can be easy.
It's not that easy actually. Moderators could have require to present legal papers, ICO bench rating and proof of funds. And of course the identities of those behind the ICO So much have to select everyday, try to imagine, is it easy for the moderator? Of course not.
So let's help the moderator to tell if there's any ico that smelling like scam.
But if it easy for you, please try to explain how it can be easy.
Some bounty campaigns are moderating the participant's post to qualify for their rewards but some member disregard it that's why the bounty managers does not count the works of applicants in a specific week. Every bounties have their own rules to qualify their campaign and we must take note or obey it in order for us to receive rewards.
We're talking about Scams here dude. Scam ICOs don't give reawards at all or their coins will be zero in value. There's something that moderators could do to filter the legit ICOs 
Of course this is so good, everyone hope for this, but that just a joke.
So much have to select everyday, try to imagine, is it easy for the moderator? Of course not.
So let's help the moderator to tell if there's any ico that smelling like scam.
But if it easy for you, please try to explain how it can be easy.
So much have to select everyday, try to imagine, is it easy for the moderator? Of course not.
So let's help the moderator to tell if there's any ico that smelling like scam.
But if it easy for you, please try to explain how it can be easy.
What criteria would you use on what ICOs to allow and what not to? Seems like a slippery slope. Maybe have a minimum ICO Bench score?
Some bounty campaigns are moderating the participant's post to qualify for their rewards but some member disregard it that's why the bounty managers does not count the works of applicants in a specific week. Every bounties have their own rules to qualify their campaign and we must take note or obey it in order for us to receive rewards.
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
That will be a lot of work for moderators here, they will have to do research and do an interview and this is not a guaranty that the ICO will turn scam in the end, it's up for the investor to do their own research because they are going to invest their own money anyway we have a lot of ico rating site and other article about ICO.
Of course it was good. But how can this be done? On the form you will not enter check for swindle at creation of a topic.
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
It's difficult to decide whether an ICO is scam or not.
And bounty hunters generally describe an bounty that doesn't pay them to be scam which is not always correct.
Most of the time even the scam ICO pays while in some the legit ICO may not pay on the basis of their terms stated.
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
I really want to completely remove those fake ICO that can really affects the good activity of all hunters, but not just hunters are suffering alot of stress in this fake ICO but including investors too. I think this will implement soon as many members of this forum will protest this kind of activity that actually ruin the life of people who wants to earn in crypto (fake ICO), but the real questions is, how and when? This will be more hard time to our mods/admins to completely remove them, because it is really hard to find which is legit one.
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
It's difficult to decide whether an ICO is scam or not.
And bounty hunters generally describe an bounty that doesn't pay them to be scam which is not always correct.
Most of the time even the scam ICO pays while in some the legit ICO may not pay on the basis of their terms stated.
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
I really want to completely remove those fake ICO that can really affects the good activity of all hunters, but not just hunters are suffering alot of stress in this fake ICO but including investors too. I think this will implement soon as many members of this forum will protest this kind of activity that actually ruin the life of people who wants to earn in crypto (fake ICO), but the real questions is, how and when? This will be more hard time to our mods/admins to completely remove them, because it is really hard to find which is legit one.
it can not blame moderators, because moderators are unlikely to screen legitimate ICOs or are merely fraudulent as long as the ICO has the requirements to perform ICO. the purpose of the heart and the human mind can not be guessed
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
Right, i agree. The scam ICO makes no profit for all of us, both investors and hunters.
maybe in the future, moderating service is needed for this section, or for the ICO sections.
I agree on you, Sometimes it's getting hard for us to pick a good legit ICO's. Bounty hunters and investors are paying attention on how to choose best ICO and some of my research are pretty good they have good review and before joining it i always do back round check!
It will be tedious work and I don't think is quite important. ICO listing sites and other monitors are already doing that. The best thing any serious bounty participants can do is to visit these listing sites and do a thoroughly review and research on them before joining them.
I think you are right, nowadays a lot of irresponsible people who want more and bigger profits in a bad way, like nowadays a lot of tokens and scam projects. The sacrifices are the less cautious investors in choosing a project . hopefully this will be no settlement
This will be a very tedious task. I myself took so much time on reviewing new ICO's before I joined bounty campaigns. Not only that, even we review the ICO thoroughly, we are not sure yet if the ICO is scam or legit. If ICO is registered in the government agency before going public then at least government or any authorized institution, then I guess that could be a very great to make sure that ICO's in the market are legit.
