This thread should have stopped at reply two. [Thread Viewer]
Then it becomes a meaningless cycle of repeating the same "there exists a house edge" statement. How many replies do you want about that?
If every single gambling discussion eventually evolves into the abstracted structure of the house edge discussion which constantly repeats the same things incessantly, then what is the point of making these threads about specific games (i.e. beating blackjack vs beating roulette vs beating baccarat)?
Then it becomes a meaningless cycle of repeating the same "there exists a house edge" statement. How many replies do you want about that?
If every single gambling discussion eventually evolves into the abstracted structure of the house edge discussion which constantly repeats the same things incessantly, then what is the point of making these threads about specific games (i.e. beating blackjack vs beating roulette vs beating baccarat)?
Same with this thread and probably most the threads on this site. I think picking and choosing which spam to remove is a bit like attempting to moderate scams. It's all subjective unless proven otherwise. It's a good example of treating the symptoms and not the underlying condition. Do you think I would have taken the time to post this if I weren't being paid? Who is to say. One thing is for certain though, so long as advertisers are allowed to incentivize posting here, there will be more spam posts. Removing them is an exercise in futility (albeit likely a necessary one to keep this forum from being totally unusable).
