Many people are not in support of crypto adoption and this apathy is stemmed from the belief that it is not trustworthy and it can be used to defraud people. Using the vehement stance of György Matolcsy( Hungarian Central Bank Governor) as an instance; he feels crypto should not be even considered, as it could be used by some members of the EU to fund illegal businesses.
But I think it only seems as if the EU wants to control the finance of individuals by imposing taxes but since crypto does not allow for imposition of taxes, they move to outlaw or ban it. Is he just being a fascist or are is fears founded??
https://www.outlookindia.com/business/hungary-calls-for-total-crypto-ban-in-eu-uber-open-to-crypto-adoption-market-crashes-by-10--news-122319Although I love your nickname, I have to tell you, your post has several conceptual flaws.
To begin with, this would not be an EU case study, in any case an EU country case study, and precisely Hungary does not represent the average EU country in terms of political ideology, but rather tends to have opposing views, especially as far as the NWO is concerned.
As for crypto being used to fund illegal businesses, nothing new, the only thing is that they could apply the same argument to cash, but of course, cryptocurrencies and especially Bitcoin are more difficult for them to control, but when you say that crypto doesn't allow the imposition of taxes you are wrong again.
Crypto are regulated to pay taxes, generally by capital gains in most parts of the world. And governments have some way to control it with centralized exchanges. Another thing is that there is room for certain people to use Bitcoin and certain crypto without governments knowing about it and thus evade paying taxes.
The fascist thing makes me laugh a little, and as for whether his fears are founded, I think so but from his point of view of someone who serves the established power, not from the point of view of the benefit of the general population.