How exaclty , moderators will determine where is a scam ICO or not ? Can you imagine a volume of work needed to observe , investigate and determine for each separate project , that are shooting up like mushrooms every day ? In addition , I think it's a bad idea to give so much power in one hands , crypto must be decentralized , while you offer to put rights to judge where scam projcet or not into forum moderators hands =\\
Before posting we could set requirements for the ICO owners to be fully fulfilled like their passports and other legal papers that will suffice the legitimacy of their company. If they run away we have their identities at least. How about that?
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
This is a very good idea. I am ready to support this idea, because I think it is very good for the market as a whole
How exaclty , moderators will determine where is a scam ICO or not ? Can you imagine a volume of work needed to observe , investigate and determine for each separate project , that are shooting up like mushrooms every day ? In addition , I think it's a bad idea to give so much power in one hands , crypto must be decentralized , while you offer to put rights to judge where scam projcet or not into forum moderators hands =\\
Filtering out scam ICOs by moderators might be difficult. I think we all can do this by collective efforts, both investors and bounty hunters. For instance, if any bounty hunter or investor notices any scam project and he or she has proofs to back it up, i think it will be best if such is reported so that the information can be disseminated fast to others.
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
I do not rule out that over time, some sort of selection tools will appear. Either the IСO evolves into something else, more honest, legal ...
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
Absolutely 100 percent I support this idea. There are a lot of fraudsters on the market that can be advertised on the forum without any problems. It needs to be somehow resolved
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
Absolutely 100 percent I support this idea. There are a lot of fraudsters on the market that can be advertised on the forum without any problems. It needs to be somehow resolved I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
There are 100s of new ICO's coming up every other day and how are the moderators supposed to know that whether each one of the ICO is legit or not ?It is the responsibility of the invester or bounty hunters to evaluate each project before investing their time/money into it.
Most ICOs run the bounty campaigns successfully but later tun out to be scam only in their last phase as their tokens become worthless. There is no way that the managers could foretell this.
For the full moderation you can go to any centralized institution. There are a lot, kickstarter and forex and banks just to mention few of them.
yes i agree with this centralized institution has the full control of all the ICO that comes their platform, i think it is not possible in decentralized platform, in my opinion bounty hunters like us is fully responsible to check and research the ICO that we are planning to participate in order to avoid unneccesssary waste of time and effort as well as money if your planning to invest. i think this is how we go in this field of work. earning is not always easy.
Yes it is possible but at forum level i think it is not possible by the forum managers to screen and filter each ico, there are specialized ico and bounty platforms available now that do the due diligence before listing an ico, so maybe you can check there if your desired ico is approved by them, some platforms include kickico, fundyourselfnow, crowdholding, amazix, tokensuite etc.
And what about investors? There isnt problem with bounty, they spend only time, but when you spend money and time it is a big problem and that´s why we see many regulations to ICOs.
This is not easy, especially for bounty managers. Many of them fall prey to corporate fraud, which they have to endure two things, protest bombardment from campaign participants, and they are threatened with red paint in the forum if they can not solve the problem.
I am totally agree of moderating the bounty campaign. ICO posters should pay a listing fee plus a documentation of or proof of legibility. Bitcointalk is asking donation during registration. If they combating the buy and sell of BTCtalk accounts. How about fighting against scammers by having a requirements to post in Bounty sections and creating ANN threads.
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
Then, who will determine if it's a scam ICOs or not. The moderators had there own life and I think it's not there duty to scrutinized all those ICOs that wants to promote their projects. We must do our own research before joining in any type of bounty. 
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
There are 100s of new ICO's coming up every other day and how are the moderators supposed to know that whether each one of the ICO is legit or not ?It is the responsibility of the invester or bounty hunters to evaluate each project before investing their time/money into it.
Most ICOs run the bounty campaigns successfully but later tun out to be scam only in their last phase as their tokens become worthless. There is no way that the managers could foretell this.
For the full moderation you can go to any centralized institution. There are a lot, kickstarter and forex and banks just to mention few of them.
I agree with you. It is necessary that the moderators should filter the messages. and then in the forum thread there is a lot of unnecessary information, and it's more difficult to find useful information.
I am thinking of the Bounty Section to be fully moderate to the extent that scam ICO will not be posted there. As we all know that there are many many many scam ICOs nowadays. Bounty hunters are stressing out on how to choose those legit ICOs. I know bounty hunters will agree am I right? Is this even possible?
Jump to: