Topic: More than 1000 merit abusers found here (clearly motivated) - red trust time (Read 850 times)
April 29, 2018, 06:09:07 AM
Wow, for me the OP is incredible at my impression...a newbie can post with lot of collecting data like that. How to do that as newbie? Lately after go thorough the reply, I just aware that the OP is an alt. I understand it is impossible a real newbie can post such thing. How to find data of merit transfer as lot as that? I do not know yet a lot about merit, just to fight my post hasn't been deleted is good for me now....
April 28, 2018, 04:59:28 AM
bitcointalk.org account got hacked ??
No OP extracted the public merit data and analyzed based on some rules like merit exchanges between two users within specified time... which could be possible if they agreed to exchange merits... Technically to me it won't be merit abuse if they give merit to the deserving posts...
April 28, 2018, 03:20:05 AM
Quote
Favoured criteria would scout for:
- Injective cases: High amounts of sMerit awarded to a single user from a single user (1 or n TXs).
- Bijective cases: High amouts of sMerit awarded to a user and back again (1 or n TXs).
This will probably still tag me as an alt of nullius, so I'll have to disagree.- Injective cases: High amounts of sMerit awarded to a single user from a single user (1 or n TXs).
- Bijective cases: High amouts of sMerit awarded to a user and back again (1 or n TXs).
I guess the solution is: don't cheat. I know why I give merit, and if anyone is bored, feel free to review it.
April 27, 2018, 05:49:26 PM
I understand you point of view but Merit are not designated to Thanks people but for improving the quality of the forum. It's not the Like from facebook.
While we will not be directly moderating this, I encourage people to give merit to posts that are objectively high-quality, not just posts that you agree with.
But that's exactly how people use it -- like a Facebook "like" button. We should approach merit based on how the system is actually used, not the intent. I agree with Theymos' words above, but there are other social dynamics at play. Getting merit often seems more about saying what people want to hear -- and doing it in the right venue (e.g. Meta vs. Bitcoin Discussion) -- than anything else.
Unfortunately, OPs subject heading is not too well chosen, since it leads to assume that the 1k list are indeed merit abusers, when the real deal is potential abusers (he does clarify in the post this fact though).
Yeah, the OP ought to edit the title.
Quote
Favoured criteria would scout for:
- Injective cases: High amounts of sMerit awarded to a single user from a single user (1 or n TXs).
- Bijective cases: High amouts of sMerit awarded to a user and back again (1 or n TXs).
This will probably still tag me as an alt of nullius, so I'll have to disagree.- Injective cases: High amounts of sMerit awarded to a single user from a single user (1 or n TXs).
- Bijective cases: High amouts of sMerit awarded to a user and back again (1 or n TXs).
I guess the solution is: don't ever give or receive merit. But since you can't avoid receiving merit, allegations of merit abuse will always surface. C'est la vie.
April 27, 2018, 05:55:53 AM
<...>
I think the best use of the information is for anyone who has time and the inclination to do it to go through and see if there are other links to the accounts. Like are they in the same bounty campaigns etc.
I think the best use of the information is for anyone who has time and the inclination to do it to go through and see if there are other links to the accounts. Like are they in the same bounty campaigns etc.
Exactly, and what would then be the final proof is seeing if the ETH (generally speaking) addresses are linked through transfers from one to the other. If anybody has a function to query Etherscan ETH and Tokens someone could work on that at some point (there are APIs, but I'm wondering if there's any easy way to pull data into SQL Server to cross over there) . Although hinting it here is probably not my best idea...
April 27, 2018, 05:49:28 AM
I think the best use of the information is for anyone who has time and the inclination to do it to go through and see if there are other links to the accounts. Like are they in the same bounty campaigns etc.
In that case, I must be an alt of about half the users in the ChipMixer campaign.Unfortunately, OPs subject heading is not too well chosen, since it leads to assume that the 1k list are indeed merit abusers, when the real deal is potential abusers (he does clarify in the post this fact though).
The clickbait title is what got me to read this thread. I couldn't believe he identified more than 1000 out of just 14500 merit receivers as being abusers.I would in any case favour filtering by tighter criteria
I'd say leave out everybody who sent/received merit to/from more than a certain number of unique users, to leave out the users who turned positive just because they have had so many merit transactions.Quote
Favoured criteria would scout for:
- Injective cases: High amounts of sMerit awarded to a single user from a single user (1 or n TXs).
- Bijective cases: High amouts of sMerit awarded to a user and back again (1 or n TXs).
This will probably still tag me as an alt of nullius, so I'll have to disagree. - Injective cases: High amounts of sMerit awarded to a single user from a single user (1 or n TXs).
- Bijective cases: High amouts of sMerit awarded to a user and back again (1 or n TXs).
April 27, 2018, 05:47:49 AM
Having said that, I figure that the OPs intention is not to assert that the 1k list are merit abusers, but rather a narrowed down list of potential abusers by the 1 hour timeframe sMerit swapsies criteria he used.
The problem with this approach is that chances of a positive increase as someone has sent and received more merit. Eventually, almost all quality posters who use merit as intended will show on this list.I would in any case favour filtering by tighter criteria, creating shorter lists ordered descending by that criteria, being less false positive prone (for example the two lists I took extracts from in my previous post above). Favoured criteria would scout for:
- Injective cases: High amounts of sMerit awarded to a single user from a single user (1 or n TXs).
- Bijective cases: High amouts of sMerit awarded to a user and back again (1 or n TXs).
The former seems more logical from an Account Farming point of view.
All will surely throw false positives, and even if they didn’t, actually proving that account farming is behind is highly difficult just due to suspicion derived from sMerit TXs.
April 27, 2018, 05:36:30 AM
Those two can be combined: after receiving merit, I sometimes end up reading someone's post history. If I find posts that deserve merit, I merit them. Not because someone merited my post, but because I ended up reading them. You could argue this is because of the first merit transaction, but I don't think that matters as long as the posts are worth it.
I've done that a few times when it has been an account name I didn't recognise. I think the best use of the information is for anyone who has time and the inclination to do it to go through and see if there are other links to the accounts. Like are they in the same bounty campaigns etc.
On a side note while Vod's site rebuilds its database, from the information it has so far I seem to be an alt of TMAN and achow101. Who knew?
April 27, 2018, 05:31:22 AM
~SNIP~
I see nothing wrong or bad in giving a merit (or two) as an expression of your thanks. Is this a red-trust time for you, OP?
I see nothing wrong or bad in giving a merit (or two) as an expression of your thanks. Is this a red-trust time for you, OP?
I understand you point of wiew but Merit are not designated to Thanks people but for improving the quality of the forum. It's not the Like from facebook.
They were designed specifically to thank people for writing quality posts
Unless their real purpose was in fact to find and weed out account farmers, of course. Anyway, you still have to prove that giving a merit to a useful post (which should be merited on its own but wasn't) as a kind of thank you is a violation of any forum rules or ethics. Mind that I'm not talking about thoughtlessly giving merits back just for being merited (kind of an-eye-for-an-eye approach in reverse). If you have difficulty interpreting or perceiving the meaning of my words, imagine that a merit given is an invitation to evaluate the posts of the giver. Since there are many threads across the forum offering just that (i.e. evaluating and meriting quality posts), you will have difficulty challenging this view
April 27, 2018, 05:27:55 AM
~SNIP~
I see nothing wrong or bad in giving a merit (or two) as an expression of your thanks. Is this a red-trust time for you, OP?
I understand you point of wiew but Merit are not designated to Thanks people but for improving the quality of the forum. It's not the Like from facebook.I see nothing wrong or bad in giving a merit (or two) as an expression of your thanks. Is this a red-trust time for you, OP?
Having said that, I figure that the OPs intention is not to assert that the 1k list are merit abusers, but rather a narrowed down list of potential abusers by the 1 hour timeframe sMerit swapsies criteria he used.
The problem with this approach is that chances of a positive increase as someone has sent and received more merit. Eventually, almost all quality posters who use merit as intended will show on this list. April 27, 2018, 05:01:03 AM
As shahzadafzal reminds us in a post somewhere above, the official position is that any sMerit malpractice will (eventually) decay and become proportionally insignificant in the bigger picture. Being that so, chasing Merit malpractice, aside from being extremely difficult to prove, doesn’t really get us too far regardless of whether we like it or not and the sheer ethics behind it, where effort should be the core driver, and not cheating the system.
Distinguishing malpractice from friendship, liking or affinity is likely to be a non-feasible task, and since sMerit is a free currency to use once earned (with ethical and tactical goals, yes, I know), who’s got the overall right to judge and act upon?
Having said that, I figure that the OPs intention is not to assert that the 1k list are merit abusers, but rather a narrowed down list of potential abusers by the 1 hour timeframe sMerit swapsies criteria he used. That is, if someone were to look for merit abusers, that is a better staring point that having nothing. Unfortunately, there is no strong focus put on this, so persuing this will probably render a face-on crash against a wall.
In full disclosure, I too created a post sometime back with narrowed down lists by other criteria. I believed, at the time, that merit abusing was being pursued adamantly, but soon came round to letting it be.
What is against Forum rules, as I understand it, is having multiple Alt Account participating in the same campaign simultaneously. That is being pursued and, being it a difficult task that needs to be treated manually on a one per one basis, could benefit both from reporting on threads (which does take place regularly) and/or to moderators, as well as from lists that help narrow down suspect cases.
Now sMerit transactions could lead to helping the latter, since farmers are likely to try to uprank their Alt accounts for a larger gain. With the Merit System, these Alt accounts will require to receive sMerit at some point in order to uprank, thus perhaps some lists base on sMerit TXs could help pursue this goal (account farming).
Even so, it will not be automatic and will require someone with experience, criteria and power to do a one by one check and act upon what he sees.
To prove or deny my point, I went through the sMerit.txt file crossed with user profiles and though that a potential (underline potential, not certain in any way) set of cases to look into would be:
- Jr. Members that have receive high amounts of Merit from one single user (50 or so to start off with).
- Likewise with Members.
(there are plenty more potential criterias we could come up with, but these are easy top of mind).
Now the sMerit can be received as a one shot deal, over multiple transactions, etc. The suspect could receive himself the sMerit from one source alone or multiple sources that allow to understand the sMerit he receives. These factors all help to narrow down the study of the case.
I gave it a go with a quick drawn list of 10 Jr. Members and 5 Members:
From User From Rank ToUser ToRank Merit numTx Comment
152126 Legendary 366535 Jr. Member 50 1 50 sMerits for a single link to an Article
168114 Legendary 289275 Jr. Member 50 1 50 sMerits for a deleted post
192898 Legendary 1130764 Jr. Member 50 1 50 sMerits for reserving an Ann thread
211531 Legendary 1593656 Jr. Member 50 1 50 sMerits for an article summary; no more sMerits received from others
211641 Hero Member 232828 Jr. Member 50 1 50 sMerits for a 2016 2 liner comment
244104 Legendary 319826 Jr. Member 50 1 Initial Monero 2014 Ann thread; account not active for over a year
307978 Legendary 1227588 Jr. Member 50 1 50 sMerits for a quick one liner (no other receives sMerits)
319535 Hero Member 1308930 Jr. Member 50 1 Phore workbuddies
339752 Legendary 769913 Jr. Member 50 11 ann ICO bounty OP
412599 Hero Member 1163497 Jr. Member 50 1 50 sMerits for a pre Merit kick-off short post
From User From Rank ToUser ToRank Merit numTx Comment
377987 Legendary 1580039 Member 73 64 Deep connection here
105730 Hero Member 1348903 Member 72 2 Deep connection here
85601 Hero Member 1393407 Member 60 2 Can´t understand the language, but merited threads are oldish
668854 Hero Member 1162829 Member 55 3 Not very clear to me
672155 Hero Member 1201858 Member 50 1 encouraging for newbies: 50 sMerits for 12 words and a wink (on backdated post)
Do I consider I have proof of Account Farming through the above ? No, not prove, but suspicions.
In all the cases ? No, just a couple, but those cases are visible thanks to analyzing the sMerit transacted, and then performing a case by case study.
Do I want to become a Forum Cop? No, not really.
The point is that we can use sMerit to help detect Farming Accounts as an additional way of approaching the matter.
Distinguishing malpractice from friendship, liking or affinity is likely to be a non-feasible task, and since sMerit is a free currency to use once earned (with ethical and tactical goals, yes, I know), who’s got the overall right to judge and act upon?
Having said that, I figure that the OPs intention is not to assert that the 1k list are merit abusers, but rather a narrowed down list of potential abusers by the 1 hour timeframe sMerit swapsies criteria he used. That is, if someone were to look for merit abusers, that is a better staring point that having nothing. Unfortunately, there is no strong focus put on this, so persuing this will probably render a face-on crash against a wall.
In full disclosure, I too created a post sometime back with narrowed down lists by other criteria. I believed, at the time, that merit abusing was being pursued adamantly, but soon came round to letting it be.
What is against Forum rules, as I understand it, is having multiple Alt Account participating in the same campaign simultaneously. That is being pursued and, being it a difficult task that needs to be treated manually on a one per one basis, could benefit both from reporting on threads (which does take place regularly) and/or to moderators, as well as from lists that help narrow down suspect cases.
Now sMerit transactions could lead to helping the latter, since farmers are likely to try to uprank their Alt accounts for a larger gain. With the Merit System, these Alt accounts will require to receive sMerit at some point in order to uprank, thus perhaps some lists base on sMerit TXs could help pursue this goal (account farming).
Even so, it will not be automatic and will require someone with experience, criteria and power to do a one by one check and act upon what he sees.
To prove or deny my point, I went through the sMerit.txt file crossed with user profiles and though that a potential (underline potential, not certain in any way) set of cases to look into would be:
- Jr. Members that have receive high amounts of Merit from one single user (50 or so to start off with).
- Likewise with Members.
(there are plenty more potential criterias we could come up with, but these are easy top of mind).
Now the sMerit can be received as a one shot deal, over multiple transactions, etc. The suspect could receive himself the sMerit from one source alone or multiple sources that allow to understand the sMerit he receives. These factors all help to narrow down the study of the case.
I gave it a go with a quick drawn list of 10 Jr. Members and 5 Members:
From User From Rank ToUser ToRank Merit numTx Comment
152126 Legendary 366535 Jr. Member 50 1 50 sMerits for a single link to an Article
168114 Legendary 289275 Jr. Member 50 1 50 sMerits for a deleted post
192898 Legendary 1130764 Jr. Member 50 1 50 sMerits for reserving an Ann thread
211531 Legendary 1593656 Jr. Member 50 1 50 sMerits for an article summary; no more sMerits received from others
211641 Hero Member 232828 Jr. Member 50 1 50 sMerits for a 2016 2 liner comment
244104 Legendary 319826 Jr. Member 50 1 Initial Monero 2014 Ann thread; account not active for over a year
307978 Legendary 1227588 Jr. Member 50 1 50 sMerits for a quick one liner (no other receives sMerits)
319535 Hero Member 1308930 Jr. Member 50 1 Phore workbuddies
339752 Legendary 769913 Jr. Member 50 11 ann ICO bounty OP
412599 Hero Member 1163497 Jr. Member 50 1 50 sMerits for a pre Merit kick-off short post
From User From Rank ToUser ToRank Merit numTx Comment
377987 Legendary 1580039 Member 73 64 Deep connection here
105730 Hero Member 1348903 Member 72 2 Deep connection here
85601 Hero Member 1393407 Member 60 2 Can´t understand the language, but merited threads are oldish
668854 Hero Member 1162829 Member 55 3 Not very clear to me
672155 Hero Member 1201858 Member 50 1 encouraging for newbies: 50 sMerits for 12 words and a wink (on backdated post)
Do I consider I have proof of Account Farming through the above ? No, not prove, but suspicions.
In all the cases ? No, just a couple, but those cases are visible thanks to analyzing the sMerit transacted, and then performing a case by case study.
Do I want to become a Forum Cop? No, not really.
The point is that we can use sMerit to help detect Farming Accounts as an additional way of approaching the matter.
April 27, 2018, 04:51:35 AM
~SNIP~
I see nothing wrong or bad in giving a merit (or two) as an expression of your thanks. Is this a red-trust time for you, OP?
I see nothing wrong or bad in giving a merit (or two) as an expression of your thanks. Is this a red-trust time for you, OP?
I understand you point of view but Merit are not designated to Thanks people but for improving the quality of the forum. It's not the Like from facebook.
While we will not be directly moderating this, I encourage people to give merit to posts that are objectively high-quality, not just posts that you agree with.
April 27, 2018, 01:11:37 AM
I have coded a script to find abuses in the current merit system automatically, this is briefly what is does:
- go through the merit file and simply checks for any direct exchange of merits between 2 users within 1 hour
- count how many of the merit given in total have been used for possible exchanges and produce a percentage
- write down who received the merits, how many and how many they sent back as part of the possible exchange.
- go through the merit file and simply checks for any direct exchange of merits between 2 users within 1 hour
- count how many of the merit given in total have been used for possible exchanges and produce a percentage
- write down who received the merits, how many and how many they sent back as part of the possible exchange.
This is bullshit and witch-hunting at its best. There are a lot of excellent posts which go unmerited (up to a point where you can safely say that the merit system doesn't work), so if someone gives you a couple of merits, you feel like you should give them a couple of merits in return. And if both of you are good posters, I see nothing wrong or bad in giving a merit (or two) as an expression of your thanks. Is this a red-trust time for you, OP?
Obviously, cases with a lot of merits exchanged is a completely different matter
How have you worked that out? I've given out hundreds of merits, and I've received hundreds. I'm sure that I have given merits to members who have also given merits to me. I haven't checked, and don't remember as the awards ween't linked.
But what are the chances that those users have given you merit back within one hour? The chances of two random users giving each other merit is already a big coincidence, but then doing it within the hour is very unlikely and very suspicious. I haven't looked through the results in the OP but if it works as stated it would be helpful to go through and manfully look for potential abuses for those that can be bothered or have the time. People will get wise to this though and just wait a day or two to return merit.
The odds are really low and so what? Is there a rule which forbids you awarding a merit to someone who merited you as long as the posts of both of you are good? Okay, now if someone gives you a merit, you should think twice and wait at least a week before meriting back so as not to raise the suspicion of the forum's "merit police"
April 27, 2018, 12:05:19 AM
How have you worked that out? I've given out hundreds of merits, and I've received hundreds. I'm sure that I have given merits to members who have also given merits to me. I haven't checked, and don't remember as the awards ween't linked.
But what are the chances that those users have given you merit back within one hour? The chances of two random users giving each other merit is already a big coincidence, but then doing it within the hour is very unlikely and very suspicious. I haven't looked through the results in the OP but if it works as stated it would be helpful to go through and manfully look for potential abuses for those that can be bothered or have the time. People will get wise to this though and just wait a day or two to return merit.
The chances may actually higher than you think. I believe time between merit isn't such a good indicator of abuse because legitimate people/accounts tend to give and return merits as a means of saying "thank you."
I understand it's not designed to work this way but some people will use the following logic:
gee thanks for the merit buddy, here let me return the favor and merit one of your posts as well.
April 26, 2018, 10:53:45 PM
- go through the merit file and simply checks for any direct exchange of merits between 2 users within 1 hour
I can't really view all on my phone, bit since I'm on your list, I can say with 100% certainty your method is at least inaccurate.What you should do, is manually check all your positives and see if the merited posts don't deserve it.
April 26, 2018, 10:32:36 PM
What we need to do is to post better and don't mind these fraudulent activities because obviously this is just a waste of time.
What we need to do is to let people to rank up normally after receiving at least 100 merits and never let them to send any merits to others. when you have the ability to send merits and rank up other members, you'd go with your nature to rank up your alts.
Monitoring 80 or 100 people is easier than monitoring thousands. now if you already have received 100 merits, you should rank up with no merit requirement and you shouldn't have the ability to send or receive any merits.
EDIT: disclaimer: the tongue of my language is not my English mother.
April 26, 2018, 08:29:42 PM
It's a shame to found out those. Though this is not a clear indication that they we're the same person who is abusing the merit system for themselves. What we need to do is to post better and don't mind these fraudulent activities because obviously this is just a waste of time.
April 26, 2018, 06:53:57 PM
How have you worked that out? I've given out hundreds of merits, and I've received hundreds. I'm sure that I have given merits to members who have also given merits to me. I haven't checked, and don't remember as the awards ween't linked.
But what are the chances that those users have given you merit back within one hour? The chances of two random users giving each other merit is already a big coincidence, but then doing it within the hour is very unlikely and very suspicious.
If someone gives 100% of their sMerit 100% of the time to another user, obviously it's suspicious.
And if we assume that any two users are random, then your assertion would be correct. But social media functions are not random. One example is the Wall Observer thread. A lot of the regulars in there seem to merit each other -- and re: the time question, the conversation actually moves really quickly. Merit distribution is probably nowhere near random even if we ignore the alt accounts, farming, etc. This isn't 4chan; users aren't anonymous. There are clearly established social groups on the forum.
I guess I would just stress caution when the pattern isn't extremely clear. People around here really love their witch hunts, though.
April 26, 2018, 05:25:42 PM
Op, I want to merit you for this post but I think this can be an alt so let me know (I don't waste my precious merit if they are not useful)
I started off thinking like that, but now I don't think that it matters. I feel that it is the post that is getting the merit, and not the poster, so we should not be influenced by rank or other factors. The exception is where a post has been made to gain merit to pass on to another account. Hopefully these will be highlighted in the current research, and we will be able to ignore these posters.
Yes you are probably right but I know the feeling to be one not English native and try to post here, so I prefer to use merit to help people (when they deserve). For this reason usually, at least for now, because merit is harder and harder to get for the "decay"(-40% from March to April), usually I don't merit legendary even if sometime they deserve a lot of merit cause they don't need it.
April 26, 2018, 03:42:47 PM
The script is showing those who have exchanged minimum one merit with each others. While the whole list might not be even 50% accurate (a wild guess) but it's obvious that scanning the list will make the life easier if you want to dig down the merit abusers rabbit hole.
I wonder with the earlier poster...
Why did you created this ALT? Why not you use your real account. Scared about getting RedTrust. Man... Look at my trust page LOL
PS: This is really a good shit but since it's from an alt I stopped myself sending an sMerit
I wonder with the earlier poster...
Why did you created this ALT? Why not you use your real account. Scared about getting RedTrust. Man... Look at my trust page LOL
PS: This is really a good shit but since it's from an alt I stopped myself sending an sMerit
April 26, 2018, 03:31:42 PM
April 26, 2018, 03:02:19 PM
@OP: why did you use a new account? are you afraid of something?
this list is really huge. the next step would be to further clean it. but if we have to this by hand than its too much work. its not worth the work i think.
but the list shows that every attempt to stop the bounty spammers are not perfect. bur do they need to be perfect to be helpful? i dont think so.
this list is really huge. the next step would be to further clean it. but if we have to this by hand than its too much work. its not worth the work i think.
but the list shows that every attempt to stop the bounty spammers are not perfect. bur do they need to be perfect to be helpful? i dont think so.
April 26, 2018, 02:08:18 PM
I've taken a look of 25 random activities and the system is accurated in approximately an 80% (really nice, then)
Despite some of the merit sending is not so clearly a farming activity, there are many crystal clear in your list, like this one: It seems that user 1199648 exchanged 100% ( 49 ) of the merits he gave with: 979690 ( received 49 ) ( sent 34 )
This is, no doubt, farming.
Now, what is going to happen to them? If we develop the necessary tools to be aware of farmers, what is going to be the procedure against them?
Is there any strategy?
Despite some of the merit sending is not so clearly a farming activity, there are many crystal clear in your list, like this one: It seems that user 1199648 exchanged 100% ( 49 ) of the merits he gave with: 979690 ( received 49 ) ( sent 34 )
This is, no doubt, farming.
Now, what is going to happen to them? If we develop the necessary tools to be aware of farmers, what is going to be the procedure against them?
Is there any strategy?
April 26, 2018, 12:10:33 PM
Do not make people afraid to use the system. It is hard enough to gain merit.
April 26, 2018, 11:52:19 AM
there is good possibility that many among this list (may be 50%) are just random by luck. I guess this list can be ignored if they are distributing mertis among each other its ok. I don't think they can abuse that much. Of course they will run out of sMerit very soon.
As theymos said in one of his quote its not of much an issue:
We are in good hands so merit trades should not bother us much
As theymos said in one of his quote its not of much an issue:
Merit sales, transfers to aliases, back-and-forth trading, etc. are not much of an issue. All illegitimate merit will decay, and will account for a tiny and very expensive fraction of the total merit economy.
We are in good hands so merit trades should not bother us much
then the small volume of black-market merit trades don't themselves bother me much, and I think that it does more harm than good to get too witch-hunty about it.
April 26, 2018, 11:41:30 AM
But what are the chances that those users have given you merit back within one hour? The chances of two random users giving each other merit is already a big coincidence, but then doing it within the hour is very unlikely and very suspicious. I haven't looked through the results in the OP but if it works as stated it would be helpful to go through and manfully look for potential abuses for those that can be bothered or have the time. People will get wise to this though and just wait a day or two to return merit.
I did a quick search with my profile number, and it doesn't look as if I'm in there. I must have some cross account awards, and maybe I should check at some time.
how can i find out my profile number?
exchange of merits and trust are nothing special, there are fraternising interest and lobby groups, that support each other.
forum admins and mods do the same but only they can do it "legally"
according to that.
political parties would be also illegal, as they also push each other up.
April 26, 2018, 11:36:32 AM
Looks like I'm on the list.
April 26, 2018, 11:24:18 AM
But what are the chances that those users have given you merit back within one hour? The chances of two random users giving each other merit is already a big coincidence, but then doing it within the hour is very unlikely and very suspicious. I haven't looked through the results in the OP but if it works as stated it would be helpful to go through and manfully look for potential abuses for those that can be bothered or have the time. People will get wise to this though and just wait a day or two to return merit.
I did a quick search with my profile number, and it doesn't look as if I'm in there. I must have some cross account awards, and maybe I should check at some time.
April 26, 2018, 10:59:19 AM
This is a great work, thanks for spending time making this great work. But it is just a rough list if i may say because some people resend merit back as a "thank you". The list need a lot of proving process before giving a negative or red trust for the people in the list. Maybe you can start by prioritizing an exchange between users with big number of merits
April 26, 2018, 10:33:54 AM
How have you worked that out? I've given out hundreds of merits, and I've received hundreds. I'm sure that I have given merits to members who have also given merits to me. I haven't checked, and don't remember as the awards ween't linked.
But what are the chances that those users have given you merit back within one hour? The chances of two random users giving each other merit is already a big coincidence, but then doing it within the hour is very unlikely and very suspicious. I haven't looked through the results in the OP but if it works as stated it would be helpful to go through and manfully look for potential abuses for those that can be bothered or have the time. People will get wise to this though and just wait a day or two to return merit.
I think op job is good, and it can be a useful tool to track abusers.
But it's very important to avoid banning the wrong person.
I think it's better to have some abusers (as merit is scarse they will not last long) than to ban a single member for wrong reasons.
April 26, 2018, 10:28:03 AM
How have you worked that out? I've given out hundreds of merits, and I've received hundreds. I'm sure that I have given merits to members who have also given merits to me. I haven't checked, and don't remember as the awards ween't linked.
But what are the chances that those users have given you merit back within one hour? The chances of two random users giving each other merit is already a big coincidence, but then doing it within the hour is very unlikely and very suspicious. I haven't looked through the results in the OP but if it works as stated it would be helpful to go through and manfully look for potential abuses for those that can be bothered or have the time. People will get wise to this though and just wait a day or two to return merit.
April 26, 2018, 10:16:51 AM
A direct exchange of merits between two users within an hour will gives random results.
Clear cases of abuse are cases in which tens/hundreds of merit points are sent to a single user.
It is best to modify the script to who sent 80% - 100% of his merits to one user with in one hour.
Thanks for taking a bit of your time trying to improve this forum
Clear cases of abuse are cases in which tens/hundreds of merit points are sent to a single user.
It is best to modify the script to who sent 80% - 100% of his merits to one user with in one hour.
Thanks for taking a bit of your time trying to improve this forum
April 26, 2018, 10:07:34 AM
Op, I want to merit you for this post but I think this can be an alt so let me know (I don't waste my precious merit if they are not useful)
I started off thinking like that, but now I don't think that it matters. I feel that it is the post that is getting the merit, and not the poster, so we should not be influenced by rank or other factors. The exception is where a post has been made to gain merit to pass on to another account. Hopefully these will be highlighted in the current research, and we will be able to ignore these posters.
April 26, 2018, 10:01:38 AM
My first reaction was that we should hammer merit abusers. On reflection, I think Theymos could have been quite clever in implementing the system in the way that he has. It's highlighting a lot of alts, and users ( rather than members ) who are likely to cheat bounties and other members.
April 26, 2018, 09:54:25 AM
How have you worked that out? I've given out hundreds of merits, and I've received hundreds. I'm sure that I have given merits to members who have also given merits to me. I haven't checked, and don't remember as the awards ween't linked.
I was thinking the same thing at first but a closer look at the list and it only contains those that have exchanged between 80% and 100% of the merit they used. It is still just a suspect list rather than anything concrete. It seems to be that there is no sanction for merit abuse anyway but it might be a useful source of information for the alt hunters.
April 26, 2018, 09:50:27 AM
How have you worked that out? I've given out hundreds of merits, and I've received hundreds. I'm sure that I have given merits to members who have also given merits to me. I haven't checked, and don't remember as the awards ween't linked.
For those who send so much merit, we can assume that they sent merit to many different people.
Bigger is the number of sMerit you sent, lower is the probability that the giveback is high. (He tracks only 60%+ Giveback)
Op, I want to merit you for this post but I think this can be an alt so let me know (I don't waste my precious merit if they are not useful)
April 26, 2018, 09:43:01 AM
How have you worked that out? I've given out hundreds of merits, and I've received hundreds. I'm sure that I have given merits to members who have also given merits to me. I haven't checked, and don't remember as the awards ween't linked.
April 26, 2018, 09:32:30 AM
Wow! Didn't know that merit abuse is so serious. That script you wrote is sick! I only checked few members with high merit exchange and I think you're right, whose are merit farmers. Don't want to start trust war with anybody, hopefully, DT members will sort it out. So I cowardly retreat 
But I haven't build a strong reputation on this forum yet and it could backfire on me (Lame!)
But I haven't build a strong reputation on this forum yet and it could backfire on me (Lame!) April 26, 2018, 01:04:58 AM
600 of 1270
Quote
It seems that user 1278075 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1283479 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1340002 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1283479 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1278075 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1210694 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1477664 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1338388 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1025234 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1388666 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1007695 exchanged 100% ( 28 ) of the merits he gave with: 850811 ( received 28 ) ( sent 45 )
It seems that user 1065802 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 976768 ( received 7 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1102634 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1477664 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1282336 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1168477 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1146856 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1056600 ( received 9 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1291198 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1182384 ( received 2 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1128784 exchanged 100% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1122909 ( received 8 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1272286 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1196887 ( received 2 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1251101 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1077383 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1393744 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1393701 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1530481 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 954159 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1253176 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1232646 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1155277 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1010495 ( received 7 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1079327 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 344915 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1134568 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 991046 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1121407 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1269162 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1282342 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1282342 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1121407 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1269162 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1121407 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1014323 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1018222 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1010495 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1155277 ( received 7 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1295341 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1297383 ( received 6 ) ( sent 9 )
It seems that user 1052553 exchanged 100% ( 40 ) of the merits he gave with: 1133779 ( received 13 ) ( sent 1 ) 1113026 ( received 27 ) ( sent 26 )
It seems that user 1159958 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1158577 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1428301 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1052765 ( received 7 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 298905 exchanged 100% ( 26 ) of the merits he gave with: 221867 ( received 26 ) ( sent 50 )
It seems that user 954745 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1255809 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1255809 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 954745 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1072576 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 648954 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1229825 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1221402 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 30229 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 58651 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1221402 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1229825 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1000761 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1276622 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1276622 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1000761 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1379635 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1082600 ( received 4 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 1361437 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1199864 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1217524 exchanged 100% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1104727 ( received 8 ) ( sent 15 )
It seems that user 908195 exchanged 100% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1388666 ( received 6 ) ( sent 6 ) 824736 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 353612 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1001712 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1318340 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1232646 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1246073 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1302804 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1253145 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1160375 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1099851 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 630976 ( received 4 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1231279 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1136853 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1189054 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1168550 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1168550 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1189054 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1135164 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1160375 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 245426 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1129603 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1440806 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1045374 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1238102 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1284574 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1286797 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1286797 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1284574 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1238102 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1440806 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1062606 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1078345 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1168923 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1167691 ( received 7 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1167691 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1168923 ( received 7 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1383391 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1001712 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1304541 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1001712 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1250962 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1326809 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1326809 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1250962 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1369096 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1370909 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1370909 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1369096 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1238923 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1203446 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 987777 exchanged 100% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1184333 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 ) 1215922 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1140853 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 988212 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 999110 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 934649 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 962182 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1142012 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 915311 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1169719 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1195699 ( received 6 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1594824 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 154782 ( received 5 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 154782 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1594824 ( received 10 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1252266 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 934649 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1071002 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1136170 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1136170 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1071002 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1162217 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1133785 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1287652 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1218208 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1218208 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1287652 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1248920 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1170003 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1008177 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1266442 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1336024 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1317727 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1215922 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 987777 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1317727 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1336024 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 255089 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 151341 ( received 4 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1266442 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1008177 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 988147 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1058621 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 521226 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1110133 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1237156 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1138564 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1427907 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1343594 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1196051 ( received 3 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 874351 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 153634 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1517809 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 658788 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1194292 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 658788 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1517809 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1143888 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1142530 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1324720 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1176691 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1221820 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1223647 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1223647 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1221820 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1333605 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1234661 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 877700 exchanged 97% ( 34 ) of the merits he gave with: 1289787 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 ) 905837 ( received 27 ) ( sent 14 ) 1348145 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 377879 exchanged 97% ( 41 ) of the merits he gave with: 316540 ( received 41 ) ( sent 50 )
It seems that user 1035345 exchanged 96% ( 49 ) of the merits he gave with: 756570 ( received 18 ) ( sent 50 ) 1018920 ( received 31 ) ( sent 36 )
It seems that user 1123153 exchanged 96% ( 28 ) of the merits he gave with: 842041 ( received 28 ) ( sent 50 )
It seems that user 975365 exchanged 96% ( 28 ) of the merits he gave with: 80810 ( received 28 ) ( sent 13 )
It seems that user 1052765 exchanged 95% ( 44 ) of the merits he gave with: 1428236 ( received 23 ) ( sent 9 ) 1616153 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 ) 1428301 ( received 4 ) ( sent 7 ) 1056566 ( received 12 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 973621 exchanged 94% ( 16 ) of the merits he gave with: 1294613 ( received 16 ) ( sent 23 )
It seems that user 905837 exchanged 94% ( 18 ) of the merits he gave with: 877700 ( received 14 ) ( sent 27 ) 1348145 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1018920 exchanged 94% ( 36 ) of the merits he gave with: 1035345 ( received 36 ) ( sent 31 )
It seems that user 1275299 exchanged 93% ( 27 ) of the merits he gave with: 1108972 ( received 27 ) ( sent 49 )
It seems that user 1104727 exchanged 93% ( 15 ) of the merits he gave with: 1217524 ( received 15 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 1126634 exchanged 93% ( 15 ) of the merits he gave with: 880977 ( received 15 ) ( sent 27 )
It seems that user 1325560 exchanged 93% ( 14 ) of the merits he gave with: 868650 ( received 14 ) ( sent 26 )
It seems that user 335943 exchanged 93% ( 41 ) of the merits he gave with: 1059990 ( received 36 ) ( sent 22 ) 1115243 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 868650 exchanged 92% ( 26 ) of the merits he gave with: 1325560 ( received 26 ) ( sent 14 )
It seems that user 1455178 exchanged 92% ( 12 ) of the merits he gave with: 1375708 ( received 12 ) ( sent 16 )
It seems that user 952731 exchanged 92% ( 12 ) of the merits he gave with: 1221919 ( received 10 ) ( sent 5 ) 1197849 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1181556 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 959904 exchanged 91% ( 31 ) of the merits he gave with: 1191222 ( received 31 ) ( sent 16 )
It seems that user 1033117 exchanged 91% ( 75 ) of the merits he gave with: 639205 ( received 13 ) ( sent 27 ) 1311351 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 1105316 ( received 4 ) ( sent 3 ) 1133785 ( received 10 ) ( sent 5 ) 1212054 ( received 7 ) ( sent 16 ) 988901 ( received 37 ) ( sent 50 ) 1166875 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 ) 363752 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 ) 1114228 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1684585 exchanged 90% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1203429 ( received 5 ) ( sent 9 ) 245653 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 413210 exchanged 90% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 305482 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 412345 exchanged 90% ( 36 ) of the merits he gave with: 984164 ( received 33 ) ( sent 16 ) 1061308 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1063830 exchanged 90% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 366042 ( received 9 ) ( sent 9 )
It seems that user 366042 exchanged 90% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1063830 ( received 9 ) ( sent 9 ) 1118896 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1070628 exchanged 90% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 993080 ( received 10 ) ( sent 25 )
It seems that user 1159343 exchanged 90% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1209531 ( received 9 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1433857 exchanged 90% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1174524 ( received 10 ) ( sent 21 )
It seems that user 1131623 exchanged 90% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 378111 ( received 5 ) ( sent 6 ) 924671 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1068300 exchanged 90% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1111232 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 ) 1004946 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1173879 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1109867 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 ) 1155996 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1109845 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 953567 exchanged 90% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1019229 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1002258 exchanged 89% ( 17 ) of the merits he gave with: 1176691 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1082911 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1185547 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 955642 ( received 2 ) ( sent 3 ) 1448068 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 988678 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 ) 988671 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1025635 exchanged 89% ( 17 ) of the merits he gave with: 1124415 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 ) 1104013 ( received 11 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1233301 exchanged 89% ( 41 ) of the merits he gave with: 1229152 ( received 16 ) ( sent 15 ) 1207946 ( received 25 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 1137345 exchanged 88% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1139626 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 ) 1137368 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 ) 1138263 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1024227 exchanged 88% ( 24 ) of the merits he gave with: 1719093 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1801141 ( received 7 ) ( sent 5 ) 1109045 ( received 15 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1214462 exchanged 88% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1229152 ( received 8 ) ( sent 19 )
It seems that user 771836 exchanged 88% ( 37 ) of the merits he gave with: 882756 ( received 31 ) ( sent 31 ) 862089 ( received 6 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1024739 exchanged 88% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1148209 ( received 8 ) ( sent 9 )
It seems that user 1388666 exchanged 88% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1232646 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1338388 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 908195 ( received 6 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1062823 exchanged 87% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1151300 ( received 7 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 985812 exchanged 87% ( 34 ) of the merits he gave with: 934649 ( received 23 ) ( sent 22 ) 1207946 ( received 11 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1037973 exchanged 87% ( 14 ) of the merits he gave with: 1284832 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 ) 980653 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 ) 1198189 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1114493 exchanged 87% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1213661 ( received 4 ) ( sent 3 ) 1249814 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 863567 exchanged 87% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1257088 ( received 7 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 765739 exchanged 87% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 878336 ( received 3 ) ( sent 2 ) 1453078 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1394362 exchanged 87% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1432257 ( received 7 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 929600 exchanged 86% ( 57 ) of the merits he gave with: 1334470 ( received 33 ) ( sent 3 ) 855962 ( received 24 ) ( sent 47 )
It seems that user 1050120 exchanged 85% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 848747 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1164814 exchanged 85% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1266135 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 ) 1199272 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1282549 exchanged 85% ( 34 ) of the merits he gave with: 1280519 ( received 34 ) ( sent 21 )
It seems that user 1172510 exchanged 85% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1379817 ( received 6 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 378111 exchanged 85% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1131623 ( received 6 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1290136 exchanged 85% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1372625 ( received 6 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 973393 exchanged 85% ( 24 ) of the merits he gave with: 979690 ( received 7 ) ( sent 8 ) 915311 ( received 7 ) ( sent 7 ) 487377 ( received 6 ) ( sent 21 ) 944905 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1030272 exchanged 85% ( 18 ) of the merits he gave with: 1464168 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 ) 1569501 ( received 6 ) ( sent 5 ) 1135680 ( received 1 ) ( sent 5 ) 1116129 ( received 3 ) ( sent 6 ) 1011691 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 1137150 ( received 1 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1006575 exchanged 85% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1207946 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1145187 exchanged 85% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1047075 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1129318 exchanged 85% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1117238 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1031095 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1121700 exchanged 84% ( 11 ) of the merits he gave with: 1065634 ( received 7 ) ( sent 7 ) 1175031 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1121653 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1079999 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 947773 exchanged 84% ( 22 ) of the merits he gave with: 1724125 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 ) 994863 ( received 20 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 870828 exchanged 83% ( 20 ) of the merits he gave with: 880986 ( received 20 ) ( sent 20 )
It seems that user 1072622 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 610371 ( received 5 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1209531 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1159343 ( received 5 ) ( sent 9 )
It seems that user 1019229 exchanged 83% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 953567 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1113026 exchanged 83% ( 26 ) of the merits he gave with: 1052553 ( received 26 ) ( sent 27 )
It seems that user 529073 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1238989 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 980653 exchanged 83% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1037973 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1316221 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 959179 ( received 5 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 989078 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1580081 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 ) 1317942 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1471933 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1439269 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 ) 1271270 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1109045 exchanged 83% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1024227 ( received 10 ) ( sent 15 )
It seems that user 1149996 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1765313 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 ) 1232671 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1199272 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 830405 exchanged 83% ( 50 ) of the merits he gave with: 56939 ( received 50 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1135680 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1030272 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1354558 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1220014 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 ) 1082600 ( received 1 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1418208 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1355924 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 259629 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1428774 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1188361 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1296859 ( received 5 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1220142 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1240896 ( received 5 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 353680 exchanged 82% ( 46 ) of the merits he gave with: 1000199 ( received 46 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1217918 exchanged 82% ( 38 ) of the merits he gave with: 1217914 ( received 38 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1229152 exchanged 82% ( 38 ) of the merits he gave with: 1214462 ( received 19 ) ( sent 8 ) 1207946 ( received 4 ) ( sent 15 ) 1233301 ( received 15 ) ( sent 16 )
It seems that user 1108972 exchanged 81% ( 49 ) of the merits he gave with: 1275299 ( received 49 ) ( sent 27 )
It seems that user 1028342 exchanged 81% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1049908 ( received 4 ) ( sent 5 ) 1034500 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1892364 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1886478 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1096565 exchanged 80% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1127763 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 ) 1129330 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1395398 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 956126 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 994455 exchanged 80% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 934649 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 ) 988212 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 999110 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1001712 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1546400 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1892629 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1190777 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1518939 ( received 4 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1519258 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1519069 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1096080 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1096108 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1127453 exchanged 80% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 80810 ( received 8 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1509386 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1571993 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 935619 exchanged 80% ( 12 ) of the merits he gave with: 1102027 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 ) 896735 ( received 8 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 1402383 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1468144 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 ) 1427907 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1166578 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1685440 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1287806 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1127264 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 1183954 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 988671 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1249814 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1114493 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 ) 1306619 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1415033 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1542466 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1047545 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 978568 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1435034 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1435606 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1186697 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1112932 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 860708 exchanged 80% ( 38 ) of the merits he gave with: 95437 ( received 38 ) ( sent 39 )
It seems that user 1350675 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 986242 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1283479 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1278075 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1210694 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1477664 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1338388 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1025234 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1388666 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1007695 exchanged 100% ( 28 ) of the merits he gave with: 850811 ( received 28 ) ( sent 45 )
It seems that user 1065802 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 976768 ( received 7 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1102634 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1477664 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1282336 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1168477 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1146856 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1056600 ( received 9 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1291198 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1182384 ( received 2 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1128784 exchanged 100% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1122909 ( received 8 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1272286 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1196887 ( received 2 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1251101 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1077383 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1393744 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1393701 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1530481 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 954159 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1253176 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1232646 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1155277 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1010495 ( received 7 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1079327 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 344915 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1134568 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 991046 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1121407 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1269162 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1282342 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1282342 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1121407 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1269162 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1121407 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1014323 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1018222 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1010495 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1155277 ( received 7 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1295341 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1297383 ( received 6 ) ( sent 9 )
It seems that user 1052553 exchanged 100% ( 40 ) of the merits he gave with: 1133779 ( received 13 ) ( sent 1 ) 1113026 ( received 27 ) ( sent 26 )
It seems that user 1159958 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1158577 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1428301 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1052765 ( received 7 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 298905 exchanged 100% ( 26 ) of the merits he gave with: 221867 ( received 26 ) ( sent 50 )
It seems that user 954745 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1255809 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1255809 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 954745 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1072576 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 648954 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1229825 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1221402 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 30229 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 58651 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1221402 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1229825 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1000761 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1276622 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1276622 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1000761 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1379635 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1082600 ( received 4 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 1361437 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1199864 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1217524 exchanged 100% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1104727 ( received 8 ) ( sent 15 )
It seems that user 908195 exchanged 100% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1388666 ( received 6 ) ( sent 6 ) 824736 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 353612 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1001712 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1318340 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1232646 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1246073 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1302804 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1253145 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1160375 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1099851 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 630976 ( received 4 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1231279 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1136853 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1189054 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1168550 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1168550 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1189054 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1135164 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1160375 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 245426 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1129603 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1440806 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1045374 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1238102 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1284574 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1286797 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1286797 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1284574 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1238102 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1440806 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1062606 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1078345 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1168923 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1167691 ( received 7 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1167691 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1168923 ( received 7 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1383391 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1001712 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1304541 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1001712 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1250962 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1326809 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1326809 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1250962 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1369096 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1370909 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1370909 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1369096 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1238923 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1203446 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 987777 exchanged 100% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1184333 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 ) 1215922 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1140853 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 988212 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 999110 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 934649 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 962182 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1142012 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 915311 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1169719 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1195699 ( received 6 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1594824 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 154782 ( received 5 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 154782 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1594824 ( received 10 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1252266 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 934649 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1071002 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1136170 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1136170 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1071002 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1162217 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1133785 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1287652 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1218208 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1218208 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1287652 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1248920 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1170003 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1008177 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1266442 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1336024 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1317727 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1215922 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 987777 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1317727 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1336024 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 255089 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 151341 ( received 4 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1266442 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1008177 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 988147 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1058621 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 521226 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1110133 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1237156 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1138564 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1427907 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1343594 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1196051 ( received 3 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 874351 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 153634 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1517809 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 658788 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1194292 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 658788 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1517809 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1143888 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1142530 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1324720 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1176691 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1221820 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1223647 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1223647 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1221820 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1333605 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1234661 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 877700 exchanged 97% ( 34 ) of the merits he gave with: 1289787 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 ) 905837 ( received 27 ) ( sent 14 ) 1348145 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 377879 exchanged 97% ( 41 ) of the merits he gave with: 316540 ( received 41 ) ( sent 50 )
It seems that user 1035345 exchanged 96% ( 49 ) of the merits he gave with: 756570 ( received 18 ) ( sent 50 ) 1018920 ( received 31 ) ( sent 36 )
It seems that user 1123153 exchanged 96% ( 28 ) of the merits he gave with: 842041 ( received 28 ) ( sent 50 )
It seems that user 975365 exchanged 96% ( 28 ) of the merits he gave with: 80810 ( received 28 ) ( sent 13 )
It seems that user 1052765 exchanged 95% ( 44 ) of the merits he gave with: 1428236 ( received 23 ) ( sent 9 ) 1616153 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 ) 1428301 ( received 4 ) ( sent 7 ) 1056566 ( received 12 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 973621 exchanged 94% ( 16 ) of the merits he gave with: 1294613 ( received 16 ) ( sent 23 )
It seems that user 905837 exchanged 94% ( 18 ) of the merits he gave with: 877700 ( received 14 ) ( sent 27 ) 1348145 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1018920 exchanged 94% ( 36 ) of the merits he gave with: 1035345 ( received 36 ) ( sent 31 )
It seems that user 1275299 exchanged 93% ( 27 ) of the merits he gave with: 1108972 ( received 27 ) ( sent 49 )
It seems that user 1104727 exchanged 93% ( 15 ) of the merits he gave with: 1217524 ( received 15 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 1126634 exchanged 93% ( 15 ) of the merits he gave with: 880977 ( received 15 ) ( sent 27 )
It seems that user 1325560 exchanged 93% ( 14 ) of the merits he gave with: 868650 ( received 14 ) ( sent 26 )
It seems that user 335943 exchanged 93% ( 41 ) of the merits he gave with: 1059990 ( received 36 ) ( sent 22 ) 1115243 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 868650 exchanged 92% ( 26 ) of the merits he gave with: 1325560 ( received 26 ) ( sent 14 )
It seems that user 1455178 exchanged 92% ( 12 ) of the merits he gave with: 1375708 ( received 12 ) ( sent 16 )
It seems that user 952731 exchanged 92% ( 12 ) of the merits he gave with: 1221919 ( received 10 ) ( sent 5 ) 1197849 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1181556 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 959904 exchanged 91% ( 31 ) of the merits he gave with: 1191222 ( received 31 ) ( sent 16 )
It seems that user 1033117 exchanged 91% ( 75 ) of the merits he gave with: 639205 ( received 13 ) ( sent 27 ) 1311351 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 1105316 ( received 4 ) ( sent 3 ) 1133785 ( received 10 ) ( sent 5 ) 1212054 ( received 7 ) ( sent 16 ) 988901 ( received 37 ) ( sent 50 ) 1166875 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 ) 363752 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 ) 1114228 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1684585 exchanged 90% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1203429 ( received 5 ) ( sent 9 ) 245653 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 413210 exchanged 90% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 305482 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 412345 exchanged 90% ( 36 ) of the merits he gave with: 984164 ( received 33 ) ( sent 16 ) 1061308 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1063830 exchanged 90% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 366042 ( received 9 ) ( sent 9 )
It seems that user 366042 exchanged 90% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1063830 ( received 9 ) ( sent 9 ) 1118896 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1070628 exchanged 90% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 993080 ( received 10 ) ( sent 25 )
It seems that user 1159343 exchanged 90% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1209531 ( received 9 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1433857 exchanged 90% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1174524 ( received 10 ) ( sent 21 )
It seems that user 1131623 exchanged 90% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 378111 ( received 5 ) ( sent 6 ) 924671 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1068300 exchanged 90% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1111232 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 ) 1004946 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1173879 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1109867 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 ) 1155996 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1109845 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 953567 exchanged 90% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1019229 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1002258 exchanged 89% ( 17 ) of the merits he gave with: 1176691 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1082911 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1185547 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 955642 ( received 2 ) ( sent 3 ) 1448068 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 988678 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 ) 988671 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1025635 exchanged 89% ( 17 ) of the merits he gave with: 1124415 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 ) 1104013 ( received 11 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1233301 exchanged 89% ( 41 ) of the merits he gave with: 1229152 ( received 16 ) ( sent 15 ) 1207946 ( received 25 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 1137345 exchanged 88% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1139626 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 ) 1137368 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 ) 1138263 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1024227 exchanged 88% ( 24 ) of the merits he gave with: 1719093 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1801141 ( received 7 ) ( sent 5 ) 1109045 ( received 15 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1214462 exchanged 88% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1229152 ( received 8 ) ( sent 19 )
It seems that user 771836 exchanged 88% ( 37 ) of the merits he gave with: 882756 ( received 31 ) ( sent 31 ) 862089 ( received 6 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1024739 exchanged 88% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1148209 ( received 8 ) ( sent 9 )
It seems that user 1388666 exchanged 88% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1232646 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1338388 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 908195 ( received 6 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1062823 exchanged 87% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1151300 ( received 7 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 985812 exchanged 87% ( 34 ) of the merits he gave with: 934649 ( received 23 ) ( sent 22 ) 1207946 ( received 11 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1037973 exchanged 87% ( 14 ) of the merits he gave with: 1284832 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 ) 980653 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 ) 1198189 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1114493 exchanged 87% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1213661 ( received 4 ) ( sent 3 ) 1249814 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 863567 exchanged 87% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1257088 ( received 7 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 765739 exchanged 87% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 878336 ( received 3 ) ( sent 2 ) 1453078 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1394362 exchanged 87% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1432257 ( received 7 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 929600 exchanged 86% ( 57 ) of the merits he gave with: 1334470 ( received 33 ) ( sent 3 ) 855962 ( received 24 ) ( sent 47 )
It seems that user 1050120 exchanged 85% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 848747 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1164814 exchanged 85% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1266135 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 ) 1199272 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1282549 exchanged 85% ( 34 ) of the merits he gave with: 1280519 ( received 34 ) ( sent 21 )
It seems that user 1172510 exchanged 85% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1379817 ( received 6 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 378111 exchanged 85% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1131623 ( received 6 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1290136 exchanged 85% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1372625 ( received 6 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 973393 exchanged 85% ( 24 ) of the merits he gave with: 979690 ( received 7 ) ( sent 8 ) 915311 ( received 7 ) ( sent 7 ) 487377 ( received 6 ) ( sent 21 ) 944905 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1030272 exchanged 85% ( 18 ) of the merits he gave with: 1464168 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 ) 1569501 ( received 6 ) ( sent 5 ) 1135680 ( received 1 ) ( sent 5 ) 1116129 ( received 3 ) ( sent 6 ) 1011691 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 1137150 ( received 1 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1006575 exchanged 85% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1207946 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1145187 exchanged 85% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1047075 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1129318 exchanged 85% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1117238 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1031095 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1121700 exchanged 84% ( 11 ) of the merits he gave with: 1065634 ( received 7 ) ( sent 7 ) 1175031 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1121653 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1079999 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 947773 exchanged 84% ( 22 ) of the merits he gave with: 1724125 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 ) 994863 ( received 20 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 870828 exchanged 83% ( 20 ) of the merits he gave with: 880986 ( received 20 ) ( sent 20 )
It seems that user 1072622 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 610371 ( received 5 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1209531 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1159343 ( received 5 ) ( sent 9 )
It seems that user 1019229 exchanged 83% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 953567 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1113026 exchanged 83% ( 26 ) of the merits he gave with: 1052553 ( received 26 ) ( sent 27 )
It seems that user 529073 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1238989 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 980653 exchanged 83% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1037973 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1316221 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 959179 ( received 5 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 989078 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1580081 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 ) 1317942 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1471933 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1439269 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 ) 1271270 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1109045 exchanged 83% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1024227 ( received 10 ) ( sent 15 )
It seems that user 1149996 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1765313 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 ) 1232671 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1199272 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 830405 exchanged 83% ( 50 ) of the merits he gave with: 56939 ( received 50 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1135680 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1030272 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1354558 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1220014 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 ) 1082600 ( received 1 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1418208 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1355924 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 259629 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1428774 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1188361 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1296859 ( received 5 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1220142 exchanged 83% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1240896 ( received 5 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 353680 exchanged 82% ( 46 ) of the merits he gave with: 1000199 ( received 46 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1217918 exchanged 82% ( 38 ) of the merits he gave with: 1217914 ( received 38 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1229152 exchanged 82% ( 38 ) of the merits he gave with: 1214462 ( received 19 ) ( sent 8 ) 1207946 ( received 4 ) ( sent 15 ) 1233301 ( received 15 ) ( sent 16 )
It seems that user 1108972 exchanged 81% ( 49 ) of the merits he gave with: 1275299 ( received 49 ) ( sent 27 )
It seems that user 1028342 exchanged 81% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1049908 ( received 4 ) ( sent 5 ) 1034500 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1892364 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1886478 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1096565 exchanged 80% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1127763 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 ) 1129330 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1395398 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 956126 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 994455 exchanged 80% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 934649 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 ) 988212 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 999110 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1001712 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1546400 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1892629 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1190777 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1518939 ( received 4 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1519258 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1519069 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1096080 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1096108 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1127453 exchanged 80% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 80810 ( received 8 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1509386 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1571993 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 935619 exchanged 80% ( 12 ) of the merits he gave with: 1102027 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 ) 896735 ( received 8 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 1402383 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1468144 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 ) 1427907 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1166578 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1685440 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1287806 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1127264 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 1183954 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 988671 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1249814 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1114493 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 ) 1306619 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1415033 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1542466 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1047545 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 978568 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1435034 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1435606 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1186697 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1112932 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 860708 exchanged 80% ( 38 ) of the merits he gave with: 95437 ( received 38 ) ( sent 39 )
It seems that user 1350675 exchanged 80% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 986242 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
April 26, 2018, 12:55:36 AM
400 of 1270:
Quote
It seems that user 1179424 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1124476 ( received 7 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1304454 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1454595 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1454595 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1304454 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 978568 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1047545 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1201734 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 658687 ( received 2 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1162079 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1127056 ( received 3 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1127056 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1162079 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1777539 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1010704 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1411750 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1387886 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1569501 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1030272 ( received 5 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1435606 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1435034 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1059990 exchanged 100% ( 22 ) of the merits he gave with: 335943 ( received 22 ) ( sent 36 )
It seems that user 1256877 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1159940 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1211977 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1568217 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1422556 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1379892 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1221075 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1474840 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1201921 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1085562 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1201921 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1474840 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 188646 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1120903 ( received 8 ) ( sent 8 ) 1048815 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1421389 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1221829 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 851530 exchanged 100% ( 31 ) of the merits he gave with: 1076869 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1020792 ( received 30 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1221829 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1421389 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1349840 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 987557 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1079858 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1057841 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1568217 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1211977 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1337572 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1257405 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1257405 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1337572 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1155263 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1071092 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1115243 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 335943 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1172515 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1219955 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1111232 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1068300 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1502809 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1373434 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1016048 exchanged 100% ( 21 ) of the merits he gave with: 1145552 ( received 21 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1145552 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1016048 ( received 1 ) ( sent 21 )
It seems that user 1211363 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 988671 ( received 3 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1177530 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1275152 ( received 2 ) ( sent 3 ) 1297632 ( received 8 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1297632 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1275152 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 ) 1177530 ( received 7 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 1467761 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1474850 ( received 6 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1035561 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1319597 ( received 7 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1319597 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1035561 ( received 4 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1474850 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1467761 ( received 5 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1773188 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1586971 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1749649 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 110785 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1275152 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1297632 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 ) 1177530 ( received 3 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1518880 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1377795 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1438230 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1454021 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1320219 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1166306 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1166306 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1320219 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1250976 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1723590 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1193837 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1050517 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1040411 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1646528 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1373434 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1164897 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1377795 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1221075 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1422556 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1526012 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1445919 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1178812 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1280964 ( received 4 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 20597 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1165352 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1464591 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1525062 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1358640 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1126275 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1532146 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1687907 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 542524 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1301162 ( received 7 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 928401 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 639728 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1432257 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1394362 ( received 6 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1142749 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1049524 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 144010 exchanged 100% ( 28 ) of the merits he gave with: 1010544 ( received 28 ) ( sent 20 )
It seems that user 1194572 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1226436 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1226436 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1194572 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1385212 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1385147 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1385147 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1385212 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1250976 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1166306 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 1170710 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1525062 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1464591 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1010544 exchanged 100% ( 20 ) of the merits he gave with: 144010 ( received 20 ) ( sent 28 )
It seems that user 1232671 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1149996 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1199272 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1199272 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1232671 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1149996 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 1164814 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1266135 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1219775 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 833079 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1163786 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1147601 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 366752 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1147601 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1211488 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1007179 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1007179 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1211488 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1219054 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1335790 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1335790 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1219054 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1120903 exchanged 100% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 188646 ( received 8 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 1374888 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1615171 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1615171 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1374888 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1355924 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1251868 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 886049 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1236580 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1236601 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1336450 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1365381 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 ) 1323082 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1355924 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1615171 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1418208 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1004946 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1068300 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1173879 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1068300 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1109867 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1068300 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1109845 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1068300 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1155996 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1068300 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 267293 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 311066 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1114528 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1100333 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1034785 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 828028 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 828028 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1034785 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 233135 exchanged 100% ( 19 ) of the merits he gave with: 780585 ( received 19 ) ( sent 19 )
It seems that user 1301162 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 542524 ( received 3 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1218149 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1026348 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 455350 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 977962 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1159940 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1256877 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1412698 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1693064 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 500293 ( received 2 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1423885 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1228653 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1228653 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1423885 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1072597 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1454101 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1283713 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1050517 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 192486 exchanged 100% ( 11 ) of the merits he gave with: 1027397 ( received 11 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1027397 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 192486 ( received 7 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1248160 exchanged 100% ( 15 ) of the merits he gave with: 975052 ( received 15 ) ( sent 28 )
It seems that user 1087160 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1071458 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1394786 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1351723 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 975052 exchanged 100% ( 28 ) of the merits he gave with: 1248160 ( received 28 ) ( sent 15 )
It seems that user 1780111 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 156665 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 399097 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1149313 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1212054 exchanged 100% ( 22 ) of the merits he gave with: 1033117 ( received 16 ) ( sent 7 ) 1114228 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 91845 ( received 2 ) ( sent 7 ) 358120 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 ) 1105316 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1323082 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1336450 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1023316 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1207586 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1207693 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1170710 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1250976 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 996302 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 997049 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1541577 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 979479 ( received 5 ) ( sent 31 )
It seems that user 979479 exchanged 100% ( 31 ) of the merits he gave with: 1541577 ( received 31 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 969759 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1071092 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1256377 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1220613 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 982124 exchanged 100% ( 38 ) of the merits he gave with: 979216 ( received 38 ) ( sent 34 )
It seems that user 502213 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1133918 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1138948 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1072545 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1231390 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 156665 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 996153 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1124713 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 895734 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 906023 ( received 3 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1158276 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 999110 ( received 3 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1382847 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 816568 ( received 5 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 816568 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1382847 ( received 4 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1110723 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1323940 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1188706 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1023316 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 899539 exchanged 100% ( 27 ) of the merits he gave with: 893068 ( received 27 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1477664 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1227829 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1210694 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1102634 ( received 1 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1227829 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1477664 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 882756 exchanged 100% ( 43 ) of the merits he gave with: 771836 ( received 31 ) ( sent 31 ) 1144425 ( received 8 ) ( sent 3 ) 862089 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1122909 exchanged 100% ( 35 ) of the merits he gave with: 1036967 ( received 29 ) ( sent 34 ) 1128784 ( received 6 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 95437 exchanged 100% ( 39 ) of the merits he gave with: 860708 ( received 39 ) ( sent 38 )
It seems that user 221096 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 171658 ( received 5 ) ( sent 21 )
It seems that user 1241396 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 924671 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1200150 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1124713 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1036967 exchanged 100% ( 34 ) of the merits he gave with: 1122909 ( received 34 ) ( sent 29 )
It seems that user 1213266 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1201612 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1201612 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1213266 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1064065 exchanged 100% ( 41 ) of the merits he gave with: 1001911 ( received 41 ) ( sent 50 )
It seems that user 895429 exchanged 100% ( 48 ) of the merits he gave with: 1258900 ( received 48 ) ( sent 25 )
It seems that user 912588 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1020948 ( received 5 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1257088 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 863567 ( received 3 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 355462 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1316028 ( received 10 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1015883 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1023781 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1315282 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1136312 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1294813 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1207693 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1011395 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1419378 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1136312 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1315282 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 383458 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 826579 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1296859 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1188361 ( received 4 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1114523 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 80810 ( received 7 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 999376 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1359244 ( received 7 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1359244 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 999376 ( received 4 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1122101 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1184327 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1184327 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1122101 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1639542 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1087102 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1000905 exchanged 100% ( 26 ) of the merits he gave with: 959750 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 ) 80810 ( received 21 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1159476 exchanged 100% ( 12 ) of the merits he gave with: 1022815 ( received 12 ) ( sent 17 )
It seems that user 1022815 exchanged 100% ( 17 ) of the merits he gave with: 1159476 ( received 17 ) ( sent 12 )
It seems that user 1221919 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 952731 ( received 5 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1495336 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 393327 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1137150 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1030272 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1345964 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1345981 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1454101 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1072597 ( received 1 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1119891 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1120045 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1120045 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1119891 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1345981 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1345964 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1375708 exchanged 100% ( 16 ) of the merits he gave with: 1455178 ( received 16 ) ( sent 12 )
It seems that user 1211739 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1170376 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1304830 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1065147 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1240896 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1220142 ( received 4 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1297383 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1295341 ( received 9 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1091191 exchanged 100% ( 11 ) of the merits he gave with: 121232 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 848747 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 135065 exchanged 100% ( 50 ) of the merits he gave with: 112286 ( received 50 ) ( sent 50 )
It seems that user 1106685 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1192895 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1117752 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1117777 ( received 7 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1168722 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1377795 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1031095 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1129318 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1211438 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1343925 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1112251 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1119071 ( received 7 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1119071 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1112251 ( received 4 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1009035 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 988671 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1148209 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1024739 ( received 9 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 1051343 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1263231 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1263231 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1051343 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1381159 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1374796 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1374796 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1381159 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 343375 exchanged 100% ( 32 ) of the merits he gave with: 1277896 ( received 32 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1241819 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1229988 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1229988 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1241819 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1208564 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 180477 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1034500 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1028342 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1048430 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1231225 ( received 6 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1340002 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1278075 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1304454 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1454595 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1454595 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1304454 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 978568 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1047545 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1201734 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 658687 ( received 2 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1162079 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1127056 ( received 3 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1127056 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1162079 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1777539 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1010704 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1411750 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1387886 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1569501 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1030272 ( received 5 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1435606 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1435034 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1059990 exchanged 100% ( 22 ) of the merits he gave with: 335943 ( received 22 ) ( sent 36 )
It seems that user 1256877 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1159940 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1211977 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1568217 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1422556 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1379892 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1221075 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1474840 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1201921 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1085562 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1201921 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1474840 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 188646 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1120903 ( received 8 ) ( sent 8 ) 1048815 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1421389 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1221829 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 851530 exchanged 100% ( 31 ) of the merits he gave with: 1076869 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1020792 ( received 30 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1221829 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1421389 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1349840 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 987557 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1079858 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1057841 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1568217 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1211977 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1337572 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1257405 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1257405 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1337572 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1155263 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1071092 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1115243 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 335943 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1172515 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1219955 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1111232 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1068300 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1502809 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1373434 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1016048 exchanged 100% ( 21 ) of the merits he gave with: 1145552 ( received 21 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1145552 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1016048 ( received 1 ) ( sent 21 )
It seems that user 1211363 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 988671 ( received 3 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1177530 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1275152 ( received 2 ) ( sent 3 ) 1297632 ( received 8 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1297632 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1275152 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 ) 1177530 ( received 7 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 1467761 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1474850 ( received 6 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1035561 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1319597 ( received 7 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1319597 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1035561 ( received 4 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1474850 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1467761 ( received 5 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1773188 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1586971 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1749649 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 110785 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1275152 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1297632 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 ) 1177530 ( received 3 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1518880 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1377795 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1438230 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1454021 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1320219 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1166306 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1166306 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1320219 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1250976 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1723590 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1193837 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1050517 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1040411 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1646528 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1373434 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1164897 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1377795 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1221075 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1422556 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1526012 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1445919 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1178812 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1280964 ( received 4 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 20597 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1165352 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1464591 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1525062 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1358640 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1126275 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1532146 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1687907 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 542524 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1301162 ( received 7 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 928401 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 639728 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1432257 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1394362 ( received 6 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1142749 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1049524 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 144010 exchanged 100% ( 28 ) of the merits he gave with: 1010544 ( received 28 ) ( sent 20 )
It seems that user 1194572 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1226436 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1226436 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1194572 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1385212 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1385147 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1385147 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1385212 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1250976 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1166306 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 1170710 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1525062 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1464591 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1010544 exchanged 100% ( 20 ) of the merits he gave with: 144010 ( received 20 ) ( sent 28 )
It seems that user 1232671 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1149996 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1199272 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1199272 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1232671 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1149996 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 1164814 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1266135 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1219775 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 833079 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1163786 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1147601 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 366752 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1147601 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1211488 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1007179 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1007179 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1211488 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1219054 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1335790 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1335790 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1219054 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1120903 exchanged 100% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 188646 ( received 8 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 1374888 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1615171 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1615171 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1374888 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1355924 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1251868 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 886049 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1236580 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1236601 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1336450 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1365381 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 ) 1323082 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1355924 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1615171 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1418208 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1004946 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1068300 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1173879 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1068300 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1109867 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1068300 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1109845 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1068300 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1155996 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1068300 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 267293 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 311066 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1114528 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1100333 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1034785 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 828028 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 828028 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1034785 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 233135 exchanged 100% ( 19 ) of the merits he gave with: 780585 ( received 19 ) ( sent 19 )
It seems that user 1301162 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 542524 ( received 3 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1218149 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1026348 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 455350 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 977962 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1159940 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1256877 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1412698 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1693064 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 500293 ( received 2 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1423885 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1228653 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1228653 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1423885 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1072597 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1454101 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1283713 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1050517 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 192486 exchanged 100% ( 11 ) of the merits he gave with: 1027397 ( received 11 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1027397 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 192486 ( received 7 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1248160 exchanged 100% ( 15 ) of the merits he gave with: 975052 ( received 15 ) ( sent 28 )
It seems that user 1087160 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1071458 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1394786 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1351723 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 975052 exchanged 100% ( 28 ) of the merits he gave with: 1248160 ( received 28 ) ( sent 15 )
It seems that user 1780111 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 156665 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 399097 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1149313 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1212054 exchanged 100% ( 22 ) of the merits he gave with: 1033117 ( received 16 ) ( sent 7 ) 1114228 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 91845 ( received 2 ) ( sent 7 ) 358120 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 ) 1105316 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1323082 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1336450 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1023316 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1207586 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1207693 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1170710 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1250976 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 996302 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 997049 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1541577 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 979479 ( received 5 ) ( sent 31 )
It seems that user 979479 exchanged 100% ( 31 ) of the merits he gave with: 1541577 ( received 31 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 969759 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1071092 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1256377 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1220613 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 982124 exchanged 100% ( 38 ) of the merits he gave with: 979216 ( received 38 ) ( sent 34 )
It seems that user 502213 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1133918 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1138948 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1072545 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1231390 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 156665 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 996153 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1124713 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 895734 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 906023 ( received 3 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1158276 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 999110 ( received 3 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1382847 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 816568 ( received 5 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 816568 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1382847 ( received 4 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1110723 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1323940 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1188706 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1023316 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 899539 exchanged 100% ( 27 ) of the merits he gave with: 893068 ( received 27 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1477664 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1227829 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1210694 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1102634 ( received 1 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1227829 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1477664 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 882756 exchanged 100% ( 43 ) of the merits he gave with: 771836 ( received 31 ) ( sent 31 ) 1144425 ( received 8 ) ( sent 3 ) 862089 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1122909 exchanged 100% ( 35 ) of the merits he gave with: 1036967 ( received 29 ) ( sent 34 ) 1128784 ( received 6 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 95437 exchanged 100% ( 39 ) of the merits he gave with: 860708 ( received 39 ) ( sent 38 )
It seems that user 221096 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 171658 ( received 5 ) ( sent 21 )
It seems that user 1241396 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 924671 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1200150 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1124713 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1036967 exchanged 100% ( 34 ) of the merits he gave with: 1122909 ( received 34 ) ( sent 29 )
It seems that user 1213266 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1201612 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1201612 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1213266 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1064065 exchanged 100% ( 41 ) of the merits he gave with: 1001911 ( received 41 ) ( sent 50 )
It seems that user 895429 exchanged 100% ( 48 ) of the merits he gave with: 1258900 ( received 48 ) ( sent 25 )
It seems that user 912588 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1020948 ( received 5 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1257088 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 863567 ( received 3 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 355462 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1316028 ( received 10 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1015883 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1023781 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1315282 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1136312 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1294813 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1207693 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1011395 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1419378 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1136312 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1315282 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 383458 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 826579 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1296859 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1188361 ( received 4 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1114523 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 80810 ( received 7 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 999376 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1359244 ( received 7 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1359244 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 999376 ( received 4 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1122101 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1184327 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1184327 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1122101 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1639542 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1087102 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1000905 exchanged 100% ( 26 ) of the merits he gave with: 959750 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 ) 80810 ( received 21 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1159476 exchanged 100% ( 12 ) of the merits he gave with: 1022815 ( received 12 ) ( sent 17 )
It seems that user 1022815 exchanged 100% ( 17 ) of the merits he gave with: 1159476 ( received 17 ) ( sent 12 )
It seems that user 1221919 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 952731 ( received 5 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1495336 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 393327 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1137150 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1030272 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1345964 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1345981 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1454101 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1072597 ( received 1 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1119891 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1120045 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1120045 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1119891 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1345981 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1345964 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1375708 exchanged 100% ( 16 ) of the merits he gave with: 1455178 ( received 16 ) ( sent 12 )
It seems that user 1211739 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1170376 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1304830 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1065147 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1240896 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1220142 ( received 4 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1297383 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1295341 ( received 9 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1091191 exchanged 100% ( 11 ) of the merits he gave with: 121232 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 848747 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 135065 exchanged 100% ( 50 ) of the merits he gave with: 112286 ( received 50 ) ( sent 50 )
It seems that user 1106685 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1192895 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1117752 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1117777 ( received 7 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1168722 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1377795 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1031095 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1129318 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1211438 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1343925 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1112251 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1119071 ( received 7 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1119071 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1112251 ( received 4 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1009035 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 988671 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1148209 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1024739 ( received 9 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 1051343 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1263231 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1263231 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1051343 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1381159 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1374796 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1374796 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1381159 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 343375 exchanged 100% ( 32 ) of the merits he gave with: 1277896 ( received 32 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1241819 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1229988 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1229988 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1241819 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1208564 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 180477 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1034500 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1028342 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1048430 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1231225 ( received 6 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1340002 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1278075 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
April 26, 2018, 12:43:20 AM
I have coded a script to find abuses in the current merit system automatically, this is briefly what is does:
- go through the merit file and simply checks for any direct exchange of merits between 2 users within 1 hour
- count how many of the merit given in total have been used for possible exchanges and produce a percentage
- write down who received the merits, how many and how many they sent back as part of the possible exchange.
Example:
It seems that user 1191222 exchanged 100% (16) of the merits he gave with: 959904( received 16) ( sent 31)
This is just a simple check where you can see with your eyes that something is not right, fortunately many of these happened before the stats where public when many thought they could get away with it.
There are deeper checks and pattern not clearly visible i'm planning to look for, IF something is getting done about these people, because i'm sure this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Disclaimer: there may be few false positive, so better give the benefit of the doubt in some cases.
the complete list is here: http://pastebin.xyz/p?q=Rmp1OFQ
These are the first 200 of 1270:
- go through the merit file and simply checks for any direct exchange of merits between 2 users within 1 hour
- count how many of the merit given in total have been used for possible exchanges and produce a percentage
- write down who received the merits, how many and how many they sent back as part of the possible exchange.
Example:
It seems that user 1191222 exchanged 100% (16) of the merits he gave with: 959904( received 16) ( sent 31)
This is just a simple check where you can see with your eyes that something is not right, fortunately many of these happened before the stats where public when many thought they could get away with it.
There are deeper checks and pattern not clearly visible i'm planning to look for, IF something is getting done about these people, because i'm sure this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Disclaimer: there may be few false positive, so better give the benefit of the doubt in some cases.
the complete list is here: http://pastebin.xyz/p?q=Rmp1OFQ
These are the first 200 of 1270:
Quote
It seems that user 23203 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1041316 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 992844 exchanged 100% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1209059 ( received 8 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1302804 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1072504 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1246073 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1153839 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1236339 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1236339 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1153839 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1903494 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1825808 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 ) 1892416 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1892416 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1903494 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1886478 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1903549 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 ) 1892364 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1460442 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1239025 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1239025 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1460442 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 149064 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1259718 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1890612 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1825808 ( received 6 ) ( sent 12 )
It seems that user 1957573 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1825808 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 ) 1886502 ( received 2 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1957544 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1825808 ( received 5 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1919820 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1058576 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1078806 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 974532 ( received 3 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 85601 exchanged 100% ( 60 ) of the merits he gave with: 1393407 ( received 60 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1294613 exchanged 100% ( 23 ) of the merits he gave with: 973621 ( received 23 ) ( sent 16 )
It seems that user 1974200 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1386293 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1386293 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1974200 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1823353 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1246426 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1289787 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 877700 ( received 3 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1705676 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1522872 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1984796 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1076714 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1191222 exchanged 100% ( 16 ) of the merits he gave with: 959904 ( received 16 ) ( sent 31 )
It seems that user 1203429 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1684585 ( received 9 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1841017 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1213661 ( received 5 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 895701 exchanged 100% ( 14 ) of the merits he gave with: 1003131 ( received 14 ) ( sent 14 )
It seems that user 314001 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1037292 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1273250 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1025135 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1025135 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1273250 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 935631 exchanged 100% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 937069 ( received 8 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 937069 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 935631 ( received 2 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 1227646 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1105439 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1773935 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1728007 ( received 4 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1334470 exchanged 100% ( 42 ) of the merits he gave with: 964133 ( received 39 ) ( sent 34 ) 929600 ( received 3 ) ( sent 33 )
It seems that user 401664 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1495947 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1495947 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 401664 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1864486 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1379633 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1237893 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1031765 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1284832 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1037973 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1886502 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1289332 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1957573 ( received 3 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1379633 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1864486 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1864663 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 308793 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1469497 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1184165 ( received 3 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1117923 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1113072 ( received 10 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1113072 exchanged 100% ( 11 ) of the merits he gave with: 1117923 ( received 11 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1995745 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 925500 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 746071 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 914627 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1542437 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1895374 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 34334 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 7779 ( received 5 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1379817 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1172510 ( received 4 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1161929 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1371987 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1371987 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1161929 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1035718 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1028652 ( received 9 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1028652 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1035718 ( received 10 ) ( sent 9 )
It seems that user 1563858 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1781008 ( received 3 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 937644 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 571307 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1228020 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 855962 ( received 5 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 855962 exchanged 100% ( 57 ) of the merits he gave with: 1228020 ( received 8 ) ( sent 5 ) 1136768 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 ) 929600 ( received 47 ) ( sent 24 )
It seems that user 1136768 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 855962 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1892629 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1546400 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1095186 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 396977 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1021413 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1115049 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1297164 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1814503 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1182351 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1158359 ( received 6 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1018222 exchanged 100% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1748514 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 ) 1014323 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 848747 exchanged 100% ( 13 ) of the merits he gave with: 1050120 ( received 3 ) ( sent 6 ) 1091191 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1601846 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1299613 ( received 4 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1387805 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1499733 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1418304 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1659397 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1299613 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1601846 ( received 3 ) ( sent 4 ) 1045345 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 724686 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1192459 ( received 9 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1192459 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 724686 ( received 5 ) ( sent 9 )
It seems that user 831378 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 24140 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1667248 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1711752 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 1632666 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1024647 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1097721 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1024670 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1097721 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1024647 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1518939 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1190777 ( received 3 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1320340 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1317061 ( received 5 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1317061 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1320340 ( received 4 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1881180 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1665212 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1665212 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1881180 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 970215 ( received 2 ) ( sent 3 ) 1060964 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1065634 exchanged 100% ( 34 ) of the merits he gave with: 1121700 ( received 7 ) ( sent 7 ) 1079999 ( received 6 ) ( sent 6 ) 1614763 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 ) 1175031 ( received 9 ) ( sent 9 ) 1121653 ( received 9 ) ( sent 9 ) 1252721 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1079999 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1065634 ( received 6 ) ( sent 6 ) 1175031 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1121700 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1210893 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1239049 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 ) 1189075 ( received 1 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1049210 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1068636 ( received 7 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1347587 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1128526 ( received 4 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1128526 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1347587 ( received 6 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1852133 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1499733 ( received 10 ) ( sent 20 )
It seems that user 1068636 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1049210 ( received 3 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1785733 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1098034 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1748514 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1018222 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1175031 exchanged 100% ( 13 ) of the merits he gave with: 1065634 ( received 9 ) ( sent 9 ) 1079999 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1121700 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1121653 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1065634 ( received 9 ) ( sent 9 ) 1121700 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1886830 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1603017 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1299325 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1071136 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1421154 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1019396 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1046727 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 521226 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 995414 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 988147 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1828957 exchanged 100% ( 27 ) of the merits he gave with: 848985 ( received 22 ) ( sent 50 ) 959179 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 990983 exchanged 100% ( 60 ) of the merits he gave with: 822485 ( received 60 ) ( sent 60 )
It seems that user 997007 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1135678 ( received 7 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1515739 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1186891 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1186891 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1515739 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1863562 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1368478 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1199866 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1417443 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1081198 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1039676 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 ) 1068143 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1039676 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1081198 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 ) 1068143 ( received 7 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1217914 exchanged 100% ( 46 ) of the merits he gave with: 1217610 ( received 32 ) ( sent 17 ) 1406227 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 ) 1217918 ( received 11 ) ( sent 38 )
It seems that user 1217610 exchanged 100% ( 17 ) of the merits he gave with: 1217914 ( received 17 ) ( sent 32 )
It seems that user 1158359 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1182351 ( received 2 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1238989 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 529073 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1580081 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1317942 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 989078 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1317942 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1580081 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 989078 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1011976 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1135238 ( received 3 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 305482 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 413210 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1014351 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1702673 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1137368 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1138263 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 ) 1137345 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1121149 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1328896 ( received 7 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1159925 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1217141 ( received 7 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1217141 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1159925 ( received 4 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1801141 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1024227 ( received 5 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 970215 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1665212 ( received 3 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 344915 exchanged 100% ( 16 ) of the merits he gave with: 1074823 ( received 11 ) ( sent 11 ) 1079327 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1074823 exchanged 100% ( 11 ) of the merits he gave with: 344915 ( received 11 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1172588 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1272609 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1438740 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1439269 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1178095 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1145768 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1118896 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 366042 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1768361 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1229580 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1172719 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1136730 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1578678 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1091956 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1590675 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1091956 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1578678 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1328896 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1121149 ( received 4 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1590675 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1578678 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1689567 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 379146 ( received 1 ) ( sent 4 ) 1111040 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 1102636 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1248657 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1111040 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1689567 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1335004 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1111926 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1111926 exchanged 100% ( 11 ) of the merits he gave with: 1335004 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1232987 ( received 4 ) ( sent 3 ) 1112131 ( received 5 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1232987 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1111926 ( received 3 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1179320 exchanged 100% ( 15 ) of the merits he gave with: 1179316 ( received 15 ) ( sent 14 )
It seems that user 1179316 exchanged 100% ( 14 ) of the merits he gave with: 1179320 ( received 14 ) ( sent 15 )
It seems that user 1112131 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1111926 ( received 7 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1355705 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 964525 ( received 6 ) ( sent 13 )
It seems that user 1189075 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1210893 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1656505 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1101802 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1101802 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1656505 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1277815 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1033030 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1060964 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1665212 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1202797 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1013217 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1393407 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 85601 ( received 5 ) ( sent 60 )
It seems that user 1116129 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1030272 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1765313 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1149996 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1239049 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1210893 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1026478 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 846583 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1235254 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1008305 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1365846 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1341521 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1103808 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1135678 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1060206 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1846718 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1846718 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1060206 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1348145 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 877700 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 905837 ( received 1 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1311940 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1098034 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1372625 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1290136 ( received 4 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1648532 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1387886 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 ) 1631458 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1632666 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1667248 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1433072 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1612327 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1724125 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 947773 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1139872 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1045345 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1631458 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1648532 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1387886 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1648532 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 ) 1411750 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1183954 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1287806 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1127264 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1287806 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1752952 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1023582 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1322176 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1323670 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1323670 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1322176 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 979690 exchanged 100% ( 42 ) of the merits he gave with: 973393 ( received 8 ) ( sent 7 ) 1199648 ( received 34 ) ( sent 49 )
It seems that user 1001911 exchanged 100% ( 50 ) of the merits he gave with: 1064065 ( received 50 ) ( sent 41 )
It seems that user 1612327 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1433072 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1174524 exchanged 100% ( 21 ) of the merits he gave with: 1433857 ( received 21 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1116027 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1115986 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1115986 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1116027 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1272609 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1172588 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1685440 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1166578 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1464168 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1030272 ( received 3 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1052523 exchanged 100% ( 12 ) of the merits he gave with: 979216 ( received 12 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1497572 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1137488 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1207946 exchanged 100% ( 46 ) of the merits he gave with: 1006575 ( received 3 ) ( sent 6 ) 985812 ( received 11 ) ( sent 11 ) 1364077 ( received 9 ) ( sent 5 ) 1229152 ( received 15 ) ( sent 4 ) 1233301 ( received 8 ) ( sent 25 )
It seems that user 1104980 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1297411 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 823842 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 245285 ( received 5 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1271270 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1471933 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1267613 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1364077 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1207946 ( received 5 ) ( sent 9 )
It seems that user 1110161 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1048659 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1003131 exchanged 100% ( 14 ) of the merits he gave with: 895701 ( received 14 ) ( sent 14 )
It seems that user 1264963 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1289764 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1199648 exchanged 100% ( 49 ) of the merits he gave with: 979690 ( received 49 ) ( sent 34 )
It seems that user 1355061 exchanged 100% ( 14 ) of the merits he gave with: 1548994 ( received 13 ) ( sent 8 ) 1080356 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1137089 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1185553 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1185553 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1137089 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1478728 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1478709 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1702673 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1014351 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 992844 exchanged 100% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1209059 ( received 8 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1302804 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1072504 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1246073 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1153839 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1236339 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1236339 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1153839 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1903494 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1825808 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 ) 1892416 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1892416 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1903494 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1886478 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1903549 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 ) 1892364 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1460442 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1239025 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1239025 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1460442 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 149064 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1259718 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1890612 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1825808 ( received 6 ) ( sent 12 )
It seems that user 1957573 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1825808 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 ) 1886502 ( received 2 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1957544 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1825808 ( received 5 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1919820 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1058576 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1078806 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 974532 ( received 3 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 85601 exchanged 100% ( 60 ) of the merits he gave with: 1393407 ( received 60 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1294613 exchanged 100% ( 23 ) of the merits he gave with: 973621 ( received 23 ) ( sent 16 )
It seems that user 1974200 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1386293 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1386293 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1974200 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1823353 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1246426 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1289787 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 877700 ( received 3 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1705676 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1522872 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1984796 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1076714 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1191222 exchanged 100% ( 16 ) of the merits he gave with: 959904 ( received 16 ) ( sent 31 )
It seems that user 1203429 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1684585 ( received 9 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1841017 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1213661 ( received 5 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 895701 exchanged 100% ( 14 ) of the merits he gave with: 1003131 ( received 14 ) ( sent 14 )
It seems that user 314001 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1037292 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1273250 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1025135 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1025135 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1273250 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 935631 exchanged 100% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 937069 ( received 8 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 937069 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 935631 ( received 2 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 1227646 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1105439 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1773935 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1728007 ( received 4 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1334470 exchanged 100% ( 42 ) of the merits he gave with: 964133 ( received 39 ) ( sent 34 ) 929600 ( received 3 ) ( sent 33 )
It seems that user 401664 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1495947 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1495947 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 401664 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1864486 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1379633 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1237893 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1031765 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1284832 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1037973 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1886502 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1289332 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1957573 ( received 3 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1379633 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1864486 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1864663 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 308793 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1469497 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1184165 ( received 3 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1117923 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1113072 ( received 10 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1113072 exchanged 100% ( 11 ) of the merits he gave with: 1117923 ( received 11 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1995745 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 925500 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 746071 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 914627 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1542437 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1895374 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 34334 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 7779 ( received 5 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1379817 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1172510 ( received 4 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1161929 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1371987 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1371987 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1161929 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1035718 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1028652 ( received 9 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1028652 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1035718 ( received 10 ) ( sent 9 )
It seems that user 1563858 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1781008 ( received 3 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 937644 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 571307 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1228020 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 855962 ( received 5 ) ( sent 8 )
It seems that user 855962 exchanged 100% ( 57 ) of the merits he gave with: 1228020 ( received 8 ) ( sent 5 ) 1136768 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 ) 929600 ( received 47 ) ( sent 24 )
It seems that user 1136768 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 855962 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1892629 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1546400 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1095186 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 396977 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1021413 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1115049 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1297164 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1814503 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1182351 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1158359 ( received 6 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1018222 exchanged 100% ( 8 ) of the merits he gave with: 1748514 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 ) 1014323 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 848747 exchanged 100% ( 13 ) of the merits he gave with: 1050120 ( received 3 ) ( sent 6 ) 1091191 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1601846 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1299613 ( received 4 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1387805 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1499733 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1418304 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1659397 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1299613 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1601846 ( received 3 ) ( sent 4 ) 1045345 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 724686 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1192459 ( received 9 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1192459 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 724686 ( received 5 ) ( sent 9 )
It seems that user 831378 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 24140 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1667248 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1711752 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 1632666 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1024647 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1097721 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1024670 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1097721 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1024647 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1518939 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1190777 ( received 3 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1320340 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1317061 ( received 5 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1317061 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1320340 ( received 4 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1881180 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1665212 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1665212 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1881180 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 970215 ( received 2 ) ( sent 3 ) 1060964 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1065634 exchanged 100% ( 34 ) of the merits he gave with: 1121700 ( received 7 ) ( sent 7 ) 1079999 ( received 6 ) ( sent 6 ) 1614763 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 ) 1175031 ( received 9 ) ( sent 9 ) 1121653 ( received 9 ) ( sent 9 ) 1252721 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1079999 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1065634 ( received 6 ) ( sent 6 ) 1175031 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1121700 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1210893 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1239049 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 ) 1189075 ( received 1 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1049210 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1068636 ( received 7 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1347587 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1128526 ( received 4 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1128526 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1347587 ( received 6 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1852133 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1499733 ( received 10 ) ( sent 20 )
It seems that user 1068636 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1049210 ( received 3 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1785733 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1098034 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1748514 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1018222 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1175031 exchanged 100% ( 13 ) of the merits he gave with: 1065634 ( received 9 ) ( sent 9 ) 1079999 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1121700 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1121653 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 1065634 ( received 9 ) ( sent 9 ) 1121700 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1886830 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1603017 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1299325 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1071136 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1421154 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1019396 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1046727 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 521226 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 995414 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 988147 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1828957 exchanged 100% ( 27 ) of the merits he gave with: 848985 ( received 22 ) ( sent 50 ) 959179 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 990983 exchanged 100% ( 60 ) of the merits he gave with: 822485 ( received 60 ) ( sent 60 )
It seems that user 997007 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1135678 ( received 7 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1515739 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1186891 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1186891 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1515739 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1863562 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1368478 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1199866 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1417443 ( received 4 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1081198 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1039676 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 ) 1068143 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1039676 exchanged 100% ( 9 ) of the merits he gave with: 1081198 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 ) 1068143 ( received 7 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1217914 exchanged 100% ( 46 ) of the merits he gave with: 1217610 ( received 32 ) ( sent 17 ) 1406227 ( received 3 ) ( sent 3 ) 1217918 ( received 11 ) ( sent 38 )
It seems that user 1217610 exchanged 100% ( 17 ) of the merits he gave with: 1217914 ( received 17 ) ( sent 32 )
It seems that user 1158359 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1182351 ( received 2 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1238989 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 529073 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1580081 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1317942 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 989078 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1317942 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1580081 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 989078 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1011976 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1135238 ( received 3 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 305482 exchanged 100% ( 10 ) of the merits he gave with: 413210 ( received 10 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1014351 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1702673 ( received 3 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1137368 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1138263 ( received 4 ) ( sent 4 ) 1137345 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1121149 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1328896 ( received 7 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1159925 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1217141 ( received 7 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1217141 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1159925 ( received 4 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1801141 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1024227 ( received 5 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 970215 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1665212 ( received 3 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 344915 exchanged 100% ( 16 ) of the merits he gave with: 1074823 ( received 11 ) ( sent 11 ) 1079327 ( received 5 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1074823 exchanged 100% ( 11 ) of the merits he gave with: 344915 ( received 11 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1172588 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1272609 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1438740 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1439269 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1178095 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1145768 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1118896 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 366042 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1768361 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1229580 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1172719 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1136730 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1578678 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1091956 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1590675 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1091956 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1578678 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1328896 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1121149 ( received 4 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1590675 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1578678 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1689567 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 379146 ( received 1 ) ( sent 4 ) 1111040 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 ) 1102636 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1248657 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1111040 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1689567 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1335004 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1111926 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1111926 exchanged 100% ( 11 ) of the merits he gave with: 1335004 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 ) 1232987 ( received 4 ) ( sent 3 ) 1112131 ( received 5 ) ( sent 7 )
It seems that user 1232987 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1111926 ( received 3 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1179320 exchanged 100% ( 15 ) of the merits he gave with: 1179316 ( received 15 ) ( sent 14 )
It seems that user 1179316 exchanged 100% ( 14 ) of the merits he gave with: 1179320 ( received 14 ) ( sent 15 )
It seems that user 1112131 exchanged 100% ( 7 ) of the merits he gave with: 1111926 ( received 7 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1355705 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 964525 ( received 6 ) ( sent 13 )
It seems that user 1189075 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1210893 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1656505 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1101802 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1101802 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1656505 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1277815 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1033030 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1060964 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1665212 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1202797 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1013217 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1393407 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 85601 ( received 5 ) ( sent 60 )
It seems that user 1116129 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1030272 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1765313 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1149996 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1239049 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1210893 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1026478 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 846583 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1235254 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1008305 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1365846 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1341521 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1103808 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1135678 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1060206 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1846718 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1846718 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1060206 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1348145 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 877700 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 905837 ( received 1 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1311940 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1098034 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1372625 exchanged 100% ( 4 ) of the merits he gave with: 1290136 ( received 4 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1648532 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1387886 ( received 4 ) ( sent 2 ) 1631458 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1632666 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1667248 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1433072 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1612327 ( received 5 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1724125 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 947773 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1139872 exchanged 100% ( 6 ) of the merits he gave with: 1045345 ( received 6 ) ( sent 3 )
It seems that user 1631458 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1648532 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1387886 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1648532 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 ) 1411750 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1183954 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1287806 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1127264 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1287806 ( received 2 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1752952 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1023582 ( received 2 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1322176 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1323670 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1323670 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1322176 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 979690 exchanged 100% ( 42 ) of the merits he gave with: 973393 ( received 8 ) ( sent 7 ) 1199648 ( received 34 ) ( sent 49 )
It seems that user 1001911 exchanged 100% ( 50 ) of the merits he gave with: 1064065 ( received 50 ) ( sent 41 )
It seems that user 1612327 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1433072 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1174524 exchanged 100% ( 21 ) of the merits he gave with: 1433857 ( received 21 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1116027 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1115986 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1115986 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1116027 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1272609 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1172588 ( received 3 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1685440 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1166578 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1464168 exchanged 100% ( 3 ) of the merits he gave with: 1030272 ( received 3 ) ( sent 6 )
It seems that user 1052523 exchanged 100% ( 12 ) of the merits he gave with: 979216 ( received 12 ) ( sent 11 )
It seems that user 1497572 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1137488 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1207946 exchanged 100% ( 46 ) of the merits he gave with: 1006575 ( received 3 ) ( sent 6 ) 985812 ( received 11 ) ( sent 11 ) 1364077 ( received 9 ) ( sent 5 ) 1229152 ( received 15 ) ( sent 4 ) 1233301 ( received 8 ) ( sent 25 )
It seems that user 1104980 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1297411 ( received 5 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 823842 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 245285 ( received 5 ) ( sent 10 )
It seems that user 1271270 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1471933 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 ) 1267613 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1364077 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1207946 ( received 5 ) ( sent 9 )
It seems that user 1110161 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1048659 ( received 2 ) ( sent 4 )
It seems that user 1003131 exchanged 100% ( 14 ) of the merits he gave with: 895701 ( received 14 ) ( sent 14 )
It seems that user 1264963 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1289764 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1199648 exchanged 100% ( 49 ) of the merits he gave with: 979690 ( received 49 ) ( sent 34 )
It seems that user 1355061 exchanged 100% ( 14 ) of the merits he gave with: 1548994 ( received 13 ) ( sent 8 ) 1080356 ( received 1 ) ( sent 1 )
It seems that user 1137089 exchanged 100% ( 5 ) of the merits he gave with: 1185553 ( received 5 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1185553 exchanged 100% ( 2 ) of the merits he gave with: 1137089 ( received 2 ) ( sent 5 )
It seems that user 1478728 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1478709 ( received 1 ) ( sent 2 )
It seems that user 1702673 exchanged 100% ( 1 ) of the merits he gave with: 1014351 ( received 1 ) ( sent 3 )
Jump to: